понедельник, 26 октября 2015 г.

uMan Says E-Cigarette Exploded In His Hand, Pieces Of Metal Pierced Wallr


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-10-26 at 12.48.39 PMWhile it’s been several years since we reported on an e-cigarette exploding while charging or being used by a consumer, that doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened. Case in point: A Wichita, KS, man says the device he used to try to beat his nicotine habit erupted, burning his hands and damaging nearby walls. 

    The man tells KAKE that he had recently purchased the e-cigarette and was following the manufacturer’s guidelines on how to use the device when it simply exploded.

    The man says he charged the battery and inserted it into the device.

    “I heard a sizzling like it was hitting and I hadn’t pushed the button yet,” the man recalls. “I was on my way to listen to it and when I went to listen to it, it just went bam, like a bullet.”

    The man says the device burst into two pieces that hit two walls in his home and scattered metal and plastic fragments across the room.

    Screen Shot 2015-10-26 at 12.50.11 PMWhile the man tells KAKE he suffered minor burns, he believes it could have been worse, noting that the pieces shot across the room with enough force they could have killed someone.

    After the incident, the man took the e-cigarette back to the store. Employees there told the man he needed to purchase a small computer chip to keep the battery from exploding, but he says he wasn’t given that information when he bought the device.

    The volatility of e-cigarettes has been a concern for consumer advocates after such explosions became an almost common occurrence for consumers.

    Starting back in 2012, Consumerist reported on several incidents in which the devices burst into flames or caused injury to consumers.

    Back in 2013, the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association said it was working with government agencies to implement rules requiring that companies manufacturing the devices carried liability insurance on all products.

    Last year, advocates shared concerns that the secondary risks of e-cigarettes, such as poisoning and a tendency for the devices to explode, could be more deadly than traditional cigarettes.

    E-cigarette explodes in man’s hand, blows through wall [KAKE]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPediatricians: Raise Smoking Age To 21, Ban Flavored Tobacco, Restrict E-Cig Salesr


4 4 4 9
  • (Burton Parker)
    Even though the percentage of smokers in the U.S. has been slashed by more than half over the last 50 years, smoking is still the leading preventable cause of death in the country. The American Academy of Pediatrics believes there are a number of steps that should be taken in order to prevent people from picking up the habit in the first place.

    In a statement of public policy [PDF] released this morning, the organization calls for, among other changes, the smoking age to be increased to 21, a ban on flavored tobacco, and restrictions on marketing and sale of non-tobacco nicotine-delivery devices like e-cigarettes.

    According to the document, nearly 9-in-10 adult smokers got their start before the age of 18, and “Middle and high school students often obtain their first tobacco products from older children.”

    The organization hopes that making it more difficult for older teenagers to obtain cigarettes, they won’t be as likely to give their younger pals their first smoke.

    One way that cigarette companies have long tried to make their products more palatable is with the use of flavored and menthol tobacco. The pediatricians believe that if you take away the tastier tobacco, it will discourage youth smoking.

    “Flavoring agents, including menthol, cloves, fruit, and candy flavors, should be prohibited in tobacco products,” reads the policy statement.

    Not only does flavored tobacco make it easier for young smokers to start, say the doctors, but those teens who begin with flavored and menthol smokes have a higher likelihood of becoming dependent on nicotine.

    “Menthol flavoring is particularly hazardous to children,” argue the pediatricians. “Youth who initiate smoking with a menthol-flavored tobacco product are more likely to progress to dependence and to report higher levels of dependence.”

    Electronic cigarettes, which are growing in popularity with younger Americans — some of whom have never smoked tobacco — are also of concern to the doctors.

    “The promotion and sale of electronic nicotine delivery systems to youth should be prohibited by federal, state, and local regulations,” reads the statement, which argues for a ban on e-cig ads for “all media that can be viewed by youth, including broadcast, print,” and online. This ban should also, according to the doctors, be extended to sponsorships of sporting events, concerts, and other entertainment.

    “Electronic nicotine delivery systems should be subject to the same restrictions on advertising and promotion at least as restrictive as that on combustible cigarettes,” explain the doctors. “Until government agencies institute these prohibitions, media companies, entertainment companies, sports teams, and promoters should voluntarily institute these prohibitions.”

    Among other policy recommendations made by the pediatricians’ organization:

    • Excluding the tobacco industry from development and implementation of tobacco education and control programs.

    “The tobacco industry has a long track record of promoting programs that have been shown to be both ineffective and counterproductive,” reads the statement. “The tobacco industry has been particularly hostile to programs that tell the truth and threaten the image of their product.”

    • Increasing prices on tobacco.

    The statement calls for increases in taxes at the federal, state, and local level, in the hope that this additional cost will make smoking less accessible to minors.

    • Restricting depictions of tobacco use in movies and other media.

    “Depictions of tobacco products, tobacco product use, and images associated with tobacco product brands in movies and video games should be restricted,” say the doctors. “Movies with depictions of any tobacco product use should be given a minimum of an R rating. Movies, videos, video games, and other entertainment media with depictions of tobacco product use should be preceded by strong messages that tell the truth about the harms of tobacco in a manner that is personally relevant to the target audience. These messages should not be funded or otherwise supported or produced by the tobacco industry.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFedEx Expects To Handle A Record 317 Million Packages Between Black Friday And Christmasr


4 4 4 9
  • (JeepersMedia)
    As consumers continue to rely on online retailers to fill their holiday shopping needs, FedEx says this year will be busier than ever before: between Black Friday and Christmas, the company says it expects to handle 317 million packages. Which is a pretty impressive number — but what’s FedEx going to do to make sure those packages actually reach their destinations in time?

    In projections released Monday, FedEx says its holiday shipments will be at a record-breaking volume, up 12.4% over last year (h/t Washington Post).

    Cyber Monday and its avalanche of online deals will be especially crowded, as will the first two Mondays in December: on those days, FedEx will deal with more than double the number of packages it handles on an average day, the company predicts.

    Again, these are all big, fat numbers, but they’re numbers that could turn into a headache for FedEx (and other shippers) if it can’t handle all that volume — one only has to think back to 2013 and recall the millions of packages that didn’t arrive on time for Christmas.

    To prepare for the onslaught, FedEx says it’s made $1.6 billion investing in its ground shipping service this year to increase capacity and add automation to its network. It’s also planning to hire 55,000 seasonal workers, 10% more than last year, to handle all those packages.

    FedEx says it expects its projections to be on target, and that it’s ready to handle what comes.

    “We’re very confident,” Patrick Fitzgerald, senior vice president of marketing and communications at FedEx told the Wall Street Journal. “There’s a relatively small number of e-tail and retail customers that drive the peaks during the holiday. Because we work so closely with them, not just this year, but every year, we can really understand some of the patterns.”

    FedEx readies for a crush of holiday-season shipments [Washington Post]
    FedEx Expects Record Volume of Holiday Shipments [Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uAfter RushCard Fiasco, Consumer Advocates Urge More Oversight Of Prepaid Cardsr


4 4 4 9
  • (photo: RushCard)

    For the better part of two weeks, thousands of unbanked consumers who rely on prepaid RushCards have been unable to access their funds because of a technical glitch. While the company run by Russell Simmons continues to fix the issue, consumer advocates are pointing at the incident as evidence that federal regulators need to do more to protect prepaid cardholders. 

    A coalition of eleven consumer groups today sent a letter [PDF] today urging the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to increase consumer protections for the country’s unbanked, noting that the RushCard incident has raised issues on prepaid card vulnerabilities and a lack of regulatory oversight in the industry.

    While RushCard says that access to funds has been restored for most customers and its working with customers on a case-by-case basis to fix lingering issues, the consumer groups – which include the National Consumer Law Center, our colleagues at Consumers Union, the Consumer Federation of America and Public Citizen – say it’s time for regulators to tighten the reins on the largely unregulated prepaid card industry.

    “This incident highlights uncertainties about an obvious question: What, if any, laws are violated if a consumer cannot get access to his or her money? Certainly, any failure to let consumers spend their own money could be an unfair, deceptive or abusive practice,” the groups write.

    Under the current regulatory system, prepaid card companies and payment processors are only supervised indirectly via the card issuing bank. That means companies like UniRush – which produces the RushCard – don’t currently fall under the purview of the CFPB, Federal Reserve or other regulatory agency.

    “Prepaid cardholders need as much or more robust protection as the holders of bank accounts,” the letter states. “But in our current system, they have less. No federal agency regularly examines prepaid card companies or payment processors for either consumer protection or safety and soundness issues.”

    In order to eliminate uncertainty about consumer protections in the prepaid card market, the groups suggest that the CFPB and Federal Reserve clearly state that prepaid cardholders have the same rights as bank accountholders to prompt access to deposited funds and to demand that mistakes be fixed.

    “All steps must be taken to ensure that such a problem does not happen again,” the groups write referencing the RushCard issues. “It could be devastating for any family to be unable to access expected funds. But the families who rely on prepaid cards tend to have far fewer resources than other consumers.”

    Prior to the coalition letter, the CFPB director Richard Cordray issued a statement regarding the RushCard issue, noting that the agency would take director action “to get to the bottom of this situation.”

    Also last week, Consumer Reports announced it would suspend its RushCard recommendation in light of the company’s technical issues.

    “The company needs to step up fast, and until we know the problem is fully resolved, we don’t recommend [these cards] to any new customers.” Pamela Banks, senior policy counsel for Consumers Union, said.

    Issues with the RushCard first surfaced late on Oct. 11, when the company experienced a disturbance during a “technology transition.”

    Among other things, users reported being locked out of their accounts and that their balances suddenly showed $0.

    “During this process, many of our customers were adversely affected when the technology that was used to transition their accounts did not work as planned,” RushCard CEO Rick Savard said in a statement at the time. “RushCard is working around the clock to resolve all of these matters.”

    Since the incident began, the company has provided several updates on Twitter, including one that announced it would wave all fees for new and current users between Nov. 1 and Feb. 29, 2016 as an incentive to stay with the company.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uHere’s Why You Can’t Expect Fast Food Restaurants To Hand Over A Sweepstakes Game Piece Without Purchaser


4 4 4 9
  • (James LeVeque)
    Whenever you read the fine print on a sweepstakes promotion, or hear it read quickly during a commercial, the terms “no purchase required” might stand out. While it might sound like an easy way to get a chance to win something without spending a dime, it’s a little bit more complicated than walking into a fast food restaurant and demanding a game piece.

    For example: Consumerist reader Robbie was interested in a Call of Duty promotional sweepstakes Carl’s Jr. is running right now, so he asked for a game piece at his local restaurant in California. Despite a display that read “No purchase necessary,” he said his request was denied, and that he was told he’d have to buy a cup to get a game piece.

    That sounds an awful lot like a purchase, which Robbie thought might put the sweepstakes in violation of California law (and many other similar state laws in the U.S.), which says only the state can run lotteries. Basically, businesses legally can’t make you pay to enter a sweepstakes:

    “Consumers often confuse sweepstakes, lotteries and contests. The main difference between a sweepstakes and a lottery is that the lottery participants have paid or promised to pay value for the chance to win the prize. The main differences between a sweepstakes and a contest are that the contest participants must use at least some skill to win the prize and must pay some value to participate in the contest.”

    But because such sweepstakes often include game pieces on cups or other food containers that customers then peel off, restaurants like Carl’s Jr. understandably don’t want to just give those items away. Instead, sweepstakes like this one will include information in the rules on how players can get a game piece without paying for anything — besides postage.

    From Carl’s Jr.’s rules [PDF]:

    “To receive a free peel-off label with food offer or prize and unique 9-digit potential prize code without making a purchase, send a self-addressed stamped envelope (VT and WA residents may omit self- addressed postage but must include self-addressed envelope) to Carl’s Jr.® Call of Duty®: Black Ops III Instant Win Game & Sweepstakes, P.O. Box 809004, Houston, TX 77280-9921. The mail in request must be postmarked by December 16, 2015 and received by December 23, 2015.”



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uApplebee’s Will Pay Cook With Autism For All 480 Hours That Family Claimsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Mike Mozart)
    Last week, the family of a Rhode Island man with autism who worked part-time for a local Applebee’s for a year without being paid went public about his predicament. Within only a few days, Applebee’s promised to pay the man first for the 166 hours recorded in their system, then for all 480 hours that his family claimed he had worked.

    He had initially been part of an unpaid training program and placed in that job by a local nonprofit agency that helps developmentally disabled people that assists developmentally disabled workers. The organization’s own time logs showed that he had worked 166 hours, and he had never used Applebee’s systems to clock in or out.

    His family had submitted the 21-year-old’s payroll information multiple times, but he never ended up in the system, and never received any paychecks from the restaurant. The family finally pulled him from the job, but have pleaded with the public not to attack or boycott Applebee’s or the nonprofit involved.

    Applebee’s, for its part, claims that the call from the news station was the first that it had heard about the situation. The state’s department that works with developmentally disabled people (and that funds the nonprofit that had placed him in the job) is investigating this incident to figure out how it could have happened.

    Another lesson out of all this for members of the public is about fundraising schemes for people in the news: A Gofundme page in his name, which had a fundraising goal of $50,000, appeared and further horrified his family.

    Applebee’s agrees to pay autistic man for hours worked [WPRI]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uNow You Can Take Your Kids To The “Krispy Kreme Challenge” Clinicr


4 4 4 9
  • No, this isn't a prank. A child's healthcare clinic in North Carolina now carries the "Krispy Kreme Challenge" name.
    While hospital naming rights have long been up for grabs to big donors, it’s not every day that a healthcare facility is branded with the name of a product that most people associate with being unhealthy. There’s no “Black Tar Heroin Elder Care Facility” or “Stick Your Finger In The Light Socket Cancer Center,” but there is now a Krispy Kreme Challenge Children’s Specialty Clinic.

    And no, this isn’t some jokey, guerrilla advertising thing where Krispy Kreme employees dress up as doctors and nurses. It’s an actual, existing children’s healthcare facility run by the University of North Carolina.

    Earlier this month, the N.C. Children’s Specialty Clinic was renamed after the operators of the Krispy Kreme Challenge — a local fundraising race that involves the compulsory eating of a dozen donuts — committed to raise $2 million for the clinic.

    The Challenge is not an official Krispy Kreme event, and UNC is trying to downplay the apparent disconnect between the sugary brand name and using it for a children’s health clinic.

    A rep for the clinic recently told Fusion that “The clinic is a namesake for the Krispy Kreme Challenge… It’s a celebration and a recognition of the students” who organize the race.

    That same rep tells Consumerist that Krispy Kreme corporate had nothing to do with the renaming.

    “The Park Scholars [the organizers of the race] have Krispy Kreme’s permission (via a legal contract) to use its trademarked name in the ‘Krispy Kreme Challenge,'” explains the rep. “With that contract in hand, UNC Health Care did not involve the corporation in any discussions regarding the clinic renaming.”

    In spite of UNC trying to frame the renaming as a recognition of the students who raised the fund, some physicians and public health advocates don’t really see it that way.

    “Shame on my colleagues for not finding a way to accept funds without providing free advertisement for junk food,” one professor of nutrition and economics at UNC told MedPage Today about the name change. “What is interesting about this is if we named this the Winston-Salem [cigarette] clinic, it would outrage America and maybe even the same for the Coca-Cola Clinic, but Krispy Kremes are equally horrible for our health — they are high sugar, high fat, refined carbohydrate junk food primed to add to the child obesity problem plaguing North Carolina.”

    Margot Wootan, Director of Nutrition Policy for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, echoes this sentiment.

    “Working in nutrition, I see the devastating effects of how bad diets can undermine children’s health, resulting in type 2 diabetes and obesity,” explains Wootan. “Given kids’ near-constant exposure to junk food advertising, it can be hard for parents to feed kids well. The last thing we need is doctors and healthcare providers undermining their own medical advice by plastering a doughnut brand on their medical offices.”

    Wootan and the CSPI have started a petition calling on the hospital’s physician-in-chief to reconsider the name change.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist