четверг, 7 января 2016 г.

uTaco Bell Teases New Menu Item By Not Providing Any Details On Itr


4 4 4 9
  • (Mike Mozart)

    What’s the best way to get people trying to guess your secret? By telling them you’ve got a secret and leaving the rest to their imagination. That seems to be the tactic for Taco Bell’s latest plan to drum up hype for a new menu item.

    Taco Bell (kind of) announced on Thursday that it will introduce “what could be its biggest food creation yet” to the world via a commercial during the Super Bowl on Feb. 7.

    The heavily redacted press release (see below), which looks more like some Hoover-era FBI file than a fast food chain ad, offers virtually no details on what the new item might be.

    TB’s upcoming Super Bowl ad will mark the fast food company’s return to the big ad game after last airing a promotion during the event in 2013.

    “We aren’t revealing details of our spot until the big game, but we will have ways for our fans to engage with us in the weeks leading up to Super Bowl 50,” Chris Brandt, chief concept and brand officer for Taco Bell, tells Business Insider. “This build up will pay off with one of the most exciting announcements from the Taco Bell brand to date.”

    While Taco Bell is certainly hoping to get people talking, there’s always the slight chance that it’s overselling the announcement.

    In October 2014, the company inexplicably marked the launch of a new pre-ordering app by blacking itself out on the Internet. That ploy fell a bit flat, resulting in more questions than excitement.

    For those of you who like playing the guessing game, or just want to see what an unhelpful news release looks like, here’s the TB announcement:

    TB PR

    [via Business Insider]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPredictions About Bad Weather Hurting Retailers Didn’t Come True At JCPenneyr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uAt Least 16 NJ Towns Left With Failing Phone Service While Verizon Dithers On Repairing Copper Wiresr


4 4 4 9
  • (chrismar)

    Verizon has made it very clear that they have no interest in maintaining or upgrading their aging, legacy copper-wire networks. If they were replacing them all with fiber that would be one thing, but according to residents and officials in at least 16 New Jersey towns, that’s not what’s happening. Instead, municipalities are just seeing their entire communications infrastructure left to rot, to the point where you can’t even make a phone call on a rainy day.

    The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that the towns in a rural part of southern New Jersey have had it with their poor quality of service. The aging copper lines that service their community hum, crackle, or flat out go dead during inclement weather (which is not uncommon in the northeast or mid-Atlantic), and they want Verizon to take their complaints seriously and come fix it already.

    It’s not that residents in this section of the state are unwilling to upgrade, they say; it’s that they aren’t being given a choice to. The old copper-wire infrastructure is the only choice they’ve got, since Verizon isn’t bringing fiber-optic services out their way. Meanwhile, there aren’t enough cell towers in the area to make wireless signals strong or reliable. And as for cable competition, Comcast serves, part, but not all, of the area.

    A Hopewell Township resident said that his phone has a “hum” on sunny days, doesn’t work at all in the rain, and that Verizon won’t extend DSL service to him. Cable service stops a mile from his home. “This is 2016, and I can’t get the Internet,” he complained to the Inquirer.

    The towns formally filed their complaint about deteriorating service with the state Board of Public Utilities in late November of last year. A Verizon spokesman told the Inquirer that the company has checked its customer service reports, and found that the service quality meets the required state standards. However, Verizon will be meeting with the mayors of the 16 towns over the next month to hear more about their concerns.

    “In three to five years, there will be no dial tone, and what recourse will residents have?” an official from Hopewell Township said to the Inquirer. “The scariest thing is that this is New Jersey, which is the most densely populated state in the country, and if we can’t get 100 percent wired-out, good luck to other states.”

    Granted, parts of New Jersey are less populated and more spread-out than others, and the section in question is indeed a rural area. But the entire state is only 70 miles wide and 170 miles long, and it’s flanked on both ends by major urban centers. Only three other states (Rhode Island, Delaware, and Connecticut) are smaller. We aren’t exactly talking the great wide spreads of Montana or South Dakota, here.

    It’s no secret that Verizon wants nothing to do with maintaining its aging copper-wire infrastructure anymore, nor is it unusual for Verizon not to care what its legacy-tech-using customers think — especially, for some reason, those in New Jersey.

    Twice last year, the company made headlines for threatening customers with complete termination of service unless they consented to switch from copper wiring to modern fiber. Meanwhile when Verizon does roll out their fiber upgrades, as they have done in the northern part of New Jersey, they have been accused of skipping low-income areas.

    The union that represents the maintenance workers who actually install and repair the older lines has accused Verizon of deliberately letting them go to rot. And when residents in southern New Jersey complained last year about the degradation of their network, a Verizon spokesman actually said that “people are going to look back and laugh” at those customers and their concerns.

    16 S. Jersey towns to Verizon: Fix our copper phone lines [Philadelphia Inquirer / Philly.com]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uBad News For Naruto: Monkey Can’t Hold Copyright On Infamous Selfier


4 4 4 9
  • The monkey seen in this image is actually the one who pressed the button on the camera. Copyright law forbids a non-human animal from holding a copyright, so many believe the image is in the public domain. PETA claimed that monkeys like Naruto should be treated no differently than if a human had snapped the picture. A federal judge disagrees.
    The years-long saga of the “monkey selfie” may have rolled to a quiet end in a federal court in San Francisco yesterday after a judge tentatively ruled that Naruto the macaque photographer does not hold the copyright to images he snapped on a stolen camera more than four years ago.

    A quick refresher for those who don’t know the story behind the above image. In 2011, photographer David Slater was shooting pics of macaque monkeys in Indonesia when one of them — supposedly Naruto, though some now claim it was actually a different monkey — grabbed one of Slater’s cameras and fired off several photos, most of them blurry and useless. But among those images was the above self-portrait.

    After Slater posted the image and the story behind it online, a number of people began using it without permission. Against Slater’s repeated takedown demands, the image eventually ended up in the Wikimedia Commons collection of 22 million images and videos that are free to use.

    Supporters of its inclusion in the collection — including the Wikimedia Foundation — argued that the monkey was the actual author of the photo; Slater just owned the camera. And since U.S. copyright guidelines explicitly forbid non-human animals from holding copyright, they contend that the image is in the public domain.

    In Sept. 2015, animal rights organization PETA filed suit in a federal court, arguing that Naruto should be granted copyright, as the photo in question “resulted from a series of purposeful and voluntary actions by Naruto, unaided by Slater.”

    The lawsuit also accused Slater of violating Naruto’s copyright by making money from the sale of books that include the self-portrait.

    But after hearing arguments in the case this week, U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick issued a tentative opinion [PDF] that doesn’t look good for hipster monkey shutterbugs out there.

    Pointing to a previous federal appeals court ruling — Cetacean Community v Bush, a case involving the legal standing of sea mammals (whales, dolphins, etc) to bring suit against the U.S. government — Orrick notes that Congress and the President do have the authority to extend the protection of law to animals as well as humans, but that “there is no indication that they did so in the Copyright Act.”

    Without legislative or executive guidance, this matter is in the hands of the Copyright Office, which has made it clear that only humans can hold copyright in the U.S.

    The judge’s decision does not directly impact Slater’s ongoing attempts to plant his copyright flag on the photo.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uUber Settles With NY Attorney General Over 2014 Data Breachr


4 4 4 9
  • (afagen)
    Ride-hailing services have vital information about both their drivers and their readers on file. For drivers, they have license and vehicle information, as well as personal information used for payment. For passengers, a location-based app knows where users are, creating a Marauder’s Map of cars and people in a city. NeW York State has settled with ride-hailing company Uber for $20,000 over a 2014 breach, and the company also agreed to encrypt and limit access to passenger location information.

    “God View” was a tool that would allow Uber staff to see every user on the system, giving them the ability to track someone in a vehicle in real time. While that might have useful customer service applications, when the tool’s existence was revealed in a 2014 Buzzfeed story, many users weren’t comfortable with the existence of the tool or potential misuses.

    A reporter for that site was riding to Uber headquarters in a car hailed using the service, and the local general manager was waiting for her at the door. He explained that he had tracked her arrival using God View, knowing the exact time she would be arriving at the door. Users of the service were understandably uncomfortable to learn about this.

    That’s not what the $20,000 settlement is for, though. In an unrelated privacy issue, hackers gained access to information about the service’s drivers, including their names and license numbers.

    “I strongly encourage all technology companies to regularly review and amend their own policies and procedures to better protect their customers’ and employees’ private information,” AG Eric Schneiderman said in a statement.

    Uber drivers are neither customers nor employees; they’re independent contractors, which is the subject of a class action lawsuit against the company in California that will be tried later this year.

    Uber Reaches Accord With New York Over Tracking Rider Data [Bloomberg]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uGoogle Fixes Bug In Online Tool After It Started Translating “Russian Federation” To “Mordor”r


4 4 4 9
  • mordorGoogle says it’s addressed a bug in its online translation tool after it started translating the words “Russian Federation” to “Mordor.” This matters, of course, because Mordor is the name of a fictional region in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth, as described in the Lord of the Rings books by other names like The Land of Shadow. Unlike Russia, you can’t just walk into Mordor.

    Other errors — including translating “Russians” to “occupiers” — were introduced to Google Translate’s Ukrainian to Russian service automatically, Google said, according to the BBC.

    The terms mirror language used by some Ukrainians after Moscow annexed Crimea in 2014. Social media users have been sharing screenshots of the erroneous translations in recent days. Google Translate works by looking for patterns in hundreds of millions of documents, but perfect translation may elude it when the meaning of words is tied to the context in which they’re used, the company explained.

    “Google Translate is an automatic translator — it works without the intervention of human translators, using technology instead,” said Google in its statement. “This means that not all translations are perfect, and there will sometimes be mistakes or mistranslations. We always work to correct these as quickly as possible when they are brought to our attention.”



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uTime Warner Cable Warns 320,000 Customers Their Email & Passwords May Have Been Breachedr


4 4 4 9
  • (PROLyman Green)

    Hundreds of thousands of Time Warner Cable customers received alerts this week telling them to change their email passwords after law enforcement officials notified TWC that hackers may have gotten their hands on this sensitive information.

    Reuters reports that TWC was notified by officials with the FBI that some customers’ email addresses, including passwords, “may have been compromised.”

    While the company hasn’t determined how the information was obtained, TWC says the email and password details were likely gathered either through malware downloaded during phishing attacks or indirectly through data breaches of other companies that store TWC’s customer information.

    “Approximately 320,000 customers across our markets could be impacted by this situation,” Eric Mangan, director of public relations, tells Venture Beat. “To protect the security of these customers, we are sending emails and direct mail correspondence to encourage them to update their email password as a precaution.”

    Mangan says the company will post a notice on its website that includes tips for how customers can navigate the Web more carefully and how to avoid phishing schemes.

    TWC will contact customers who may have been affected by the possible breach individually and help them reset their passwords.

    The possible hack of TWC emails comes about two months after Comcast said it reset the passwords for about 200,000 email customers because of a similar leak.

    The list of emails and corresponding passwords made up roughly 590,000 accounts. However, Comcast determined that nearly 60% of that information was for inactive accounts, leaving just 200,000 compromised customers.

    A rep for Comcast said the company’s security teams are certain that none of its systems or apps had been compromised.

    A copy of the alert sent out by TWC to affected customers

    Time Warner Cable says up to 320,000 customers’ data may have been stolen [Reuters]
    Time Warner Cable advises 320,000 customers of possible hack [Venture Beat]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist