пятница, 18 декабря 2015 г.

uGift-Wrap Shrink Ray: Walmart’s Labels Are A Little Smallerr


4 4 4 9
  • walmart_labelsIt’s not just food that the Grocery Shrink Ray hits: we’ve seen it strike everything from grooming products to warranties. We haven’t ever seen a Christmas label shrink ray, though, until Dave sent these pictures comparing labels purchased at Walmart during different years.

    “Thought the new ones had less room to write on!” he wrote. Both of these are packages of 100 labels for $1.99, and the newer one on the left definitely gives users a little bit less room to write on. The older package seems significantly larger because the cardboard backing is so much bigger, but the labels still shrank.

     



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uAuthorities Looking Into Just How Many State Jackpots May Have Been Fixed By Former Lottery Workerr


4 4 4 9
  • (Lisa Brewster)
    Remember the ex-lottery worker from Iowa who was convicted of rigging a state jackpot so he’d win $14 million? Authorities aren’t quite sure his insider scheme was limited to his home state, and have expanded the investigation into other parts of the U.S.

    The former security director of the Des Moines-based Multi-State Lottery Association was convicted in July after prosecutors said he installed a secret software program in the system’s computers that would pick winning numbers. He then enlisted a friend in Texas to buy a ticket with those numbers to skirt state law, which says lottery employees can’t play the lottery.

    Authorities accused him of tampering with drawings in four states over six years, the Associated Press, and investigators are now expanding the inquiry nationwide to see if he could’ve cast an even larger net.

    Thus far, state lotteries in Colorado, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma have confirmed they paid jackpots worth $8 million to the man’s associates, including his old college roommate. To make sure they haven’t missed something, investigators are going over payouts in the 37 other states and U.S. territories that used random-number generators from the MSLA.

    “It would be pretty naive to believe they are the only four” jackpots involved, said now-retired Iowa deputy attorney general Thomas H. Miller, who oversaw the investigation for 2 ½ years. “If you find one cockroach, you have to assume there are 100 more you haven’t found.”

    Jackpot-fixing investigation expands to more state lotteries [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uOne Day After Arrest For Securities Fraud, Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli Resignsr


4 4 4 9
  • (frankieleon)
    A day after he was arrested as part of a securities-fraud investigation, Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli is no longer the company’s head executive.

    Though you may know Shkreli best as the guy whose company bought the rights to a generic drug used to save lives and dramatically increased the price from $13.50 to $750 overnight, a boost of more than 5400%, he’s now facing charges related to his time running a hedge fund and working at a company called Retrophin.

    Today, Turing announced that Shkreli has resigned, and that company chairman Ron Tilles will fill the role of interim chief, reports the New York Times, noting that Tilles was a founder and worked in business development at Retrophin.

    One Turing investor who spoke to the NYT said Shkreli’s arrest and indictment made it untenable for him to stay at the helm.

    “I don’t see how he can run this company anymore,’’ said the anonymous investor. “There’s no way it doesn’t hurt the company.’’

    Shkreli has been charged with illegally taking stock from Retrophin, a company he started in 2011, and using it to pay off debts from unrelated business dealings. He pleaded not guilty to the charges of securities fraud yesterday and was released on $5 million bail.

    Martin Shkreli Resigns From Turing Pharmaceuticals [New York Times]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCoolest Company President Ever Warns Employees Not To Ruin ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ For Everyone Elser


4 4 4 9
  • If your mouth runs, you better run.
    If you’ve been shunning social media and refusing to speak to anyone who’s already seen Star Wars: The Force Awakens, you aren’t alone. But you also know how difficult it can be for anyone to keep their traps shut around the water cooler (seriously, I find your lack of restraint disturbing). That’s why the coolest company president we’ve ever heard of made sure to step in and prevent life-ruining chatter before it starts.

    Yesterday, workers at Pittsburgh-area moving company Starck Van Lines received a very important memo about workplace policy from the president, warning anyone with early tickets to the movie to zip those lips or face the consequences, reports Jerry Barca at Forbes.com.

    The whole thing is pretty great:

    From: Steve Starck
    Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 1:29 PM
    To: Starck Group
    Subject: Star Wars No Disclosure Policy (SWNDP)

    To All:

    It has come to my attention that several employees who shall remain nameless have tickets to early showings of Star Wars: The Force Awakens in the next couple of days. Please note that discussing this movie prior to receiving the “all clear” from management on the property of Starck Van Lines is strictly prohibited and will result in disciplinary action up to and including immediate termination. Any communication, including written, electronic, or verbal, to management of the company, specifically myself, will also be considered a violation of the Star Wars No Disclosure Policy (SWNDP).

    May the Force Be With You,

    Steve Starck
    Jedi Master
    Force Awakens

    Barca notes that Starck won’t actually give anyone the boot, he just doesn’t want a few chatty folks to ruin the fun for everyone else.

    “Everyone is excited. I didn’t want that excitement to end up spoiling the experience for anyone else,” he told Forbes.

    One Company’s Workplace Rules For Seeing ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ [Forbes.com]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uIsis Pharmaceuticals Changes Name To Ionis Pharmaceuticals For Some Reasonr


4 4 4 9
  • This is Isis, not ISIS. (Paul Jones)
    It’s a problem when you choose a name for your company that, a few decades later, comes to mean something else entirely. The company Isis Pharmaceuticals chose the name of an Egyptian goddess associated with good health, only to find that the public’s knowledge of Egyptian mythology is weak, and that most people associate the name with a jihadist militant group.

    The name ISIS is already associated with Islamist terrorism in the public imagination, so the company decided to look for a new name. Ionis has the key advantages of still starting with “I” and ending with “S,” and not being the name of any of the participants in the civil war in Syria.

    The company’s founder and CEO said that the name change came because she was tired of addressing the name issue in interviews and everyday conversations. “To spend any time during a four-minute TV interview, for example, discussing our name,” he told Forbes, “rather than focusing on how exciting things are at Isis today with three drugs finishing Phase 3 development and a pipeline of 40 drugs, just makes no sense.”

    The name change also means that the company gets the cool stock ticker symbol IONS, so that’s a bonus to what must be a very annoying situation.

    Drug company opts for new name, dropping ISIS [CBS News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uControversial Cybersecurity Bill Makes It Into Omnibus, Will Basically Be Law Any Minute Nowr


4 4 4 9
  • capitolWe are rapidly running out of 2015 left to spend, and so the two houses of Congress have been racing to pass an omnibus spending bill that will keep the government funded and the lights on. Because that bill is a must-pass piece of legislation, all kinds of crap has been added, taken away, and snuck back in as we come down to the wire. Among the other bills that have been tacked on is a controversial piece of cybersecurity legislation that has privacy and consumer advocates worried all around.

    The bill in question is the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (S. 754), called CISA. Wired noticed late Wednesday that CISA had snuck into the latest, and final, version of the bill.

    MORE: WHAT IS CISA? HOW DOES IT WORK? WHAT DOES IT DO?

    CISA is supposed to enhance cybersecurity, in the wake of all the hacks and breaches we’ve become used to living with, by promoting data-sharing. But that sharing concerns privacy advocates, because it’s functionally limitless… and also funnels straight to the NSA.

    As Wired reports, the language that made it into the omnibus is actually even worse than the last version of CISA we saw clear the Senate earlier this year. The new edition allows for agencies like the FBI and the National Intelligence director to create online portals, where companies will hand information directly to law enforcement and intelligence instead of first going through Homeland Security. The omnibus version also changes the permission for sharing from “imminent threat” to “specific threat,” meaning that timeliness is no longer a factor and agencies can search or cherry pick data for any specific terms.

    The EFF continues to oppose the language, as do other advocacy groups, but the omnibus easily passed in the House and then the Senate earlier today, and is headed to President Obama’s desk as quickly as possible, where it will be signed and become law.

    Congress Slips CISA Into a Budget Bill That’s Sure to Pass [Wired]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uFDA Proposes Regulations That Would Keep Minors Out Of Tanning Bedsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Evil Erin)
    Though a slew of states already have regulations in place that prohibit minors from using indoor tanning beds and sunlamps, the federal government is proposing new rules that would keep anyone under the age of 18 from getting their glow on in tanning salons.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced the proposed rules — which will be available for public comment for 90 days starting Dec. 21 — aimed at protecting public health by preventing minors from using sunlamp products, as well as reducing the risk of using indoor tanning tools for adults.

    The first proposed rule would restrict the use of sunlamp devices to folks 18 years and older. Any adults going for a tanning session for the first time, as well as every six months afterward, would have to sign a risk acknowledgement certification that says they’re aware of the risks to health that could result from tanning.

    The second rule the FDA proposed would require sunlamp manufacturers and tanning facilities to take extra steps to improve the overall safety of these devices, with changes like making warnings easier to read and more prominent on the device; implementing an emergency shut off switch or “panic button”; improving eye safety by adding requirements that would limit the amount of light allowed through protective eyewear, and other measures.

    “Today’s action is intended to help protect young people from a known and preventable cause of skin cancer and other harms,” said acting FDA Commissioner Stephen Ostroff, M.D. “Individuals under 18 years are at greatest risk of the adverse health consequences of indoor tanning.”

    Though Ostroff concedes that the FDA understands some adults might still decide to tan indoors, the proposed rules are mean to “help adults make their decisions based on truthful information and to ensure manufacturers and tanning facilities take additional steps to improve the safety of these devices.”

    As the FDA notes, indoor tanning is a known contributor to skin cancer, including melanoma, and other skin damage. Despite that fact, 1.6 million minors tan inside each year, based on data in the 2013 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

    California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas and Vermont ban the use of tanning beds for all minors under 18.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist