пятница, 6 ноября 2015 г.

uToyota Will Stop Using Takata’s Ammonium Nitrate Airbagsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Mike Mozart)

    The hits just keep coming for Japanese auto parts maker Takata. After being fined $70 million by regulators over the company’s failure to report airbag defects and losing its largest customer in Honda, Takata now has to say goodbye to some of Toyota’s business.

    Toyota president Akio Toyoda says the company will stop using Takata’s ammonium nitrate airbags in its vehicles, The New York Times reports.

    The company says it is placing “top priority on ensuring the safety and confidence of our customers.”

    On Wednesday, Honda – which made up about 10% of the part maker’s global sales – said it would discontinue using Takata’s airbag inflators in any new models under development and accused the supplier of manipulating test data.

    The carmaker said in a statement that it was “deeply troubled” by evidence that suggested Takata “misrepresented and manipulated test data for certain airbag inflators.”

    Following Honda’s move, other automakers, including Fuji and Mitsubishi, announced they were considering dropping the part’s maker.

    Carmakers’ decision to drop Takata’s products come just a day after the parts maker was fined $70 million by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for its failure to properly alert regulators to airbag issues.

    The company has agreed to phase out the use of ammonium nitrate in its inflators by 2018 and faces an additional $130 million fine if it doesn’t comply with NHTSA orders or if new violations are found.

    Toyota to Drop Takata as Supplier of Airbag Inflaters [The New York Times]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAfter Less Than A Year, Verizon Pulls Plug On Affordable WiFi For Alabama Schoolsr


4 4 4 9
  • The OmniLynx website is still up, but the school district notified current customers that their service is slated to be terminated as of Nov. 30.
    Not even a year has passed since the rollout of OmniLynx — an effort by the Huntsville, AL, school system to provide city residents with affordable WiFi access — and the school’s partner, Verizon is already pulling the plug.

    For $47.75/month (without a contract), OmniLynx users got a free Verizon LTE hotspot and unlimited data access. At first, it was available to just Huntsville school system employees before being expanded to cover students and their families, then anyone in Huntsville. The school tells AL.com that around 1,900 people have signed up since OmniLynx launched in January, and that around 120 a day were signing up until last week, when Verizon brought down the hammer.

    On Oct. 30, Verizon informed the school district that it had gone “beyond the terms of the agreement” and was canceling the partnership.

    The school district informed OmniLynx customers of the bad news this week.

    “We regret to inform you that your wireless service will terminate effective November 30, 2015,” reads the letter to customers, according to WHNT-TV. “This termination of service and any resulting inconvenience has resulted from the service provider, Verizon Wireless… and its decision to discontinue its support of the program. Needless to say, this circumstance is unfortunate and we are disappointed by Verizon’s decision – particularly in light of the fact that Verizon publicly endorsed and applauded the OmniLynx program less than one year ago.”

    In response to the Verizon notice, Huntsville schools superintendent Dr. Casey Wardnyski told AL.com that Verizon’s “concern for education was dwarfed by some other concern.”

    It appears that Big V wasn’t thrilled that OmniLynx use had expanded beyond the borders of the Huntsville area.

    But Wardnyski says that view is “short-sighted” and that the intention was to always expand the program and offer unlimited data.

    “Verizon had the capability to limit the service area,” he explains.

    The school district tells WHNT that it will try to find another partner for the service.

    For its part, all Verizon has said thus far, is that “Verizon has and will continue to discuss this situation directly with Huntsville City Schools.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uSugar Plum-Flavored Marshmallow Peeps Are An Actual Thingr


4 4 4 9
  • I have to admit, I’m not much of a candy historian, and I’ve always pictured “sugar plums,” when mentioned in the literary canon, as prunes covered with crunchy sugar. This is, of course, wrong, but in the case of a new holiday-themed Peeps brand product, at least the crunchy sugar part is correct.

    This exists.

    The historical sugar plum, like the ones represented by a nice fairy in the ballet “The Nutcracker,” was a candy of hardened sugar around a nut or seed. Back when candy was handmade, the sugar plum was a difficult confection to make and a pricey treat to buy. Receiving some for Christmas would have been a special treat, then. Similar candies became cheaper to make in the era of culinary mass production, but classic Christmas literature has left us with the 17th-century term, and no candy to associate it with.

    The scrambling of the historical candy name, the traditional association of sugar plums with Christmas, and our anachronistic tendency to insert the actual fruit where it never was has led to something weird: sugar plum marshmallow Peeps, which are purple, probably because Just Born didn’t feel like giving the world a lecture on candy history. That’s our job.

    They are artificially flavored, which I assume means thy have a vaguely plum-like taste. They are covered with fudge and available only at Target this holiday season.

    COMING SOON: Sugar Plum Delight Peeps [The Impulsive Buy]
    Sugar Plums: They’re Not What You Think They Are [The Atlantic]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uTarget Believes Porn That Played Over California Store’s PA System Come From An Outside Sourcer


4 4 4 9
  • (Mike Mozart)

    A few weeks ago, shoppers at a California Target received an unsettling surprise when the unmistakable sounds of professional coitus aired loud and clear over the store’s PA system. While an investigation into the incident continues, the retailer believes the pornographic audio originated from an outside source. 

    The Minnesota-based company has so far determined that no employees were involved in the disturbing broadcast, The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports.

    A spokesperson for Target says that “there is absolutely no indication that any team members were involved” in the incident and that the company now believes the recording didn’t originate inside the store.

    Although it’s still unclear just how someone infiltrated the store’s PA system in order for the raunchy recording to be heard.

    “We’ve taken steps to prevent it from happening again,” the spokesperson tells the Star Tribune, noting that the investigation continues into finding the source.

    The Oct. 14 incident was caught on video – and posted on YouTube and Facebook [warning: language NSFW] – by a woman shopping with her young twin sons when she realized there was something coming out of the store’s speakers that shouldn’t have been.

    “What is going on at Target right now?” the woman asks in the video, as a female actress’ voice sighs “Oooh, yeah…” as well as what the shopper calls “very explicit foul language.”

    The shopper wrote that the noises went on for about five minutes, while the store’s workers ran around trying to stop the recording.

    The Star Tribune reports that the October incident isn’t the first time the retailer has run into issues with explicit recordings playing over the PA system.

    Back in July, the same issue occurred at a store about 185 miles away from the most recent location, while two other episodes allegedly happened in the state in April and September.

    Target believes audio porn played in Calif. store was from outside source [Minneapolis Star Tribune]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uLeaked Comcast Doc Admits: Data Caps Have Nothing To Do With Congestionr


4 4 4 9
  • (knittinandnoodlin)
    For years, as Comcast and others have rolled out data caps on home broadband usage, we’ve shown evidence that these artificial limitations on data are all about squeezing money out of consumers, and have nothing to do with congestion. Now, with Comcast prepping to make its first large-scale push of its “data thresholds,” we’re seeing how the company is telling its employees to spin the discussion.

    In documents leaked online yesterday, Comcast explains to customer service staff the details of the data cap expansion we told you about earlier this week.

    In addition to explaining the pricing plans and limitations for each of the affected markets (you can read the docs in full here: p.1; p.2; p.3; p.4; p.5; p.6), it contains a section on frontline customer service should and should not say about the caps:
    comcasttalkingpoints

    You’ll notice a few things here. First, they’ve finally given up on the “data threshold” nonsense that Comcast has tried to force onto the media. Instead, reps are being told to just call them “Data Usage Plans.”

    But the biggie is the last one, where reps are instructed to not use congestion as an excuse. As you can see in the document, it explicitly states:
    Don’t Say: “The program is about congestion management.” (It is not.)

    That parenthetical was not added by us. This is an admission by Comcast that its data cap has absolutely nothing to do with easing the load on its network.

    Instead, it’s — according to the script — about “Fairness and providing a more flexible policy to our customers.”

    We’ll give you a second to wipe off your screen from the spit-take you might have just done while reading that.

    The reps are also told to not use the term “unlimited” to describe the access that Comcast customers in the rest of the country still enjoy. That’s because Comcast is now selling an “Unlimited” option to capped customers that lets them pay even more — upwards of $35/month on top of their existing bill — for broadband access.

    Rather than label the not-yet-capped customers as “unlimited,” reps are told to explain that those lucky Comcast customer still have a 250GB/month data limit — but that “we are not currently enforcing this policy.”

    The fact is that broadband is no longer about checking e-mail or watching YouTube clips. Walk into most homes in America and you’ll find multiple non-computer/phone connected devices — thermostats, lights, TVs, speakers, alarm systems, crockpots — and it’s a trend that isn’t going to reverse itself.

    For years, Comcast and other ISPs could blame edge-case data hogs — video pirates, people who ran their own online gaming servers — and say “Why should you have to subsidize their use of your Internet?”

    But between the increased use of connected devices and online video — and the higher quality of those video streams — a growing number of consumers are going to reach that monthly data limit, presenting Comcast and others with an opportunity to measure just how much these people will be willing to pay for unfettered access.

    In 2013, former FCC Chair-turned-cable-industry-frontman Michael “Stop Asking Me About My Famous Dad” Powell exhorted cable providers to move with “some urgency and purpose” to introduce data caps before it was too late. It looks like Comcast has heeded this call.

    [via DSLreports]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uLawmakers Open Inquiry Into College Accreditation Agenciesr


4 4 4 9
  • (bluwmongoose)

    One might assume that a college accreditation is an indicator the school has met high standards for education and financial security. But as the recent collapse of Corinthian Colleges demonstrated, this is not always true. In an effort to ensure that America’s students aren’t duped into racking up huge debts to pay for substandard schools, lawmakers are looking to improve the oversight of accrediting agencies.

    Earlier this week, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations opened an inquiry into higher education accreditation by requesting records from several agencies, Insider Higher Ed reports.

    The committee notes in a letter [PDF] sent to Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) – one of the largest national accrediting agencies – that it is “reviewing the role that accreditors play in assessing the quality and financial health of postsecondary institutions and programs.”

    ACICS, which provided accreditation to CCI schools up until its collapse in April – has until Nov. 13 to provide the subcommittee with all documents and data about the colleges it has accredited in the past 10 years.

    While the committee has yet to make its inquiry public, ACICS confirmed it had received the information request, Insider Higher Ed reports.

    “ACICS will comply in a timely fashion,” he said. “The council looks forward to working with the subcommittee to improve and strengthen the accreditation process.”

    The committee’s inquiry comes just weeks after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau requested documents from ACICS related to its accreditation of for-profit colleges.

    The Bureau’s request was part of its investigating into possible “unlawful acts and practices in connection with accrediting for-profit colleges,” according to Insider Higher Ed.

    Senate Inquiry Into Accreditation [Inside Higher Ed]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uMarketers Are Robbing ‘Black Friday’ Of Any Meaning That It Ever Hadr


4 4 4 9
  • (Michael Holden)
    A few years ago, Consumerist looked around at the retail landscape and the nascent nationwide trend of stores opening up on Thanksgiving Day, and we wondered whether it was time to put a modern twist on an initiative from the Great Depression. President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried to move Thanksgiving up a week to lengthen the retail season, which didn’t catch on. Why can’t we just leave Thanksgiving where it is and move Black Friday up a week?

    That proposal didn’t catch on in 2012. Not directly. Instead, marketers have decided to pick their own weekends to start blowout sales, or to just declare the entire month “Black November.”

    No, really. Here’s an actual e-mail that we received from a deals site sending in a story pitch:

    black_november

    Can something “officially” begin if it doesn’t really exist? I don’t even know. What I do know is that big-box stores are getting into the Franksgiving spirit already. Best Buy is holding a pre-Black Friday sale at a few hundred of their stores tomorrow, and they are calling it exactly that. The deals aren’t doorbuster-quality, but they’re pretty impressive.

    The following weekend, Walmart-owned warehouse club Sam’s Club is joining the fun, holding its own pre-Black Friday sale with some nice deals on TVs and other gadgets.

    We’re not saying that these are bad sales and that you shouldn’t check them out if you’re in the market for a MacBook or a new TV, but pummeling consumers with the concept of “Black Friday” beginning after Halloween could very well backfire. The phrase “Black Friday” has become pretty much meaningless at this point, since it’s employed more or less monthly to describe other sales.

    septemberbf

    blackfridayspringhorz

    This Target mailer went out in July 2013:

    redcard

    There was a dark time when Home Depot was holding monthly Black Fridays.

    One goal of spreading out sales is to avoid the early morning danger and mayhem that happens when people are desperate to get their hands on a cheap TV. That’s a nice thought, but probably not why marketers are out to rob America’s favorite soulless shopping frenzy of all meaning.

    The only ever meaning that Black Friday really ever had was “CHEAP STUFF!” so this will eventually backfire.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist