пятница, 18 сентября 2015 г.

uTurbulence On Hawaii-To-Philippines Flight Leaves 15 Injuredr


4 4 4 9
  • (Rachel)

    (Rachel)

    More than a dozen passengers flying from Hawaii to the Philippines on Friday were injured when the plane hit an unusually rough patch of air.

    The Associated Press reports that 15 people received medical attention after the Philippine Airlines flight safely landed at Manila airport.

    The plane, which was carrying 132 passengers, experienced clear air turbulence after departing Honolulu around noon on Thursday, the Ninoy Aquino International Airport tells CNN.

    Medical personnel, airport officials and PAL customer relations officers met the plane at the gate to provide assistance to the passengers, the airport statement said.

    Clear air turbulence is unusual as it is not associated with clouds and cannot be detected visually or by conventional weather radar.

    Passengers on the flight tell local reporters in the Philippines that the plane suddenly fell and rose during the trip, throwing many off-balance or out of their seats.

    Turbulence on Hawaii-Philippines Flight Hurts 15 Slightly [The Associated Press]
    At least 15 passengers injured in PAL flight turbulence [CNN]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uComcast Must Pay $33M To Settle Charges It Listed 75,000 Unlisted Phone Numbersr


4 4 4 9
  • Nearly a year after the California Public Utilities Commission held a hearing to determine if Comcast should be held liable for a screwup that published more than 75,000 phone numbers, names, and addresses that were supposed to be unlisted, the cable and Internet giant has reached a $33 million deal that puts an end to the matter.

    As part of the settlement announced on Thursday, Comcast will pay $25 million in penalties and investigation costs to the California Department of Justice and CPUC, as well as $8 million in restitution to customers whose information was improperly disclosed.

    The settlement comes after a year-long investigation and three days of hearings, the CPUC reports.

    “Our investigation revealed that many Comcast customers complained to Comcast that their names, addresses, and phone numbers were published, though they had paid for that information to be kept private,” CPUC commission Catherine J.K. Sandoval said in a statement. “It is imperative that customer complaints be quickly addressed and that systems are established to identify and correct the root cause of the problem and protect consumer privacy.”

    According to a complaint [PDF] filed with the California AG’s Office, the problem arose after Comcast implemented a new process for producing and disseminating listing information for its residential phone customers in late 2009.

    Under the system, Comcast sent non-published listings to a third-party company, while placing a “privacy flag” on the non-published listings. However, the flag was never attached to approximately 75,000 non-published/non-listed subscribers.

    As a result, that information – for which customers paid between $1.25 and $1.50 per month to keep unlisted – appeared in certain county phone books for the years of 2010 and 2011.

    The issue came to light in 2012, following a CBS Sacramento story about a Comcast customer who paid to have her information kept private, but whose number could be easily discovered by calling 4-1-1.

    At the time, Comcast apologized and refunded her the fees, saying it was a rare occurrence. But then in early 2013, it revealed to the CPUC that, during a 27-month period starting in July 2010, it had goofed and allowed the 74,000 unlisted numbers to be shared with third-party phone directories.

    Still, the company maintained that the issue with the CBS13 view was “not the same” as the one involved in the CPUC investigation.

    Under the settlement, the $8 million in restitution will be provided to customers as follows:

    • $100 credits (or checks to former customers) for each of the 74,774 affected customers ($7,477,400);
    • $432,000 for home security and/or safety-related services for approximately 216 customers with specific and acute safety concerns related to the unauthorized disclosure; and,
    • $517,714 in non-published fees collected from former customers whom Comcast had not previously been able to reach.

    Additionally, the company has agreed to a permanent injunction that requires it strengthen restrictions placed on its vendors’ use of personal information about customers.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uConsumerist Friday Flickr Findsr


4 4 4 9
  • Here are seven of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last week, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.

    Want to see your pictures on our site? Our Flickr pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


четверг, 17 сентября 2015 г.

u6 Things We Learned About Bluetooth ATM Skimmers In Mexicor


4 4 4 9
  • If you took a summer vacation this year, you may have spent it on a beach, on a boat, or at a theme park. Security journalist Brian Krebs spent his summer vacation doing something that sounds super-fun to us: hunting down compromised ATMs in Mexico. He found quite a few, and also learned who might be behind all of his fraud.

    Check out the whole series of stories: they have handy photos and videos, and will give you a healthy dose of paranoia before the next time you travel internationally.

  • An ATM is only as secure as the employees who have access to it. A source in Mexico explained to Krebs that men with Eastern European accents offered ATM technicians impressive amounts of money to allow them access to the innards of the machines they maintained. One person said yes, and the devices they found inside compromised machines provided clues about how to find other compromised ATMs.
  • They’re easy to find. Simply scanning the area for Bluetooth devices would turn up ATMs giving off a telltale signal: Bluetooth beacons that were part of the scheme bore the name of the non-criminal manufacturer that made them.
  • You can’t just wander by and harvest the data from a Bluetooth skimmer: the bundles of customer data are locked up with a code that only the criminals have.
  • Compromised devices were thick on the ground. Once Krebs knew what to look for, he found compromised ATMs everywhere. There were some in the airport. One of the ATMs in the hotel in Cancun where he stayed was compromised. Sometimes there was more than one telltale Bluetooth signal visible from where he was standing.
  • It’s hard to find anyone to tell when you do find a compromised machine. By the time tourists notice fraudulent withdrawals, they’ve already gone home. Hotel employees seemed concerned at first, but the Bluetooth signal kept on signaling until he left town.
  • There’s no one to tell. The criminal justice system in Mexico can easily be manipulated with bribes, and someone with a cash-extracting business has lots of money to pay bribes. Compromised ATMs belonged to independent ATM-servicing companies, not banks.
  • The ATM you’re using might not dispense money at all. Some ATMs didn’t have Bluetooth beacons, but “malfunctioned” and wouldn’t spit out a receipt when used. It’s possible that there are fake ATMs on the ground that just capture your account information, and in a tourist town it’s possible that no one would notice.
  • In summary, always travel internationally with large wads of cash. But that isn’t safe, either, so don’t do that.

    Tracking a Bluetooth Skimmer Gang in Mexico [Krebs On Security]
    Tracking Bluetooth Skimmers in Mexico, Part II [Krebs On Security]
    Who’s Behind Bluetooth Skimming in Mexico? [Krebs On Security]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uBuffalo Wild Wings Severs Ties With “League” Star Who Lied About 9/11 Experiencer


4 4 4 9
  • bwwaddYesterday morning, actor and new Buffalo Wild Wings shill Steve Rannazzisi — best known as Kevin on FXX’s The Leagueadmitted to having told terrible untruths about being in the World Trade Center on the morning of September 11, 2001, when terrorists flew commercial jets into the building’s two towers. In the wake of the actor’s confession, BWW said it was “reevaluating our relationship” with Rannazzisi, and now it looks like that relationship has been terminated.

    “Upon careful review, we have decided to discontinue airing our current television commercials feature Steve Rannazzisi,” the wing chain said in a statement to Bloomberg.

    For years, Rannazzisi had been saying interviews that he was working for Merrill Lynch on the 54th floor of the WTC’s south tower when the first plane struck the north. He used the tale to explain how it changed his life and put him on the path to a career in acting and comedy.

    Problem is, while Rannazzisi was in Manhattan on that fateful day, he was nowhere near the Trade Center, nor was he employed by Merrill Lynch. He admitted yesterday that he was actually working for a different company miles away in Midtown at the time.

    With The League‘s seventh and final season debuting earlier this month, Rannazzisi had just begun a new gig starring in commercials for Buffalo Wild Wings, playing up his association with the FXX show about a group of friends who are a little too serious about fantasy football.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uAndroid Users Give Apple’s ‘Move To iOS’ App Bad Reviews For Some Reasonr


4 4 4 9
  • move_to_iosWhile Samsung is trying to recruit current iPhone users as customers with a free “test drive,” Apple also wants to recruit new users for the iPhone. To make the move easier for future customers, Apple introduced its first-ever Android app to help them transition. This app is available in the Google Play store, so you can guess what happened next.

    There are all sorts of reasons why you might want to move from one smartphone platform to another. Our staff is multi-platform, and we don’t judge. It’s also important to us to help people who have problems moving from iOS to other phone platforms. However, among some reviewers over at Google Play, the audacity of Apple to help people switch platforms and to design the app to look like their own products is simply too much.

    Rages one reviewer:

    An Android app looking like a iOS?? IMHO, Apple should have showed some respect and followed android material design! How does Google allow such kind of thing? Come on!!!

    Its average review dipped to one star earlier today, and there were unfortunate references to lobotomies and brainwashing. Now the average score has now reached two stars, perhaps since some Apple fans or people with a sense of proportion stepped in.

    The app moves over a user’s contacts, text message history, photos and videos, e-mail accounts, and calendars. That eases the transition, and if it works correctly would be a fun and very useful product.

    However, it’s worth noting that an app meant to do the reverse wouldn’t appear in Apple’s own iOS App Store: its rules prohibit software that promotes other mobile operating systems. Whoops.

    Apple’s New Android App Helps You Move to Apple [Digits]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uFeds Say Vision-Improvement App Not Backed By Sciencer


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-09-17 at 4.10.37 PMThey say that staring at a computer for hours at a time can ruin you vision, so it might be hard to swallow claims that a mobile app can improve your vision… especially when science doesn’t back it up.

    Carrot Neurotechnology, the maker of Ultimeyes app, agreed today to pay $150,000 to settle Federal Trade Commission charges it deceived consumers with claims that its app could improve users vision.

    According to the FTC complaint [PDF], since 2012, Carrot Nuerotechnology and its co-owners Adam Goldberg and Aaron Seitz advertised and sold Ultimeyes on the company’s website and through third-party app stores including the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, claiming it is “scientifically shown to improve vision.”

    The app which sold for between $5.99 to $9.99, brought in more than $350,000 in sales from January 2012 to June 2015, the complaint states.

    The FTC alleges that ads for the app deceptively stated it would “Turn Back The Clock On Your Vision,” and that users would benefit from “comprehensive vision improvement” for activities such as sports, reading and driving.

    Among other unsubstantiated claims, the app purportedly improved vision on average by 31% and two lines on the Snellen eye chart.

    Additionally, the operators claimed that using the app would “reverse, delay, or correct aging eye or presbyopia, including, but not limited to, by improving night vision, improving users’ ability to read in dim light, and diminishing the need for glasses or other visual aids.”

    Carrot Neurotechnoloy claimed that the app’s capabilities were supported by studies and “scientific research” conducted by co-owner Aaron Seitz.

    However, the FTC alleges that these studies don’t prove the app works as promised, and that Carrot Neurotechnology failed to disclose Seitz relationship to the company.

    In addition to paying a $150,000 fine, the proposed settlement [PDF] orders Carrot Neurotechnology and its owners to provide “competent and reliable scientific evidence” before making the vision claims about Ultimeyes and other products.

    The order also prohibits the company from misrepresenting any scientific research, and it requires it to clearly disclose any connections with anyone conducting or participating in scientific research they cite as substantiation for their claims, and with anyone endorsing their products.

    FTC Charges Marketers of ‘Vision Improvement’ App With Deceptive Claims [Federal Trade Commission]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist