четверг, 10 сентября 2015 г.

uSbarro To Open First Standalone Store In Neither Mall Nor Airportr


4 4 4 9
  • Imagine picking up the phone and calling your local chain pizzeria for delivery. No, not Papa John’s, Pizza Hut, or Dominos: you call up Sbarro, even if you don’t live inside a food court. Sbarro? Out in the real world? Next month, the eatery opens its first-ever standalone restaurant in the town where its headquarters is: Columbus, Ohio.

    Sbarro would really like to be known as something other than the place where you eat at the mall when you don’t like burgers, then immediately wonder exactly how you just spent $7 on a single slice of pizza and a soft drink. Customers have complained to our sibling publication Consumer Reports that the chain’s food doesn’t seem fresh and is a poor value for the money.

    Sbarro has also filed for bankruptcy protection twice in the last four years, and would rather people didn’t see them as the restaurant where people go when they have no other choice. The first standalone restaurant will have about twenty seats, but intends to mostly serve carryout and delivery customers.

    What about those mall stores? The chain is only in about 1/3 of malls nationwide, so it could theoretically expand into even more.

    One thing won’t change: it will always be the best place to get a real New York Slice.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRgEeDR98X8

    Sbarro’s New Chapter [QSR Magazine]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uAntitrust Concerns For Staples, Office Depot Merger Now Center On Corporate Supply Contractsr


4 4 4 9
  • In an effort to gain approval for their $6.3 billion proposed marriage to Staples, Office Depot announced last month it would close about 400 stores. While that move could certainly help the merger process, it appears that federal regulators are less worried about retail sales at physical stores, and more concerned about their contracts to provide supplies to large corporations and businesses.

    The Boston Globe reports that the two companies could face more costly concessions than just closing a few hundred stores when it comes to gaining antitrust approval from the Federal Trade Commission to walk down the aisle.

    Instead, the FTC is reportedly looking more closely at how a combined mega-office supply store could restrict competition when it comes to commercial customers restocking paper, pens and other necessities for the workplace.

    Staples and Office Depot are currently the top two office suppliers in the U.S. contract business, with the next closest company being W.B. Mason which serves only select regions of the U.S.

    Analysts believe that in order for the Staples/Office Depot merger to gain approval, the larger of the two chains – Staples – would have to divest a significant portion of its contract division, including distribution centers and certain client contracts.

    “To cure the anticompetitive threats, you’d have to divest operations to create a national competitor,” Randy Stutz, associate general counsel at the American Antitrust Institute in Washington, tells the Globe. “You’re talking about giving up extremely valuable assets and huge numbers that almost make the deal not worthwhile at that point.”

    While Staples declined to comment on the possible antitrust issues to the Globe, CEO Ron Sargent said in an investor conference Wednesday that the merger was “on track.”

    In a quick address to contract business, Sargent told investors that nearly half of Staples deals with large companies involve products that are outside the realm of traditional office supplies.

    “So, if you start to look at the market as beyond office supplies, which is what we do, obviously the market gets a lot bigger and our share gets a lot smaller,” he said.

    Office Depot declined to provide comment to the Globe about potential contract antitrust issues.

    Citing people close to the matter, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that the FTC has stepped up its scrutiny of the deal by seeking sworn legal declarations that could be used if antitrust enforcers decide to challenge the deal.

    The Commission currently has until mid-October to decide whether to approve or challenge the office supply merger. However, that deadline could be extended.

    Staples and Office Depot first announced their plans to walk down the aisle back in February, after receiving significant pressure from shared investor Starboard Value in December.

    The two companies – which have faced significant competition for office supply sales from online companies like Amazon – previously tried to tie the knot 17 years ago, but those efforts were thwarted by the federal regulators.

    Staples’ merger with Office Depot faces antitrust questions [The Boston Globe]
    FTC Intensifies Antitrust Review of Staples-Office Depot Merger [The Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPolice: Man Pretended To Be An Uber Driver, Tried To Hug Fleeing Passengerr


4 4 4 9
  • Reminder: If you didn’t call that cab or order that Uber ride, it’s not always safe to just hop in the car and hope to get to your destination. Police in Texas have identified a suspect in connection to an odd incident early last Sunday morning, where two female college students reported that a man pretending to be an Uber driver offered them a ride, saying his fare didn’t show up.

    Campus police at Texas Christian University said the man approached the women just before 2 a.m. on Sunday with the lure of a free trip, reports CBS News. When they accepted, he allegedly made indecent comments as they rode in his dark, four-door sedan. They demanded he pulled over, at which point one of the women says he tried to hug her as they escaped the car.

    A few days into the hunt for the suspect, police were able to use license plate information to narrow down their search.

    “They do have a suspect, but there’s nothing more to release at this point,” the university’s interim director of communications told CBS. It’s unclear if police have arrested the suspect yet.

    The university is urging students to only use cabs that they’ve specifically called. Uber echoed that in a statement, saying passengers should only use drivers hailed directly through the ride service’s app, citing the safety of both passengers and drivers: the app shows riders the driver’s name and other identifying information including a license plate number, as well as their trip details. Those details can be shared with friends and family if passengers want someone to follow their trip and make sure they’ve arrived safely.

    “Uber driver partners are prohibited from accepting street hails. All trips must be requested through the app,” the company said.

    Texas police have suspect in fake Uber driver case [CBS News]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uWhat’s It Like To Be An NFL Owner? Ask The Green Bay Packers Shareholdersr

uAT&T, Verizon Must Pay To Investigate Landline Service Quality Problems In Californiar


4 4 4 9
  • The California Public Utilities Commission plans to get to the bottom of why Verizon and AT&T phone service isn’t consistent in the state by making it clear that the state hasn’t forgotten a years-old order requiring that both providers conduct and finance investigations into their infrastructures. 

    The Commission once again directed the companies to provide financing for an independent consultant to begin an analysis of their networks in the next three months following the determination that the performance of AT&T and Verizon networks has “consistently failed to meet existing service quality metrics.”

    The decision [PDF] comes nearly four years after the commission first recommended such an investigation following a series of widespread telecommunications outages on the networks back in the winter of 2010 and 2011.

    At that time, CPUC found that neither provider was restoring services within its standardized time limits, despite the fact smaller network providers were able to meet the required restored service time frame.

    Two years later, in February 2013, the CPUC ordered the companies to conduct and pay for investigations, saying it was necessary “to gauge the condition of carrier infrastructure and facilities and ensure the facilities support a level of service consistent with public safety and customer needs.”

    However, both AT&T and Verizon objected to taking financial responsibility of the studies, and to date no analysis has been conducted.

    AT&T claimed in a response [PDF] to CPUC’s decision earlier this year that the Commission’s out-of-service metric was “inherently flawed and the allegations of substandard performance are flatly wrong.”

    The company said it had submitted “extensive and unrefuted” evidence that prove the metrics were out of date based on the declining use of traditional landline phones.

    Likewise, Verizon argued [PDF] that both companies’ networks were reliable and healthy, noting that the Commissions’ determination that delaying a study would be harmful to consumers is wrong.

    Still, CPUC said the arguments from the companies misunderstand the logic of the study and provide no reasoning why the investigation should not go forward as ordered.

    “Given the absence of relevant circumstances or new evidence, we find that it would not be appropriate to further defer the ordered study,” the CPUC decision states. “Further delay could undermine the integrity of the regulatory process by suggesting that if enough time passes without action on a Commission order, that order can be disregarded.”

    Under the decision, Commission staff must report on collecting funding from the companies within three months, and provide a status report on progress toward completion of the investigation within six months.

    [via Ars Technica]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uRestaurants Prep For All-Day Breakfast Battle With McDonald’sr


4 4 4 9
  • In just a few short weeks, McDonald’s will find out whether its move to offering all-day breakfast was a great idea or a rotten egg, but family restaurant chains that rely on breakfast to make their bottom lines aren’t waiting to find out and are launching promotional assaults to win the hearts (and wallets) of America’s pancakes and sausage eaters.

    BurgerBusiness.com points to numerous new promotions and marketing campaigns being launched in advance of the Oct. 6 debut of all-day breakfast at McDonald’s.

    Like Shoney’s bringing back its “$5 All-Star Breakfast,” which has bacon, potatoes, a biscuit and two “freshly cracked” eggs — and this at a time when egg prices have been soaring.

    Similarly, IHOP is talking up its “Double Dipped French Toast,” Perkins has introduced a new “Griddle Up” menu, and Golden Corral ads featuring Jeff Foxworthy espouse the virtues of “Breakfast for Lunch and Dinner 7 Days a Week.”

    BurgerBusiness notes that traffic at family dining restaurants has been down about 3% over the last five years, while breakfast has been the fasting growing daypart in fast food for the last year.

    Family restaurants and diners have long relied on customers who wanted a breakfast fix after 10:30 a.m., so McDonald’s could pose a threat to their business if it’s able to fulfill those consumers’ afternoon hunger for bacon and eggs. Many of these chains don’t have anywhere near the buying power of McDonald’s and may have trouble keeping prices affordable if egg prices continue to increase.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFake Comcast Employee Sought In Sexual Assaultr


4 4 4 9
  • A Union City Police Dept. sketch of the suspect who posed as a Comcast employee in an effort to gain entry into his victim's home.

    A Union City Police Dept. sketch of the suspect who posed as a Comcast employee in an effort to gain entry into his victim’s home.

    Even if you don’t have a service call scheduled, you might be inclined to answer the door when someone in a cable company uniform comes knocking. But police in California are on the lookout for a man who allegedly posed as a Comcast employee to enter a woman’s house and sexually assault her.

    CBS San Francisco reports that the attack occurred on Aug. 24 in Union City, CA, when a woman answered her door for a man — described as white, around 30 years old, between 5’9″ and 6′, 180 lbs., muscular build, with short black hair, and wearing a red Comcast shirt — claiming to be from the cable company.

    He said he was making a service call, but the woman says she told him that she hadn’t requested one. She tried to shut the door to prevent the man from entering but claims he forced his way into her home and the assaulted her.

    Reps for Comcast tell CBS that it employees do occasionally make unannounced service calls — after all, there might be a problem in the area that not every customer is aware of — but that these workers should always have a photo ID readily visible. Before opening the door, Comcast customers can call (800) 266-2278 to verify that the service visit is legitimate.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist