четверг, 30 апреля 2015 г.

uAmerican Airlines Passenger Accused Of Stealing From Crew Member, Fellow Traveler Mid-Flightr


4 4 4 9
  • (benh57)

    (benh57)

    While you might expect a pickpocket working amid a large crowd of people, it’s not the norm to worry about your possessions getting swiped mid-air. Law enforcement authorities say an American Airlines passenger flying from Los Angeles to New York yesterday has been accused of stealing from not only a fellow traveler onboard the flight, but a crew member as well.

    When a flight attendant noticed her tote bag containing her iPad, among other items, had gone missing, the pilot made an announcement on the loudspeaker asking passengers to look around for it, reports NBC New York.

    A passenger eventually spotted the cover of the missing iPad under a seat, and the area was searched until the tote bag was found — sans iPad.

    The crew member told authorities she saw the suspect put the tote bag under the seat where it was later found, prompting a search of her belongings. The iPad turned up in the passenger’s carry-on bag.

    In the meantime, another passenger said she swa the suspect near her purse after she woke up from a nap, and found that her passport and bank card were missing. Authorities said a search revealed the suspect had hidden the items in her underwear. A prescription bottle containing marijuana was also allegedly discovered in her possession.

    She was brought in for questioning by Port Authority of New York and New Jersey officers when the flight landed, and was ultimately charged with grand larceny and possession of stolen property.

    Woman on Flight to NYC After “Judge Judy” Appearance Allegedly Stole iPad, Hid Bank Card in Underwear [NBC New York]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uFTC Halts Mortgage Relief Operation Targeting Consumers In Foreclosurer


4 4 4 9
  • Financially distressed consumers on the brink of foreclosure have enough to worry about without having to be on the lookout for shady mortgage relief companies making hollow promises to save their homes. Today, the Federal Trade Commission put an end to an operation that took advantage of homeowners’ vulnerabilities.

    The FTC announced today that a court had granted the agency’s request to halt the operation of HOPE Services – also doing business as HAMP Services – alleging that the mortgage relief enterprise promised homeowners it would help get their mortgages modified, but instead effectively stole their mortgage payments, leading some to foreclosure and bankruptcy.

    According to the FTC complaint [PDF], the operation targeted consumers facing foreclosure – especially those who had failed to get any relief from lenders – by pretending to be “nonprofit” with government ties.

    The company allegedly sent homeowners mail bearing what looked like an official government seal, and indicated that the recipients might be eligible for a “New 2014 Home Affordable Modification Program” (HAMP 2).

    HAMP 2 was described by the company as “an aggressive update to Obama’s original modification program,” saying that consumers’ banks now have an incentive from the government to lower interest rates.

    The company drew consumers into its scheme by falsely claiming it had a high success rate, special contacts who would help get loan terms modified, and an ability to succeed even when consumers had failed, the FTC complaint states.

    Once HOPE Services obtained consumers’ financial information, the company falsely told them they were “preliminarily approved” and claimed they would submit loan modification applications to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America and the “Making Home Affordable” program.

    Shortly after this, the company told consumers they were approved for a low-interest rate and monthly payments significantly lower than their current payment. They were also told that making three monthly trial payments and providing a fee to reinstate a defaulted loan would get them a loan modification and make them safe from foreclosure.

    Consumers were also allegedly advised not to speak with their lender or an attorney.

    In reality, the FTC alleges in its complaint, homeowners who made the payments did not have their mortgages modified and their lenders never received their trial payment.

    Consumers who were promised the loan modifications were then contacted by an Advocacy Department’ run by one of the defendants named in the FTC complaint, and told that the fictional department could get them an even better loan modification than the one purported obtained by through the Making Home Affordable program.

    The Advocacy Department was developed to allegedly trick consumers into continuing to make all of the monthly trial payments. When concerns were raised by consumers about continuing foreclosure warnings, sale date notices and court dates, they were told their loan modifications were being processed or nearly completed.

    According to the FTC, by keeping consumers on the hook for months, the operation was able to significantly increase consumers’ trial payments.

    Consumers were told their payments were put in escrow accounts and would eventually be used to pay off lenders.

    Instead, the company took the payments for themselves, often leading consumers to lose their homes, and incur additional penalties and interest as they fell behind on their mortgages.

    In addition to halting the operation’s business, the FTC has filed a contempt complaint against one of the scheme’s principals, Brian Pacios, who is already under a court order that prohibited him from mortgage relief activities.

    Court Halts Mortgage Relief Operation that Targeted Homeowners Facing Foreclosure [Federal Trade Commission]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uInternet Money Guys Start Asking The FCC Not To Implement Net Neutralityr


4 4 4 9

  • Net neutrality has already made a lot of enemies, and the new rule hasn’t even been implemented yet. Along with big ISP lawsuits and hostility in the House, the FCC’s Open Internet Rule is now facing pushback from some of the big money entrepreneurs who make the internet their business.

    An “ad hoc group of Internet gray beards,” as tech reporter Katy Bachman aptly styles them, have filed a petition to the FCC requesting that the agency put a stay on their own order.

    If that sounds unlikely to happen, that’s only because it is. The petition therefore also includes a threat: if the FCC doesn’t hold its own order by May 11, then the “Tech Innovators” group will file a suit asking the court to issue a stay.

    Daniel Berninger, founder of VCXC, filed the petition (PDF). VCXC is a tech group pushing to hasten the IP transition — that is, the move away from copper wire telecom service and onto replacement phone-over-broadband services.

    You may or may not have heard of Berninger or of most of the other executives among the group (Marc Cuban is probably the most recognizable name), but you’ve heard of many of their companies and products, like Vonage and Lotus Notes.

    In short, these are entrepreneurs who have backed successful internet venture bets before, and they are now telling the FCC that it’s in everyone’s best interest if future would-be entrepreneurs aren’t guaranteed the same equal playing field they got their starts on.

    The petition claims, much like the lawsuits, that the Open Internet order exceeds the FCC’s authority, is “arbitrary and capricious,” and will harm future innovation and investments in internet businesses.

    Berninger and the others are pushing for a Congressional, non-Title II solution to the problems of net neutrality, and to that end are meeting with some members of Congress today. Realistically, the most likely outcome of the stay is one more lawsuit to be rolled together with all the others and eventually decided in one fell swoop years down the line.

    [via Katy Bachman]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uSales Of $100 Million Homes Are Way Upr


4 4 4 9
  • The housing market simply can’t keep up with the demand from a very specific part of the market…people who seek houses worth $100 million or more. Sales of houses with nine-figure price tags have reached an all-time high of…well, five of them sold last year, but there are many more on the market or being sold away from the general real estate market, and the fabulous-homes-for-billionaires market will just keep growing.

    Not that the lovely people at Christie’s International Real Estate are objective observers of the high-end real estate market. However, looking at the very highest end of the real estate market does give us some interesting insights into global trends. First is the fact that billionaires see giant houses as an investment. “It’s something they’ll hold onto for a lifetime,” the CEO of Christie’s Real Estate told Bloomberg News, “the same way they’ll hold onto a Picasso or a Warhol or any number of the great pieces of art we’ve sold over the years.” You can put a painting inside your house, but you can’t live inside a painting.

    Some of these mega-homes aren’t really “homes” for their owners, anyway: they’re a place to park money. It was just three years ago that uber-rich people from mainland China were first allowed to buy houses abroad, and many of the nine-figure residences on the market have sold to them.

    Good news for people with more modest means, though: in the world’s wealthiest areas, the experts say that luxury homes usually only start at around $2 million.

    Sales of $100 Million Homes Rise to Record Worldwide [Bloomberg News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uGuy Pours Molten Aluminum Into Watermelon Because He Knew We Couldn’t Resist Watching The Videor


4 4 4 9
  • There is no question we never fail to answer in this Internet age, and it’s, “What’s gonna happen next?” We have to know. We were born needing to know. And so of course, we must click a button and find out what could possibly occur when some guy pours molten aluminum into a watermelon and films it.

    Because something must happen, if the video is posted on the Internet in the first place, especially when it pairs two things that don’t normally interact, right?

    Probably, but it’s not always what you’d expect: In the case of watermelon-plus-melty-metal, even The Backyard Science guy behind the clip admits that he had a pretty buzzworthy result in mind.

    Did he achieve instant virality? Is Gallagher going to be very jealous? We’re not in the habit of spoiling the end of stories, so you’ll just have to watch and findout for yourself. I will say it’s pretty cool, regardless of your expectations when it comes to molten metals and fruit.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uPRO Students Act Aims To Protect Students From For-Profit Colleges’ Bad Behaviorr


4 4 4 9
  • It’s difficult to go a month or even just a few weeks without hearing of another for-profit college being under investigation for unscrupulous practices, such as inflated job placement rates and pushing students into costly student loans. New legislation announced today aims to curtail the number of investigations we hear about by protecting students from predatory, deceptive, and fraudulent practices in the for-profit college sector, before they even enroll.

    The Protections and Regulations For Our Students Act – also known as the PRO Students Act – would, among other things, ensure that students have access to accurate information and data about schools, strengthen oversight and regulation governing the for-profit college industry, and hold schools accountable for violations and poor performance.

    California Representative Mark Takano announced the bill during a press conference on Thursday afternoon saying the legislation would ensure that student and taxpayer funds are being well spent, and that students are receiving quality, affordable education.

    “It is critical that our students are able to make informed decisions about where they will receive the quality, affordable higher education that is right for them,” Takano said in a summary [PDF] of the PRO Students Act prior to the announcement Thursday. “Unfortunately, some schools, particularly those in the for-profit college sector, are employing predatory, fraudulent, and deceptive practices to enroll students, and then leave them with unsustainable debt, worthless credits, certifications, and degrees, and dismal job prospects.”

    The PRO Students Act includes provisions that:
    • Require proprietary institutions to derive at least 15% of their revenue from non-federal student aid and ensure that military and veterans’ education benefits are included in that calculation.

    • Prohibit schools from using revenues derived from federal student aid for recruiting and marketing.

    • Launch a complaint tracking system for students to report grievances.

    • Establish a Proprietary Education Oversight Coordination Committee and create a framework for targeting and prioritizing program reviews by the Department of Education.

    • Strengthen sanctions for violations, establish a Student Relief Fund, and bolster consumer protections for students.

    • Improve the quality of and access to key information, such as the student default risk index, cohort default rates, loan repayment rates, degree completion rates, and accreditation documents.

    • Prohibit pre-dispute arbitration clauses in loan contracts that waive the rights available to borrowers against loan servicers.

    • Prohibit incentive compensation based on recruitment or academic success.

    • Strengthen whistleblower protections for faculty and staff. The legislation is co-sponsored by California Rep. Susan Davis and Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen.

    Rep. Mark Takano to Introduce Higher Education Regulation Legislation to Protect Students [Mark Takano]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uSprint Customers Will Get Access To Free WiFi At 35 Airports In Deal With Boingor


4 4 4 9
  • (JeepersMedia)

    (JeepersMedia)

    When faced with wasting precious data allotments, many travelers submit to paying for WiFi on the go. But Sprint customers will find their wallets staying a bit fatter with new, free access to Boingo Wireless hotspots in 35 U.S. airports, starting today.

    Sprint and Boingo announced their deal today, without disclosing financial details of the arrangement. Customers will be able to automatically connect to WiFi networks at a slew of airports, the companies said in a press release today, without dinging their data allowances.

    “With WiFi being the world’s largest wireless ecosystem, we view it as a highly complementary layer to our network,” said Stephen Bye, Sprint CTO. “By enabling customers to move seamlessly between secure Wi-Fi and cellular, our customers will have a better mobile experience in more locations, all while lowering their cost of data usage.”

    Sprint’s been pushing WiFi connectivity in other ways as well, introducing free calling over WiFi for iPhone customers last month.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist