среда, 29 апреля 2015 г.

uOhio Health Officials: Home-Canned Potatoes To Blame For Botulism Outbreakr


4 4 4 9
  • Canning your own food at home is a fantastic idea for anyone who wants vegetables on-hand all year-round. But health officials are warning people to make sure they stick to proper canning techniques, after a batch of home-canned potatoes used to make potato salad was linked to an outbreak of botulism in Ohio that’s killed one person.

    There have been 21 confirmed cases of botulism and 10 more suspected cases after a potluck at an Ohio church, reports CNN, where all of the victims ate on April 19. A 54-year-old woman died after falling ill, while the others were treated at area hospitals with an antitoxin from the Strategic National Stockpile provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Dr. Mark Aebi, Health Commissioner and Medical Director at the Fairfield County Department of Health said in a statement: “This is a difficult time for our community, and our thoughts and prayers are with the affected individuals and their families.”

    The blame is being laid on Clostridium botulinum bacteria, known as botulism, believed to have come from home-canned potatoes, prompting local health officials to remind people to use a pressure canner or cooker when canning foods at home, because that pressure is what kills the germ that causes botulism.

    Botulism can only affect those eating contaminated food and does not spread from person to person. It can cause paralysis, double vision, difficulty swallowing and respiratory failure.

    Home-canned potatoes to blame for botulism outbreak [CNN]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCongress May Delay Predatory Lending Protection For Military Personnelr


4 4 4 9
  • The Military Lending Act prevents military personnel from being caught in revolving debt traps of triple-digit interest loans from predatory financing operations like payday and auto-title lenders, but there are loopholes that allow some lenders to get around the MLA’s 36% APR interest rate cap, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars to servicemembers each year and raising issues of national security. The Dept. of Defense is currently working toward new rules that would add protections for military personnel, but Congress may intervene to slow the DoD from making progress.

    Today, the House Armed Services Committee is marking up and voting on the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act [PDF], a very large bill that includes a small provision (Sec. 594) which would require the Sec. of Defense to submit a report to Congress by March 1, 2016 on any new MLA-related rules. That’s all well and good, but the real catch comes here:

    “Additionally, the Secretary of Defense may not implement any final regulation concerning [the Military Lending Act] until the end of a 60 day period beginning when the required report is submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.”

    This would have the effect of pushing any new rules off until at least May 2016, a full year from now, meaning that servicemembers will lose millions more dollars to lenders and other companies. For example, the Virginia-based retailer that “finances” purchases by military personnel through monthly installments without making it clear that the sticker prices on these products are already marked up and that the customer will end up spending several times the actual price; like the servicemember who ended up paying $8,626 for a $650 laptop.

    Credit cards and deposit advance loans are also not currently limited by the MLA. And according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, nearly 1-in-4 servicemembers will take out a deposit advance loan — often with an APR of around 300% — each year, paying millions in fees.

    This isn’t just about doing something nice to protect the people that protect us. Allowing active-duty military members to risk these levels of debt is a matter of national security.

    “When servicemembers default on loans, bad credit reports result in security clearances being revoked,” explains Ed Mierzwinski of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. “The Pentagon found that the problem was big enough to harm unit preparedness since significant numbers of servicemembers were being prevented from deployment on ships or overseas, which generally requires a security clearance. The Pentagon also found that unit morale suffered from the harsh effects of predatory lending.”

    Advocacy group Public Citizen says the attempt to delay the reforms is “unconscionable” and that it is a “sign of just how indebted certain members of Congress are to corporate interests that a critical, commonsense regulation that is needed to protect our national security can be sacrificed in service to the predatory lending industry.”

    Committee member and veteran, Rep Tammy Duckworth of Illinois is expected to offer an amendment to the Authorization Act that would strike Sec. 594 from the bill, though it remains to be seen if she will get enough support from her fellow committee members to make this change.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uRegulators Gearing Up To Take Action On Slow-Moving Takata, Jeep Recall Fixesr


4 4 4 9
  • After months of expressing concern over the slow-moving pace automobile and parts manufacturers have taken to remedy defects associated with nearly 1.5 million Jeeps that can explode following low-speed rear-end collisions and more than 25 million vehicles equipped with defective, shrapnel-shooting airbags, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is poised to take aggressive action to better ensure the safety of owners of those vehicles. 

    Reuters reports that NHTSA administrator Mark Rosekind expects the agency to be ready to take action to reduce the safety risks linked to gas tank fires under Jeep vehicles and exploding Takata-produced airbags within the next two weeks.

    Rosekind says the any forthcoming action will kick off when staff presents a plan of options for each recall in early May.

    “We’re going to look at every option, and we’ll be as aggressive as possible,” he told reporters during a NHTSA conference discussing ways to increase recall effectiveness.

    This isn’t the first time Rosekind has talked about taking steps to ensure owner safety regarding the 2013 Fiat Chrysler recall of 1.56 million model year 1993 to 2007 Jeeps.

    Earlier this month he said that reopening an investigation into the vehicles after closing an initial inquiry just five months ago was “on the table,” along with other possible actions.

    On Tuesday, Rosekind said the pace of remedying the Jeep issue – which has been linked to 75 deaths – has gotten worse.

    “The numbers came out, they’re horribly low,” he said. “Those translate into lives at risk, and more lives have been lost and people hurt. That’s unacceptable.”

    Last summer, Chrysler reported that only about 8.6% of the 1.56 million Jeeps involved in the initial recall had been fixed. Earlier this month the manufacturer said progress has increased, with nearly 25% of the recalled Jeeps now fixed.

    But that’s still not enough progress for regulators, especially when considering the average completion rate for a vehicle recall after a year an a half is 75%.

    The agency and Chrysler have been involved in a bit of back-and-forth with regard to more than one million Jeep vehicles with rear-mounted fuel tanks that sit too low and put the vehicle at risk of catching fire if involved in a rear-end explosion.

    For nearly three years, Chrysler has maintained that the millions of Jeeps do not have a safety defect. However, safety documents show that the issue has resulted in nearly 75 deaths.

    During the summer of 2013, the car manufacturer and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration agreed to a remedy for the issue that involved equipping vehicles with a trailer hitch that could reduce the risk of fires.

    Officials with Chrysler have said dealers would inspect the recalled Jeeps to determine if there was a need to install the trailer hitch assemblies.

    Rosekind was also critical of Takata’s progress in producing replacements for airbags that have been found to explode, sending shards of metal into drivers and passengers of nearly 25 million vehicles. In all, the defective airbags have been linked to 6 deaths and 105 injuries.

    After being hit with a $14,000 per day fine from regulators in recent months, Takata has increased its cooperation with NHTSA’s investigation into the airbag defect. The company also announced that it expects to double the number of replacement airbags produced by September.

    Increasing the number of vehicles fixed because of defects has been of growing concern for regulators and lawmakers after a record number of vehicles were recalled in 2014.

    In March, a group of senators introduced a bill that aims to make sure potentially dangerous vehicles aren’t on the road, by requiring fixes be completed before registration renewals are granted. Owners of vehicles with outstanding recalls would be required to fix the issue before renewing their registration each year.

    UPDATE 2-U.S. auto safety regulator poised for action on Takata, Jeep recalls [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uApple Bans Time-Telling Apps From Apple Watchr


4 4 4 9
  • applewatchheyWhen it comes to telling the time with an Apple Watch, there’s only one king of the roost so far as the company is concerned, which means any other developers trying to enter the App Store with watch apps for the Apple Watch will get roundly rejected.

    As you might recall, the Apple Watch is, at its heart, a device designed to tell the time, among a few other bits of glitzy technology. Which means the company doesn’t want any interlopers trying to horn in on its product’s primary function, and as such, has given notice to developers that their time apps aren’t welcome, reports 9to5Mac.com.

    The company added a new guideline to the App Store Review Guidelines, as the first clause to single out Apple Watch development.

    Basically if your app is designed only to tell the time, and that is it, it can’t be included as a Watch app. As seen in Section 10.7: “Watch Apps whose primary function is telling time will be rejected.”

    This had been the case early on for developers, but adding it to the guidelines makes it an official policy, 9to5Mac notes.

    If you’re already sick of the face options for your Watch, Apple could be rolling out more first-party face options eventually, as indicated in the device’s Help guidelines:

    “Apple Watch includes a variety of watch faces, any of which you can customize to suit you. Check frequently for software updates; the set of watch faces that follows might differ from what you see on your Apple Watch.”

    Apple says it will reject Apple Watch apps that just tell the time, more first-party faces may be coming soon [9to5Mac.com]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uLumber Liquidators Faces Federal Charges Of Selling Illegally Sourced Woodr


4 4 4 9
  • lumberliquThings are not going particularly well at Lumber Liquidators right now. Not only is the company facing more than 100 customer lawsuits and a federal consumer safety investigation over flooring it sold that may be releasing dangerous levels of formaldehyde, but the company is also facing criminal charges for selling wood that suppliers may have harvested illegally.

    The company is being charged under the Lacey Act, a conservation law that’s meant to protect animals and plants that aren’t supposed to be harvested and local ecosystems from each other. Part of the law bans wood products that have been harvested or imported illegally, and that’s what Lumber Liquidators has been charged with.

    US seeks criminal charges against Lumber Liquidators [Chicago Tribune]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uMcDonald’s Cuts Nine Items From Menu Including Chicken Sandwiches, Deluxe Quarter Pounderr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uHulu Scores Deal For Streaming Rights To Every Single Episode Of ‘Seinfeld’r


4 4 4 9
  • seinfeldOne of the best things about hanging on to that TV cord? Flipping through the channels with the knowledge that at some point, likely very soon, you’ll land on an episode of Seinfeld. Cord-cutters can get in on that feeling now as well, as a report says Hulu has signed a deal to snag reruns of Seinfeld.

    The Wall Street Journal cites people familiar with the matter who said the new deal will be announced to advertisers today at a presentation in New York, in what is one of the biggest programming buys in Hulu’s history.

    Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed, but the insider talking to WSJ said each episode of Jerry and the gang was valued at about $700,000. That would make the whole shebang worth close to $126 million for all 180 episodes, going by that figure. Other reports have quoted a price near $1 million per episode.

    Hulu wasn’t alone at the bidding table — Amazon.com and Yahoo also reportedly threw their hats in the ring, but ultimately failed. Netflix had been interested at first, it’s reported, but then walked away to grab streaming rights to Friends instead, at about $500,000 per episode.

    Never fear, those with the remote in trembling hand — TBS will still be airing reruns of Seinfeld on regular TV, waiting for that moment when you flip through and decide to land on 1990s New York, yet again.

    Hulu Strikes Deal for Reruns of ‘Seinfeld’ [Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist