вторник, 8 сентября 2015 г.

uVerizon Prepping Trials Of 5G Wireless; Could Be 50 Times Faster Than 4Gr


4 4 4 9
  • (dooley)

    (dooley)

    Odds are that your wireless provider’s 4G LTE service is nearly as fast — and maybe faster — than the wired Internet service to your home (if only it weren’t so expensive on a per-gigabyte basis). But Verizon says it’s getting ready to test 5G service that could blow all current wireless — and most wireline — broadband out of the water.

    An chief technology exec at Verizon tells CNET’s Roger Cheng that the company is prepping to launch field trials of its 5G network within the next year, with deployment to some commercial accounts by 2017.

    In terms of speed, Verizon says its tests found the next-gen service is 30 to 50 times faster than the company’s current 4G offering. So a movie that currently takes six minutes to download over 4G would take as few as 15 seconds.

    Not only is 5G expected to faster, it should also be more energy efficient, meaning your phone and other 5G wireless devices won’t need to be charged as frequently.

    We’re still a few years off from 5G being available to anyone, but the 2017 date for launching some commercial 5G service puts Verizon’s timeline three years ahead of the predicted 2020 debut of 5G in the U.S.

    CNET notes that providers in South Korea and Japan are rushing to try to deploy 5G in advance of their upcoming Olympic games (2018 and 2020, respectively).

    Expect to hear more about 5G this week as Verizon and other providers talk up their next big things a the CTIA Wireless trade show in Las Vegas.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uNetflix Won’t Offer Downloadable Content Anytime Soon Because Users Just Couldn’t Handle Itr


4 4 4 9
  • Any Netflix users who got their hopes up that maybe the streaming service would follow in Amazon’s footsteps and offer downloadable content that can be watched offline on a mobile device, well, your dreams probably won’t be coming true anytime soon: Neil Hunt, Netflix’s Chief Product Officer says it’s unlikely the company will go the route of offline viewing because adding another choice will just make the whole thing too complicated for users.

    Hunt told Gizmodo UK at a recent trade show in Berlin that he doesn’t think offline viewing is a very “compelling proposition,” and that it remains to be seen whether that’s something a lot of people will actually use. Why? Because it’s a hassle to have yet another choice.

    “Undoubtedly it adds considerable complexity to your life with Amazon Prime – you have to remember that you want to download this thing,” Hunt said. “It’s not going to be instant, you have to have the right storage on your device, you have to manage it, and I’m just not sure people are actually that compelled to do that, and that it’s worth providing that level of complexity.”

    He says offering that extra option would render some people unable to make decisions about what to do next, so they won’t do anything, calling it the “Paradox of Choice.”

    “You put strawberry, apricot and blackberry jam in the supermarket aisle and you can persuade half the people coming down the aisle to taste the jam and maybe buy one,” he explains. “But if you decide to add lemon, orange, blueberry and grapefruit, by adding the choices you don’t increase the number of people choosing one, but in fact you go the other way. Fewer people choose anything at all.”

    Hunt says that in addition to this paralysis, Netflix users are very sensitive to change — even the slightest tweak and people are turned off. For example, when Netflix experimented with allowing half stars in its five-star rating system, the company saw 11% less ratings come in than when only full stars were allowed.

    Bu even if you’re struck motionless by one more Netflix feature, preventing you from efficiently binging on Star Trek: The Next Generation, Netflix isn’t saying never to offline downloads — it just won’t be happening soon.

    “I don’t think it’d be particularly complicated to implement, but doing it right would take time,” says Hunt, adding that Amazon’s new offer isn’t all that great anyway, since some titles aren’t available for download, which could be frustrating to users.

    “I think Amazon is playing a good game of PR, but I’m not sure it’s a good consumer experience. We’ll see,” Hunt said.

    The Real Reason Netflix Won’t Offer Offline Downloads [Gizmodo]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uNew Policy Means AutoNation Won’t Sell Vehicles With Open Safety Recallsr


4 4 4 9
  • (smcgee)

    (smcgee)

    Although it’s not illegal for used car dealers to sell recalled vehicles, nearly a year ago AutoNation – one of the nation’s largest pre-owned vehicle dealers – suspended the sale of cars with potentially deadly Takata airbag defects. Now, the company plans to take things a bit further, announcing it will no longer sell any vehicle that has an open safety recall.

    AutoNation announced on Tuesday that each of its 293 franchises across the country will cease the sale, leasing or wholesale of any new or used vehicle with a safety recall.

    The company says it has taken the “explicit position that it will not have any role whatsoever in these [recalled] vehicles being on the road.”

    The affected vehicles will be identified, physically pulled from inventory and “Not For Sale” tags and key tags will be placed on them until adequate replacement parts are available.

    The dealer also pledges that it won’t simply rid itself of the affected vehicles through wholesaling.

    While the new stance will likely result in a loss of some revenue from sales and inventory space, AutoNation maintains that “customers’ protection is worth the investment in the process.”

    “There’s no way to expect that customers would or should know of every safety recall on every vehicle they might purchase, so we will ensure that our vehicles have all recalls completed,” Mike Jackson, Chairman, CEO and President of AutoNation, said in a statement. “We make it our responsibility as a retailer to identify those vehicles and remove them from the market until their safety issues have been addressed.”

    Despite the policy, AutoNation says it will continue to accept recalled vehicles as trade-ins from consumers. However, those cars will then be put on hold until fixes are available.

    AutoNation’s move to keep recalled vehicles off the roadways comes almost a year after the company took steps to ensure that vehicles equipped with potentially deadly Takata airbags were no longer being sold by its dealers.

    That defect, which has now been linked to eight deaths and hundred of injuries, culminated with nearly 30 million vehicles recalled earlier this year.

    Consumers who have purchased a used car recently, or who may be thinking of purchasing one, should first check the National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration’s latest recall look-up tool to determine if the vehicle has been recalled and fixed.

    The search tool, which launched last August, requires consumers to input the vehicle’s 17-digit VIN, which can usually be found in the left corner where the dashboard meets the windshield or on insurance and registration documents. Results will then appear if the consumer has an open recall on their vehicle, and if there are none, owners will see “No Open Recalls.”

    The database will only provide information on the vehicle’s safety status and won’t publish personal information or track who checked the recall status of the vehicle, officials with NHTSA say.

    While AutoNation has vowed to stop selling the recalled vehicles, other used car dealers have tussled with NHTSA and consumer safety groups over the same issue in the past.

    Just last month, the Connecticut Public Interest Research Group released a report that examined the inventory and sales records at two CarMax dealerships in the state, and found that many of the vehicles listed for sale have unaddressed recalls.

    CarMax is currently the nation’s largest used vehicle seller.

    In all, the report found that 74 of the 566 vehicles for sale at the two dealerships during the month of July were currently under recall campaigns.

    Sen. Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut, who has sponsored several bills that would ensure used vehicle recalls are addressed before being sold, said that the ConnPIRG report is “chilling.”

    “Bottom line: CarMax is playing a deadly game of ‘used car recall roulette’ with consumer lives,” he said.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAmazon Now Delivering Restaurant Food In Seattler


4 4 4 9
  • IMG_3060If having Amazon deliver your groceries or farmers market produce wasn’t enough, the e-commerce giant turned deliverer-of-all-things-edible now plans to bring consumers piping hot meals right to their dining room tables with its foray into the restaurant delivery service arena.

    Amazon announced today that it will begin testing yet another service, this time delivering food from local restaurants to Prime members in Seattle.

    The service will be completed through Amazon’s Prime Now program, which provides members of the company $99/year Prime service deliveries in one or two hours.

    Using the Prime Now mobile app, Seattle customers can view participating restaurants, browse menus, place orders and track the status of their delivery. Once an order is placed, Amazon delivery drivers pick up and deliver the food within an hour or less, the company says.

    While it’s always nice to have options when it comes to hot food showing up at your door, the promise of delivery within one hour of pick up has us wondering if dinner will actually arrive hot, or just luke warm.

    According to Amazon, the menus featured on the Prime Now app will include “transparent prices – there are no markup or hidden service fees.” For a limited time, delivery thought the service will be free.

    “Prime members can now enjoy food from the Seattle restaurants they love without having to drive all over the city,” Gus Lopez, general manager of Amazon Restaurants, said in a statement. “For many of these restaurants, this is the first time they are offering delivery, and we are delighted they have chosen to work with us.”

    For now, restaurant delivery is only available in select Seattle zip codes, but the company anticipates rolling out the new service to other areas of the city in the coming days.

    “Prime members can download the Prime Now app and enter their zip code to see if Prime Now is available in their area,” the company says. “In zip codes where restaurant delivery is available, customers will see Restaurants on the home page.”

    Prime Now Introduces Restaurant Delivery in Seattle [Amazon]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uSurge Is Back On Retail Store Shelvesr


4 4 4 9
  • surgemapAlmost a year ago, the dreams of many fans of caffeine and carbos came true when Coca-Cola brought back the green soft drink called “Surge,” which had been discontinued in 2003. Coke made the stuff available only on Amazon, and only for a limited time, but maybe they got the hint when the initial batch sold out within a few hours.

    Coke, perhaps eager for an opportunity to get Americans, especially young adults, guzzling soda again, decided to bring back Surge on a more permanent basis in physical stores. They have a Facebook page with more than 220,000 fans dedicated to the beverage to thank for its return to stores, though fan sites pleading for the return of Surge went up almost as soon as it went off the market in 2003.

    You can allegedly find stores where it’s available near you, or will be, on Coke’s official site, though I can’t get the site to work this morning.

    Remember ’90s soda Surge? Meet the Fargo man who helped bring it back [Grand Forks Herald]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uSan Francisco Landlord Charged $4K/Month In Rent For Rodent-Infested “Death Trap” Apartmentsr


4 4 4 9
  • The building in San Francisco's Mission district is now being renovated, "presumably for wealthier tenants," notes the judge. [image via Google Maps]

    The building in San Francisco’s Mission district is now being renovated, “presumably for wealthier tenants,” notes the judge. [image via Google Maps]

    A San Francisco man who fancied himself a landlord and building manager — but who apparently failed to do more than just collect rent that he didn’t always pay up the ladder — has been ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to tenants who paid exorbitant sums to live in “squalid” conditions with phantom appliances, exposed wiring, and rodents run amok.

    The beginnings of this case go back more than a decade. That’s when the owner of a rent-controlled building in San Francisco’s Mission district decided to lease three 6-bedroom apartments to a single tenant, for $2,050 each. This tenant then entered into an informal “management agreement” with the owner that he could sublease these apartments. He was also declared “general manager” of these units, according to postings in the building.

    According to a recent San Francisco Superior Court ruling [PDF] against this de facto landlord, he would enter rooms “without notice or permission, scaring children, threatening physical violence or to report tenants to immigration authorities.” He also would use his tenants’ rooms to smoke pot in with his friends.

    The conditions in these apartments, for which he charged as much as $800 for a single room, that the judge wrote “it is not hyperbolic to call the building a death trap.”

    Among the many, many unpleasant allegations made in the complaint are exposed electrical outlets, an oven that turned itself on, another oven infested with mice, children being bitten by bedbugs, and locked fire exits. Because of the cost associated with the rent, tenants would often sleep upwards of four people in one room.

    But at least all that rent money they paid protected the tenants from ending up on the street, right?

    Nope.

    According to the court, even though the manager was bringing in nearly double the amount he agreed to pay the building’s owner, he sometimes didn’t pass any of that money on.

    In 2006, he came up $24,400 short to the owner. Four years later, he failed to pay $16,400 in rent that was due. Then again in 2013, he went ten months without sharing any of the rent money he’d brought in. Yet he concealed this all from the tenants who paid him.

    So in 2014, when the building owner decided to hire a proper management company to run the property, he had these tenants served with three-day eviction notices for failure to pay rent — even though they’d paid thousands to the defendant.

    The landlord lied to the tenants that he had “put our rent in an escrow account,” that they would get it back, and that “everything was going to be fine, and we just needed to keep paying our rent.”

    But there was no escrow account and that money never went back to the tenants, who were all evicted — except the landlord, who reached a deal with the owner to stay in his apartment.

    The court has tentatively awarded damages to the nine plaintiffs, ranging from $67,000 to more than $110,000. In total, the defendant owes around $780,000 in damages.

    Meanwhile, the building in question is being renovated, “presumably for wealthier tenants,” notes the judge, who described the case as a “tawdry tale from the seam side of San Francisco’s hyper-inflated housing market.”

    [via MissionLocal]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uLawsuit: American Airlines Failed To Protect Girl From Passenger Accused Of Touching Her Inappropriatelyr


4 4 4 9
  • (benh57)

    (benh57)

    The parents of a girl who said she was touched inappropriately while she was flying alone on an American Airlines flight to New York from Iowa in July have sued the airline, claiming it failed to protect her.

    The family is also suing the 57-year-old man accused of groping the girl: he was arrested after the flight on charges including engaging in sexual contact with a victim between the ages of 12 and 16, charges he denies.

    The girl texted her mother on the flight, reporting that she’d woken up to a man who’d moved into the open seat next to her inappropriately touching her with his foot and then his hand, reports the Associated Press.

    “I can’t move cause the seat belt sign is on and I want to get away,” the girl said in texts turned over to the FBI, according to the lawsuit. She also texted her mother that she was scared, and that the man tried to touch her genitals.

    When he left his seat to go to the bathroom, the girl told a flight attendant, who moved her to an empty seat in first class. The airline reported the incident to authorities and an FBI agent met the suspect when the flight stopped in Chicago. But the family’s attorney says American Airlines should’ve put her in a seat where she could be monitored. The airline charges $150 extra for minors traveling alone.

    “American cares deeply about our young passengers and is committed to providing a safe travel experience for them,” an airline spokesman said in a statement. “We take these matters very seriously and have cooperated fully and immediately with law enforcement’s investigation of the suspect.”

    Iowa parents sue American Airlines and passenger after inappropriate touching incident [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist