среда, 22 апреля 2015 г.

uJohn Deere Wants To Be Able To File Copyright Claims Against The Way You Use Your Tractorr


4 4 4 9

  • In the modern, digital economy, there are a whole lot of things you buy but still technically don’t own. Nearly all entertainment, for example: digital books, video games, music, and so on. Other software, too. But as basically everything continues to become some kind of computer in a specialized body, plenty of other goods are starting to be subject to licensing, copyright law, and non-ownership problems, too. Like tractors.

    Famous farming machinery company John Deere is making the case that you don’t own your vehicles, Wired reports this week. In filings with the copyright office (PDF), the maker of the ubiquitous green and yellow tractor argues that because your tractor has a chip and some code in it, you don’t actually own it. You’ve just got an “implied license for the life of the vehicle to operate the vehicle.”

    We’ve been through this song and dance before — really, we’re still going through it right now — with specifically high-tech items. You might own the plastic, glass, and aluminum casing of your iPad but everything that runs on it, every single line of code that makes it go, is just something you have paid for the right to access until someone else takes it away or changes it. That affects your ability to unlock your phone, resell your used tablet, or in fact act in any way like you actually own the thing you went and bought and paid for.

    Software is more like an event than like a thing, in many ways: You pay for a ticket that gets you into the rock concert, and you get to watch and participate and enjoy it, but you don’t own the musician, the concert, or any recordings made of it. You paid for the time-limited experience of using it, basically.

    So it goes with your digital book, or your video game, or that song or movie you downloaded. You’re paying for access to the experience, on the company’s terms. And with digital goods, culturally speaking, we’ve pretty much gotten used to that. They’re not tangible, and they’ve been subject to strict licensing for a long time. Overall we’ve more or less accepted that you can’t sell a used Steam game or Kindle book or iTunes song.

    But we still have an expectation of ownership for physical, tangible goods. I can resell this paperback, or this CD, or this DVD, or this car. We still have a (rapidly fading) second-hand market for disc-based video games. There’s an expectation that an actual object I can hold in my hands or park in my driveway is mine to do with as I please after I’ve legally paid for it with my money.

    Except, well, maybe you can’t.

    Copyright law controls basically everything, thanks to the pervasiveness of software. Everything has a chip and some code telling it how to act, from your coffeemaker to your TV to your car. And as John Deere so unsubtly points out, for farmers, that includes tractors and other farm equipment.

    Lest you think it’s just the agriculturally-employed who need to worry, it’s not. GM is right there with John Deere explaining to the Copyright Office that drivers might own the frames and windows and trunks of their cars, but that because everything under the hood and in the dash is driven by a computer chip, General Motors retains a claim on every car they sell. If you decide to go get some aftermarket mods done on your Chevy, you might be a software pirate.

    Congress has gotten involved with the YODA proposal (yes, really) to protect the consumer’s right to resell goods they own even if they have software in them, but that seems unlikely even to limp through committee and even less likely ever to see the light of day as law.

    The Copyright Office will be holding hearings on the matter in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. in May, and they are expected to issue a ruling in July saying just what you can and can’t do with the things you thought you paid for.

    We Can’t Let John Deere Destroy the Very Idea of Ownership [Wired]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uMcDonald’s CEO Says He Has Turnaround Ideas Up His Sleever


4 4 4 9
  • Facing sagging sales, increasing criticism of its labor practices, and growing disenfranchisement from its franchisees, McDonald’s recently installed CEO Steve Easterbrook is at the head of a flagging company that was once viewed as an unstoppable fast food force. But Steve-E claims that he’s got some ideas on how to reverse the course before this burger Titanic strikes the iceberg.

    “We are developing a turnaround plan to improve our performance and deliver enduring profitable growth,” Easterbrook said in a statement, according to Bloomberg.

    Of course, he’s not sharing those plans just yet. We’ll all have to wait until May 4 for that.

    McDonald’s same-store sales were down 2.6% in the first quarter, even as the company made a massive media push with its “lovin'” campaign, which briefly allowed random customers to pay with non-currency like hugs. The marketing, which included prominent Super Bowl advertising, increased brand awareness of McDonald’s but failed to improve sales or consumers’ feelings toward the company.

    McDonald’s also recently announced pay hikes for employees at company-owned stores in an apparent effort to steer away some of the negative publicity arising from protests and walk-outs from workers demanding higher wages. However, since 90% of U.S. McDonald’s are owned by franchisees who make their own decisions about wage levels, the overwhelming majority of employees are unaffected by this raise.

    The fast food giant recently held a Turnaround summit with franchisees, but some said the event was a “farce… The ideas presented — such as Create Your Taste — DO NOT fit our business model. McDonald’s Corp. has panicked and jumped the shark. The problem is an unwieldy menu—too big—and trying to be all things to all people.”

    In San Diego, McDonald’s has just begun testing an all-day breakfast menu (no biscuits included). If successful, it might appease disgruntled franchisees who have been complaining about too many high-cost, limited-time menu offerings that don’t pay off. By serving breakfast all day, it could give franchisees additional revenue without having to add anything new to the menu.

    One unquestionably positive move made by Easterbrook was to start sourcing meat from chickens raised without controversial antibiotics. This may not have an immediate impact on the company’s sales, but when one of the largest chicken-buying entities in the U.S. demands drug-free birds, it should lead more poultry producers to curb their medically unnecessary use of these antibiotics.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uPolice: Man Sick Of Fighting His Computer Took It Into The Alley And Shot Itr


4 4 4 9
  • (Colorado Springs Police Department)

    (Colorado Springs Police Department)

    Listen, everyone has their issues with computers, and we all know they’re going to be our overlords in the future, but taking out your frustrations by firing a few shots into the offending technology won’t go over well with law enforcement.

    According to Colorado Springs police (scroll down) , a 37-year-old man was cited for discharging a weapon within city limits after he took his computer into a back alley and shot it for being insubordinate.

    “Investigation revealed a resident was fed up with fighting his computer for the last several months,” the report on the police blotter reads. “He took the computer into the back alley and fired 8 shots into the computer with a handgun, effectively disabling it.”

    Police tell the Colorado Springs Gazette that the man didn’t realize he was breaking the law when exacting his revenge. A judge will now decide a penalty for the citation.

    Man shoots computer in Colorado Springs alley, gets revenge he wanted – and a citation [Colorado Springs Gazette]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uDon’t Panic, But Chipotle Is Still Experiencing Rolling Pork Blackoutsr


4 4 4 9
  • (su-lin)

    (su-lin)

    For a few months now, Chipotle restaurants have been running low on carnitas, the slow-cooked pork shoulder that you can get as a meat filling in burritos. They pulled the meat from about a third of their restaurants after a supplier didn’t meet Chipotle’s “responsibility standards” for meat. Now the pork shortage has turned into a rolling blackout, with the meat rotating in and out of different restaurants according to supply levels.

    Unlike when the company can’t source enough beef or chicken raised according to its standards, Chipotle has been known to substitute conventionally raised versions of those meats. That isn’t an option for carnitas for a reason that the company hasn’t quite explained. Instead, they’ve been taking it off the menu entirely in some areas for about six weeks at a time, then rotating it back on.

    That’s a fair way to deal with supply issues, but confusing for customers, who want to know when and where they will have access to their favorite pork products. Reporting on their first-quarter sales, Chipotle’s chief financial officer explained the issue is affecting sales, as customers don’t particularly want to call in to check on pork supply levels, even if they do know about the issue before a burrito craving hits them.

    What Chipotle has learned is that carnitas fans are very loyal, and aren’t especially interested in trying other meats while the shortage continues. “We had hoped that the shortage would encourage our carnitas customers to try another menu option, and some did,” CFO Jack Hartung explained during that quarterly conference call. “But many have decided to hold out until carnitas returns to their market.”

    There are two pieces of good news: the company has found a new pork vendor, and the shortages will resolve later this year. For burrito fans who don’t want to leave the house, Chipotle is also working on delivery options in partnership with an outside company, Postmates Inc. Delivery is available in 67 cities now, and will grow if consumers like it.

    Chipotle Supply Woes Threaten to Hamper Growth for Rest of Year [Bloomberg News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uConsumer Advocates Say There Are No Conditions That Would Make Comcast, Time Warner Cable Merger Acceptabler


4 4 4 9
  • Comcast-TWCLogoComcast representatives are reportedly meeting with regulators today to discuss the status of the cable colossus’s pending $45 billion acquisition of Time Warner Cable. While some reports claim that antitrust lawyers at the Dept. of Justice are leaning toward suing to block the merger, others believe that the DOJ and FCC will attempt to put conditions on the deal in order to approve it. But consumer advocacy groups say that there are no conditions that would make this merger palatable.

    “You can’t fix this merger with conditions,” says Delara Derakhshani, our colleague and policy counsel for Consumers Union. “The size and influence of Comcast would be so huge that no amount of promises or commitments could outweigh the harm to consumers. This merger would give Comcast more control than ever before over what we see on TV and online, and how much we pay for it.”

    Consumers Union points out what most Consumerist readers already know — that Comcast and Time Warner Cable have consistently demonstrated some of the worst customer service around, not just for cable/Internet providers, but for all retail-facing U.S. companies.

    “You have two companies with notoriously bad reputations for customer service, looking to become one company that will have even less incentive to address these deep, long-standing problems,” says Derakhshani. “Even if Comcast comes to the table with more promises to do better, we know millions of consumers would be hit with higher prices, fewer choices, and even worse service.”

    Other advocates criticize Comcast’s Internet Essentials program, which gets the company lots of good press and great photos of company execs shaking hands with mayors and other civic leaders, but which may not be living up to its promise to deliver affordable Internet access to low-income Americans.

    “According to Comcast’s own reports, in the four years since its rollout, the Internet Essentials program has only enrolled 13.4% of the estimated 2.6 million households that are eligible for the program nationally,” said John Bergmayer, senior staff attorney at Public Knowledge. “This remarkably low enrollment rate suggests that Internet Essentials is far from the success story Comcast touts in the press and on Capitol Hill.”

    The Stop Mega Comcast Coalition — whose members include both Consumers Union and Public Knowledge — points to a number of Comcast’s shortcomings in the wake of its heavily conditioned 2010 acquisition of NBC Universal.

    It notes that Comcast still won’t allow its customers to access HBO Go service on Playstation devices while all other major pay-TV providers have done so.

    In spite of a condition requiring that Comcast keep similarly themed channels in the same “neighborhoods” rather than scatter new competitors to far-flung areas of the channel listings, the company waged a 3-year legal battle to keep Bloomberg away from news stations (like Comcast-owned MSNBC and CNBC).

    Comcast also publicly claims to be a supporter of net neutrality but passive-aggressively allowed Netflix traffic to bottleneck until the company had to pay for better access to Comcast end-users. At the same time, it doesn’t want any of its streamed content to count against customers’ data caps.

    “While Comcast has defied numerous conditions of its merger with NBCUniversal, Internet Essentials represents a marquee failure on the part of the cable giant to live up to its commitment to the FCC and the general public,” said Bergmayer. “Conditions haven’t worked in the past and they won’t work here.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uKentucky Authorities Say They’ve Busted A Criminal Whiskey Syndicater


4 4 4 9
  • (pjpink)

    (pjpink)

    Officials in the bourbon basin* say they’ve put all the pieces of a puzzling disappearing whiskey caper together, announcing the arrest of a group accused of orchestrating liquor thefts at two famous Kentucky distilleries.

    A Franklin County grand jury indicted nine people Tuesday accused of being part of a veritable organized crime group that officials say pulled off a series of thefts that could go back to 2008, perhaps including the theft of 65 cases of Pappy Van Winkle Reserve from Buffalo Trace in 2013 and five barrels of Wild Turkey bourbon that went missing from its eponymous facility this year, reports The Courier Journal.

    The Pappy Van Winkle heist had remained unsolved, or so it seemed. Authorities said earlier this month they were putting the grand jury indictment in the Wild Turkey case on hold while they reviewed new leads and evidence.

    Which brings us up to Tuesday, when the grand jury issued charges of engaging in organized crime against a Buffalo Trace Distillery worker possibly linked to “Pappygate,” his wife and father-in law, two other Kentucky distillery workers and others.

    The group is accused of stealing bourbon worth at least $100,000 — both bottles and barrels — from both the distilleries to sell it in a scheme going on since 2008, as well as trafficking in anabolic steroids.

    One of the workers was the main member, said Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Zachary Becker, and that everyone knew each other socially or through softball.

    Becker said that the Buffalo Trace-made Pappy Van Winkle bourbon stolen might possibly have been a part of the Pappygate hullabaloo from 2013 but that “is more for Buffalo Trace to figure out and their inventory issues.”

    “When it comes to us, we were able to determine that there was a certain, very large amount of Pappy Van Winkle stolen by members of this syndicate, by [the worker] and then thereafter sold to various individuals.”

    Buffalo Trace and Wild Turkey released a joint statement thanking the sheriff’s office for their work, saying they’re cooperating and supporting the prosecution of crimes related to their businesses.

    The investigation is ongoing.

    Check out the rest of the Courier-Journal’s great reporting on this. Heck, we wouldn’t be surprised to see this turned into a movie directed-by-and-starring some It actor with the perfect five o’clock shadow.

    Pappy Van Winkle theft poss. tied to syndicate [The Courier-Journal]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uFBI, TSA Issue Warning To Airlines Over Possible Flight Hackingsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Rachel)

    (Rachel)

    A week after a government report identified security weaknesses within the airline industry including the possibility that newer airplanes with interconnected WiFi systems could be hacked, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Transportation Security Administration issued an alert warning airlines to be vigilant about monitoring for such threats.

    Wired reports that the alert, which was posed as a private industry notification, urges airline staff to be on the lookout for signs that any passengers might be trying to connect to the network ports located beneath their seats.

    While the FBI and TSA say in the joint alert that there currently isn’t information to support claims that an attacker could override a plane’s navigation system through WiFi networks, they are further investigating whether such threats can be credible.

    “Although the media claims remain theoretical and unproven, the media publicity associated with these statements may encourage actors to use the described intrusion methods,” the alert notes. “Attempting to gain unauthorized access to the onboard networks of a commercial aircraft violates federal law.”

    The alert also advises flight crews to be on the lookout for activity involving travelers connecting unknown cables or wires to the IFE system or unusual parts of the airplane seat and evidence of suspicious behavior following a flight, such as IFE systems that show evidence of tampering or the forced removal of covers to network connection ports.

    Additionally, airlines should be attentive to suspicious behavior concerning aviation wireless signals, including social media messages with threatening references to Onboard Network Systems, ADS-B, ACARS, and Air Traffic Control networks should be reported.

    Crews should also review network logs from aircraft to ensure any suspicious activity, such as network scanning or intrusion attempts, is captured for further analysis.

    According to Wired, the alert appears to be a direct response to an admission from a security researcher last week that he had connected to the network ports beneath his seat on more than a dozen flights to uncover vulnerabilities.

    Feds warn airlines to look out for passengers hacking jets [Wired]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist