вторник, 28 апреля 2015 г.

uCFPB Fines Regions Bank $7.5M For Collecting Illegal Overdraft Feesr


4 4 4 9
  • Each year consumers spend nearly $32 million in exorbitant overdraft fees to their banks and credit unions without fully understanding the way in which these fees work or how much they spend on each overdraft. Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reminded banks that using consumers’ lack of knowledge to collect more fees isn’t acceptable by imposing a $7.5 million fine against Regions Bank for unlawful overdraft practices.

    The CFPB fine, which marks the Bureau’s first action under a 2010 rule that protect consumers against illegal overdraft fees by their banks, stems from Regions’ practice of charging overdraft fees to consumers who had not opted-in for overdraft coverage and charging overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees on its deposit advance product despite claims that it would not.

    In addition to paying the $7.5 million CFPB fine, Regions must provide full refunds to consumers who were unlawfully charged overdraft fees. So far, the bank has already refunded approximately $49 million in fees to hundreds of thousands of customers.

    According to the CFPB consent order [PDF], Alabama-based Regions Bank violated a 2010 rule that prohibits banks and credit unions from charging overdraft fees on ATMs and debit card transactions unless customers specifically opt-in to the service.

    If a customer does not opt-in to enabling overdrafts, then banks must decline transactions if the accounts do not have enough money, without charging a fee.

    The CFPB says that Regions failed to provide an opt-in option for customers who linked their checking accounts to their savings accounts – a function that often allows an automatic transfer to cover a shortage in a consumer’s checking account.

    Despite not opting-in to the coverage, Regions charged these consumers a fee of up to $36 if a transfer was required to cover an overdraft.

    While Regions uncovered the violation of overdraft opt-in rules during an internal review, the CFPB found that the bank failed to stop the unauthorized charges for nearly a year.

    In addition to charging unauthorized fees on linked accounts, Regions misrepresented overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees related to its deposit advance product, the CFPB says.

    According to the CFPB, from November 2011 to August 2013, Regions charged customers $1.9 million in overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees to consumers with Regions Ready Advance.

    Those charges were incurred when the bank collected payment from the consumer’s checking account and the payment was higher than the amount available in the account. At that point the bank would either cover the transaction and charge an overdraft fee or reject its own transaction and charge a non-sufficient funds fee.

    Under the CFPB’s enforcement action, Regions is required to hire an independent consultant to identify any other customers who may have been charged illegal fees and correct any errors that could show up on consumers’ credit reports.

    CFPB Fines Regions Bank $7.5 Million for Unlawful Overdraft Practices [CFPB]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uDisney Ordered To Rehire Workers Who Refused To Wear “Contaminated” Costumesr


4 4 4 9
  • (afagen)

    (afagen)

    Three performers fired from Disney’s Animal Kingdom in Orlando last June after they refused to wear costumes dubbed “contaminated” by other sweaty garments will be given their old jobs back and get back pay.

    A federal arbitrator ruled that the employees were in the right, and that Disney had violated a collective bargaining agreement by firing them, reports the Orlando Sentinel.

    The employees said the unitards they had to wear for the Festival of the Lion King show had been tainted by other sweaty garments that had been pushed up against their clean clothes. When they refused to put the outfits on, one of the shows had to be canceled and they were fired shortly after.

    That violated Disney’s contract, the local Teamsters union representing the workers argued, by giving them unsanitary clothing.

    “I’m really, really happy that everything ended up working out in the end,” said one of the performers, who will go back to the show. “This is just awesome news.”

    A Disney spokesman said the company will comply with the ruling.

    Disney workers fired over sweaty costumes win their jobs back [Orlando Sentinel]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCablevision Will Sell Hulu Plus Subscriptions Directly To Broadband Customersr


4 4 4 9
  • huluplusNew York-based Cablevision continues to make the case to its fellow pay-TV providers that there is money to be made from customers who don’t necessarily want a cable subscription. It was the first cable company to make HBO Now available to broadband customers, then it started offering free digital antennas to cord cutters. Now Cablevision will also sell Hulu Plus subscriptions directly to its Optimum Online users.

    Hulu — the video streaming service co-owned by Disney, News Corp, and Comcast — has generally sold its $8/month premium Hulu Plus tier itself. Cablevision says it is the first pay-TV provider to allow its customers to add Hulu Plus to their monthly bill.

    “The partnership with Hulu reflects Cablevision’s desire to meet customers where they are,” said Kristin Dolan, chief operating officer, Cablevision in a statement.

    What’s interesting is that the company has not stated what price it will charge for Hulu Plus, saying instead that price information is forthcoming. One can assume it won’t charge more than the current $8/month, but the inclusion of the service alongside broadband service may give Cablevision the opportunity to offer Hulu Plus at a discount or as a promotional add-on for certain levels of Optimum service.

    HBO CEO Richard Plepler has repeatedly made the argument that charging for add-on streaming services is a huge potential revenue source for traditional cable companies because they are also the primary (and sometimes only) seller of broadband services in their markets.

    “Who controls the broadband pipes in the U.S.? Our distributors,” said Plepler in 2014. “There is gold in the hills, lets go get it together… its your money too.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uDOE’s List Of Possible Transfer Schools For CCI Students Includes Other For-Profits Chains Under Investigationr


4 4 4 9
  • (tomQ)

    (tomQ)

    Just because students who attended the now closed Everest University, Heald College or WyoTech campuses can’t finish their college career with Corinthian Colleges Inc., doesn’t mean they can’t finish their education somewhere else. For student who would prefer to transfer to a similar program rather than receive a refund, the Department of Education has provided a list of viable colleges. But that list has quickly garnered criticism from lawmakers because it includes other for-profit education institutions under scrutiny.

    Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois condemned [PDF] the Dept. of Education Tuesday for suggesting that students harmed by Corinthian College’s deceptive practices transfer to other for-profit college chains currently under state or federal investigations for similar practices.

    “Has the Department of Education learned nothing?” Durbin says in a statement. “How in good faith can they tell these Corinthian students – who just had their college disappear and are sitting on a pile of debt – that these are viable transfer options for their students?”

    Following the closure of CCI’s remaining 28 campuses on Sunday evening, the Dept. updated its frequently asked questions page on Corinthian.

    In the update, students who wish to continue their program are advised that they may be able to do so by transferring to a new school.

    “If you do transfer into a comparable program offered by another school, that school will evaluate your Corinthian course work and will decide whether to give you credit for the work already completed, and what courses you need to take to complete your program of study,” the Department states, while providing a list of possible transfer options.

    The list [PDF] allows students to view their specific school and other local schools with similar programs of study.

    Viable transfer options for a number of the closed schools include several locations of ITT Technical Institute, DeVry University, University of Phoenix, The Arts Institutes, Argosy, Le Cordon Bleu and International Academy of Design and Technology – all of which are currently party to either a state or federal investigation.

    • ITT Technical Institute, which is actually on the Department’s Heightened Cash Monitoring list, was sued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in February 2014 over allegations of predatory lending. The company is also under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and 16 state attorneys general.

    • Education Management Corporation, which owns The Arts Institutes and Argosy schools, is currently under investigation by the Department of Justice and 17 state attorneys general. The company is also on the DOE’s Heightened Cash Monitoring list.

    • Career Education Corporation, owner of Le Cordon Bleu and International Academy of Design and Technology, is under investigation by 17 state attorneys general and on the Heightened Cash Monitoring list.

    • Westwood College is being sued by the Illinois attorney general for alleged deceptive recruiting practices.

    • University of Phoenix’s parent company Apollo is being investigated by two state attorneys general.

    • DeVry University, which announced last week that it would move most its operations online, is under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission and two state attorneys general.

    In addition to including the schools under investigation for deceptive practices on its list of viable alternatives, the Department fails to warn students that transferring their CCI credits could mean they will lose eligibility to discharge their Corinthian student loans.

    “A move like this leads me to the sad conclusion that the Department of Education is out of touch with reality,” Durbin says. “At the end of the day, the losers are not only the students who have wasted their time and end up with debt, but also the taxpayers of America. I call on the Department of Education to put as their highest priority the casualties and victims of Corinthian Colleges, Inc.”

    The Department of Education did not immediately return Consumerist’s request for comment on the list of alternative schools.

     



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAT&T Becomes Latest ISP To Promise New Homeowner Broadband Connection At Address They Won’t Actually Server


4 4 4 9
  • You’ve heard it all before: a man buying a new home needs to make sure it has acceptable broadband connectivity, not just for entertainment but also because he works in IT. He calls the provider in the area three times before moving, and every time is assured that they service his house. Until he moves in and finds out that in actual reality, they don’t, and aren’t sure why they said they did. The last time we shared such a tale of woe, it was Comcast in Washington state. This time, it’s a homeowner in Michigan, and the ISP that doesn’t know what they actually do is AT&T.

    Ars Technica has the story of a new homeowner stymied by his quest to get broadband at his new house. When David Mortimer went house-hunting in 2013, connectivity was a priority.

    “I called AT&T on three separate occasions to verify that this home had U-verse capabilities or, at the very least, 20Mbps,” he told Ars. “I was told every single time ‘Yes, that service is available at that residence.'” He also checked his address against AT&T’s website and that, too confirmed that he could get U-verse at his new home.

    Until, of course, he actually tried to get service at the house hooked up.

    What AT&T was actually able to provide was old-school DSL at “up to” 768 Kbps (that’s 0.7 Mbps). 768K would be bad enough to work with, but what he actually was able to pull down was 300-400 Kbps at best.

    The FCC’s minimum threshold for broadband service is now 25 Mbps — meaning his DSL service got to about 0.04% of “broadband.” Even under the old minimum threshold of 4 Mbps, Mortimer’s connection was not even up to 25% of where it needed to be.

    Basically, a connection of 0.3 Mbps is all but useless for any streaming or real-time internet use. You can e-mail, and IM, and do the things you would have done in 1998 when that was super-fast, but say goodbye to Netflix, Skype, or online gaming. Even web browsing, with the current trends in design, is hard on connections that slow.

    Mortimer’s story at least has a better ending than would-be Comcast customer Seth in Washington, who ended up with no real option but to move.

    In this case, the homeowner was eventually able to get a wireless service, Vergennes Broadband, to work with him on a creative solution:

    “I had them come out to try again, and they couldn’t get anything at the house itself, so me and the installer got a little creative,” Mortimer said. “We got a good signal with line of sight down by the road so we attached the dish to a tree, then buried the line, and in order to get it to my house over the driveway we had to snake it through some cracks in my driveway and cover it with dirt.”

    It is true that anyone moving house has an obligation to check what services are available before they sign on the dotted line, especially anyone buying property. But in both of these cases and countless others, buyers have done their due diligence and then some, calling and checking with their area ISP several times. The problem isn’t a lack of research on part of the consumer; it’s a lack of clue on part of the provider.

    “ISPs don’t actually serve my house even though they said several times that they would” has become its own entire genre of customer service complaint. And in order to solve it, ISPs are going to have to figure out what the heck services they actually provide, and then figure out how to be both honest and accurate when potential future customers call.

    When AT&T promises broadband—but delivers only 300Kbps [Ars Technica]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uRadioShack Agrees To Mediation After Auction Of Customer Mailing Listsr


4 4 4 9
  • In bankruptcy court this morning in Delaware, there was a hearing regarding RadioShack’s plan to offer tens of millions of pieces of customer data in its bankruptcy auction. The attorney general of the Shack’s home state of Texas objected to this sale, mostly because the company’s original privacy policy didn’t allow the company to sell customer data to just anyone. Now RadioShack has agreed to mediation after its intellectual property, including those mailing lists, is auctioned on May 11.

    Before any of RadioShack’s assets went up for sale, they secured a stalking horse bid from lender Standard General. Much of the controversy over the bankruptcy has been about the question of whether Standard General should be permitted to use hundreds of millions of dollars of RadioShack’s debt to that company as

    What’s in those files that are for sale? Part of the AGs’ problem with the sale of customer data is that the original list of items for sale was kind of vague about what it contained. In response, RadioShack explained exactly what’s in those files. The “transaction data” mentioned in the bidding list went back 5 years except for items with extended warranties, and the data that will be sold does not include credit card numbers, since encrypted credit card information is only rendered unusable after 60 days, once items can no longer be returned. Oh, good. What do you have to worry about if you’ve shopped at RadioShack in the last decade or so?

    Specifically, the Debtors’ Customer Database consists of approximately 8.5 million opt-in email addresses, of which approximately 3.1 million were active within the last twelve months, and approximately 65 million complete customer name and physical address files, of which approximately 11.9 million were active within the last twelve months. It is possible to extract consumer files from the Customer Database to account for data considered more relevant for marketing or other purposes.

    RadioShack further explains that not many of these addresses are likely to be either current or useful, and that there are surely a lot of duplicates in the databases as well. You can download RadioShack’s response here.

    The AGs still had some concerns about the sale, mostly about vetting the buyer. Standard General, the company that bought most of RadioShack’s remaining stores, is the most likely to be interested in the entire package of intellectual property. That package includes RadioShack’s house brands and patents, its domain names, the mailing lists, and the RadioShack name itself.

    In a response, the attorneys general explained their continuing concerns with the mailing list sale and with how RadioShack’s attorneys have been explaining the sale:

    The State is further concerned by the use of the term “opt-in” to describe the 8.5 million email addresses which have elected to receive email communications from the Debtors. The customers who elected to receive electronic communications from the Debtors were expressly covered by Debtors’ the privacy policy to the same extent as other customers and the State contends the term “opt-in” could be misleading to bidders who may interpret it as willingness to opt-in to the transfer of their data (as the term “opt-in” policy is sometimes used in the industry).

    That makes sense: while privacy-minded customers may have refused to give their information at all, people weren’t signing on to have their names and addresses handed over at cut rates to an unknown buyer.

    RadioShack Agrees to Mediation Over Sale of Customer Data [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uYou Can Now Rent A Chicken To Get The Freshest Of Fresh Eggsr


4 4 4 9
  • Because there are inevitably going to be those people who cannot stand to have something even one second after other people can get it, one company has started offering up chickens for rent, giving poultry hipsters a chance to get the very freshest eggs possible.

    In all seriousness though, the whole thing is pretty funny — “Rent The Chicken” doesn’t roll off the tongue without a giggle, the owner tells the Associated Press.

    “When I answer the phone and I say, ‘Rent The Chicken, this is Jenn,’ they giggle and say, ‘I would like to rent the chicken.’ And then they giggle some more,” she says.

    Her Pennsylvania-based company is now in three other states as well as Toronto after two years of leasing chickens to people who want fresh eggs from humanely raised hens.

    “As a society, we don’t really like commitment,” the owner explained. “We don’t want a contract on our cellphones; we don’t want long-term commitment with our cable company. With chickens, they can live to seven or 10 years, and people are a bit scared of that.”

    But when you rent, you don’t have to worry about raising chickens in the long run, just about how long you want eggs. An example package would run a person $150 per month for two hens, a coop that can be easily moved around the yard, feed and help if you need it from the experts.

    Other businesses are booming as well, with the owner of Rent a Coop in Maryland saying his company rents out 25 to 30 coops every month.

    “I think it will be sustained,” he says of poultry leasing. “People want to know where their food comes from.”

    Before you jump into chicken renting, companies suggest talking to your neighbors first to see if they’re cool with it, as well as checking with local ordinances or homeowners associations.

    Entrepreneurs hatch hen-rental idea for fans of fresh eggs [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist