среда, 1 апреля 2015 г.

oAirline’s Pilots Warn Passengers Of Safety Concernsw



4 4 4 4



  • In an open letter to their passengers, the pilots of Nevada-based budget carrier Allegiant Air have gone public with their concerns about what they see as sagging service and safety standards for the airlines.

    “[W]e are uncomfortable remaining silent about company practices that negatively impact our customers’ travel and vacation, including your comfort, and – most importantly – your safety,” begins a letter posted on the website for the union representing Allegiant pilots.


    The letter points out that Allegiant is the “most profitable airline in the industry and has had 48 consecutive profitable quarters,” while at the same time experiencing a record number of delays and cancellations, resulting in “the second-highest customer complaint rate out of any U.S. commercial airline.”


    According to the union, management is “content with just barely meeting acceptable safety standards,” and is “driving a race to the bottom in service, safety standards and treatment for veteran pilots.”


    The pilots claim that there are “persistent mechanical problems due to poor equipment and the company’s unwillingness to invest in its operation or its workforce,” and accuses CEO Maurice Gallagher of making millions of dollars while allegedly refusing to invest company money in infrastructure and employees.


    “The company’s profits are propped up by the extra workload placed on its understaffed, underpaid and overworked workforce and its minimalist approach to maintenance and safety,” reads the letter. “Allegiant represents the worst in an economy today where greedy CEOs disregard needed investments into a company’s workforce and infrastructure at the expense of passenger safety and for the benefit of Wall Street.”


    The union, speaking to Skift.com, points to a recent report [PDF] from the Teamsters Aviation Mechanics Coalition (TAMC) that notes several “air returns and diversions related to maintenance-related issues” involving Allegiant’s fleet during Sept. and Oct. 2014.


    “The lack of experience, parts, tooling and training combined with the age of the fleet; roughly 22.2 years, is creating a dangerous paradigm that could eventually lead an accident resulting in serious injury and loss of life,” concludes the TAMC report. “In conversations with some of the pilots it became evident that they are used to flying these aircraft with what they consider ‘nuisance’ issues. A situation such as this creates a ‘Bad Norm’ where a perceived ‘nuisance’ is in actuality the precursor to an accident.”


    The airline and the Teamsters have been at odds for a few years now over issues of benefits and rules involving pilot seniority and scheduling. The union recently voted overwhelmingly in favor of approving a strike.


    “This is not something we prefer to do,” the president of the union, which also represents pilots of 10 other airlines, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “We believe in a progressive approach (to labor negotiations), but this is a sign of how bad it’s gotten and how concerned we are.”


    The airline’s Chief Operating Officer defended Allegiant’s record to Skift.com.


    “Allegiant has one of the best safety records among passenger airlines in the world, and complies with all FAA regulations,” reads the statement from the COO, who adds that the airline is committed to negotiating a contract with our pilots that is “in the best interest of our pilots, as well as our other work groups and the health of our business.”


    The executive accuses the union of engaging in “scare tactics, including manipulating facts in an attempt to manipulate our customers,” and says such actions are “irresponsible and unfair to our customers.”










wow







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist



oLawmakers Receiving Anti-Net Neutrality Messages From People Who Never Sent Themw



4 4 4 4



  • In the wake of the FCC’s vote to adopt the new net neutrality rule, Americans of every stripe have bombarded their lawmakers with feedback. Some applaud the rule; others condemn the action. And that is all well and good: it’s the American system of democracy at work, exactly as designed.

    Except there’s one big problem: a number of messages against the open internet rule seem to be coming from people who say they never sent them, or in fact from unverifiable “people” who don’t seem to be real constituents at all.



    Politico reported this week on a flood of suspect letters reaching certain lawmakers’ offices. The messages all use the same form text, penned by anti-regulation group American Commitment.


    American Commitment boasted this week that it has sent 1.6 million messages to lawmakers, from over half a million Americans (each of whom is a constituent of two senators and one representative).


    And that’s fine. The issue isn’t that the message is a form letter. Plenty of people have trouble with words, and using a template or a form provided by an organization is, overall, probably more common than sending in an original letter. Organizations of every political leaning, representing every possible permutation of concerns, use the same approach.


    The problem is that it doesn’t seem that real, verifiable people living in the actual districts they purport to be from sent the letters.


    Politico points to Rep. Jackie Speier of California, who received a significant number of the anti-net-neutrality messages. Spier’s staff noticed the trend of nearly-identical form letters, and discovered that 98% of them came from constituents who had never communicated with her office before, on any issue.


    So, the Congresswoman’s office did what representatives’ staffs do, and went to reply or reach back out to some of the senders. And that’s when some replied that, no, they’d never sent messages criticizing net neutrality.


    Politico continues:


    [Speier’s] aides pointed to a memo sent to members’ staff last week by Lockheed Martin, which manages the technology behind some lawmakers’ “contact me” Web pages. Lockheed initially said it had “some concerns regarding the messages,” including the fact that “a vast majority of the emails do not appear to have a valid in-district address.” In some cases, Lockheed also questioned the “legitimacy of the email address contact associated with the incoming message[s].”

    Lockheed Martin also noted that the source of the messages was not clearly or currently identified.


    In plain, everyday English, the upshot seems to be: some entity has basically been working a scam on congressional contact forms, to make it look like many more people are pissed off about net neutrality than actually are.


    Phil Kerpen, the head of American Commitment, denied to Politico that his organization had anything to do with sending the fraudulent communications — but did note that several other organizations could have borrowed American Commitment’s language.


    As for messages said to be coming from people who never sent them, lists of contact information, including name, address, and e-mail address, are incredibly easy to come by. They are frequently bought, sold, rented, and traded in the world of politics and nonprofits. American Commitment has rented access to such e-mail lists in the past, but, Kerpen told Politico, did not do so as part of this particular 1.6m comment campaign.


    No matter what the root issue, though, Rep. Speier, is not a fan of any of it.


    “The idea that an outside group could use consumer data to impersonate constituents suggests an attempt to hijack the important feedback members of Congress need to truly represent their districts,” Speier said in a statement. “This is identity theft, but instead of impersonating for financial gain, the originators of this theft are striking at the heart of our representative democracy.”


    Net neutrality emails raise suspicions [Politico]










wow







  • by Kate Cox

  • via Consumerist



oNFL Linebacker Files $20M Lawsuit Against Bank Of America For Alleged Fraudw



4 4 4 4



  • When looking to manage one’s money, it wouldn’t be unusual to seek advice from the financial professionals at one of the country’s largest banks. But an NFL linebacker says his decision to rely on Bank of America to manage his finances cost him millions of dollars and led to the closing of his budding restaurant business.


    Seven-time Pro Bowl linebacker Dwight Freeney, who most recently played for the San Diego Chargers after a decade with the Indianapolis Colts, recently filed a lawsuit [PDF] against BofA and one of its executives, alleging that the bank aided and abetted a fraud scheme that ultimately cost him $20 million, CBS Los Angeles reports.


    “This is a case of conspiracy, criminal fraud, theft and breach of trust in which the nation’s second largest bank, Bank of America, participated in and aided and abetted a scheme to defraud one of its clients,” the lawsuit states.


    According to the 138-page lawsuit, Freeney authorized the bank’s Global Wealth & Investment Management Division to manage his assets, including his company Roof Group LLC in 2010.


    At the time he joined the bank as a client, Freeney’s Roof Group owned and operated the Rolling Stone Los Angeles restaurant and had entered into a licensing agreement with Rolling Stone magazine to open several additional locations.


    However, Freeney claims that over the next two years he was forced to abandon those plans when he became the victim of an “elaborate and malevolent scheme to defraud.”


    The complaint claims that Bank of America was negligent in the scheme for using fraudulent representations, false promises and the concealment of material facts to convince Freeney to become a BOA client and then permitting the act of embezzlement by referred advisors.


    The scheme was allegedly devised and carried out by present and former Bank of America employees acting with several outsiders that had been referred to Freeney.


    Under the recommendation of a Bank of America executive, Freeney says he hired an outside individual as his private banker. Freeney alleges that his advisor failed to reveal the woman was unlicensed and unqualified to serve in that capacity.


    The lawsuit further alleges that Bank of America lied to Freeney about the true identity of the man brought on as a financial advisor. The complaint claims the man used a false name to conceal the fact he was previously linked to real estate fraud, forgery and theft, among other accusations.


    During the course of the scheme, Freeney says he was lied to, misled, manipulated and had more than $8.5 million misappropriated from his accounts by the bankers and advisors appointed to his team.


    Actions related in the scheme included the breaches of fiduciary duty, the theft of millions of dollars of Freeney’s personal funds and conversion of Roof Group’s assets, the purchase of $55 million in worthless life insurance and payment of illegal kickbacks in connection with them, unauthorized disclosure and use of Freeney’s personal, financial, tax and account information, and money laundering transactions to promote and conceal the scheme.


    In 2012, two of the scheme perpetrators were arrested after fraudulently wiring $2.2 million out of Freeney’s account. The scammers were hit with federal wire fraud charges. The FBI arrests were aided by information reported by Freeney and another informant.


    A spokesman for Bank of America tells CBSLA that the bank did not play any role in the alleged scheme.


    “The two people responsible for this wrongdoing have already been convicted,” the spokesperson said. “The primary wrongdoer never worked for the bank or any of its affiliates and the other person committed her criminal conduct after she left Merrill Lynch in 2010.”


    In all, Freeney is seeking $20 million to compensate his loses and additional punitive damages.


    NFL Linebacker Alleges Bank Of America ‘Aided & Abetted’ $20M Fraud Scheme [CBSLA]










wow







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist



oImpersonating A Police Officer To Cut Into Drive-Thru Line Frowned Upon By Actual Policew



4 4 4 4



  • As badly as you think you want that burger and fries, is jail time really worth getting it a few minutes faster? A Texas man is facing some heat from the police after an off-duty officer said he saw him impersonating law enforcement to skip ahead of other customers in the drive-thru line at Whataburger.

    The real officer says the suspect used sirens and flashing flights on his truck, outfitted in law-enforcement

    style to cut the line, reports the Associated Press.


    According to the actual police on the scene, the vehicle was made to look like an unmarked police unit, and the suspect was wearing a uniform. That made the officer think perhaps he was a volunteer firefighter.


    After seeing him beat others to the food, the officer followed the suspected impersonated to some apartments nearby and confronted him. The man allegedly confessed to not being police, and added that he used the lights and sirens to speed through traffic lights as well.


    He was charged with impersonating an officer and released on bond. Hope that burger was worth it.


    Odessa man allegedly posed as officer to cut in Whataburger drive-thru [Associated Press]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oPizza Hut Menu Additions Failing To Generate Additional Salesw



4 4 4 4


  • One of the 21 Pizza Hut menu options we sampled back in late 2014.

    One of the 21 Pizza Hut menu options we sampled back in late 2014.



    A few months back, Pizza Hut announced a complete menu revamp, adding a bunch of new crusts, drizzles, toppings and whatnot to their regular slate of pizzas. We sampled 21 of these additions ahead of their release, though we weren’t exactly blown away, and it looks like we weren’t the only ones unmoved by the changes.

    Earlier this week, the nation’s largest Pizza Hut franchisee, which operates 1,277 Pizza Hut along with more than one hundred Wendy’s, announced its quarterly earnings and said that the “new ‘Flavors of Now’ positioning did not deliver the sales momentum that we had anticipated.”


    In fact, sales for the quarter were down 3.5%. That said, the franchisee’s CEO says the company still believes in the new flavors; it’s just a matter of getting the world to actually try them.


    He contends that these “Flavor of Now” menu options offer a “diverse flavor platform that better connects with millennials and provides the brand a leveragable point of differentiation,” but admits “there is much work to be done to bring more awareness” of the revamp.


    “In fact, consumers who have tried our new flavors have a higher propensity to return to Pizza Hut when compared to those who have not tried the new flavor options,” he explained, according to Nation’s Restaurant News. “However… it is clear we need to increase the awareness of the positioning and the related consumer benefits in the marketplace, especially with our core user, in order to achieve the desired result of increased market share and organic sales growth.”


    The franchisee’s statements echo those made last month by curiously Australian Yum Brands CEO Greg Creed, who said that “the initial relaunch of the Pizza Hut brand in the U.S. did not deliver the sales lift we expected.”


    Pizza Hut franchisee: ‘Flavors of Now’ relaunch yet to gain traction [NRN.com]


    Pizza Hut’s Largest Franchisee Says Menu Revamp Hasn’t Helped Sales [Entrepreneur.com]










wow







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist



oUber Driver Accused Of Returning To Burgle House After Dropping Off Passenger At The Airportw



4 4 4 4



  • Having a complete stranger know where you live is always a risk, but it’s one we’ve all learned to take for the sake of practicality — how else are you supposed to get anywhere if you don’t have the means to drive yourself, after all? But police in Denver say that risk turned into attempted burglary, when an Uber driver picked a woman up from her home, took her to the airport, and then returned to her house to try to break in.

    According to investigators, the suspect is an Uber driver who’d given a woman a lift to the airport and then circled back to her home, likely thinking it’d be empty, reports 9News (warning: link has video that auto-plays).


    But the woman’s roommate was home during the burglary attempt around 1 p.m. in the afternoon, and allegedly caught the man trying to break in through the back of the house.


    Police say the suspect was unaware there was a roommate involved, and after realizing someone was home, he left. The victim had taken a screenshot of her receipt showing the driver’s picture, however, and sent it to her roommate, who identified the driver as the man who tried to break in.


    He was arrested yesterday, and could face a criminal attempted burglary charge.


    Uber responded via a spokesperson who said the company “takes rider safety very seriously and upon learning about this incident, we reached out the rider. We immediately removed the driver’s access to the Uber platform, pending an investigation. We continue to be in contact with the rider and will assist the authorities in whatever way we can.”


    Uber driver in alleged burglary case arrested [9News]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oFAA Once Again Fines Southwest Airlines For Maintenance Related Violationsw



4 4 4 4



  • For the second time in the last 12 months, Southwest Airlines is facing another fine from the Federal Aviation Administration because of safety issues; this time totaling $328,550.

    The Dallas Morning News reports that the latest fine covers two 2013 instances in which the FAA claims Southwest violated federal aviation regulations.


    The first case – which received a penalty of $265,800 – involved a plane that lost cabin pressure during a flight from Boston to St. Louis in May 2013.


    The FAA alleges that mechanics for the airline failed to do a mandatory inspection for damage and to ensure the depleted oxygen bottles were replaced after the flight landed. Despite this failure, the FAA claims Southwest operated the plane on 123 flights before completing the inspection on June 3.


    “Additionally, the airline allegedly operated the aircraft on May 14 and 15 flights with two of the four portable oxygen units unserviceable,” the FAA claims. “A minimum of three were required under the conditions of Southwest’s Minimum Equipment List (MEL).”


    In the second case, the FAA alleges that mechanics improperly deferred repairs and failed to log issues regarding air leaking from an air conditioning unit on one of Southwests’ AirTran Airways planes.


    The incident stemmed from a report from a pilot who had operated the flight and saw ice and water coming from the plane’s galley vent.


    According to the FAA, over the next few weeks, the plane remained in service while maintenance technicians replaced several components in an attempt to correct the issue. However, those attempts did not follow the FAA-approved maintenance procedures.


    The FAA said in a statement that Southwest has requested a meeting with the agency to discuss each case.


    For its part, a spokesperson for Southwest tells The Dallas Morning News that issues only concerned two specific planes and that both were repaired appropriately upon discovery.


    “These items were fully resolved some time ago and are not currently an issue for aircraft being operated by Southwest Airlines,” the spokesperson said. “We are committed to continuous enhancements to our internal maintenance procedures, with a focus on Safety in all aspects of our operations. We make every effort to ensure that our fleet is maintained in accordance with applicable regulations and is aligned with best practices in the industry.”


    The proposed fine is just the latest safety and maintenance related obstacle Southwest has faced in the last year.


    Back in February, the airline had to cancel dozens of flights after learning that one-fifth of its entire fleet was overdue for necessary maintenance checks. In all, the airline had to ground 128 planes pending inspection, but reached a deal with the FAA that allowed the jets to continue flying.


    The airline is also currently battling the FAA on a $12 million fine related to improper repairs going back as far as 2006. When the fine was first reported in January 2014, FAA investigates said they found three separate incidents in which Southwest and its hired contractor improperly repaired aircraft.


    Southwest refused to pay the fine, and in November the U.S. government filed a lawsuit seeking the payment. That case is still pending.


    Southwest Airlines faces $328,550 in additional fines from Federal Aviation Administration [The Dallas Morning News]










wow







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist