четверг, 10 сентября 2015 г.

uTide Detergent Pod Containers Make Easy Trick-Or-Treat Baskets, But Is It A Good Idea?r


4 4 4 9
  • Back in 2012, Proctor & Gamble changed the packaging of Tide Pods to look less like candy in a jar after children showed an affinity for putting the colorful, shiny, toxic detergent packets in their mouths. While the move – and constant reminders to keep the detergent far, far away from kids – was meant to deter children from snacking on the poisonous packets, consumers are apparently finding a new use for the bright orange opaque container, a use that some say might not dissuade youngsters from thinking the contents are edible: Halloween candy buckets.

    While it might seem perfectly reasonable to “upcycle” the Pods packaging for another use after it’s served its intended purpose, some parents are concerned about the confusion that might result from the bevy of Pinterest projects depicting Tide Pod containers as festive candy-storage vessels.

    Consumerist reader L pointed us to Pinterest where, in anticipation of the upcoming spooky holiday, you can find several projects that turn Tide Pod containers into trick-or-treat candy baskets, among other things.

    As she points out, the Tide container’s curved shape and orange hue means these plastic jars can be quickly transformed into pumpkin-like containers that can be used to either store candy for hungry trick-or-treaters, or for kids to schlep around from house to house during their annual sugar harvest.

    But as L notes, the entire reason that Tide uses the orange plastic is to make the container’s contents less yummy-looking for kids. So converting them into Halloween decorations may be “missing the point that Tide changed the packaging so kids wouldn’t think it was a candy jar.”

     

    For those who haven’t followed the saga of Tide Pods, shortly after Tide introduced the detergent pods in 2012 reports started surfacing that kids just can’t help but be enticed by the small orange, white and blue shiny blocks of detergent, licking, chewing and swallowing the packets.

    As a result, poisonings related to the products increased, federal safety regulators issued warnings and the company vowed to change the containers that hold the cleaning products.

    In spite of efforts by manufacturers to make the pods look less like candy jars, as of May 2015, detergent-related poisonings continue to grow. According to data from the American Association of Poison Control Centers, between 2012 and 2014 the number of reported poisonings jumped from 6,343 to 11,714.

    Which makes it all the more important to keep a separation between the containers that hold potentially lethal chemicals and those that should hold actual candy.

    “We all like Halloween,” William Wallace, policy analyst with our colleagues at Consumers Union, tells Consumerist. “But these containers are intended to keep detergent pods away from young kids. Using them for candy baskets could be confusing.”

    While potentially confusing a child on what holds candy and what holds detergent is bad enough, the reuse of Tide containers also created other concerns: are people properly cleaning these containers — which only recently held dozens of poisonous detergent pods — before turning them into treats totes?

    Another concern is that some parents may not have the patience to wait until their Tide Pods container is empty before upcycling. If so, are they putting the leftover pods in an equally safe opaque container or are they leaving them in a plastic bag on a low shelf in the laundry room? In a rush to make these cute crafts, parents may be inadvertently defeating the safety measure that the manufacturer has put in place.

    Of course, not all the Tide-container-turned-Halloween decoration projects on Pinterest were as worrisome. One resourceful upcycler used the empty packaging to create a jack-o-lantern – one that didn’t hold candy.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uOusted United Airlines CEO Smisek Scores Millions Of Dollars, Free Flights, Airport Parking Foreverr


4 4 4 9
  • I’m not saying I want to be fired in the middle of an investigation into a scandal involving one of the country’s busiest airports, but if it were to happen, I’d want the same deal that ousted United Airlines CEO Jeff Smisek is getting.

    Smisek, who suddenly stepped down from his top spot at United on Tuesday afternoon, is going to make out incredibly well — so if you know him and he starts hitting you up for cash to buy some scratch-off lotto cards, don’t feel bad when you say no.

    According to the airline’s SEC filing with regard to Smisek’s exit, his golden parachute includes:

    • A lump-sum cash “Separation Payment” of $4.875 million.

    • An “Annual Incentive Award” for fiscal year 2015 and other longer-term financial awards for 2013-2015 if the company meets certain performance targets.

    • 60,746 shares of the company’s common stock. At the current stock price of around $56.70, that’s worth more than $3.4 million.

    • “Flight benefits,” meaning the former CEO can continue to fly on United planes for free. He also gets free parking at United airport lots in Chicago and Houston for the rest of his life — and he’ll be parking the company car that will belongs to him after the airline transfers the title to his name.

    For all this, Smisek agrees to not do anything for two years that would compete with United, nor can he solicit any United staffers or clients.

    He also can’t disparage United, which he doesn’t have any reason to, since they are paying him well for his silence.

    In all, Smisek could receive compensation worth upwards of $28 million — just for being let go amid accusations that his airline created an entire flight from Newark, NJ, to Columbia, SC, just to curry favor with the Chair of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates United’s hub airport in Newark.

    While it’s not uncommon for top executives to be paid gross sums for being bad at their jobs, some United employees aren’t happy that Smisek is getting off so easily.

    “From the worker’s perspective, it’s obviously a different mentality,” a spokeswoman for the flight attendants’ union tells the Washington Post. “We believe there’s something wrong when an executive is awarded over $25 million for failing to do his job.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFormer Uber Driver In California Granted Unemployment Paymentsr


4 4 4 9
  • (afagen)

    (afagen)

    While a decision by the California Employment Development Department only affects one employee and their claim for unemployment benefits, it’s yet another official declaration from a government agency that the people who drive for Uber have an employer-employee relationship with the company, which in theory should entitle them to benefits that employees receive: reimbursement of vehicle costs, having the employer’s portion of their income taxes paid, and receiving unemployment benefits when their employment with the company ends involuntarily, if appropriate.

    This case didn’t become public until the attorneys organizing a class action suit in California posted the paperwork. That’s the same class action suit that was just certified as a class action covering all current and former Uber drivers in California.

    In the Employment Development Department case, a former driver filed for unemployment benefits last year. The EDD found that the ex-driver was entitled to receive benefits, and Uber appealed that decision on the grounds that their drivers are independent contractors, not employees. An administrative law judge found that Uber does act as an employer, regulating who they can and can’t pick up while logged in to the app, setting fares, and deactivating drivers who break the rules or receive too many bad reviews.

    An Uber spokesperson told Reuters that this decision only affects one ex-driver’s case, and “does not have any wider impact or set any formal or binding precedent.” It may not, but the decision does reflect an impartial observer’s opinion that Uber’s relationship with its drivers is that of an employer.

    Former Uber driver was an employee, rules California department [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uLeaked Photo Leads To 3-D Printed Copies Of TSA’s Master Keys For Approved Luggage Locksr


4 4 4 9
  • The keys to the Transportation Security Administration luggage kingdom can now be printed on a 3-D printer, thanks to photos published on the Internet of the agency’s master keys, the ones that can unlock any number of approved locks travelers might use to keep their belongings safe.

    TSA security screeners need to be able to access travelers’ baggage, even if it’s locked, so agents use a set of master keys to open those locks instead of breaking them open. As part of a November 2014 behind-the-scenes story about luggage, the <em>Washington Post at first included a photo of a set of seven of those TSA master keys.

    From the Post:

    It’s locked? No problem, Dr. Mumbai, the inspector has a key ring full of master keys for TSA approved locks. The photographer headed for Boise had two locks on the golf case containing his tripods, and both yielded readily to the inspector’s keys.

    Though the photo went seemingly unnoticed for months, by the time the Post pulled it in August, it was too late: a security researcher going by “Xyl2K” was able to create CAD files that can be used to 3-D print all seven of those master keys, and posted them to code-sharing site Github, reports Wired.com.

    So far, at least one owner of a 3-D printer has been able to make a key in five minutes using cheap plastic. He posted a video online showing that it opened a TSA-approved luggage lock:

    He told Wired he used cheap plastic and didn’t make any modifications, and that it “worked on the first try.”

    We reached out to the TSA for comment and will update this post if we hear back. In the meantime, if you’re worried about the safety of your belongings while traveling, you can either risk having a non-TSA approved lock that gets broken if your bag needs to be searched, or hope that no one out there is walking around with a set of 3-D printed keys that could unlock your baggage.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uOver 10M Consumers’ Personal Info Stolen In Latest Health Insurer Data Breachr


4 4 4 9
  • For at least the fourth time this year, millions of consumers are being faced with some bad news: health insurer Excellus Blue Cross Blue Shield has announced the discovery of a major data breach in their systems. Over 10 million subscribers to Excellus and their partner services now have their most personal information — including medical claims records and social security numbers — stolen.

    Excellus has its headquarters in Rochester, NY and serves consumers in central and upstate New York. Excellus estimates that any of the 10 – 10.5 million individuals who have received health care in their service area are at risk. A statement from the company’s president and CEO Christpher Booth confirms that “attackers may have gained unauthorized access to individuals’ information, which could include name, date of birth, Social Security number, mailing address, telephone number, member identification number, financial account information and claims information.”

    In other words: this breach is bad. You name it, and the hackers probably got it.

    The intrusion into the Excellus systems began nearly two years ago, with hackers apparently first getting in on December 23, 2013. Excellus discovered the hack about a month ago, on August 5.

    Excellus says the information was encrypted, but that does absolutely no good in this case as the hackers had administrative access to the company’s network. That means they would be perfectly able to decrypt it the same way an actual internal systems administrator could.

    The company is now performing the standard mea culpa trifecta: working with the FBI to investigate who did it; engaging an IT forensics and sybersecurity company to figure out what the heck actually happened; and signing all their customers up for two years of identity theft protection services.

    Unfortunately, Excellus customers are now just the latest members of a popular club. 2015 seems to be the year that insurers discover data breaches, with 80 million Anthem customers, 11 million Premera Blue Cross customers, and over 1 million CareFirst Blue Cross customers already having their data purloined this year. Add Excellus to the mix, and that’s potentially over 100 million Americans affected in about nine months.

    Excellus customers can visit the company’s dedicated breach-explainer site or call 1-877-589-3331 for more information.

    [via Wired]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uGoogle Confirms That Android Pay Is Rolling Out This Weekr


4 4 4 9
  • andypayThough McDonald’s and Subway have been able to accept Android Pay — Google’s answer to the iPhone’s Apple Pay digital payment platform — for weeks, the actual app has yet to become available for the millions of Android device owners who might want to try it. The company is now finally confirming that Android Pay is rolling out in the coming days.

    “We’ll be rolling out gradually over the next few days, and this is just the beginning,” a Google exec tells Bloomberg. “We will continue to add even more features, banks and store locations in the coming months, making it even easier to pay with your Android phone.”

    Google has long offered its Google Wallet payment service that allows users to make payments with certain vendors using stored payment card information. The company now says Wallet will pivot to focus more on allowing users to send and receive funds, while Android Pay will be used for the making of purchases.

    In addition to the two fast food giants mentioned above, a number of major retailers have already agreed to accept Android Pay, including Macy’s, Meijer, BJ’s, Petco, Foot Locker, Staples, Whole Foods, Walgreens, GameStop, Panera.

    As of right now, the Android Pay site still lists the service as “coming soon.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uMaker Of Oreos, Chips Ahoy! And Other Snacks Plans To Offer Significantly More Healthy Treats In Five Yearsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Ben Schumin)

    The snack aisle at your local supermarket may look a lot healthier in five years. (Ben Schumin)

    Perhaps the introduction of the so-called healthier, more adult-focused Thin Oreos earlier this year was a sign that Mondelez, the maker behind the cookies and a plethora of other snacks, was on the fast track to being a health-conscious brand.

    The company vowed today to revamp its offering so that in five years 50% of its revenue comes from healthy snacks.

    Executive vice president and chief growth officer Mark Clouse says in the release that the company currently records just one-third of its sales from healthy snacks.

    “We intend to become the global leader in well-being snacks,” he says in a statement. “Our goal is to simplify and enhance the ingredient and nutritional profile of our base business while also focusing on breakthrough innovation to address consumers’ well-being needs.”

    To achieve the new health-focused goal, Clouse says the company will dedicate 70% of new product development efforts on “well-being platforms.”

    Those efforts will likely include more individually wrapped snacks that are 200 calories or less and products that have nutritional attributes, such as fewer ingredients and no artificial flavors, Reuters reports.

    “If you look at where consumers are going, we have to better position the portfolio to fully unlock the potential for growth,” Clouse said.

    In addition to turning toward more healthy fare, Mondelez reaffirmed on Thursday its commitment to increasing revenue of organic products by 3% this year.

    [via Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist