среда, 9 декабря 2015 г.

uMcDonald’s All-Day Breakfast Is Bringing Back Customers, But Don’t Expect Full Menu Anytime Soonr


4 4 4 9
  • Unfortunately, most McDonald's customers can only make this McGriddle tower before 10:30 a.m. (photo: Morton Fox)
    It’s been two months since McDonald’s began offering an all-day breakfast menu — which includes most popular early morning items, but not everything — nationwide. A new report indicates that the idea has been successful in luring back some lost McD’s customers, but not so successful that we’ll all be able to get McGriddles on our way home from work.

    A new study from the NPD Group [via WSJ.com] found that 1-in-3 people who purchased McDonald’s breakfast during the afternoon or evening hadn’t eaten at McDonald’s at all in the previous three months, indicating that the chain is either luring in new customers or wooing back some who had given up on McD’s.

    The lunch hours appear to be the biggest time for people to chow down on McMuffins and the like. Interestingly, 61% of the receipts that include breakfast items also include non-breakfast food. NPD research also indicates that the size of McDonald’s lunch receipts since the offering of all-day breakfast has increased. That could mean that the offerings are bringing in people to eat with their friends, family or co-workers, who may have gone elsewhere because they don’t like McDonald’s non-breakfast foods.

    While these results are promising — at least in the short term; no telling if these afternoon breakfast customers were happy enough to make McD’s a regular thing again — it doesn’t mean McDonald’s is yet willing to take the risk of offering the full breakfast menu at all hours of the day.

    BurgerBusiness.com noticed that a McDonald’s franchisee in North Carolina was Tweeting customers to say that the full menu would be offered “in the future,” but if so, that’s news to McD’s HQ. The company tells Burger Business that there are no nationwide plans to offer the full menu. However, if a franchisee wants to try it, that’s up to them.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uVW Claims Carbon Dioxide Emission Issue Only Affects 36,000 Vehicles, Not 800,000r


4 4 4 9
  • (Eric Arnold)

    In early November, Volkswagen added to its mounting emissions scandal by announcing that an internal investigation had found that nearly 800,000 vehicles may have issues with carbon dioxide emissions resulting in inflated fuel efficiency. But now, the carmaker says its was all just a big misunderstanding: only a fraction of those cars are actually affected. 

    VW announced today that irregularities in CO2 levels and fuel efficiency were found in only about 36,000 vehicles, Reuters reports.

    “Only a small number of the model variants of new cars will have the catalogue (CO2) figure slightly adjusted,” VW said.

    The CO2 problem was found during the company’s ongoing review of processes and workflows in connection with diesel engines. Investigators found that CO2 levels and fuel consumption figures for some models were set too low during the carbon certification process. VW never disclosed which vehicles were affected by the new issue.

    “Based on present knowledge around 800,000 vehicles from the Volkswagen Group could be affected,” the company said in a statement at the time. “An initial estimate puts the economic risks at approximately two billion euros (about $2.19 billion).”

    Changes to the second emissions scandal plaguing the carmaker likely means it will no longer face the previously reported economic risk of two billion euros (about $2.19 billion).

    “The negative impact on earnings… has not been confirmed,” VW said. “Whether we will have a minor economic impact depends on the results of the remeasurement exercise.”

    News that the carbon emissions issue affects far fewer vehicles comes just two weeks after reports surfaced showing that VW knew of the problem years ago. German Publication Bild am Sonntag reported last month that VW executives were previously made aware that many of its vehicles were less fuel-efficient than advertised, even pulling one of the vehicles from the market because of the discrepancy.

    While the findings related to carbon dioxide emissions might bring a bit of relief to VW and owners of its vehicles, the company has yet to gain approval for any of its planned remedies for 11 million vehicles worldwide that contain “defeat devices” used to cheat nitrogen oxide emission standards.

    VW’s CO2 cheating affects far fewer cars than feared [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uBill To Ban The Use of Microbeads In Personal Care Products Nationwide By 2019 Passes Houser


4 4 4 9
  • microbeadsWith several states and companies passing or currently considering rules to stop the use of tiny microbeads in beauty products, the nation as a whole has been playing catchup. After at least one failed attempt to pass a measure to keep the microscopic plastic spheres from going down the drain and possibly into the stomachs of our seafood, the House passed legislation this week that would ban the use of the products. 

    The Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 [PDF], which would phase out the use of microbeads in consumer products over the next several years, passed the House on Monday via voice vote, indicating widespread support in the legislature.

    Under the bill, a ban on manufacturing products with the beads, the first step, would begin on July 1, 2017, followed by product-specific manufacturing and sales bans in 2018 and 2019.

    The bill’s definition of a microbead — “any solid plastic particle” less than five millimeters in size intended for use as an exfoliant — also closes a potential loophole that environmental groups feared could keep the small spheres in use: simply using a different kind of plastic.

    “As someone who grew up on Lake Michigan and represents a large chunk of Michigan coastline, I understand firsthand how important it is to maintain the beauty and integrity of our Great Lakes,” Representative Fred Upton, who co-sponsored the bill, said in a statement.

    A companion measure for the House bill is currently waiting for review by the Senate Health, Education, and Labor Committee.

    The small bits of plastic, often found in face washes, soaps and toothpaste, have become a hot topic for lawmakers and environmentalists in recent years, with many states taking action to end the use of microbeads.

    A report issued by the New York Environmental Protection Bureau last year outlined just how unsafe the small plastic pieces can be.

    According to the report, after microbeads are washed from our bathrooms, they easily travel through wastewater treatment plants and enter our waterways. The tiny beads then act as sponges for toxic chemical pollutants and become an attractive snack for marine wildlife. And because we humans often like to eat seafood, that means there’s a pretty good chance the spheres could end up in your stomach.

    Despite the findings, legislation to phase out the use of microbeads state-wide has passed the New York Assembly twice in the last two years, but has stalled in the Senate both times.

    Last year, Illinois became the first state to pass an ordinance that would gradually fade out the use of microbeads beginning in 2017 and ending in 2019.

    The state bill even had the cooperation of product manufacturers. An official with the Chemical Industry Council of Illinois said at the time that the quick deal resulted from unique circumstances, and the availability of substitute ingredients, such as oatmeal and sea salt.

    Earlier this year, the state of California voted to phase out the use of microscopic exfoliating beads in personal care products sold in the state.

    Michigan also considered a ban on the use of the beads this year. MLive reports that legislators debated the bill, but failed to reach a consensus.

    The issue hasn’t just been on the minds of activists, either. Several major manufacturers, such as Proctor & Gamble, Unilever and Colgate-Palmolive, have pledged to phase out use of plastic microbeads.

    In February 2014, L’Oréal said it would begin phasing out the materials this year in their Biotherm products and continue with Body Shop products in 2015. All of the company’s products are expected to be microbead-free by 2017.

    U.S. House approves bill to ban microbeads [MLive]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uReturn Of Crystal Pepsi Confirmed, But You Can’t Actually Buy It (Yet)r

вторник, 8 декабря 2015 г.

uPatti LaBelle’s Sweet Potato Pies Are Back At Walmart, Company Calls It A “Christmas Miracle”r


4 4 4 9
  • pie_walmartThanksgiving may have come and gone, but that doesn’t mean Walmart’s ready to give up on the celebrity pie fever that swept the country last month. No siree. Instead, the company says it has restocked the unusually popular Patti LaBelle-branded sweet potato pie — with an assist from some two million pounds of sweet potatoes. 

    CNBC reports that the new shipment of pies will be delivered to Walmart stores across the country in the next two weeks.

    The announcement was made by Walmart CEO Doug McMillon on Instagram, with the exclamation “They’re Back!”

    (Doug McMillon)

    Walmart’s director of corporate communications, John Forrest Ales, confirmed the news to CNBC, noting that “it took about two million pounds of California-grown sweet potatoes to deliver this Christmas miracle.”

    The pies became something of a sensation last month with the big box retailer unable to keep the dessert (or not dessert?) on the shelves.

    Celebrity pie fever was the brainchild of Kinna Thomas, senior buyer for cakes and pies at the store, who wanted to improve the chain’s desserts. She began the process of sending her family sweet potato pie recipe to its mass-baking suppliers to find the best pie.

    Then, somehow LaBelle – who is apparently known for her sweet potato pie – added flourishes to Walmart’s version before it went into mass production.

    While the pie has been for sale nationwide since spring, it didn’t gain traction until recently thanks to a combination of a few things: fall began, Thanksgiving approached, and a much lesser-known singer than Patti LaBelle posted a video review on YouTube that became a viral sensation, turning the pie itself into a viral sensation.

    Ales tells CNBC that in the 72 hours after the video went viral, the company sold one pie per second.

    “At the end of November, the pies were the most-requested item across all Walmart Wish Lists,” he said, noting that the pies will now be available all year.

    Patti LaBelle Sweet Potato Pies are back at Wal-Mart [CNBC]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uStarbucks Again Offering The Chance To Win Free Coffee Every Day For Life (Which Really Means 30 Years)r


4 4 4 9
  • (emilybean)

    If you weren’t one of the lucky 14 customers to win free Starbucks for life (psych! it’s really one free drink and food item each day for 30 years) last year, then you have a shot at redemption, as the coffee giant is once again unleashing its “Starbucks for Life” sweepstakes. 

    Starbucks announced the second year of its holiday-timed, rewards member-only contest on Tuesday, marking the start of the program.

    Unlike last year, when there were 14 winners — 10 in the U.S., three in Canada and one in the U.K. — this year’s version of the contest only includes five “Starbucks for Life” grand prizes.

    It’s unclear if the grand prize is still valued at $54,000, applies only to the U.S., Canada, and U.K., or if it includes an engraved card made of 10K hammered gold. We’ve reached out to Starbucks for comment on these issues and will update this post when we hear back.

    Other prizes for this year’s contest include 25 winners of Starbucks for a year, 125 winners of Starbucks for a month and 500 winners of Starbucks for a week.

    In addition to changing up the quantity of grand prize winners, the new version of the sweepstakes takes on a bit more of a game persona than its previous edition.

    Starbucks rewards members earn one game play in the sweepstakes by making a purchase at a store with a registered card or the Starbucks Mobile App.

    The member then goes to starbucksforlife.com and logs in using their My Starbucks Rewards credentials to play the game for the chance to win instant prizes, like bonus stars, or a game piece to place on their game board for the chance to win Starbucks for a day, a week, a month or a lifetime, the company says.

    The promotion ends January 11, 2016.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uBoeing Unveils New 737 That Can Fit 11 More Passengers In Coach; Fate Of Travelers’ Knees Uncertainr


4 4 4 9
  • (Boeing)
    The first of Boeing’s new 737 Max airplanes has made the journey from planned concept to reality, with the company quietly celebrating its debut Tuesday. But there’s still one question on everyone’s minds — are my knees going to be knocking against other fliers?

    The company held a little party for its employees with a few media in Renton, WA, to celebrate the arrival of the first 737 MAX, which rolled off the line at the end of November. It’s the biggest upgrade to the company’s top-selling, single-aisle jet in 19 years, notes Reuters, and boasts new engines, more-aerodynamic wings and winglets, and cockpit displays lifted from the 747.

    It’s also supposed to burn 20% less fuel than the previous line of 737s from the 1990s, which likely has many carriers seeing dollar signs. The first test flight is scheduled for early 2016, but the first delivery, to Southwest Airlines, isn’t slated until mid-2017.

    That gives us some time to ponder the inevitable about one of the other benefits the airplane manufacturer touted to carriers: the possibility of cramming 11 additional seats into coach by adding an extra exit door.

    At the time, Boeing’s executives said it would be up to each airline whether or not to crowd passengers with two inches less for their knees or not.

    “With this, we’re just giving our customers another option to make more revenue,” a Boeing rep said in July. “If their routes can take this additional capacity, then that’s more revenue for them.”

    We reached out to Southwest to ask if the airline would be taking advantage of that potential moneymaker, or if it’d be saving some room for tall people to exist. We’ll let you and your knees know if we hear back.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist