среда, 6 января 2016 г.

uBye Bye Puking Rainbows: Snapchat Shuttering Lens Storer


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2016-01-06 at 12.53.22 PMTwo months after Snapchat opened the Lens Store to offer users the option to jazz up their self-destructing messages, the company is shutting down the venture. 

    Snapchat announced the change in a support notice on its site Wednesday, noting that while the Lens Store would cease to exist starting Jan. 8 (this Friday), it’s not doing away with the so-called lenses — which add special effects and sounds to messages — completely.

    Instead, the company says it will still offer users about 10 free lenses each day, including some that are sponsored by movies, companies, and other organizations, Mashable reports.

    The Lens Store, which launched in November, allowed users to purchase special effects filled add-ons for $0.99 each.

    Snapchat says that some of the company’s most popular lenses – you might be familiar with the puking rainbow – will eventually be available through its free offerings.

    Still, the company warns that it plans to change the free offerings on a regular basis, and that users can’t actually save those options for later use.

    Snapchatters who previously purchased lenses through the Lens Store will continue to be able to use them.

    [via Mashable]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uNetflix Goes Live In More Than 130 New Countries (But Not China)r


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2016-01-06 at 12.55.17 PMIn the span of an hour this morning, Netflix more than tripled the number of countries in which it offers service, effectively serving everywhere in the world with one huge exception: China.

    When we woke up this morning, Netflix was available in around 60 countries, which is a pretty big feat for any company that has to deal with the insane logistics of streaming video to customers around the globe. There’s not just the technical issues of delivering the data, but also acquiring content and making sure it’s licensed correctly in each market.

    This morning, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings ended his keynote address at CES International by saying that the number one question he gets asked when traveling the world is “When is Netflix gonna come here?”

    Then, said Hastings, “While we have been here on stage at CES, we switched Netflix on in Azerbaijan, in Vietnam, in India, in Nigeria, in Poland, in Russia, in Saudi Arabia, in Singapore, in South Korea, in Turkey, in Indonesia, and in 130 new countries.”

    Hastings acknowledged the vast hole that is China, saying that “we hope to also be [there] in the future.”

    Netflix had been largely unavailable to the continents of Africa and Asia, but today’s additions mean that the company is now streaming to every continent — including Antarctica.

    Likewise, the previously omitted Central and Eastern portions of Europe are now included under the Netflix umbrella.

    Missing from the list of countries are Crimea, North Korea, and Syria. Federal restrictions prevent U.S. companies from doing business in these corners of the world.

    With new countries come new languages. Netflix was already available in 17 different languages around the world but today added support for Arabic, Korean, Simplified and Traditional Chinese.

    “Today you are witnessing the birth of a new global Internet TV network,” said Hastings in a statement released after the keynote. “With this launch, consumers around the world — from Singapore to St. Petersburg, from San Francisco to Sao Paulo — will be able to enjoy TV shows and movies simultaneously — no more waiting. With the help of the Internet, we are putting power in consumers’ hands to watch whenever, wherever and on whatever device.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uWill This Biofeedback Sleep Hat Improve Your Slumber?r


4 4 4 9
  • sleephatNightcaps–as in hats that you wear while sleeping, not sipping booze before bedtime–have gone = out of style with the spread of central heating, but maybe it didn’t have to be that way. For $150, an actual product that’s on the market promises to use biofeedback to monitor your brain waves and lull you to sleep, which is apparently a thing that people really want in a device.

    The Sleep Shepherd was funded on Kickstarter back in 2014, and we’re glad to see a crowdfunded project successfully reach the market. Does the Sleep Shepherd actually work, though, and is it worth $150?

    The company itself uses studies on 20 adults and 15 adolescents to prove its efficacy, which isn’t a very large sample. Our hard-napping colleagues down the hall at Consumer Reports put the cap on one tester, who found that it was cozy, but functioned pretty much as a personal white noise machine. You can get a nice white noise machine for less than $150, and tuning your radio to static is even free.

    This ad on the Sleep Shepherd site compares the lives of couples who do and don't use the product. It's pretty harrowing.

    Amazon reviews for the size “medium” hat are mixed, averaging three stars. “The night before anything significant, this device is no match for my racing brain and just adds to my misery while staring at the side of my eyelids,” writes one reviewer who gave the device only one star. “It’s possible it may have helped me achieve a deeper state of sleep when my mind wasn’t racing to begin with.”

    The Sleep Shepherd is not advertised as a medical device, and therefore not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. We have to question the company calling their product an “all-natural sleep aid” when it’s a hat with speakers and little electronic box on top of your head, since that is not a thing found in nature. That claim is apparently because the cap is meant to mimic the feeling of sleeping in a hammock without needing to hang hooks from your ceiling.

    Can the Sleep Shepherd Sleeping Cap Lull You Into Sweet Slumber? [Consumer Reports]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uReport Finds That As E-Cigarette Ad Spending Increases So Does Teens’ Use Of The Devicesr


4 4 4 9
  • As e-cigarette makers increase their ad spending, more teens have started using the devices.

    About 2.4 million teens smoked e-cigarettes last year, and that number is poised to rise, thanks in part to the tens of millions of dollars device manufactures have poured into advertisements for the products, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

    The agency’s Vital Signs report found that more than 18 million young people see e-cigarette advertising in stores, online, in newspapers and magazines, or on television and in movies, increasing the likelihood they’ll eventually pick up one of the devices.

    In fact, the report, which is based on a 2014 survey of 22,000 children and teens, found a correlation between increased ad spending and the number of teens who are using e-cigarettes.

    The industry has rapidly increased marketing spending from $6.4 million in 2011 to $115 million in 2014, according to the CDC report.

    During that same time period, e-cigarette use in the past 30 days increased from less than 1% to almost 4% among middle school students and from less than 2% to 13% among high school students.

    “Exposure to e-cigarette advertisements may be contributing to increases in e-cigarette use among youth,” the CDC hypothesizes.

    According to the CDC, the continued uptick in advertising of e-cigarettes threatens to undo decades of campaigns that focused on keeping teens away from tobacco products.

    That’s because e-cigarette ads use many of the same themes – independence, rebellion, and sex – used to sell cigarettes and other conventional tobacco products.

    Teens says they see nearly the same amount of ads on TV, online, in stores and in magazines or newspapers. {click to enlarge}

    “The same advertising tactics the tobacco industry used years ago to get kids addicted to nicotine are now being used to entice a new generation of young people to use e-cigarettes,” CDC Director Tom Frieden, said in a statement. “Kids should not be using e-cigarettes and yet two-thirds of kids in this country are seeing e-cigarette ads.”

    In all, the CDC report found that 68.9% of middle and high school students see ads from one or more media sources.

    Most see e-cigarette ads in retail stores – about 54.8% – while about 39.8% view ads online. Similarly, nearly 36.5% of teens see the products on TV or in movies, and 30.4% reported viewing ads in newspapers and magazines in the last year.

    The CDC and health advocates warn that if advertising, and other aspects of the e-cigarette industry aren’t regulated soon, more and more young people will be drawn to the devices.

    “The irresponsible and indiscriminate marketing by the e-cigarette industry, coupled with a complete lack of government oversight, is putting the health of our nation’s kids at risk,” Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, tells NBC News. “It shouldn’t be a surprise that youth use of e-cigarettes has skyrocketed when kids are being inundated with marketing for these products.”

    E-cigarettes have become increasingly popular in recent years, while the Food & Drug Administration has been slow to implement federal regulations.

    While we wait for a final verdict on the FDA’s proposed regulations over e-cigarettes, the CDC suggests states and communities can do more to protect their youngest residents from the devices and the advertisements that go along with them. Those strategies include:

    • Limiting tobacco product sales to facilities that never admit youth,
    • Restricting the number of stores that sell tobacco and how close they can be to schools,
    • Requiring that e-cigarettes be sold only through face-to-face transactions, not on the Internet, and
    • Requiring age verification to enter e-cigarette vendor’s websites, make purchases, and accept deliveries of e-cigarettes.

    “States and communities can also help reduce youth tobacco use by funding tobacco prevention and control programs that address the diversity of tobacco products available on the market, including e-cigarettes,” Corinne Graffunder, director of CDC’s Office on Smoking and Health, said in a statement. “We know what works to effectively reduce youth tobacco use. If we were to fully invest in these proven strategies, we could significantly reduce the staggering toll that tobacco takes on our families and communities.”



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uFather Claims 10-Year-Old Daughter Experienced “Uncomfortable” Two-Minute TSA Pat-Downr


4 4 4 9
  • (via Today show)
    While it’s normal for travelers to undergo additional screening procedures from the Transportation Security Administration when there could be something amiss, the father of a 10-year-old girl says she was made uncomfortable by a two-minute pat-down after she left a juice pouch in her carry-on.

    The San Diego man says his daughter was thoroughly patted down by a female TSA agent for almost two minutes at Raleigh-Durham International Airport, an experience he said clearly made her feel uncomfortable.

    “She just had a completely blank stare on her face,” he told the Today show. “I could tell it was very uncomfortable for her.”

    Agents swabbed her bag after discovering the juice — which exceeds TSA limits for how much liquid can be brough on a plane — and got a false-positive reading for explosives on the bag. The pat-down followed.

    “What was going through my mind is, ‘This is annoying, I don’t like this, I want to run out of the door,'” the daughter told the show.

    According to TSA protocol, “Modified screening procedures are in place to reduce the likelihood of a pat-down.”

    “TSA screening procedures allow for the pat-down of a child under certain circumstances,” the agency said in a statement. The process by which the child was patted down followed approved procedures.”

    In this particular situation, TSA said the process was observed by her parent, and that a cell phone alarm sounding in her bag required additional checks.

    But her dad says the rules should be changed when it comes to young children. He’s contacted his congressman and will file a formal complaint against the agency, he says.

    “Maybe they need retraining. Maybe they did everything by the book. I don’t really know, but it was an uncomfortable situation,” he said.

    Father Outraged By ‘Uncomfortable’ TSA Pat-Down on 10-Year-Old Daughter [Today]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uESPN Admits: Tweets By Adam Schefter & Chris Mortensen Were Unmarked Ads For Domino’sr


4 4 4 9
  • Schefter's Tweet should have been flagged as an ad for Domino's, but someone goofed and failed to mention this sponsorship.
    Plenty of famous people post Tweets, Facebook updates, and Instagram photos where they mention a product or company name that they truly enjoy. But if those celebs are getting paid to slap their name on these messages, they need to be transparent about it. A pair of sportscasters at ESPN apparently missed that memo when they recently name-dropped Domino’s Pizza on Twitter.

    In the lead-up to New Year’s, during which ESPN aired a seemingly endless string of college football bowl games, both Adam Schefter and Chris Mortensen appeared to have a hunger for the same brand of mega-chain pizza:

    What are the odds of both sportscasters feeling so overwhelmed by a need for Domino’s that they needed to mention it on Twitter within 24 hours of each other? Pretty slim, thought the folks at Deadspin, who checked with ESPN.

    Lo and behold, the network confirmed that these Tweets were indeed bought and paid for by Domino’s — they just happened to forget to mark the Tweets as advertisements, as required by the FTC Act.

    Celebrities are learning that if they get paid to shill a product on their social media channels, they are going to be held to the same standards as traditional ads.

    Earlier this year, Kim Kardashian was caught by the FDA blabbing about a prescription morning sickness medication without (A) revealing that it was a paid endorsement, and (B) providing any of the required disclosures about the drug’s effects. She ultimately had to post a lengthy mea culpa on Instagram with the information she’d omitted.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uStar Wars Monopoly Game Getting Female Character After Allr


4 4 4 9
  • "C'mon Rey! I said I was sorry... I didn't ask to be made a Monopoly game piece!"
    Hasbro recently explained that the reason it didn’t include the main character from Star Wars: The Force Awakens in its new Star Wars-themed Monopoly game wasn’t because she was a female, but because it didn’t want to spoil info about her character that was already quite obvious from the trailers. But now that everyone and their goldfish has done their mandatory 135-minute duty and watched the movie, Hasbro is going to add a woman to the Monopoly mix.

    “We love the passion fans have for Rey, and are happy to announce that we will be making a running change to include her in the Monopoly: Star Wars game available later this year,” a rep for Hasbro tells EW.

    Now that this is settled, perhaps Hasbro can do something about moving Des Moines back to Iowa?



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist