четверг, 16 апреля 2015 г.

uFrederick’s Of Hollywood Closes All Stores, Moves Business Onliner



4 4 4 9



  • Just two months ago Frederick’s of Hollywood made plans to shudder one-third of its stores, keeping just 60 locations open. Since then, the company appears to have drastically rethought its “re-engineering” strategy, announcing today that it will close all stores and move to an online-only business model.

    The Los Angeles Times reports that the lingerie store has struggled to keep up with rival Victoria’s Secret in recent years.


    The company announced its new business strategy on its website: “We no longer have store locations. Our online store offers the same selection of products.”


    Moving sales solely online will, in a sense, bring Frederick’s back to its early years. The company began with just one store in the late 1940s, offering only mail order catalogs before expanding into malls in the 1960s, the L.A. Times reports.


    Retail experts say that the move online could be a profitable move for the lingerie store.


    “An online business is nothing more than another retail store without fixed rent,” Ron Friedman, an expert with consulting and accounting firm Marcum, tells the L.A. Times. “They have to really focus and hire people that really understand the online business.”


    Frederick’s of Hollywood closes all stores, strips down to Web [The Los Angeles Times]


















ribbi







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist






uNetflix Bases International Pricing On Country’s Piracy Levelr



4 4 4 9



  • Netflix has rapidly expanded beyond the borders of the U.S. and now has 60 million subscribers worldwide. However the price of Netflix service varies from country to country, and the company says this is due in no small part to local piracy levels.

    “Piracy is a governor in terms of our price in high piracy markets outside the U.S.,” said Netflix Chief Financial Officer David Wells on the most recent quarterly earnings call for the company.


    Netflix recently launched in Australia, where piracy is more popular than in other parts of the world. And while the approx. $9.37/month Netflix charges for HD streaming in Australia is slightly higher than the comparable $8.99/month plan here in the U.S., it’s less expensive than other streaming options in the country.


    “We wouldn’t want to come out with a high price because there’s a lot of piracy, so we have to compete with that,” explained Wells.


    Netflix’s head of content Ted Sarandos said that the best way to combat piracy is to bring Netflix to high-piracy markets. Give people an affordable option with the content they want, and you’ll convert them into paying customers, according to Sarandos.


    “The real great news is that in the piracy capitals of the world Netflix is winning. We’re pushing down piracy in those markets by getting access,” he said during the investor call.


    [via TorrentFreak]


















ribbi







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist






uColorado DOT Installing Fake Arcade Racing Game At Pot Shops To Warn Players Against Driving While Highr



4 4 4 9


  • (CBS Denver)

    (CBS Denver)



    Now that marijuana is legal in Colorado, state officials want to make sure that drivers know it’s not just alcohol that shouldn’t be with you behind the wheel, but pot as well. The state’s Department of Transportation is publicizing that message ahead of the April 20 (4/20) celebrations in the state by way of a fake driving game installed at various dispensaries.

    Officials are warning drivers in the state that they don’t belong the wheel after partaking or puffing as part of their 2015 “Drive High, Get A DUI” campaign, reports CBS Denver.


    Ten Denver dispensaries feature a fake video game called “End Game,” where at first, it seems to be just another racing adventure. That’s until a public service announcement pops up, reminding players that driving while stoned is illegal.


    This, because the CDOT says 20% of drivers who use marijuana in Colorado are unaware they can get a DUI by driving high. Another 50% admit to having driven high — and some of them may gave gotten caught: 12% of the Colorado State Patrol’s DUIs in 2014 related to pot.


    “I don’t think people really realize that you can become just as impaired, it’s just as dangerous, when you drive high verses after consuming a few beers,” Sam Cole with CDOT said.


    In additional efforts to spread the message, CDOT is partnering with Yellow Cab for the 4/20 event in downtown Denver, to have a Cannabis Quiz Cab driving people around.


    “When folks get in the cab, they’re going to be asked questions about the dangers of marijuana and driving. For each question they get correct they’ll get a credit for a future ride,” Cole said.


    New Video Games At Denver Pot Dispensaries Aren’t What They Seem [CBS Denver]


















ribbi







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist






uThe Other Danger Of Online Payday Loans: Identity Theftr



4 4 4 9



  • Many people who seek online payday loans are already in a very vulnerable position when they take on the added risk of the excessive interest rates and often exorbitant fees associated with these short-term loans. But there’s another danger possibly lurking in the payday shadows: Having all their personal and financial data end up in the hands of cyber criminals.


    Bloomberg reports that as millions of consumers turn to online payday lenders – companies known to skirt state laws in order to provide high-interest, short-term loans – for needed lines of credit, they’re also putting their most valuable information up for grabs.


    Cybersecurity experts say that the highly sensitive information online payday lenders and lead generators store – such as names, Social Security numbers, addresses and financial data – have made the companies an increasingly tempting target for hackers.


    While online payday lenders aren’t the only entities to carry such sensitive consumer information, experts say that larger banks often have more robust cybersecurity defenses.


    But even those institutions aren’t exempt from devastating hacks. Just last year, information for 76 million households and 7 million small businesses was compromised in a mega coordinated attack against JPMorgan Chase and other banks.


    And it’s not just consumers who take out an online payday loan that are vulnerable to this kind of breach, those who have simply researched the option or shown interest in the credit have also put their data at risk.


    Lead generators and clearinghouses often collected personal information from consumers looking for payday loans. Those companies then sell that data to actual payday lenders, creating another avenue in which criminals can get their hands on personal data – either through a hack or by purchasing the information.


    In fact, the Federal Trade Commission shut down one such operation that made $46 million by issuing unauthorized payday loans to consumers who had provided their information to a third-party lead generator.


    According to the FTC complaint [PDF], the operation purchased the information from the lead generators and, without approval from the borrower, used it to deposit money — typically between $200 to $300 — in a borrower’s account.


    Once the unauthorized “loan” was deposited, the defendants would then allegedly withdraw recurring bi-weekly “finance charges” of up to $90, quickly racking in millions of dollars.


    Andrew Komarov, president and chief intelligence officer of cybersecurity firm IntelCrawler, tells Bloomberg that criminals accessing consumers’ personal information through online payday lenders is a “new wave of fraud.”


    To illustrate his point, Komarov says that IntelCrawler recently obtained several databases from a seller on a hacking forum who claims to have access to lending information for more than 105 million consumers.


    Bloomberg contacted several consumers on the list and many said their data came from payday loan applications.


    One man told Bloomberg that he was notified last November that two accounts he had with a bank – and had previously provided to a payday lenders – had been hacked multiple times. In all, he says he lost about $1,100.


    Hackers getting their hands on consumers’ personal information through online payday lenders isn’t exactly a new worry for consumer advocates.


    Tom Feltner, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America says that these kinds of breaches highlight a significant threat to the financial system.


    “When you have this amount of information in this level of detail about consumers that may have taken out a loan or are considering taking out a loan, that puts their bank accounts at considerable risk,” he tells Bloomberg.


    Representatives for the online lending industry tell Bloomberg they’re working to expose fraudulent practices, like companies that knowingly sell consumer information to identity thieves. But that could be easier said than done, considering the thousands of online payday lenders working online.


    “The challenge is that people go on lots of different sites—some of those sites are fraudulent sites that are put up there exactly for this purpose: capturing this data,” Lisa McGreevy, chief executive officer of the Online Lenders Alliance, tells Bloomberg.


    While the industry tries to find unscrupulous lenders, consumers are left wondering if their information is up for grabs.


    For advocates like Feltner, the vulnerability of already-struggling consumers’ information is just another reason payday loan reform need to occur sooner, rather than later.


    How Hackers Can Cash In on Your Online Payday Loans [Bloomberg]


















ribbi







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist






uEntrepreneur Wants To Sell Un-Frozen Artisanal Ice Cubesr



4 4 4 9



  • Last fall, we learned that artisanal ice cubes were an actual thing. Bars charge $1 extra for them, and they supposedly melt more slowly, leading to a less watery beverage experience and bragging rights. They cost about $1 per giant cube, and here’s the weird part: they ship unfrozen.


    Wait, what? Why would anyone ship pre-frozen ice to customers, defeating the entire point of buying ice? With artisanal ice cubes, the point isn’t the temperature: freezers are very common, but it’s the formula of the water that’s important for creating ice free of clouds, bubbles, and contaminants.


    This new venture has an interesting background: it’s named after the American “Ice King” of the 19th century, Frederic Tudor, who found a way to preserve and ship massive blocks of ice from New England all over the world during the pre-refrigeration era. One of Tudor’s descendants is an investor in this new venture, and happened to have already trademarked the name “Tudor Ice Company.”


    Here’s the $5.99 question, though: are the un-frozen ice cubes any good? They’re sold in 6-packs that cost $5.99, which is not cheap, but if you’re buying artisanal ice cubes, you’re probably not very cost-conscious to start with. Bloomberg News froze up some samples, and they found them cloudy. Boo. They’ll have to be flawless in order to get anyone interested in this product.


    Going Clear: Artisanal Ice [Bloomberg News]


    HISTORICAL BACKGROUND:

    The Man Who Shipped New England Ice Around the World

    The Development of the Ice Trade [PBS]


















ribbi







  • by Laura Northrup

  • via Consumerist






uVirginia’s Highest Court Says Yelp Doesn’t Have To ID Anonymous Reviewersr



4 4 4 9



  • For nearly two years, we’ve been telling you about the Virginia carpet cleaner trying to compel Yelp to identify seven of anonymous users so that the business could name them in a defamation lawsuit. After Yelp lost legal battles in both the trial and appeals courts, the state’s highest court today ruled in favor of the review site, but only because the subpoena was served in the wrong state.

    A quick recap of this case. In 2012, the carpet cleaner filed suit against seven anonymous Yelp reviewers, claiming they had deliberately and maliciously posted false, negative reviews. The company then subpoenaed Yelp, requesting the real identities of these John Doe defendants.


    Yelp objected, claiming its users’ rights would be violated if they were identified without the plaintiff first proving that certain conditions had been met. In Nov. 2012, a trial court in Alexandria, VA, ordered Yelp to abide by the subpoena and provide the requested information to the plaintiff.


    Yelp offered a compromise — it would investigate the cleaner’s claims while maintain the anonymity of the users pending the outcome of the investigation. The cleaner declined this offer and the court found Yelp in contempt.


    Yelp, working with the advocates at Public Citizen, appealed in May 2013, arguing that a plaintiff must show evidence that a defamation lawsuit has merit before Yelp should be compelled to identify the users. Additionally, there should be a factual showing that the statements made by the John Doe defendants are, in fact, false and defamatory, argued the appeal. But the appeals court again sided with the plaintiff.


    The legal catch-22 in this case involved whether or not the reviewers in question were actual customers of the cleaning service. The company insisted they were not, but obviously could not prove that without being able to concretely identify them. Yelp maintained that the reviews in question were materially no different than other reviews that the cleaner did not contest.


    In its appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court, Yelp argued that while the carpet cleaner claims that the John Doe reviews were written by non-customers, the company has “offered no evidence to support its belief, no description of its investigation… and no explanation of how its investigation led it to that belief.”


    But in the end, today’s ruling doesn’t ponder the First Amendment issues involved in the case. Instead, it looks at whether the carpet cleaner should have issued a subpoena in California — where Yelp and all its relevant files are based — rather than in Virginia.


    The carpet cleaner’s lawyer could have presented a subpoena to the clerk’s office of a California circuit court (along with the proper application and fee, of course), which would have obliged the clerk to issue a California subpoena. But instead, the plaintiff presented the subpoena to a representative of Yelp in Virginia.


    To the Virginia Supreme Court, this is not sufficient to compel a California company that is not a party to the lawsuit to abide by the subpoena.


    “The information sought by [the Plaintiff] is stored by Yelp in the usual course of its business on administrative databases within the custody or control of only specified Yelp employees located in San Francisco, and thus, beyond the reach of the circuit court,” reads the ruling [PDF].


    “Although we were hoping the court would rule on both jurisdictional and First Amendment grounds, this is still an important win,” said Paul Alan Levy, the Public Citizen attorney representing Yelp.


    But this isn’t the end of the matter. While Yelp is no longer obliged to abide by the original subpoena, the carpet cleaner can now go through the process of seeking a subpoena through the California courts.


    If that happens, Levy contends that “those courts will require it to show evidence to meet the well-accepted First Amendment test for identifying anonymous speakers.”


















ribbi







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist






uVeterinarians Warning Pet Owners In Midwest Over Canine Flu Outbreak That’s Sickened Hundreds Of Dogsr



4 4 4 9



  • While we humans dread the arrival of flu season every year, we aren’t the only ones who can get sick by coming into close contact with the fellow members of our species. Veterinarians in the Midwest are warning pet owners over a recent canine flu outbreak, telling them to keep sick pooches away from clinic waiting rooms filled with their furry brethren.

    At least 1,000 dogs in Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio and Indiana have been sickened by the H3N2 strain of the flu virus, reports the Associated Press, though it’s not clear yet how effective current vaccines are against this particular strain.


    Dogs can develop a persistent cough, runny nose and fever, and although the virus can’t jump to humans, cats could fall ill from it as well. A small percentage of pups will develop more severe symptoms, experts say, with some deaths associated to the H3N2 infection.


    Clinical assistant professor Keith Poulsen of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Veterinary Medicine advises pet owners with sick dogs to make arrangements with their vet to schedule a test outside the veterinary clinic, to cut down on the risk of infecting other dogs.


    As such, keeping your sick pets away from anywhere they’d sniff, lick or otherwise interact with their friends is a good idea.


    “It’s really no different if you’re talking about dogs or toddlers, if you think they’re sick, don’t bring them to day care,” Poulsen said.


    Canine flu outbreak sickens hundreds of dogs in Midwest [Associated Press]


















ribbi







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist