четверг, 5 ноября 2015 г.

uCharmin Shaves A Fraction Of An Inch Off Wet Wipes For Adultsr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


среда, 4 ноября 2015 г.

uTarget May Hire Outside Company To Help Actually Keep Grocery Items In Stockr


4 4 4 9
  • (Nicholas Eckhart)
    Target has gradually added more food to their store inventory over the last decade or so, and that’s an area where they want to grow. The problem is that as their food selections have grown, they’ve created a patchwork supply chain to get food items into stores. That’s inefficient, and has left some Target stores with empty shelves. The company’s solution may be to hire someone else to help.

    That’s how they’re handling another facet of their grocery business, after all, partnering with Instacart for delivery service and Curbside for curbside pickup. That will mean more grocery business if both services expand nationwide and let Target sell more groceries online, but in order to do that, they need to able to keep items in stock.

    Reuters reports today that Target is considering hiring a wholesaler or even another retail company to help them with these problems. Target wouldn’t name any candidates or even specify when they might bring on partners in the future, but analysts have some possible candidates: competitor SuperValu in Minneapolis has a wholesale grocery business, and other companies whose names you wouldn’t recognize since they aren’t consumer-facing could also get the job.

    Exclusive: Target considers outside help for fresh food business [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uGirl In England Claims McDonald’s Served Her A McFrog Wrapr


4 4 4 9
  • (Jacki Vance-Kuss)
    A few years ago, when frogs and pieces of frogs began turning up in frozen vegetables all over the country, we came to refer to any unwanted animal or animal part found in one’s food as “free frogs.” The term literally came true in Wales last week. A 10-year-old girl says that she took a great big bite of frog in her wrap over the weekend, but McDonald’s claims that it’s “unlikely” that the frog was put in there along with the vegetables.

    McDonald’s UK is one of the chain’s current successes, winning over customers by serving fresher food and cutting back on ingredients, the same formula that the chain is hoping will work over on this side of the Atlantic. McDonald’s even imported their UK CEO, Steve Easterbrook, to run the entire company earlier this year.

    McDonald’s wraps consist of chicken and sauce with a generous helping of lettuce and other vegetables. The family says that their daughter took a big bite of her wrap that included the frog, spat out what seemed like a gristly piece of chicken, and then freaked out when she saw a frog.

    They didn’t bring the wrap back because they were traveling, and instead contacted customer service later. They offered a refund, but not an apology, which bothered the girl’s dad. Also, they wanted the wrap and the frog to investigate.

    Little crunchy raw unboned real dead frogs don’t often appear in salads in the UK, apparently, and a McDonald’s spokesperson told The Sun that the frog most likely didn’t get wrapped in the wrap at the restaurant. “Our wraps are freshly prepared when ordered and it is extremely unlikely this originated from our restaurant and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise at this stage,” they explained.

    The girl rather understandably doesn’t want to go to McDonald’s anymore. Neither does the rest of the family. They’re holding on to the wrap instead of surrendering it to McDonald’s, which is kind of a problem. “It’s all wrapped up in an outside fridge at the moment,” the girl’s mother explained. “It’s starting to smell but we need to preserve it.”

    Dead frog ‘found in McDonald’s chicken wrap’ by horrified 10-year-old girl [Mirror]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uMPAA Celebrates The Shutdown Of Two Sites Accused Of Circulating Pirated Moviesr


4 4 4 9
  • (TroyMarcyPhotography.com)
    The Motion Picture Association of America is doing a happy dance right now at the news that two online services that distribute movies and TV have been shuttered: Popcorn Time, which streams content from torrent sites and is sometimes called “Netflix for pirates,” and YST, a site that has pirated editions of movies using BitTorrent software.

    The MPAA said in a statement that it was legal action brought by its member studios that took down the two sites: a court order in Canada shuttered Popcorn Time and another effort in New Zealand closed YTS, reports the AFP.

    Canada’s federal court issued an injunction on Oct. 16 requiring web operators to close down Popcorn Time, which had an estimated 1.5 million visitors in July. YTS was believed to have had about 3.4 million visitors as of August, and was told to shut things down in an interim injunction from New Zealand’s High Court.

    Those two sites “enabled acts of copyright infringement worldwide on a massive scale,” the film industry trade group said.

    “Popcorn Time and YTS are illegal platforms that exist for one clear reason: to distribute stolen copies of the latest motion pictures and television shows without compensating the people who worked so hard to make them,” said Chris Dodd, MPAA’s chairman and chief executive.

    This isn’t the first time Popcorn Time has been involved in a piracy lawsuit: in September, Millennium Films sued 16 users of the service for allegedly using it to download the movie Survivor. Millennium is not a member of the MPAA, however.

    ‘Netflix for pirates’ shut down by courts [AFP]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCustomers Suing General Mills Over Recalled “Gluten-Free” Cheerios That Contained Wheatr


4 4 4 9
  • cheeriosGFWhenever a company recalls a product on a large scale, lawsuits are sure to follow. General Mills’ recall of 1.8 million boxes of supposedly gluten-free Cheerios that could have possibly contained wheat is no different: two shoppers have filed a lawsuit against the food giant, claiming the company sold a misbranded product.

    In a proposed class-action lawsuit [PDF] filed in California against General Mills and the manufacturing manager at the plant that accidentally introduced wheat-containing flour into gluten-free Cheerios, the plaintiffs accuse the company of “deceptive, unfair and false advertising and merchandising practices” that caused customers to buy items they would have avoided, as well as putting their health at risk.

    “By labeling products ‘Gluten Free’ Defendants created the misimpression that their products do not contain gluten and are therefore safe for those persons who may be sensitive to gluten to eat,” the complaint reads.

    The lawsuit mentions shoppers with gluten sensitivities specifically, but seeks to represent any customers who bought the mislabeled boxes, and isn’t limited to just those who got sick from eating the wheaty cereal.

    The plaintiffs want the company to claim responsibility for notifying consumers about the “true nature of the ‘Gluten Free’ Cheerios,” to avoid further deceptive labeling, and to surrender profits made from selling the improperly-labeled cereal.

    Shoppers also want their money back, and an undecided amount for penalties and damages.

    In early October, General Mills said that “an isolated incident resulted in wheat flour being inadvertently introduced into the gluten-free oat flour system” at the facility.

    Jim Murphy, senior vice president of General Mills’ cereal division, said at the time that the incident that led to wheat being introduced into the gluten-free oat flour at the Lodi, CA, facility was “purely human error.”

    “We sincerely apologize to the gluten-free community and to anyone who may have been impacted,” he said.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uComcast Exec Who Failed At Time Warner Cable Merger Gets Boost To Annual Bonusr


4 4 4 9
  • When your cable and Internet bill goes up, at least know that Comcast Dave is being rewarded well for a job not done.
    If you succeed at being the gladhanding, politically connected Beltway insider who can sweet-talk regulators and legislators into approving an outrageously anticompetitive $45 billion merger of the nation’s two largest cable and Internet providers, then you probably deserve a raise. But if you fail at that job and you work for Comcast, you apparently still get more money.

    Multichannel News noted that a recent Comcast regulatory filing [PDF] includes news about the cable giant re-upping its contract with Senior Executive VP and Chief Diversity Officer David “Don’t Call Me A Lobbyist” Cohen.

    The exec’s base pay will remain the same, but “his annual cash bonus opportunity will increase to 250% of base salary for 2016 (based on the achievement of performance goals).”

    That’s in addition to his $1.28 million a year in deferred compensation contributions and $3 million in stock that will vest between now and when his contract comes up again in 2020.

    You may remember it was Cohen, and not Comcast CEO/scion Brian Roberts, who made the public case for the company’s ultimately doomed merger with Time Warner Cable.

    With a straight face, he told lawmakers in 2014 that there are a “vast number of competitive choices” for consumers in the pay-TV market (while tacitly omitting the fact that this is not true for the broadband Internet access market, which now comprises the larger part of Comcast’s customer base).

    Though Comcast and Cohen proudly talked up the efficiencies and cost savings that would come from a TWC merger, he steadfastly refused to commit to passing those savings on to customers. Cohen would only say, “There’s nothing in this transaction that will cause cable bills to go up.”

    At that same hearing Cohen wouldn’t say whether Comcast would continue to abide by the 2010 net neutrality rules that were a condition of its merger with NBC. Again, he deflected by noting that the FCC was in the process of drafting revised neutrality rules and saying, “I can’t imagine the commission isn’t going to have those rules in place before 2018.”

    Except he was off by about three years, as those new rules were approved and enacted in the first half of 2015.

    Speaking of net neutrality, Cohen was the well-paid wordsmith behind Comcast blog posts, like the one declaring that no other company supported neutrality more than Comcast, and the one where he wrote that Comcast agreed with the White House’s stance on neutrality (except in all the ways that actually matter).

    Cohen’s attempts to spin data to Comcast’s benefit often fell flat, like when he tried to argue that the Comcast/TWC merger would have no impact on broadband competition because “Every consumer in America will have the same choices among broadband providers after this transaction as before.”

    All that statement did was bolster opponents’ position that there is a lack of competition in the marketplace and that the merger would be of no benefit to consumers.

    Cohen — the same guy who somehow managed to convince the FCC and Justice Department to approve the 2010 acquisition of NBC (and then offered a big paycheck to one of the FCC commissioners who helped push that deal through) — wasn’t just a failure in public forums. His attempts to win over regulators also resulted in more raised eyebrows.

    Like trying to use the FCC’s own data to pull one over on the FCC.

    The VP told regulators that a merged Comcast/TWC would only control about 35% of the U.S. broadband market, as opposed to the 50% estimate calculated by merger critics. Thing is, he fudged the numbers by lumping in slow DSL service that didn’t even qualify as broadband at the time Cohen made the argument.

    While the merger was still pending, Cohen didn’t help Comcast win over support from consumers by saying things like all Comcast markets would have data caps within five years, or telling the people of Philadelphia — Comcast’s hometown — that they were lying about their experiences with the company’s billing and customer service departments.

    Here’s to another five years of Cohencast, may his reign be bountiful.

    [via DSLreports.com]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uWhat Should I Do When I Can’t Get My Recalled Car Fixed?r


4 4 4 9
  • me and the sysop
    It’s one thing to know that your car has been recalled, which is happening right now to a record number of Americans, but it’s even worse when you know that your car has been recalled and can’t get the manufacturer to service it at a dealership. When you’re told that there are no carts or no technicians to fix your car, what do you do?

    CBS Sacramento interviewed two local motorists who are driving cars that have been recalled for safety issues. One is driving a Mazda R-X 8 with a Takata airbag, and the other has a Ford Fiesta with a potentially dangerous door latch problem. What they have in common is that neither can get her car repaired.

    “I have the stress of wondering if somebody’s going to hit me and blow this airbag in my face,” the owner of the Mazda told consumer reporter Kurtis Ming. She could disable the airbag, but that would be removing an important safety feature that might or might not spray metal shards in her face when it inflates.

    Rosemary Shahan of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety says that the options for car manufacturers should be very simple: they shouldn’t let owners drive around fearing for their lives on a daily basis. “Either fix the car, provide a loaner, or buy the car back,” she told the station. If the manufacturer won’t do any of these things, escalate your complaint, and remember that your issue is with the manufacturer, not with the local dealer.

    Of course, as we learned yesterday, actually getting that warranty repair doesn’t mean that your car is safe, which is why you should periodically check the bulletins for your own vehicle on your own.

    Call Kurtis Investigates: I Can’t Get My Recalled Car Repair Fixed, What Do I Do? [CBS Sacramento]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist