вторник, 6 октября 2015 г.

uWalmart Moving Protein Bars To More Highly-Trafficked Areas In Health Pushr


4 4 4 9
  • (Will)
    Walmart wants its customers to know it’s thinking about their health, so it’s moving things around a bit in its stores: instead of leaving health and protein bars to languish amidst dietary supplements and vitamins, in January the big box store is shifting those products to aisles that see more grocery traffic.

    That could even mean spots for such protein bars like Cliff and Luna products near cash registers eventually, notes Fortune, as part of the company’s nationwide “health fair” marketing push. Other healthy bait Walmart has set to bring in customers includes free blood pressure and glucose level screenings on Saturdays at all stores.

    Walmart is just one of the major retailers currently trying to get a nice chunk of the health and wellness pie, as consumers continue to go for products they see as healthy: for example, Target recently announced that it’d be removing candy bars from register areas, and replacing them with granola bars and other healthy offerings.

    “We’re probably a little bit ahead of the customer here but we certainly think that that’s where the customer is going,” Michelle Gloeckler, Walmart’s EVP for consumables and health and wellness, said of consumers’ shifting shopping habits.

    Walmart to give nutrition bars prime space as part of big health push [Fortune]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uUnited Passenger Says Airline Suggested She Pump Breast Milk In Pet Relief Arear


4 4 4 9
  • (Adam Fagen)

    Over the years, airlines have been found to be less than welcoming when it comes to nursing mothers: a flight attendant shaming a women for breastfeeding during a flight or the carrier that made a mother check a bag containing her breast pump. That rocky relationship continued this week as a United Airlines passenger says she was instructed to use a “pet relief’ area for pumping purposes. 

    A Boston woman traveling on United early Monday morning says she was looking for a private place to pump after landing at the Dulles Airport when an airline employee offered the unhelpful suggestion, Boston’s Fox25 reports.

    A nursing woman claims that a United employee suggested she pump in the terminal's pet relief area. (@lizabethmeagher)

    At first the United employee recommended the woman simply use the public restroom.

    “I said the bathroom is not sanitary,” the woman recalls. “And I can’t pump in a bathroom. She said we also have a pet relief center. And I just looked at her.”

    The woman then Tweeted a photo of the pet relief area, sarcastically thanking the airport and United for having no area for breastfeeding moms to pump.

    A United spokesperson tells FOX25 that it would reach out to the woman to offer its apologies that it wasn’t able to provide her more suitable accommodations.

    “Although many of the airport terminals where we operate do not have dedicated private spaces, we welcome nursing mothers to breastfeed or pump on our aircraft and in our facilities,” the airline said.

    A spokesperson for Dulles Airport said the facility currently doesn’t have dedicated nursing areas.

    However, it is developing lounges to accommodate nursing mothers. Those facilities should be in place later this year.

    Woman says United Airlines suggested she use pet relief area for breast feeding [Fox25]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uCustomers Claiming Burger King’s New Black Burger Bun Is Coming Out Green On The Other Endr


4 4 4 9
  • blackbunwhopperSure, changing the color of your product up is sure to garner some attention. But you know what else will get people talking? When that new hue causes something else to change color: Burger King customers are airing their bathroom business on the Internet, claiming that the chain’s black Whopper bun for Halloween is turning their poop green.

    The bun’s coloring comes from A.1. Thick and Hearty Sauce, Burger King says, and contains less than 1% food dye. And the nutrition facts for the limited-edition burger say that flavorings and food colorings in the bun “are commonly used in the industry and within the safe and Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),” points out the Huffington Post.

    While it’s unclear which colors are used specifically, Medical Daily reports that green dyes are often used in black food coloring.

    No matter the catalyst, there’s now a #GreenPoop hashtag on social media, devoted to the colorful potty talk. It’s not something you want to browse if you’re eating lunch, or if you don’t like seeing photos of other people’s feces, because that is definitely something that’s happening.

    Reports started to pop up last week when the burger debuted:

    Of course, now much of the Twitter chatter is people pledging to try the burger just to see if it really does turn their poop green, which I guess is a win for Burger King?

    Is this really a widespread thing, or is it just a widely spread story? It’s unclear, though there is that photographic evidence out there that we’ll let other, braver folks try to verify.

    In the meantime, we’ve reached out to Burger King to see if the company has any comment on the claims of odd poo hues, and will update this post if we hear back.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uThis Is Not Pumpkin Spice Snapple, And We Are All Gratefulr


4 4 4 9
  • (TIB)
    If you’ve been paying attention to what’s available in the aisles of stores every fall, you probably had the same reaction that we did when looking at this label: “Pumpkin spice Snapple?!” No. Look closer. It’s “fall spice” flavored black tea, with zero pumpkins. However, the pumpkin spice nog is on the shelves at Kroger, so there’s that. [The Impulsive Buy]


ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


u12 Countries Finally Reach Agreement On Trans-Pacific Partnership; Now Congress Gets To Fight About It Nextr


4 4 4 9
  • (Great Beyond)
    The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) hasn’t technically been in the works since the dawn of time, but it sure does feel like it sometimes. Negotiations first began in 2008, and culminated in a formal agreement being announced yesterday. With 12 nations having now more-or-less agreed on what is billed as the largest, most momentous international agreement of our time, one big question remains: now what?

    Canada, the U.S., Mexico, Peru, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, Vietnam, and Japan — all Pacific rim nations making up about 40% of the global economy — have been hammering out the details of the massive, 30-chapter treaty for years. The agreement covers everything from prescription drugs to agriculture and the internet, and includes enforcement mechanisms giving it some teeth both domestically and abroad.

    MORE: WHAT THE HECK IS THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP, AND WHY SHOULD I BE CONCERNED?

    The finalized agreement contains 30 chapters; the official announcement from the White House touts nine key achievements from among them. Some of those include:

    • Eliminating taxes on many American-made exported goods
    • Requiring all participating nations to meet certain minimal labor standards
    • Environmental protections, particularly for some ocean-dwelling species
    • Protecting digital freedom and the open internet
    • Requiring state-owned businesses in other nations to adhere to certain competitive standards that privately-owned (especially American) businesses have to follow

    The known areas of the TPP generally sound beneficial at first blush. However, critics around the nation and worldwide have continued to express concerns about the details, and the various devils waiting in them.

    The text has been and remains non-public for the time being. Some leaks along the way have created concern, however, especially in the areas of copyright and IP law.

    Every participating nation now has to undertake its own process for formally signing on to the agreement. In the United States, that means moving the process from the exclusive purview of the executive branch, where the office of the Trade Representative resides, over to the legislative branch. In short, now Congress gets to stick its oar in.

    The Senate has to vote on the completed treaty for it to become ratified. However, unlike the process of drafting and passing domestic legislation, the TPP exists under something called fast-track authority. That means the finished, negotiated treaty goes to the Senate for a vote as-is: no amendments, no changes, and no negotiations allowed. It’s a binary yes-or-no vote, full stop.

    In order to pass, completed treaties need a 2/3 vote — 67 senators — to approve the measure. And that’s where it’s going to get complicated.

    Getting 2/3 of the current Senate to agree on anything in the year 2015 is like trying to convince a sack full of cats to sing a Mozart opera. And politically speaking, sentiment for and against the TPP has made for some strange bedfellows here in the U.S.

    While most Congressional disagreements these days are distinctly partisan, opposition to this trade agreement has dotted up on both sides of the aisle. Reasons for opposing provisions of the treaty vary from increasing income inequality to insufficient protection for certain American industries (like tobacco). But although left-leaning and right-leaning individuals and groups oppose different provisions of the TPP for different reasons, the result is the same: they don’t want to approve the deal.

    Under the fast-track authority, the president has to give Congress 90 days’ notice before he signs the deal, then wait another 30 days before bringing it to Congress as legislation to pass. Even if that process started right this minute, 90 days from October 6 brings us to January 4, 2016. Add another 30 days and you’re well into February. Insiders speculate that realistically, it is likely to be April or even later by the time the Senate has to vote.

    Stick that against the political backdrop of the looming 2016 elections, and it’s basically time for Washington watchers to go get a bucket of popcorn and watch the sparks fly.

    Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Reached, but Faces Scrutiny in Congress [The New York Times]
    FACT SHEET: How the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Boosts Made in America Exports, Supports Higher-Paying American Jobs, and Protects American Workers [The White House]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uCostco Executive Points To Record Sales Of Cage-Free Eggs As Evidence Of Progressr


4 4 4 9
  • (PepOmint)
    In another round of the ongoing tug-of-war between Costco and its customers, one executive at the wholesale store is holding up its sales numbers as evidence that it’s making progress toward selling entirely cage-free eggs.

    Despite the fact that Costco promised in 2007 that it’d a completely cage-free operation, the company has yet to set a date for when that’ll happen. That’s ticked off some customers — including famous folks like Brad Pitt, Ryan Gosling and Bill Maher — who want Costco to set a firm deadline.

    Costco Vice President Craig Wilson is the guy who made that promise, and he’s still not ready to set a date.

    “There’s no question I said that but I was very clear that we will work with our producers on this and it will take time,” he told Fox Business. “We are still not ready to give a time frame or schedule.”

    But that doesn’t mean the company isn’t working on it, he adds, pointing out that Costco sold a record amount of cage-free eggs this year.

    “In 2015, we sold 2.9 billion eggs and 763 million of them were cage-free. That’s 26% of our total sales,” he told Fox Business. “When you look at those numbers you can see where Costco is and look at the progress we have made.”

    In comparison, in 2006, Costco sold 1.6 billion eggs and only 34 million were cage-free.

    “That’s only 2%,” he adds. “We’re the largest seller of cage-free eggs in the world and we’ve been working on this for a long time.”

    Costco Sells Record Amount of Cage-Free Eggs Despite Feud [Fox Business]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uChevron And Visa Try Out Mobile Payments At The Gas Pumpr


4 4 4 9
  • (So Cal Metro)
    Mobile payment at the gas pump using NFC technology like Apple Pay, Samsung Pay, or Android Pay? What is this technological wizardry? Yes, Chevron is starting to experiment with making the hottest technology of 2014 available at the pumps in its gas stations, starting with 20 stations in California.

    This may be the application of payment-by-waving-your-phone-at-something that makes the most sense, as long as gas pumps stay especially susceptible to fraud by installation of card skimmers. Mobile payments would bypass the physical card reader and be harder to intercept.

    CNET reports that while some gas stations have mobile payments available inside as part of the payment terminals in their convenience stores, adding the technology to the outdoor gas pumps is something that hasn’t really caught on yet.

    Even though Visa is part of this project, it will work with all brands of credit cards that are stored in customers’ mobile wallets. It helps both companies to have an investor buddy for this project, because outfitting a gas station with mobile payment technology outside costs between $10,000 and $100,000.

    Apple Pay debuted a year ago, and it hasn’t really caught on here in the United States: maybe once there’s a critical mass of users and of retailers making it available, the idea will catch on. Maybe it will remain a weird novelty.

    Visa, Chevron pump up mobile payments [CNET]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist