четверг, 29 октября 2015 г.

uGroup Must Pay $700K Penalty For Allegedly Profiting From ‘Charity’ Donation Binsr


4 4 4 9
  • This is not one of the boxes in question, though it is a clothing drop box. (JeepersMedia)
    How do you turn a charitable donation into a scam? Take the donated item and sell it for a profit, instead of giving it to the needy. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said his office has reached a settlement with a for-profit company accused of doing just that, by way of more than 1,100 clothing donation bins scattered throughout the New York City area.

    According to Schneiderman’s office, Thrift Land USA allegedly set itself up as a charitable outfit, using logos for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Rockland County and I Love Our Youth to “trick and mislead the public into believing that the clothing it collected would benefit the charity whose name and logo appeared on its bins.”

    Instead, Thrift Land turned around and sold the clothing at “huge profit” and the charities featured on the bins only got a small, monthly fee for use of their name and logo.

    As part of the settlement resolving the above allegations, Thrift Land has agreed to pay $50,000 in penalties and costs, and will give $650,000 to two not-for-profit organizations “so that the charitable intent of the people who placed clothing in its bins will be fulfilled,” Schneiderman’s office said.

    It will also be required to attach a prominent disclosure label on all of its bins, nothing that none of the clothing people put in will benefit a charity, reading: “This is not a charity. Donated items deposited here will NOT support any charity and are not charitable donations, but will be sold for profit.”

    Schneiderman’s investigation also found that Thrift Land engaged in false advertising with mailings and its website, both which misled the public to believe that proceeds from the sale of used clothing would go toward helping the two charitable groups.

    On top of all of the above, Schneiderman’s office found that Thrift Land deceived people who scheduled home pickups of used clothing by answering the phone using the name I Love Our Youth, and “falsely led people who arranged for home pickup to believe that their donations were tax deductible.”

    I Love Our Youth will also pay $50,000 to settle claims that it continued to let Thrift Land use its name to reap rewards from the scheme, even after the charity’s state registration and federal tax exempt status had been revoked. The chairman of the group has also agreed to dissolve it.

    Big Brother Big Sisters of Rockland County has agreed to keep a closer eye on any charitable solicitations or advertisements in its name to resolve allegations that it had failed to oversee what Thrift Land was doing with its name and logo.

    “Duping members of the public into thinking that they are making a charitable donation, when in fact they are enriching a for-profit corporation, is both deceptive and illegal,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “When a for-profit company masquerades as a charity, my office will hold it and its owners accountable.”



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uTime Warner Cable Launching Pilot Program To Sell Cable-Free Cable To Cord-Cuttersr


4 4 4 9
  • (JKehoe_Photos)

    As it has often been foretold, so it is coming to pass: another major cable company is planning to sell cable-free, internet-based cable to its cord-cutting customers, starting with a pilot program in New York City.

    At least that’s the pilot plan from Time Warner Cable, the Associated Press reports. It’s an over-the-top offering, of the style we’ve seen from plenty of other companies spanning everything from broadcast networks (CBS), to satellite companies (Dish Sling), cable companies (Comcast), and digital natives (Netflix).

    TWC’s CEO Rob Marcus told analysts on a call that “where we’re headed is the ability of customers to access the complete video product without having to rent a set-top box from us.” The service would be like any other login-using, account-based streaming tool that consumers access through their gaming consoles, Rokus, Fire TVs, or a zillion other little bits of hardware. It’s just that instead of navigating to Netflix or Hulu and streaming their content, users would navigate to TWC and stream TV.

    A spokesperson for TWC told the AP that there would be different options for packages and service levels, but declined to provide specific answers about prices or what would be included.

    TWC already has an app that existing subscribers can use, but those subscribers must first also have a device from their cable company. The shift would make the app able to be a user’s primary cable device, and TWC is planning to throw in a free Roku for anyone who signs up.

    Like basically every other cable company, TWC (which may be Charter by this time next year) has been losing video subscribers over time but continues to gain broadband subscribers. If TWC can sell video programming to those internet-only customers through an app, they can call it a win and keep making more money.

    Time Warner Cable plans for TV on the Internet [AP]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uNot At All Creepy KitKat Billboards Will Give You A Massager


4 4 4 9
  • massage_breakKitKat slogans all over the world acknowledge that the chocolate-wafer concoction is for giving people breaks. As Nestle introduces the candy in the country of Colombia, their ad concept is about taking a literal “break” at public transit stops in Bogotá. A massage break. By leaning up against a billboard.

    Where things get a little weird are the two hands cartoons on the billboard with the tall headline: “Come [here], I’ll give you a massage.” The ad vibrates when someone leans up against it, which is cozy and could earn the brand loyalty of millions of commuters worldwide if it expanded. Just saying.

    unfortunately, the brand doesn’t plan to take this idea global, and it just exists in a demonstration video from the ad agency. It was only for the KitKat rollout in Colombia. Will the people of the country’s capital always associate the candy with backrubs, with comfort, or with just taking a break? Will the “KitKat = break” brand messaging get through?

    KitKat’s New Billboards Are Truly Touching: They Give You a Free Massage [AdWeek]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uFeds Sue Scammers Who Charged For Bogus Student Financial Aid Assistancer


4 4 4 9
  • The operation sent millions of letters like the one picture above to students and families promising assistance in receiving financial aid.

    Paying for college out of pocket is nearly impossible for millions of prospective students. Instead, these individuals turn to scholarships, grants, and student loans, often relying on financial service programs to assist them in obtaining the funds. But not all of the companies promising a helping hand are looking out for your best interests. That was apparently the case for a California company accused of ripping off tens of thousands of victims in a nationwide financial aid scam.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced today that it filed a complaint in federal court against Global Financial Support, Inc. and its owner, Armond Aria, for illegally charging millions of dollars in fees for sham financial services.

    According to the complaint [PDF], since at least January 2011, the company – which operated under the guise of a government or university-affiliated program – issued millions of marketing letters to students and their families under the names Student Financial Resource Center and College Financial Advisory.

    The letters, featuring logos and seals to appear as if they were sent from or endorsed by the government, instructed individuals to fill out and return an application and a fee — ranging from $59 to $78 — to apply for maximum merit and need-based financial aid programs.

    By paying the fee, the company promised it would conduct extensive searches to target or match prospective students with individualized financial aid opportunities. In reality, the complaint claims applicants either received nothing or a generic booklet that failed to provide individualized advice.

    The CFPB alleges that the operation also created a false sense of urgency and used fake deadlines in order to pressure students and families into enrolling and paying for the services.

    Through the lawsuit, the Bureau seeks to stop the company’s unlawful practices and order the defendants to provide restitution to those scammed by the operation.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uDynamic Airways Plane Catches Fire On Florida Runwayr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPharma Biggie Hit With $125M Penalty For Illegal Kickbacks To Doctors, Falsified Insurance Formsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Steven Depolo)
    A subsidiary of multibillion-dollar international pharmaceuticals company Allergan has agreed to plead guilty to a felony charge of healthcare fraud and pay $125 million to close the books on criminal and civil liability claims tied to the subsidiary’s illegal marketing activities for seven different name-brand prescription drugs.

    Warner Chilcott USA Sales LLC (whose connection to Allergen we’ll get to later) has agreed to plead guilty in federal court to felony criminal charges of paying kickbacks to physicians to get them to prescribe the company’s drugs. Warner Chilcott was also caught manipulating prior authorizations to induce insurance companies to pay for prescriptions of osteoporosis drug Atelvia that the insurers may not have otherwise paid for. To top it all of, the company also made unsubstantiated marketing claims on another osteo med, Actonel.

    While the company won’t be going to jail, former Warner Chilcott President W. Carl Reichel might be. The erstwhile exec was arrested today in Boston, and according to a newly unsealed indictment [PDF] has been charged with conspiring to pay kickbacks to physicians.

    The DOJ accused Warner Chilcott management of directing employees to violate federal law by paying doctors to prescribe certain medications, including Asacol (for Chron’s disease), Doryx (an antibiotic used to treat acne that is at the center of a different legal hurricane), Enablex (for urinary incontinence), Estrace (for hormone treatment), and Loestrin (an oral contraceptive).

    This wasn’t a matter of merely slipping the doctors an extra ten-spot or buying them a beer at the doctor bar.

    Warner Chilcott staffers would invite physicians to “Medical Education Events” at pricey restaurants where prosecutors say little-to-no actual education was involved.

    Doctors who prescribed a lot of Warner Chilcott drugs would be hired as “speakers” for the company, but did very little speaking. And if these paid mouthpieces let their Warner Chilcott prescription numbers fall, the company warned them they would not be paid until those prescriptions increased.

    The Warner Chilcott staffers also lied to insurance companies. When a generic or less-expensive drug is available, many insurers won’t pay for certain name-brand drugs, including Atelvia, unless a physician specifically asks for it.

    In order to get around this, some company employees would fill out deceptive prior authorizations for Atelvia using information that was often inconsistent with the patient’s needs. Some Warner Chilcott employees actually went so far as to pretend to be physicians in their representations to the insurers.

    Sellers of Actonel were told by Warner Chilcott management to make unsubstantiated superiority claims about the drug during their sales pitch. They would tell doctors it was better than competing drugs because of its supposedly unique “mechanism of action,” employing misleading visual props to show off purported benefits of the drug that had not been demonstrated in clinical trials.

    For its sins, Warner Chilcott will pay a criminal fine of $22.94 million, plus another $102.06 million to the federal government and the states who made payments through Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs based on the company’s bad behavior.

    “Doctors’ medical judgment should be based on what is best for the patient, and not clouded by expensive meals and other pharmaceutical company kickbacks,” said U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz for the District of Massachusetts. “Pharmaceutical company executives and employees should not be involved with treatment decisions or submissions to a patient’s insurance company.”

    Following Warner Chilcott U.S. Sales LLC’s connection to Allergan is a bit like sitting through the “begat” section of the Book of Genesis. The sales company is a subsidiary of pharmaceutical manufacturer Warner Chilcott PLC. Actavis acquired Warner Chilcott in 2013. Just a couple months ago, Actavis finished its acquisition of Allergan, but chose to retain that company’s name for the entire operation. Now Allergan and Pfizer are talking about getting together… it’s messy.

    In addition to the pending charges against former president Reichel, other Warner Chilcott managers have already entered guilty pleas, including two former district managers, Jeffrey Podolsky and Timothy Garcia (conspiracy to commit health care fraud, violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA]).

    Another former district manager, Landon Eckles, was criminally charged earlier this month for alleged HIPAA violations relating to the allegations of falsified prior authorizations.

    And last week, Rita Luthra, a physician in Massachusetts, was charged with, among other things, allegedly accepting free meals and speaker fees from Warner Chilcott in return for prescribing its osteoporosis drugs.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uYou’ll Soon Be Able To Pay With Venmo Anywhere That Accepts PayPalr


4 4 4 9
  • venmograbThough PayPal has owned payment service Venmo since 2013, until now it’s sort of just allowed it to do its thing, which is transferring money between people using a mobile app. Now, in a bid to get some money out of Venmo, the payments giant will soon allow merchants to accept it as a form of payment anywhere that PayPal is already taken.

    Venmo users link their debit or credit cards to their accounts, and can then send friends and family money or charge people who owe them. Got your friend’s dinner bill last night because she didn’t have cash? Send her an emoji of a pizza and get paid back.

    Using Venmo at accepted merchants won’t mean any fee changes for Venmo users — sending money will still be free, unless you’re drawing funds from a credit card — but merchants will have to pay the same transaction fees that they do for accepting PayPal transactions, reports Fortune. PayPal charges merchants 2.9% on transaction, plus an extra $0.30.

    PayPal CEO Dan Schulman told analysts on a call Wednesday that the company will target merchants that already accept payments through PayPal, adding that Venmo will be “fully monetized by the end of next year.”

    You will soon be able to shop using Venmo [Fortune]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist