понедельник, 5 октября 2015 г.

uDisney Parks Considering Surge-Pricing Model To Determine The Cost Of Admissionr


4 4 4 9
  • (frankieleon.)
    If you’ve got a visit to Disney World slotted into your annual budget, you might have to adjust the amount of money you’re setting aside: Walt Disney Co. is toying with the idea of using a demand-based pricing model to determine how much you’ll pay to get in, depending on how busy it is at the Disney park you’re visiting.

    Tickets might cost more if there are a lot of people at the park, or perhaps you’d be able to score a cheaper ticket if you choose to go on an “off-peak” day, say, the middle of winter.

    “We have to look at ways to spread out our attendance throughout the year so we can accommodate demand and avoid bursting at the seams,” Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Chairman Bob Chapek told the Wall Street Journal.

    Simply raising the prices overall as it’s done in the past isn’t enough, he added, because the parks are trying to attract more visitors during slower times of the year.

    The surge-pricing model could also benefit guests who are sick of facing super long lines on busy days, or who have learned to simply stay away during known busy times.

    Disney is going to start surveying past visitors to get a handle on how they’d feel about different pricing options. Chopek says that while the company is all about figuring out how to “steer demand” through ticket options, there’s no solid plan on how or when Disney will choose what to do. But with new attractions aimed at bringing in the crowds — Avatar and Frozen attractions are underway in Orlando, and Star Wars-themed areas will be in the works next year in both Anaheim and Orlando — something has to change.

    “It’s a problem that is going to grow over time as we expand the size of our parks,” Disney’s Chapek said.

    Disney Parks Consider Off-Peak Prices [Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uPopular BBQ Joint Bans Professional Spot-Holders From Long Linesr


4 4 4 9
  • (@franklinbbq)
    If there’s a long line somewhere, there’s probably someone willing to hold a place for you in that line — for a price. But one Texas restaurant is tired of seeing people lined up outside who are only there to make a buck.

    Eater reports that the owners of Franklin Barbecue in Austin, which had already banned individuals from claiming a spot for an entire group, has now taken the extra step of banning pro place-keepers from waiting around for paying customers who don’t feel like standing in line.

    “We owe it to the rest of our faithful customers to not allow the distraction,” explain the owners. “We prefer to serve our customers in house, and not to have a second party representing our food and brand.”

    Earlier this year, the restaurant made headlines after a 13-year-old entrepreneur started selling “BBQ Fast Passes” to clients who paid him and others to endure the long lines outside of Franklin.

    In June, the restaurant stopped allowing individual line-waiters from holding places for large groups. The Fast Pass kid continued to take clients, but said he had to regularly turn down offers from groups of nine or ten people.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uDish Apologizes For Demanding Couple Return Equipment After Their Home Was Destroyed By Wildfirer


4 4 4 9
  • (CBS Sacramento)
    Whenever there’s a natural disaster wreaking devastation upon people and their homes, it seems there will, unfortunately, always be cable customer service representatives who respond less than sensitively. Here’s another: a couple whose home burned down in a California wildfire says they were shocked when Dish demanded they return equipment that was destroyed.

    A couple whose home was burned down in the Butte fire says when they called Dish to let them know what had happened, an employee demanded they return their equipment, reports CBS Sacramento. But it was destroyed, the woman says she told them. In response, they sent her a box and told her she’d be charged if she didn’t send the hardware back, she says.

    “I couldn’t believe it. They have no heart,” she said. “They even want the remotes back. It’s unbelievable.”

    The couple says it isn’t just Dish that’s giving them the stink eye over equipment — their satellite Internet provider also told them to return things that were destroyed in the fire, or they’d have to pay for it.

    When Call Kurtis reached out to Dish, the company issued an apology to the woman and her husband, saying it was a rogue customer service rep. They won’t be charged for the equipment, either.

    “In this situation, the agent assisting this customer regrettably did not follow standard procedure,” the company said in a statement. “DISH has implemented its standard procedures to assist in the wake of natural disasters. While all of DISH’s customer care representatives receive thorough training and have the tools necessary to promptly resolve most customer matters, we are constantly looking for ways to improve our processes.”

    The Internet provider also apologized, and closed her account “without any termination charges and all equipment fees have been waived.”

    Call Kurtis Investigates: Satellite Companies Demand Equipment Back From CA Wildfire Victims [CBS Sacramento]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


u13 Mayors (And One Almost-Mayor) Ask Verizon To Stop Dragging Its Feet On FiOSr


4 4 4 9
  • (Alec Taback)
    Earlier this year, Verizon made clear what many industry watchers had known for years — that it was reaching the end of its first major buildout phase of Verizon FiOS service and that the company was going to focus on getting customers onto that network. But more than a dozen mayors, including the presumed future mayor of Comcast’s home city, have written the company to ask that it bring much-needed competition to their markets.

    The letter [PDF] was sent late last week by the mayors of cities representing around 12 million people in Verizon’s existing telephone service footprint from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts.

    “[W]e are writing to voice our concern at your company’s failure to meet the needs of our constituents for access to state-of-the-art fiber optic cable service,” reads the note to Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam.

    “Our residents use the Internet to search for jobs, build home-based businesses, educate their children and engage in the civic life of our cities,” continue the mayors. “But consistently and increasingly, our consumers have complained that FiOS service is not available to them. These are not isolated complaints – there are millions of residents in communities throughout the Northeast who have been left without service, and with no plan or promise for future resolution.”

    The mayors point to the ongoing war of words in New York City and various parts of New Jersey where some leaders contend that Verizon has failed to meet its contractual obligation to provide high-speed Internet service.

    “In New York City, as elsewhere in the Northeast, the FiOS build-out has clear franchise deadlines and availability requirements for residents who would like to purchase FiOS,” reads the letter. “As New York City thoroughly documented in its recent audit, Verizon has failed to meet its contractual deadlines for rollout and service installation.”

    The letter also addresses Verizon’s refusal thus far to offer FiOS at all in markets like Albany, Syracue, or Lowell and Worcester in Massachusetts.

    In addition to calling out Verizon’s apparent reluctance to invest in FiOS construction, the mayors question some of the company’s business practices.

    “Based on irrefutable evidence of your company’s poor service record, lack of transparency and accountability, or demands for exclusive agreements with landlords throughout the region, we are deeply concerned that you have not acted like a good corporate citizen,” reads the letter, “and that an incomplete FiOS rollout will result in decreased competition and the reduction of benefits to consumers throughout the Verizon footprint.”

    The mayors say they all agree on a goal of having “Vigorous competition to provide the most advanced services at the lowest prices” and in “closing the digital divide and ensuring that our city residents have the same choices of providers as the affluent suburbs.”

    We’ve asked Verizon for comment on this letter and will update if we hear back.

    Below is the full list of mayors that signed on to the letter. Of interest is the inclusion of Philadelphia’s James Kenney. As the Democratic candidate for mayor, he’s the presumed winner in the upcoming election. Signing his name to a letter that calls for Verizon to bring more FiOS to his city (which has partial FiOS access) could be seen as a slap in the face of Comcast, whose tower looms large over Philadelphia City Hall.

    Kenney’s inclusion is a marked departure from current Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter who has been such a cheerleader for Comcast that he led a mayoral coalition pushing for approval of the company’s doomed acquisition of Time Warner Cable.

    The Nutter administration has also been involved in such Comcast-friendly moves as giving the cable company an advance look at a long-delayed, heavily critical customer survey. Not to mention the city’s efforts to effectively outlaw satellite dishes on the front of buildings.

    Anyway, here are the mayors that signed on to the letter sent to Verizon:

    MASSACHUSETTS
    • Joseph M. Petty; Worcester
    • Rodney M. Elliot; Lowell
    • Bill Carpenter; Brockton
    • Daniel Rizzo; Revere

    PENNSYLVANIA
    • William Peduto; Pittsburgh
    • Democratic candidate James Kenney; Philadelphia

    NEW JERSEY
    • Ras Baraka; Newark
    • Steven M. Fulop; Jersey City
    • Jose Torres; Paterson
    • Eric E. Jackson; Trenton

    NEW YORK
    • Bill de Blasio; New York City
    • Byron Brown; Buffalo
    • Stephanie Miner; Syracuse
    • Kathy Sheehan; Albany



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uPennsylvania Holding A Liquor Lottery To Sell Rare Boozer


4 4 4 9
  • (skittlbrau)
    When it comes to rare alcohol, Pennsylvania is trying to make sure anyone who wants to buy their favorite limited-quantity wines and spirits has a fair shot: the state’s Liquor Control Board is going to host a lottery this month to give drinkers a chance to get their hands on products that are hard to come by.

    Pennsylvania is in a unique situation here — the LCB owns and operates all liquor stores in the state. So if any people — or businesses — want to buy liquor or wine, it has to go through the state’s hands first.

    The lottery is the state’s attempt to make up for last year, when a first-come, first-served sale of rare Pappy Van Winkle bourbon crashed the website set up to sell it, reports the Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Officials are hoping the lottery system will be fairer.

    The first lottery will be held on Oct. 13, with 24 bottles of Buffalo Trace Experimental Collection up for grab: 12 bottles of French Oak Barrel Aged Bourbon 100 Proof and 12 bottles of French Oak Barrel Head Aged Bourbon, with each 375 ml bottle selling for $48.49. Each lottery entrant can only buy one bottle.

    Retailers as well as individual consumers will be able to take part in the lottery, with 75% of products available for the general public and 25% reserved for bars and restaurants.

    “In recent years, certain products have become very popular among aficionados, enthusiasts and collectors. When sold through our traditional online store in the past, the extraordinary demand for these products, which are often sold at prices far below what consumers find in other states, often led to products selling out within only a few minutes,” Tim Holden, PLCB chairman, said in a statement.

    “In order to ensure that all consumers interested in a particular high-demand product have a fair chance to purchase the product, we have developed a lottery system for our most limited products.”

    Lottery participants will have to register online first and put their billing information on file, and then opt in to the lottery between today and Saturday, Oct. 10. Winners will be selected at random by a computer program.

    Will Pennsylvania’s liquor lottery be a win for customers? [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uAmerican Apparel Files For Bankruptcy Protectionr


4 4 4 9
  • (Michael Kalus)

    Two months after American Apparel admitted it didn’t have enough financing to continue operations for another year, the retailer says things haven’t gotten better and it’s filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 

    American Apparel stores and manufacturing operations are expected to continue to operate normally under a restructuring deal the company has reached with most of its lenders, Reuters reports.

    The Los Angeles-based company says its first plan of action is to cut its $300 million in debt by nearly $200 million through the elimination of bonds in exchange for equity.

    It was unclear if the company intends to eventually shutter some stores as a result of the filing. The company previously announced in July that it would close some locations as part of a $30 million cost-cutting turnaround effort.

    Filing for bankruptcy is just the latest stumbling block for the apparel company that has seen its fair share of controversy in the last two years. Recent issues – including dealing with the behavior and subsequent lawsuits involving company founder and ex-CEO Dov Charney – have only exacerbated its financial problems.

    Reuters reported Monday that Charney’s 42% stake in the company – which was held as collateral by New York hedge fund Standard General LP – will be wiped out.

    American Apparel has reportedly lost money every year since 2010. In August, the company estimates that it lost $19 million in just the past quarter, bringing its total loss of the year, so far, to $46 million – double its losses from the year before.

    American Apparel files for bankruptcy, operations to continue [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAverage ATM Fees Hit Record High Of $4.52, Up 21% Over 5 Yearsr


4 4 4 9
  • (frankieleon)
    If you think you’re being bled dry more quickly by ATM fees, you’re probably not imagining things. A new survey shows that the cost of getting money from an out-of-network ATM has risen 21% over the last five years and the national average is now higher than $4.50 per transaction.

    This is according to Bankrate.com’s annual checking account survey, which figured in the two fees most of us hit when getting cash from a non-bank ATM: The amount charged by your bank for daring to mess around with someone else’s machine (national average: $1.64/transaction), and the fee charged by the out-of-network ATM for being conveniently located (national average: $2.88/transaction).

    The cities with the most expensive average ATM fees:
    1. Atlanta $5.15
    2. New York $5.03
    3. Phoenix $4.88
    4. Miami $4.84
    5. Milwaukee $4.78

    And those with the lowest average ATM Fees:

    25. San Francisco $3.85
    24. Cincinnati $3.86
    23. Kansas City $4.01
    22. Dallas $4.11
    21. Seattle $4.21

    Banks and ATM operators appear to be increasing their fees in response to the growing number of consumers that use credit/debit cards or mobile payment platforms for their purchases. The Wall Street Journal notes that some analysts calculate that debit card cash withdrawals are down 41% over the last ten years.

    Bankrate suggests that, in addition to using your bank’s website or mobile app to identify any in-network ATMs in your vicinity, people in need of immediate cash make a small purchase at a drugstore chain like Walgreens that will give you at least some cash back if you pay with a debit card. Granted, many stores limit debit card cash back to only $20-40 over the purchase total, so it won’t help if you need to pay several hundred dollars to a moving company van ASAP.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist