вторник, 29 сентября 2015 г.

uWalmart Officially Launching Online Grocery Pickup With Expansion To More Citiesr


4 4 4 9
  • (Will)

    After testing the concept for months, Walmart plans to offer more shoppers the opportunity to order their groceries online and pick them up at the store later.

    The big box store announced in a blog post Tuesday that it will roll out the free grocery pickup service starting Oct. 13.

    Instead of focusing on dense urban areas for the new service, Walmart is choosing larger, more suburban areas that are often passed over by delivery services.

    The first regions to receive the new pickup service include: Atlanta, Charlotte and Fayetteville, NC; Salt Lake City and Ogden, UT; Nashville; Tucson, AZ; and Colorado Springs.

    The company says it will open the service in additional cities in the coming weeks.

    As with the tests of the service, customers simply place their orders online, pick a time to pick up their items, drive to the store, park in a designated spot and call a special phone number. An associate then brings the goods straight to their trunk.

    Walmart says it is currently in the process of hiring additional “personal shoppers,” who fill the orders placed online.

    Back in March, the retailer attempted to entice consumer to test out the pilot pick up service by offering a $5 discount on any purchase or $10 off a $50 purchase.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uHow To Cancel Your Subscription To Apple Music Before The Free Trial Ends Sept. 30r


4 4 4 9
  • iphone6-3up-applemusic-features-pr-print-1The clock has been counting down, and the time is night: If you signed up for that three-month free trial of Apple Music back in June, today is the last day to cancel that subscription before it automatically renews on Sept. 30. Here’s how to make sure you don’t wind up locked into paying for a service you don’t want.

    There are two ways to do this, through iTunes or through the Apple Music app. If you don’t turn off auto-renew in time, you’ll either be charged the monthly individual rate of $9.99 or the family plan price of $14.99.

    iTunes:
    • Click on your account in the upper right hand of iTunes — this should have your name or Apple ID on it.
    • Navigate to “Account Info” and then settings, and click on “Manage” beside subscriptions.
    • Click “Edit” which is located next to “Apple Music Membership” — if you have multiple subscriptions.
    • Hit “Off” next to Automatic Renewal

    appleoff

    iOS:
    • Click on your account — again, the silhouette icon, on the upper left hand of the Apple Music app.
    • Next go to “View Apple ID,” then scroll down and hit “Manage” under the Subscriptions section.
    • Toggle the “auto-renewal” option to “Off”

    ioscancel



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uRegulators Investigating BMW’s Slow Recall Pace After Vehicles Failed Side Crash Testsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Norm)

    Just two months after federal regulators fined Fiat Chrysler a record $105 million as a result of a lengthy investigation into the carmaker’s leisurely pace in fixing more than 11 million vehicles connected to 23 safety recalls, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is poised to take another manufacturer to task: BMW.

    NHTSA announced that it will open an investigation into whether BMW failed to recall more than 30,000 Mini Cooper cars in a timely fashion after certain models did not meet side impact crash standards.

    According to a notice [PDF], investigators will probe 30,456 model year 2014 to 2015 Mini Cooper, Cooper S and 2015 John Cooper Works vehicle after side impact crash tests on two 2014 Mini Hardtop 2 Door Coopers showed failures more than a year ago.

    The test, which happened in mid-2014, was performed at five miles per hour faster than required by law on two Mini Cooper cars. The tests, which measured spine acceleration results on a crash dummy, showed that the vehicles were not adequate.

    “NHTSA viewed these results as indicating a potential problem and believes BMW should also have been concerned with the compliance of the vehicles,” the notice states.

    In October 2014, NHTSA performed another test on a 2014 Mini 2 Door Hardtop Cooper; it once again did not pass.

    At the time, BMW claimed the certification testing was based on a different model – a Mini 2 Door Hardtop Cooper S, a heavier vehicle.

    Still, in December, the car company issued a recall for 2014 Mini Hardtop 2 Door Cooper vehicles, creating a remedy that involved installing a small foam patch in the rear door panels.

    In January, NHTSA claims in the notice,  BMW verbally committed to conducting a service campaign to add padding to the read side panels of 2015 Mini Hardtop 2 Door Coopers.

    “However, BMW did not initiate the service campaign and failed to inform NHTSA of its failure to do so,” the notice states.

    NHTSA completed tests in July 2015 on model year 2015 Mini 2 Door Hardtop Coopers. One of the vehicles included a contemplated fix – a foam pad on the rear panels – while the other vehicle was no modified from factory settings.

    “The test of the Mini 2 Door Hardtop Cooper with the additional padding and at the higher test weight passed the test,” NHTSA states in the notice. “However, this was the only vehicle on which the service campaign was performed and thus was not representative of in-use vehicles.”

    The vehicle without the potential remedy did not pass. Additionally, a test of a 2015 Cooper S that did not receive additional padding at the test failed.

    “NHTSA is concerned that BMW was aware or should have been aware of the non-compliance,” the agency states, “and should have taken remedial action on the population of Mini Cooper vehicles identified in [the original recall] earlier than it did. It appears from a review of NHTSA’s databases that BMW may have failed to submit recall communications to NHTSA in a timely manner.”



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAmtrak Will Now Start Enforcing Baggage Limits On Trainsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Northwest dad)
    If you’ve been hopping on trains with big loads of luggage and gleefully stowing it Amtrak’s baggage compartments, you’re going to need to curb your tendency to over pack: starting Oct. 1, Amtrak will start enforcing its baggage weight limits, handing out fees to those hauling more than their fair share onboard.

    As Amtrak’s rules state, passengers are allowed two small personal items and two standard carry-ons for free. But because some people just can’t pack light, Amtrak has decided to crack down those exceeding their allotment, handing out a $20 surcharge per bag to people with too many bags or luggage that exceeds 150 pounds. There’s also a maximum of two excess carry-ons.

    It’s understandable to have such limits — people with too many bags could be keeping others from fitting theirs in the luggage areas, and super heavy bags aren’t safe for train workers to lift, Amtrak says.

    But why now? Amtrak has had these baggage restrictions on the books for a decade, but conductors and train staff weren’t really sure how to deal with rule breakers. The time has come to change that, an Amtrak spokesman told Slate.com.

    “The crews were in a difficult position because they couldn’t give anyone an option,” he explains. “They had to decide, well, do we allow people to continue to ride?”

    The other reason it’s taken so long for Amtrak to enforce the rules is that there actually aren’t too many people breaking them, the spokesman notes, which is a good thing and means that it’s likely many passengers won’t notice any difference when they travel.

    Conductors and train crew will have their eyes peeled for you over-packers, Amtrak’s spokesman says.

    “If someone at the station notices this and thinks that [a bag is] overweight or oversized … they will intercept them.”

    Amtrak Will Start Charging Passengers Who Have Too Many Bags. Great Call. [Slate.com]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


понедельник, 28 сентября 2015 г.

uNo, Facebook Will Not Be Charging You To Keep Your Profiles Privater


4 4 4 9
  • Facebook's official statement on the rumor of a $5.99/month privacy tier.
    If you’ve visited Facebook at all in the last few hours, you’ve most likely seen any number of your online acquaintances posting the terrifying news that Facebook will soon be charging users $5.99/month too keep their profiles private. It might sound believable for those who aren’t familiar with how Facebook actually makes its money, but the fact is that the company says it has no plans to start charging anyone. Even more pointless are the supposed “copyright” notices people are posting in the hopes that it will protect them.

    First off, Facebook — which, yes, has a Facebook page — posted this denial on Monday night:

    “While there may be water on Mars, don’t believe everything you read on the internet today. Facebook is free and it always will be. And the thing about copying and pasting a legal notice is just a hoax. Stay safe out there Earthlings!”

    Regarding that legal notice — as we’ve discussed previouslymultiple times — it’s both unnecessary because, according to the Facebook terms of use, you are the copyright holder of any original content you post, and because those same terms grant Facebook a “non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook.”

    If you’re using Facebook, you have at some point agreed to these terms whether you actually took the time to read them. Copying and pasting a notice claiming a copyright you already have does nothing to change that contract with Facebook.

    Beyond all of this is the fact that Facebook does not need to start nickel-and-diming its user base to increase revenue. At its current rate, the company is on track to bring in $15 billion this fiscal year — nearly 95% of that from advertising revenue. Adding a subscription tier at this point could alienate users and slow the company’s growth.

    That doesn’t mean that Facebook couldn’t go that route at some point, but if it does, that copyright notice still won’t change whatever terms you’ve already agreed to.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFord Dealership Bans Another Customer For Imperfect Survey Responsesr


4 4 4 9
  • (saguarosally)
    Automakers demand nothing but perfection. No, no, not necessarily from their employees or their dealerships. They demand perfection from us consumers when we respond to surveys about the service at the dealership. It turns out that bad scores can cost dealerships and even individual salespeople a lot of money, and dealerships will ban bad survey-takers from doing business with them.

    No, really. Robert reports that he received an e-mail saying that he was “no longer welcome” at that dealership. This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of this, and not even the first time we’ve heard about it from a Ford dealer. A dealer in a different part of the country sent one of our readers a similar e-mail a few years ago, wishing him “good luck with [his] future automotive transactions” but he wasn’t welcome back.

    Robert says that he submitted an honest survey after a bad experience buying a Ford truck, and in the comments he explained that the bad rating was because his salesman lacked people skills. He received this e-mail when he contacted the dealership the following year about another possible purchase:

    Since that survey actually cost myself and the dealership money from Ford, I will have to personally pass on your offer. I’ll go brush up on my people skills and I hope you find what you’re looking for in the future.

    One dealership told a reader who was a service customer that giving bad survey grades meant that he was metaphorically tossing the dealership’s employees out on the street.

    A salesperson at a luxury dealership explained that a bad survey score means that he loses at least $100 from his commission. You start to see why sales staff simply take the surveys themselves, or “fire” customers who are difficult to please.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uRegulators Send Letters To Seven Additional Automakers Related To Shrapnel-Shooting Takata Airbagsr


4 4 4 9
  • takata logoWhile federal regulators reduced the number of vehicles equipped with potentially deadly Takata airbags, more could be added to the list that already includes 19.2 million after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration sent letters last week to seven additional automakers warning that their cars include the shrapnel-shooting safety devices.  

    The Associated Press reports that the regulator sent letters to Mercedes-Benz, Jaguar-Land Rover, Suzuki, Tesla, Volvo Trucks, Volkswagen and Spartan Motors seeking information on which of their models have Takata inflators.

    “It is expected that the scope of the current Takata recalls may expand as time goes on and will likely grow to include vehicles that are outside the scope of the current recalls,” the letters said.

    The current Takata recall focuses on 11 automakers: BMW, Daimler Trucks, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru and Toyota.

    According to the letter, NHTSA is asking the seven additional automakers to identify which models use a specific Takata airbag inflator with ammonium nitrate as the propellant.

    The letters were initiated as a result of Takata’s theory that the cause of the problem is that the chemical degrades over time, which “could potentially lead to overaggressive combustion or potentially cause the inflator to rupture,” the AP reports.

    While Volkswagen – which is at the center of an unrelated emissions scandal related to 11 million vehicles – wasn’t previously part of the Takata recall, it was under investigation by NHTSA related to a June crash involving an SUV in which the side air bag inflated with too much force and blew apart the inflator canister.

    VW said at the time that it was working with NHTSA and Takata to better understand the problem.

    Mercedes confirmed that the company uses Takata airbags, just not those connected to previous recalls. A spokesperson said the company was gathering information to provide NHTSA, the AP reports.

    The six other manufacturers were unavailable to provide comment to the AP.

    Takata air bag recalls could expand to 7 more companies [The Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist