пятница, 11 сентября 2015 г.

uConsumerist Friday Flickr Findsr


4 4 4 9
  • Here are eight of the best photos that readers added to the Consumerist Flickr Pool in the last week, picked for usability in a Consumerist post or for just plain neatness.

    Want to see your pictures on our site? Our Flickr pool is the place where Consumerist readers upload photos for possible use in future Consumerist posts. Just be a registered Flickr user, go here, and click “Join Group?” up on the top right. Choose your best photos, then click “send to group” on the individual images you want to add to the pool.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


четверг, 10 сентября 2015 г.

uKmart Expands Layaway Program, Hopes You’ll Trust Them This Yearr


4 4 4 9
  • Layaway is a very simple transaction: you pick out an item, a store puts it aside, and you make payments on it until you’ve paid it off and you can bring it home. It was a dying retail tradition when tightening credit markets and a massive recession led stores, notably discount retailers Kmart and Walmart, to bring it back. This year, Kmart wants customers who may no longer have a local store to use layaway plans to buy holiday gifts.

    The retailer is offering 8- or 12-week layaway plans, letting customers spread out their payments before Christmas. Standard layaway agreements require the customer to put money down: Kmart is instead pushing layaway with no money down, and allowing customers to “lease to own” pricey items like appliances and electronics, also with no money down. That option will be available up until November 29.

    The new layaway policies don’t include “inadvertent” cancellations, pre-holiday confusion, and cancellations after items have already shipped, so we hope that everything is working smoothly over at Kmart layaway HQ and will for the rest of the year.

    Santa’s Helper Kmart® Brings Back No Money Down Layaway; Introduces No Money Down Leasing [Press Release]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uState AGs And Former RadioShack Reach Unredeemed Gift Card Settlementr


4 4 4 9
  • There’s good news for holders of old RadioShack gift cards: people who purchased cards directly at stores or from gift card kiosks will get their money back, instead of either forfeiting the funds or filing a claim in the bankruptcy, metaphorically getting in line behind companies owed thousands or millions of dollars.

    That’s how it normally works in retail bankruptcy: customers have a brief period to make it to the store after bankruptcy to use up their cards, and the cards lose their value as soon as liquidators swoop in, if the entire chain or your local store is shutting down. You might get a few pennies on the dollar, if anything, from filing a bankruptcy claim. Sometimes competitors offer discounts in exchange for defunct companies’ gift cards, as Toys ‘R’ Us did when Kay-Bee Toys closed.

    The attorneys general of several states arranged this deal, led by RadioShack’s home state of Texas. “Today’s settlement agreement confirms that consumers can have their voice heard even in large bankruptcy cases, and that former RadioShack customers will be treated fairly in the bankruptcy process,” the lead attorney on this case for Texas, Assistant Attorney General Hal Morris, said in a statement.

    Customers who have gift cards they received when returning merchandise or as bonus deals, which are the majority of the outstanding gift cards are less lucky. While the AGs are working on a deal with the bankruptcy court and the new owners of the RadioShack brand, it wouldn’t get consumers back the full value of their cards. One option could be that the 1,750 RadioShack stores run in a joint venture by one of RadioShack’s biggest lenders and mobile carrier Sprint would let card holders have a 50% discount. The parties will negotiate that at the hearing next week that was originally scheduled to discuss all of the gift cards.

    The site for gift card claims will be oldradioshackgiftcard.com. You have one year to find the gift cards lurking in your old wallets and junk drawers.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uTide Detergent Pod Containers Make Easy Trick-Or-Treat Baskets, But Is It A Good Idea?r


4 4 4 9
  • Back in 2012, Proctor & Gamble changed the packaging of Tide Pods to look less like candy in a jar after children showed an affinity for putting the colorful, shiny, toxic detergent packets in their mouths. While the move – and constant reminders to keep the detergent far, far away from kids – was meant to deter children from snacking on the poisonous packets, consumers are apparently finding a new use for the bright orange opaque container, a use that some say might not dissuade youngsters from thinking the contents are edible: Halloween candy buckets.

    While it might seem perfectly reasonable to “upcycle” the Pods packaging for another use after it’s served its intended purpose, some parents are concerned about the confusion that might result from the bevy of Pinterest projects depicting Tide Pod containers as festive candy-storage vessels.

    Consumerist reader L pointed us to Pinterest where, in anticipation of the upcoming spooky holiday, you can find several projects that turn Tide Pod containers into trick-or-treat candy baskets, among other things.

    As she points out, the Tide container’s curved shape and orange hue means these plastic jars can be quickly transformed into pumpkin-like containers that can be used to either store candy for hungry trick-or-treaters, or for kids to schlep around from house to house during their annual sugar harvest.

    But as L notes, the entire reason that Tide uses the orange plastic is to make the container’s contents less yummy-looking for kids. So converting them into Halloween decorations may be “missing the point that Tide changed the packaging so kids wouldn’t think it was a candy jar.”

     

    For those who haven’t followed the saga of Tide Pods, shortly after Tide introduced the detergent pods in 2012 reports started surfacing that kids just can’t help but be enticed by the small orange, white and blue shiny blocks of detergent, licking, chewing and swallowing the packets.

    As a result, poisonings related to the products increased, federal safety regulators issued warnings and the company vowed to change the containers that hold the cleaning products.

    In spite of efforts by manufacturers to make the pods look less like candy jars, as of May 2015, detergent-related poisonings continue to grow. According to data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers, between 2012 and 2014 the number of reported poisonings jumped from 6,343 to 11,714.

    Which makes it all the more important to keep a separation between the containers that hold potentially lethal chemicals and those that should hold actual candy.

    “We all like Halloween,” William Wallace, policy analyst with our colleagues at Consumers Union, tells Consumerist. “But these containers are intended to keep detergent pods away from young kids. Using them for candy baskets could be confusing.”

    While potentially confusing a child on what holds candy and what holds detergent is bad enough, the reuse of Tide containers also created other concerns: are people properly cleaning these containers — which only recently held dozens of poisonous detergent pods — before turning them into treats totes?

    Another concern is that some parents may not have the patience to wait until their Tide Pods container is empty before upcycling. If so, are they putting the leftover pods in an equally safe opaque container or are they leaving them in a plastic bag on a low shelf in the laundry room? In a rush to make these cute crafts, parents may be inadvertently defeating the safety measure that the manufacturer has put in place.

    Of course, not all the Tide-container-turned-Halloween decoration projects on Pinterest were as worrisome. One resourceful upcycler used the empty packaging to create a jack-o-lantern – one that didn’t hold candy.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uOusted United Airlines CEO Smisek Scores Millions Of Dollars, Free Flights, Airport Parking Foreverr


4 4 4 9
  • I’m not saying I want to be fired in the middle of an investigation into a scandal involving one of the country’s busiest airports, but if it were to happen, I’d want the same deal that ousted United Airlines CEO Jeff Smisek is getting.

    Smisek, who suddenly stepped down from his top spot at United on Tuesday afternoon, is going to make out incredibly well — so if you know him and he starts hitting you up for cash to buy some scratch-off lotto cards, don’t feel bad when you say no.

    According to the airline’s SEC filing with regard to Smisek’s exit, his golden parachute includes:

    • A lump-sum cash “Separation Payment” of $4.875 million.

    • An “Annual Incentive Award” for fiscal year 2015 and other longer-term financial awards for 2013-2015 if the company meets certain performance targets.

    • 60,746 shares of the company’s common stock. At the current stock price of around $56.70, that’s worth more than $3.4 million.

    • “Flight benefits,” meaning the former CEO can continue to fly on United planes for free. He also gets free parking at United airport lots in Chicago and Houston for the rest of his life — and he’ll be parking the company car that will belongs to him after the airline transfers the title to his name.

    For all this, Smisek agrees to not do anything for two years that would compete with United, nor can he solicit any United staffers or clients.

    He also can’t disparage United, which he doesn’t have any reason to, since they are paying him well for his silence.

    In all, Smisek could receive compensation worth upwards of $28 million — just for being let go amid accusations that his airline created an entire flight from Newark, NJ, to Columbia, SC, just to curry favor with the Chair of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates United’s hub airport in Newark.

    While it’s not uncommon for top executives to be paid gross sums for being bad at their jobs, some United employees aren’t happy that Smisek is getting off so easily.

    “From the worker’s perspective, it’s obviously a different mentality,” a spokeswoman for the flight attendants’ union tells the Washington Post. “We believe there’s something wrong when an executive is awarded over $25 million for failing to do his job.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFormer Uber Driver In California Granted Unemployment Paymentsr


4 4 4 9
  • (afagen)

    (afagen)

    While a decision by the California Employment Development Department only affects one employee and their claim for unemployment benefits, it’s yet another official declaration from a government agency that the people who drive for Uber have an employer-employee relationship with the company, which in theory should entitle them to benefits that employees receive: reimbursement of vehicle costs, having the employer’s portion of their income taxes paid, and receiving unemployment benefits when their employment with the company ends involuntarily, if appropriate.

    This case didn’t become public until the attorneys organizing a class action suit in California posted the paperwork. That’s the same class action suit that was just certified as a class action covering all current and former Uber drivers in California.

    In the Employment Development Department case, a former driver filed for unemployment benefits last year. The EDD found that the ex-driver was entitled to receive benefits, and Uber appealed that decision on the grounds that their drivers are independent contractors, not employees. An administrative law judge found that Uber does act as an employer, regulating who they can and can’t pick up while logged in to the app, setting fares, and deactivating drivers who break the rules or receive too many bad reviews.

    An Uber spokesperson told Reuters that this decision only affects one ex-driver’s case, and “does not have any wider impact or set any formal or binding precedent.” It may not, but the decision does reflect an impartial observer’s opinion that Uber’s relationship with its drivers is that of an employer.

    Former Uber driver was an employee, rules California department [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uLeaked Photo Leads To 3-D Printed Copies Of TSA’s Master Keys For Approved Luggage Locksr


4 4 4 9
  • The keys to the Transportation Security Administration luggage kingdom can now be printed on a 3-D printer, thanks to photos published on the Internet of the agency’s master keys, the ones that can unlock any number of approved locks travelers might use to keep their belongings safe.

    TSA security screeners need to be able to access travelers’ baggage, even if it’s locked, so agents use a set of master keys to open those locks instead of breaking them open. As part of a November 2014 behind-the-scenes story about luggage, the <em>Washington Post at first included a photo of a set of seven of those TSA master keys.

    From the Post:

    It’s locked? No problem, Dr. Mumbai, the inspector has a key ring full of master keys for TSA approved locks. The photographer headed for Boise had two locks on the golf case containing his tripods, and both yielded readily to the inspector’s keys.

    Though the photo went seemingly unnoticed for months, by the time the Post pulled it in August, it was too late: a security researcher going by “Xyl2K” was able to create CAD files that can be used to 3-D print all seven of those master keys, and posted them to code-sharing site Github, reports Wired.com.

    So far, at least one owner of a 3-D printer has been able to make a key in five minutes using cheap plastic. He posted a video online showing that it opened a TSA-approved luggage lock:

    He told Wired he used cheap plastic and didn’t make any modifications, and that it “worked on the first try.”

    We reached out to the TSA for comment and will update this post if we hear back. In the meantime, if you’re worried about the safety of your belongings while traveling, you can either risk having a non-TSA approved lock that gets broken if your bag needs to be searched, or hope that no one out there is walking around with a set of 3-D printed keys that could unlock your baggage.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist