среда, 22 апреля 2015 г.

uGoogle Could Announce New Wireless Service Today; May Only Charge For Data You User


4 4 4 9
  • In March, Google confirmed its plan to launch some sort of wireless service for consumers in the U.S., and a new report claims that the Internet biggie could pull back the curtain on this new product as early as today.

    This is according to the Wall Street Journal, which reports that a major difference between existing wireless providers and what Google intends to provide is that customers would only pay for the data they use each month.

    So rather than wasting money on unused data each month, your bill would reflect your actual usage. Whether that ultimately saves you money will depend on how much Google charges.

    As mentioned in earlier reports, it’s expected that Google’s service will run on existing Sprint and T-Mobile networks. It may also use WiFi hotspots to carry phone and data signals, reducing the burden on the wireless system.

    The biggest drawback, according to the Journal report, is that the Google service will only work — at first — for users with Google Nexus 6 devices. So consumers with the most popular smartphones — like Apple’s iPhones and Samsung’s Galaxy devices — would have to switch or wait until Google supports their phones.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uTrek Recalls 998,000 Bikes Over Brake Issue That Left One Rider Paralyzedr


4 4 4 9
  • trekbikesTrek is recalling almost one million bikes in the United States and Canada after an issue with a quick-release lever on the bike’s front wheel hub left one rider permanently paralyzed.

    According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the quick-release lever can come into contact with the front disc brake assembly, resulting in either complete wheel separation, or the wheel coming to an instant stop. The problem occurs when the lever opens beyond the 180 degrees it’s supposed to, bringing it into contact with the disc brake.

    Any bikes with front quick release levers that don’t open past that 180-degree mark from the closed position are not included in the recall.

    Quick release lever caught in front disc; Quick release lever open more than 180°

    Quick release lever caught in front disc; Quick release lever open more than 180°

    The bikes include any model years between 2000 and 2015 that include front disc brakes and a sliver or black quick release lever on the front wheel hub, for a total of about 900,000 bikes in the U.S. and 98,000 sold in Canada. Bikes were sold anywhere from September 1999 through April 2015, priced between $480 and $1,640.

    Three reported accidents all included injuries, according to Trek: One accident resulted in the rider being permanently paralyzed in quadriplegia, another in facial injuries and the third in a fractured wrist.

    Trek is advising consumers to immediately stop using the bike and contact an authorized Trek retailer for a free installation of a new quick release lever on the front wheel, as well as receive a $20 coupon from Trek towards any Bontrager brand merchandise.

    Consumers can call Trek toll-free at 800-373-4594 8AM – 6PM Central, Monday through Friday with any questions, or visit www.trekbikes.com and click on Safety & Recalls at the bottom of the page.

    Trek Recalls Bicycles Equipped with Front Disc Brakes to Replace Quick Release Lever Due to Crash Hazard [CPSC.gov]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uMortgage Servicer Must Refund Consumers $48M For Array Of Deceptive Practicesr


4 4 4 9
  • Every once in a while government agencies team up to take down unscrupulous operations that prey on financially vulnerable consumers. Such was the case this week when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission took action against a mortgage servicer that engaged in a assortment of deceptive practices often resulting in consumers losing their homes.

    The CFPB and FTC announced Tuesday that Minnesota-based Green Tree Servicing agreed to pay $48 million in restitution to victims and a $15 million civil penalty to resolve allegations the company mistreated borrowers.

    According to the CFPB complaint [PDF], Green Tree – a national mortgage servicing company specializing in servicing delinquent loans purchased from other lenders – failed to honor modifications for loans transferred from other servicers, demanded payments before providing loss mitigation options, delayed decisions on short sales and harassed and threatened overdue borrowers.

    On a number of occasions, the FTC and CFPB allege that Green Tree – which markets itself as a “high touch” servicer making frequent collection calls –  failed to honor loan modifications that consumers had entered into with their prior servicers and insisted that the consumer pay their original, higher monthly payment.

    The company also purportedly failed to obtain the information and documentation from the prior servicer that was needed to accurately collect payments from consumers, the complaint states.

    Additionally, the servicer allegedly demanded payments before providing loss mitigation options, delayed decisions on short sales, and resorted to illegal practices to collect mortgage payments from consumers who fell behind on their loans, including the use of false threats, repeated calls, and revealing debts to third parties, like employers.

    The Bureau and FTC also allege that Green Tree engaged in deceptive tactics to charge consumers convenience fees, such as $12 for a pay-by-phone service called Speedpay.

    Green Tree representatives would pressure consumers to use the service by telling consumers that Speedpay was the only available payment method to ensure the payment would be received on time, the complaint states. However, in reality, Green Tree accepted other payment methods that did not involve a fee, such as checks and ACH payments, which consumers could have used to make a timely payment.

    In many cases, Green Tree’s failures ultimately led consumers to lose the ability to save or sell their homes.

    In addition to providing consumers with $48 million in redress and paying a $15 million civil fine, Green Tree must engage in other efforts to help consumers affected by its illegal practices.

    For certain borrowers affected by Green Tree’s unlawful practices who were not foreclosed on, Green Tree must convert in-process loan modifications into permanent modifications and engage in outreach, including telephone and mail campaigns and translation services, to contact borrowers and offer them loss mitigation options. Green Tree must halt the foreclosure process, if one is happening, during the outreach and qualification process for these borrowers.

    Under the proposed settlement the company must also create a detailed data integrity program that tests, identifies, and corrects errors in loans transferred to Green Tree to ensure that Green Tree has accurate information about consumers’ loans.

    CFPB and Federal Trade Commission Take Action Against Green Tree Servicing for Mistreating Borrowers Trying to Save Their Homes [Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uCalifornia Bureau Of Consumer Affairs Orders CCI To Stop Enrollment At WyoTech, Everest Campusesr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


вторник, 21 апреля 2015 г.

uFICO Expands Program To Give Millions Of Consumers Free Access To Credit Scores & Reportsr


4 4 4 9
  • Millions of financially struggling consumers who work with qualified nonprofit counseling agencies now have access to free credit scores and credit reports with the expansion of the FICO Score Open Access program.

    FICO announced today that it reached an agreement with Experian – one of the three major credit reporting agencies (CRAs) along with Equifax and TransUnion – to allow millions of consumers who receive nonprofit credit counseling, housing counseling, and other services to obtain a copy of the FICO score that these organizations have purchased.

    Under the current program, counseling organizations have been generally prohibited by contracts with CRAs to give their consumers the credit report or score that was purchased on the client’s behalf.

    According to the CFPB, the no-sharing policy is common practice by business users of credit reports and scores, but when applied to consumer counseling it limits a consumer’s ability to manager or improve their credit standing.

    The expanded program – now known as FICO Score Open Access for Credit & Financial Counseling – aims to aid consumers who have credit management problems by providing their credit scores along with credit education materials designed to help consumers understand credit scoring and learn about responsible financial health management.

    FICO says it began exploring the expansion of the program after being approached by the CFPB about concerns regarding restrictions on consumers’ access to credit information and urged the company and CRAs remove restrictions.

    “Because of FICO’s longstanding commitment to consumer financial education, when the CFPB approached us about enabling credit and financial counselors to share FICO Scores they purchase with their clients, we recognized the importance of working with our data partners to make it happen,” the company says in a statement.

    While the CFPB says in a statement that it is “encouraged by this positive step,” the policy change has no affect on individual contracts between CRAs and counseling organizations that still prohibit the sharing of credit reports with clients.

    “Ending restrictions on sharing credit scores and reports by consumer financial counseling organizations will empower consumers to take more control of managing their credit and help counselors to do their jobs more effectively,” the CFPB says.

    Millions of consumers will now have access to credit scores and reports through nonprofit counselors [CFPB]
    FICO Makes FICO® Scores Available to Financially Struggling Consumers Through Non-Profit Credit and Financial Counselors [FICO]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uSenators Urge Regulators To Block Comcast Acquisition of Time Warner Cabler


4 4 4 9
  • (Consumerist)

    (Consumerist)

    As we head into the final stretch of regulatory review for the pending $45 billion of Comcast and Time Warner Cable — and with the Dept. of Justice possibly prepping to block the deal — a group of U.S. Senators has written to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and FCC Chair Tom Wheeler urging them to prevent these two companies from getting hitched.

    The letter [PDF] — signed by Senators Al Franken (Minnesota), Ed Markey (Massachusetts), Bernie Sanders (Vermont), Ron Wyden (Oregon), Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), and Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) — raises numerous concerns that have been repeatedly brought up by opponents of the merger.

    “Since the proposal was announced last year, we have from consumers across the nation,” states the letter, “all of whom fear that the deal would harm competition across several different markets and would not serve the public interest.”

    The senators say these concerns “center on the undeniable reality that the combined Comcast-TWC would be the overwhelmingly dominant cable and broadband Internet provider in the nation and control much of the programming that Americans watch.”

    With a merged Comcast/TWC controlling 57% of broadband and 30% of cable, the combined company would, according to the letter, “have an ability to defeat competing TV and Internet companies and stifle American innovation across the industry.”

    Given that Comcast owns a major broadcaster and content provider in NBC Universal, the senators say an even bigger Comcast would “have incentives and means by which to extract higher prices from other multichannel video programming distributors and prioritize its own programming over that of competitors.”

    The lawmakers say they have also heard from constituents “who are rightfully frustrated about their increasingly high cable and Internet providers dominating the market, consumers are often left with little choice but to pay the price a given provider demands and have little say over what content is made available to them.”

    The merger will “only make things worse for consumers,” claims the letter.

    “As the FCC and DOJ finalize their reviews of Comcast’s proposed acquisition of TWC, we urge you to defend American competition and innovation and ensure that Americans have affordable access to high-quality telecommunications services,” it concludes. “We hope you’ll take a stand for U.S. consumers and businesses and reject Comcast’s proposed acquisition of TWC.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


u59,203 Pounds Of Trader Joe’s And Al Fresco Chicken Sausage May Be Seasoned With Plastic Shardsr


4 4 4 9
  • applesausageA good chicken sausage is a nice mix of meat, seasonings, and the occasional vegetable in a casing. What is not supposed to be part of that blend of ingredients are shards of plastic, which are harmful to your teeth and don’t taste very good. Sausage sold under the Trader Joe’s house brand and the Al Fresco brand been recalled because it may have that problem.

    What should you look for if, for example, you happen to have bought a freezer full of this sausage while it was on sale like an unnamed Consumerist staffer? The affected products are both apple-maple flavored. Al Fresco is available in regular grocery stores, but the Trader Joe’s brand is only available in their stores.

    alfresoapplesausage

    For the Al Fresco products have the code 9709, and use by/freeze by dates of June 13 or June 20. Affected Trader Joe’s brand, you want to look for case code 9605 and use by/freeze by dates of April 22, April 24, and April 29, 2015.

    They learned about the issue after two customers reported finding plastic pieces in their sausages. The pieces were small, and they weren’t injured.

    Kayem Foods Recalls Sausage Products Due To Possible Foreign Matter Contamination [USDA]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist