среда, 29 апреля 2015 г.

uMicrosoft Edge Revealed As Replacement For Internet Explorer Web Browserr


4 4 4 9
  • microsoftedgeThe final nail in Internet Explorer’s coffin came today, as Microsoft revealed its erstwhile web browser’s replacement: What had been known as Project Spartan is being introduced to the world as Microsoft Edge.

    Microsoft announced Edge, which will be featured in its upcoming Windows 10 operating system, at the company’s BUILD conference, reports Ars Technica. In what is perhaps an homage to Explorer or maybe just a comfort thing, the “E” for “Edge” closely resembles the icon its predecessor used.

    This may or may not be the icon, as seen on Twitter (via VentureBeat):

    Microsoft hopes this E fares better: The company’s systems chief Joe Belfiore noted that the “e” icon “now has a completely different and better meaning than it has for a while,” reports CNNMoney.

    Edge will support modern browser functions, such as extensions, unlike Explorer. The browser touts a New Tab page that shows a user’s top pages, apps that go with those pages, featured apps and other things provided to Cortana, Microsoft’s digital personal assistant.

    Microsoft’s “Project Spartan” browser is now called Microsoft Edge [Ars Technica]
    ‘Microsoft Edge’ will replace Internet Explorer [CNNMoney]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uHow Scammers Trick You Into Giving Up That Security Code On The Back Of Your Credit Cardr


4 4 4 9
  • There are a lot of purchases you can make with the information on the front of a credit card. But ID thieves who have the card number, name, and expiration date will still hit a speedbump if they have to enter that (usually 3-digit) security code on the back of a victim’s card. Notice that we said “speedbump” and not “dead end,” because some scammers have figured out how to get this crucial info from their victims.

    According to our colleagues at Consumer Reports, the security code scam works by taking advantage of the near-constant news of data breaches that have hit retailers in recent years.

    Once a scammer has the main information for the card, they can call the unwitting victim, claiming to be from the bank or credit card network. The caller will say there has been a suspicious transaction alert on that card and asks the victim whether or not they made that purchase.

    Since that transaction is entirely fictional, the victim will correctly state that they did not make the purchase. The caller then says they are going to open a fraud investigation ticket, and oh — by the by — can you please confirm you are the cardholder by providing the security code on the back?

    Remember, the caller already has most of your card info so they can say things like “Can you verify the code on the card ending…” and then give you the actual final digits of your account.

    Scammers are also good at spoofing phone numbers, so your caller ID might say “Bank of Whatever” or the number might match the phone number on the back of your card; that doesn’t mean the person is calling from that bank or that number.

    Any time you get a fraud alert call:

    •Don’t give the caller any information about your account—even if he already knows some of the details.

    •Hang up the phone. Call the customer service number on the back of your credit card. Talk to the fraud or security department and ask about the unauthorized charges the caller told you about.

    • Report the suspicious call to the FTC at ftc.gov/complaint or 877-FTC-HELP.

    •Tell your friends, family, neighbors, and others about it. By spreading the word, you can help someone you care about avoid falling for a scam.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uRadioShack Employees Had No Idea Whether Their Stores Were Doomedr


4 4 4 9
  • Moderately perceptive RadioShack employees could look around their stores and follow the news in recent years and tell that something was about to happen to their employer. Yet RadioShack employees had very little information about what was happening to their stores and whether they could expect to have jobs in the future.

    The college town of Athens, Georgia will now be left with zero RadioShack stores. Sure, the people of Athens will muddle through, but how employees say that how they learned about the doomed state of their stores reminds us of the last days of Wet Seal. That chain, as you might recall, was a young women’s clothing retailer that recently shut down. Employees claim that they were assured the stores would stay open even as managers clearly knew that the opposite was true. “[T]hey told us specifically not to look for jobs, that everything was fine, and that we had low inventory because they were just going to remodel the store,” one former assistant manager says that Wet Seal higher-ups told her.

    One RadioShack assistant manager in Athens told the Red & Black, an independent University of Georgia paper, that something similar happened…except that preliminary lists of stores that were going to be sold and stay open and stores that were going to close had been made public. We published an early list of proposed store closings on February 6, the day after the company declared bankruptcy.

    The assistant manager told Red & Black that his regional manager didn’t know that the list of which stores would remain open had been released to the public as part of court documents, and continued to insist that his store would stay open.

    Radioshack closings leave employees in dark [Red & Black]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uCongress Has One Month Left To Change Or Renew Controversial Bulk Phone Data Surveillance Programr


4 4 4 9
  • It’s been two years since we found out that the NSA has been quietly scooping up basically everyone’s phone records, willy-nilly, without warrants. The revelations of widespread surveillance freaked plenty of people out, but under existing law, the agency has acted legally. To get change, then, you’d need to change the law… and Congress has 33 days remaining in which to do exactly that.

    Three key provisions of the Patriot Act will expire on June 1 of this year. The biggest is known as Section 215: that’s the part of the law that lets the NSA do those huge bulk phone data sweeps, in which basically all of us have been caught up.

    With the expiration date looming on Section 215 and the other two provisions, Congress has about four weeks left to take one of three actions: they can either renew them wholesale, renew them partially with changes, or let the provisions all simply expire and cease being law.

    Letting sections of the Patriot Act simply sunset doesn’t require Congress to do anything at all; inaction, therefore, is a choice — and one Congress is deeply unlikely to take. Meanwhile, there is a proposed bill in the Senate that would entirely extend the authorization for all parts of the Patriot Act, as is.

    And in the middle, hovering conveniently in the position of political compromise, we have a new bill introduced yesterday in the House. Its full name is the unwieldy Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ensuring Effective Discipline Over Monitoring Act of 2015, a fancy-pants backronym that makes it the USA FREEDOM Act.

    USA Freedom seems reasonably likely to end up as law (at least, as compared to most bills). A previous version of the Act passed the House in 2014 but failed to advance in the Senate before the Congressional term expired. The new version once again has bipartisan support, but it also has something the first one didn’t: a serious looming deadline. The combination of compromise (which politicians like to say they support) plus impending time crunch is a big mark in the “likely to go somewhere” column.

    So what, specifically, will this legislation do?

    The full proposed bill (PDF) is pretty dense. So dense, in fact, that the House Judiciary Committee has provided a TL;DR fact sheet, as well as a chart (PDF) comparing this year’s version of the bill to last year’s version.

    If USA Freedom works as advertised, it would, among other things:

    • End all bulk data collection under Section 215
    • Prohibit “large scale, indiscriminate collection” like a batch of all records from an entire state or ZIP code
    • Make FISA court decisions available to the public
    • Require transparency reporting on data collection from the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence
    • Give tech companies “a range of options for describing how they respond” to orders for data

    But USA Freedom is a far cry from ending surveillance. The bill would create a new call detail records program overseen by the FISA court, which means records would still be collected.

    The bill would also create a “strictly limited emergency authority” under which the emergency use of Section 215 would still be authorized. The only difference is that the government would be required to destroy the collected information after the fact if a FISA court denies the application.

    Ideally, supporters say, the new transparency requirements would make “stretched interpretations” of the justification provisions less likely.

    Supporters of the new version include Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo as well as several software and tech industry trade groups and some digital rights advocacy groups. Google and several others also all called for Congress to pass USA Freedom’s 2014 incarnation as well.

    However, many rights groups that supported reform in 2014, like the EFF and ACLU, are notably absent from the current support roster. They are instead continuing to push hard for a complete sunset of all the Patriot Act surveillance provisions.

    Meanwhile, there are still plenty of questionable surveillance programs this bill won’t touch. And the Senate, working straight to the June 1 deadline, could significantly alter or weaken the proposal

    The House Judiciary Committee is set to work over USA Freedom this week, and to try to get a version through the House as quickly as possible so that the Senate can start their turn. If the new legislation does become law, it would renew the three expiring portions of the Patriot Act until December, 2019.



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uT-Mobile CEO Sees Cable/Wireless Mergers As Inevitabler


4 4 4 9
  • tmoconfAs we sip the last drops of champagne over the failure of the merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable, an even bigger acquisition appears to be passing through the regulatory process with relative ease — that of AT&T and DirecTV. And with Comcast, TWC, Charter, and other cable operators all now looking for potential corporate spouses, their eyes may also be turning toward the wireless market.

    During T-Mobile’s quarterly earnings call on Tuesday, CEO John Legere made it clear that the day is coming when people don’t think in terms of wireless companies versus fixed-line cable or fiber broadband.

    “We think far too simplistically about the four major carriers and what the structure of the industry is going to be,” he explained, “without understanding that the tangential players in various industries are touching mobile players” in a way that’s going to drive new partnerships and acquisitions.

    He repeatedly stated that video, music, and other content are all primarily moving online and that the Internet is all moving toward mobile.

    “So there’s a real synergy,” between all these companies. “These other industries are in the same game that we’re in.”

    “I’ve always said on consolidation that it’s not a matter of ‘if,’ it’s a matter of ‘when and how,’” said Legere, “and now I’m gonna add, ‘and who.’”

    The T-Mo chief that that people need to stop thinking of cable and mobile as competitors, but as “potential partners and alternatives for each other in the future.”

    Further consolidation among the existing wireless players seems unlikely. Following the FCC’s rejection of both the AT&T/T-Mobile deal and the Comcast/TWC merger, there appears to be a tendency to oppose acquisitions that would remove major players from the market or consolidate too many customers under one banner.

    But Legere contends that when you just think in terms of delivering online content to consumers in all the ways they want it, “there’s a far more broad set of potential partnerships, integrations, and mergers that the United States could be looking at. In that case, I think you will see consolidation of a much broader set.”

    The argument in favor of wireless-cable mergers is that the combined companies would likely complement each other rather, allowing the resulting business to offer both fixed and wireless broadband access without removing a player from either industry. In the AT&T/DirecTV deal, the two companies point out that AT&T will still sell wireless, landline, DSL, and fiber services without taking away from DirecTV’s satellite presence.

    What remains to be seen is what conditions, if any, the FCC and Justice Dept. might try to place on that merger. If they aren’t too restrictive, it would not be surprising to see a company like TWC try to make a go at T-Mobile, or for Sprint’s parent company SoftBank try to make a play for a cable or satellite provider.

    [via DSLreports.com]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uDigital Privacy And Parental Rights Act Would Put Restrictions On The Use Of Student Data Onliner


4 4 4 9
  • Students are more dependent than ever on technology and the Internet for their education, but those same apps and online learning tools that help educate them could be putting their personal information at risk if shared improperly. Nearly a month after it was first expected, a pair of U.S. representatives have introduced a bill aiming to restrict third-party use of students’ sensitive personal data.

    The New York Times Bits blog reports that the Student Digital Privacy and Parental Rights Act of 2015 [PDF] was introduced with the intention to strengthen digital privacy protections for students in kindergarten though twelfth grade.

    Under the bill – which was introduced by representatives Jared Polis of Colorado and Luke Messer of Indiana – technology companies would be prohibited from knowingly using or disclosing students’ personal information to tailor advertisements to them, as well as barring the companies from creating personal profiles of students unless it is for a school-related purpose.

    The bill also requires technology companies to allow parents or educators to view and make revisions to student information, as well as request information be deleted if it is not needed for retention by schools. Parents would also be able to download any material their child has created through the service.

    Although privacy and consumer groups previously expressed a desire for the bill to require companies to delete student information in the event of a merger or sale, the newly introduced legislation allows companies to sell or disclose student information as part of a merger or acquisition, provided the new owner continues to abide by restrictions in place when the data was first collected.

    Companies would also be able to use and disclose aggregated unidentifiable student information in order to improve their own educational products or market their effectiveness.

    Polis says in a statement that the bill, which was modeled in part by student privacy laws in California, was a needed improvement on current standards protecting student data.

    “The status quo surrounding the protection of our student’s data is entirely unacceptable,” Polis said. “It’s like the Wild Wild West – there are few regulations protecting student’s privacy and parental rights, and the ones that do exist were written in an age before smartphones and tablets.”

    He goes on to say that while the bill provides piece-of-mind to parents and consumer groups, it continue to encourage innovation and the evolution of education technology.

    While Polis and Messer say that more than two dozen education groups, parent associations, industry leaders, and privacy advocates have backed the bill, the Times reports it faces a difficult battle by the opposition.

    Legislators Introduce Student Digital Privacy Bill [The New York Times Bits Blog]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


u4 Children Who Visited Dairy Festival Now Sick From E. Colir


4 4 4 9
  • When you visit animals at a fair or a petting zoo, there are usually hand-washing or hand sanitizer stations at every entrance and exit. There’s a very good reason why these exist. That’s been proven in Washington state, where a handful of first-graders are sick from E. coli, a potentially dangerous pathogen that’s transmitted in, um, poop.

    About 1,000 first-graders visited the Milk Makers Fest, where they were able to pet farm animals, learn about farming, and drink some chocolate milk. These are all super-fun and educational activities, but authorities note that all of the children who have become ill attended the event at the fairgrounds.

    The group running the fest points out that hand-sanitizing stations were available in every barn. While the infection hasn’t yet conclusively been linked to the festival, it does seem very likely.

    Early symptoms of E. coli infection are diarrhea, vomiting, and stomach cramps. The diarrhea is often bloody. So far, four children are confirmed to have E. coli, and two more are ill and suspected of having the illness, but authorities haven’t yet confirmed it.

    There needs to be some kind of catchy slogan for this. Maybe “pet some cows, wash your hands down.” I am not good at slogans, so be sure to wash your hands after touching farm animals, and make sure that any kids under your care do the same.

    Washington First-Graders Sickened by E. Coli After Attending Dairy Festival [Food Safety News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist