пятница, 4 сентября 2015 г.

uNissan Versa And Micra Pedal Interference Problem Upgraded To Recall, Includes 300,000 Carsr


4 4 4 9
  • A photo provided by NHTSA shows the area in which drivers' feet have become stuck. The arrow shows the actuator flap that interferes with the movement between the accelerator and brake.

    A photo provided by NHTSA shows the area in which drivers’ feet have become stuck. The arrow shows the actuator flap that interferes with the movement between the accelerator and brake.

    Nissan plans to recall 300,000 vehicles in the United States from its Versa and Micra models due to problem with a console panel. That sounds harmless enough until you learn that the problem is that the driver’s shoe may catch on the panel, trapping that foot on the gas pedal and potentially causing an accident.

    The actual phrasing is “potentially impede smooth pedal operation,” but as the National Highway Safety and Traffic Administration points out in its recall report, “A delay in the application of the brake pedal would lengthen the distance needed to stop the vehicle and increase the risk of a crash.” Yes. The console issue has already been blamed for one accident that resulted in an injury.

    This is the same problem that was subject to an engineering analysis back in April, when investigators said that there were eleven reports of the pedal problem. The NHTSA has been researching this specific issue since June 2014. Now the analysis has been upgraded to a full recall.

    Affected models are:

    Versa sedan, model years 2012 through 2015
    Versa Note, model years 2014 and 2015
    Micra, 2014 and 2015

    Drivers will receive a recall notice sometime in October, and a Nissan dealership will fix the panel. Nissan didn’t specify what type of shoe, if any, might be more likely to catch on the console panel, so drive carefully if you own one of the affected models.

    Nissan to recall about 300,000 vehicles in U.S. to fix console panel [Reuters]

    PREVIOUSLY:
    NHTSA Advances Investigation Into Pedal Interference In Nissan Versa & Note, Adds Model Years



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uFacebook-Owned Mobile Messaging App WhatsApp Crosses 900-Million-User Markr


4 4 4 9

  • Facebook is having a good run this summer of taking over the world one app at a time. Hot on the heels of last week’s announcement that the big blue network now has more than 1 billion daily users, the company is now crowing about a user milestone they’ve reached on one of their two big messaging platforms, WhatsApp.

    Facebook bought WhatsApp about 18 months ago in a $19 billion deal. At the time, the app touted about 450 million monthly users, of whom roughly 315 million used the service every day. Reaching 900 million users means the user base has literally doubled since that purchase.

    But Facebook clearly had this growth in mind even at the time. Back when news of the acquisition went public, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement, “WhatsApp is on a path to connect 1 billion people,” adding, “The services that reach that milestone are all incredibly valuable.”

    It’s an impressive milestone, especially given that the smartphone world is not exactly suffering for a shortage of messaging apps. WhatsApp’s major selling point is that it uses your data instead of “counting” as SMS texts against your phone plan, but at this point, it’s just one of many competitive apps out there promising the same… and texting doesn’t cost what it used to, either.

    WhatsApp, however, is stringently against selling ads inside their platform, even going so far as to quote Fight Club on their home page as part of their explanation why. The current iteration of their privacy policy also has some strong affirmations against selling or sharing their data to third-party advertisers — a stance that seems somewhat at odds with the standard operating procedure of their parent company.

    Facebook clearly has a dominant stake in the messaging-app business. WhatsApp may be at the top as it closes in on that magic nine-zero mark, but the second-place contender — Facebook Messenger — has also crossed 700 million monthly users.

    Facebook’s WhatsApp hits 900 million users, aims for 1 billion [USA Today]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uToyota Investing $50M Into “Life-Saving Intelligent” Vehiclesr


4 4 4 9
  • There’s a lot of talk these days about the inevitable arrival of self-driving cars and the implications they will have on safety, insurance, traffic, and fuel costs, but Toyota has announced an investment in new research to develop “life-saving intelligent” vehicles that aren’t necessarily self-driving, but which could ideally combine the best of the autonomous car with one driven by a real human.

    Toyota said today that it will invest around $50 million over the course of five years to establish joint research centers at Stanford University in California and at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The goal, according to the car giant, is to “improve every-day living through artificial intelligence supported technologies” and develop “life-saving intelligent vehicles and life-improving robots.”

    The head of Toyota’s research and development group, Kiyotaka Ise, says that the immediate goal is to cut down on traffic casualties with a longterm goal of using “enhanced mobility and robotics” to improve users’ quality of life.

    Dr. Gill Pratt, who recently left DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) to join the program, says that intelligent vehicles will “recognize objects around the vehicle in diverse environments, provide elevated judgment of surrounding conditions, and safely collaborate with vehicle occupants, other vehicles, and pedestrians.”

    Speaking to the NY Times, he likened the idea of an intelligent vehicle to having a “guardian angel or driver’s education teacher” in the car with you.

    “It usually does nothing, unless you are about to do something dumb,” explained Pratt.

    MIT professor Daniela Rus believes there may be the potential for a car that is “incapable of getting into a collision.”

    The group also expects to be able to take what it learns from its work on intelligent vehicles and apply it to robotic devices and information services that interact directly with humans. While Toyota is most widely known for its cars and trucks, it has been building industrial robotic devices for decades.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFake Comcast Rep Convinces Customer To Delete Anti-Comcast Tweetsr


4 4 4 9
  • Complaining to a company on Twitter can often be a pointless endeavor, like trying to have a phone conversation in the front row of a Motörhead concert, but something inside us hopes that our gripe will be heard, which is why pranksters have repeatedly been able to trick Comcast customers into believing the company is proactively calling them in response to their Tweets. The latest story involves a customer who was actually convinced to delete his anti-Comcast comments by someone pretending to be from the company.

    Speaking to Gimlet Media’s Reply All, a man named Chris says he was taken in by a woman named Kendra who called claiming to be from Comcast’s social media team.

    Given Comcast’s less-than-stellar reputation, especially among the online community, and the company’s public claims that it’s really trying to improve its service, one might be willing to believe that Comcast would take the step of reaching out to a disgruntled customer to resolve the situation.

    But Kendra didn’t do that.

    Chris says she asked if the problem he’d Tweeted about had been dealt with. “So I told her, yeah I’m pretty sure the issue was resolved, and she said, ‘Well, since your issue was resolved I was hoping that maybe we could get you to delete the Tweet because it is slanderous towards Comcast.”

    First, a defamatory Tweet would be libel, not slander. Second, if a statement is true it’s not defamatory, even if the issue has since been resolved. At this point, Chris should have realized he was being pranked and simply hung up. But he remained on the line and things only got more interesting.

    He says that Kendra gave the example of someone Tweeting negatively about their ex-girlfriend with a statement like, “This girl’s being such a dickhole.” If you later get back together with that ex, argued Kendra, “she would be really offended if that Tweet was still there.”

    When Chris challenged Kendra on her outlandish understanding of the situation and her use of colorful language, he says she told him, “Sir, I just finished our two-week training and I’m literally reading right off the script.”

    She then told Chris that maybe he’s not the kind of customer that Comcast wants to have.

    “Sir, I can not end this session until the Tweet is deleted,” Kendra explained, according to Chris, who initially refused. Then Kendra said a note would be put “on his file” and he would either be “fined or removed from Comcast as a customer.”

    An irate Chris agreed to delete the Tweet in hopes of ending this nonsense. But Kendra then upped her demands, saying he now needed to delete any other Tweets that referenced the one he’d deleted.

    While he sought out those other posts, she asked him, “Are you just playing dumb with me? Do you think I’m stupid? The Tweets are right there.”

    That’s when he hung up in frustration. At the same time, he thought he’d been treated so outrageously that he’d get the same “we’re super sorry, here’s free service” treatment that Comcast gave to customers whose names were changed to things like “A**hole Brown,” and “Dummy.”

    But that wasn’t about to happen because the caller had nothing to do with Comcast. She’d done what other prank caller had done before her — trolled the Comcast Twitter feed looking for customers and calling ones whose phone numbers were publicly available.

    And the customers’ numbers may not even have to be in a phone book. One longtime prank caller tells Reply All that if you know what to say to the folks at Comcast you can get them to hand over customer numbers pretty easily.

    “You can call Comcast and say, ‘Hey, I’m in a different department, and you’re having computer problems so pull up the last few orders you just did and give me all the information.

    “I really want to know what the point of it was,” says Chris, who believes it might have been a failed scam attempt.

    But the odds are this was just someone out to amuse themselves and possibly their friends. It’s a game to see how long the caller can string along the other person, escalating the outrageousness, before being hung up on.

    You can check out the entire story, along with an interview with Comcast’s head of security here:



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uLawsuit Says Jessica Alba’s Honest Company Products Are Dishonest About “Natural” Claimsr


4 4 4 9
  • OptionValue-255-slide_with_zoom-ef3ca322-7179-4b4e-9713-52d2851491a9The Honest Company, co-founded by actress Jessica Alba, built its billion-dollar reputation on the fact that its products are created using natural, nontoxic elements. But a newly filed class-action lawsuit claims the company hasn’t been as honest as its name would lead one to believe, accusing the organization of deceiving consumers by selling items that actually contain unnatural and ineffective ingredients.

    The lawsuit [PDF], which seeks at least $5 million in damages for the proposed class, argues that The Honest Company deceptively and misleadingly labels and markets its products – specifically its hand soap, diapers, dish soap, multi-surface cleaner and sunscreen.

    According to the complaint, starting in 2012 The Honest Company entered into a marketing campaign that systematically labeled its products as “natural” or “effective.”

    As a result of these marketing efforts, Honest sells the products to consumers at a 10% to 20% premium.

    The plaintiff claims that he purchased the Honest products in lieu of other cheaper options based on the company’s representation that they were natural and effective.

    “Contrary to the company name, Honest’s marketing claims are misleading, deceptive, and/or untrue,” the suit states.

    While “natural” in the context of Honest products means each item contains no artificial ingredients, the suit claims that isn’t the case.

    Honest soap, dish soap, surface cleaner and diapers are in fact made with unnatural additives including Methylisothiazolinone, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Phenoxyethanol, and Sodium Polycrylate, according to the suit.

    “Honest’s conduct harms consumers by inducing them to purchase and consume the products on the false premise that they are natural and effective, when in fact four of the five products contain ingredients that are not natural, and one of the five Products is ineffective.” the suit states.

    The plaintiff bases his claims that the products are hazardous on research from the Environmental Working Group that found ingredients used in the products exceed the organization’s “low hazard” threshold.

    Additionally, the complaint accuses Honest of misleading consumers about the effectiveness of its sunscreen.

    “‘Effective’ in the context of Honest Sunscreen means the sunscreen should protect the user from unhealthy exposure to harmful UV rays,” the suit states. “This representation is literally false.”

    The lawsuit goes on to cite a recent onslaught of consumer complaints to the Honest Twitter account that detailed how users of the sunscreen were left with sunburns and blisters after exposure to the sun.

    Following the complaints from consumers, Alba and co-founder Christopher Gavigan released a statement to People saying the company was “committed to providing safe and effective products” and reminded consumer to use the product as directed.

    “Our sunscreen Lotion was tested, by an independent 3rd party, again the protocols prescribed by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration’s monograph for over-the-counter sunscreen products,” the company said in the statement “The results showed that our product is effective and safe for use as an 80 minute water-resistant (FDA’s highest rating), SPF 30 sunscreen lotion in accordance with FDA regulations when used as directed (Shake Well. Apply liberally and evenly 15 minutes before sun exposure. Reapply after 80 minutes of swimming or sweating, immediately after towel drying and at least every 2 hours).”

    In all, the suit seeks to provide refunds to all customers who purchased the specified products, a total estimated to be $5 million.

    [via People]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uWendy’s Brings Back Pulled Pork Sandwich To Close Out Summer Of Fast-Food Pulled Porkr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uNew Spotify Privacy Policy Aims To Provide “Plain Language” Explanation For Collected Datar


4 4 4 9
  • Just weeks after Spotify ticked off many of its 75 million active users with an updated, potentially invasive privacy policy, the music streaming service has once again revamped the terms, this time including an introduction that provides clear reasoning and examples of data collected.

    In a post on Spotify’s official blog, CEO Daniel Ek wrote an explainer for the latest policy update, noting that many of the changes came after receiving feedback from users of the service.

    While Ek’s post is on Spotify’s corporate blog, the actual policy updates are currently only live in the U.K., Denmark, Norway, Sweden and New Zealand. A spokesperson for the company says they will be rolled out in the U.S. and other markets in the coming weeks and days.

    Ek says the new policy – which he describes as “plain language” – essentially breaks down into two categories of information that Spotify collects and is “intended to be a clear statement of the company’s approach and principals about privacy.”

    The first category Ek refers to is “information that we must have in order for you to use Spotify,” this includes users’ names, IP address, music they listen to and sensor information to rotate videos.

    The second category, which is where most people took issues the first time around, involves “information that enables us to offer you additional features,” namely the collection of data from your mobile devices.

    The newly updated privacy policy aims to simplify several of the clauses in that category, including a sentence that proclaimed that Spotify “may collect information stored on your mobile device, such as contacts, photos, or media files.”

    The relevant section — under the header “Information Stored on Your Mobile Device” — now gives additional context and examples on why the service would even want some of that information from you.

    “We may provide features that rely on the use of additional information on your mobile device or require access to certain services on your mobile device that will enhance your Spotify experience but are not required to use the Service,” the policy introduction reads. “For example, we might allow you to upload photos to your profile, connect with friends, or let you use voice commands to control the Service.”

    According to the updated policy, which again has not yet been rolled out to U.S. customers, “Granting us access does not mean you are granting us unlimited access to that information or that we will access specific information without your permission. To the contrary, for each type of information listed in this section, before we access this information or these features of your mobile device, we will ask for your permission.”

    The soon-to-be released in the U.S. policy – and Ek’s introduction – also includes clarification for specific data collection of photos, location, contacts and voice.

    The policy changes first announced in August also included a controversial clause that said Spotify could “collect information about your location based on… your phone’s GPS location or other forms of locating mobile devices (e.g. Bluetooth).” This raised concerns that the company would be tracking users’ locations.

    The company reiterates it won’t access that information without permission, but the introduction goes on to clarify why those details could be beneficial.

    “This information enables us to create collaborative listening experiences (only with others who have also given permission), and to provide even better recommendations about locally popular music, live venues, and concerts,” Ek writes.

    According to Ek’s introduction, the collection of contacts and photos would allow users to find friends or contacts who use Spotify and customize playlist art. Allowing Spotify to have access to your microphone could allow users to control their selections verbally rather than by physically pushing buttons.

    Users who signed the August privacy policy update do not have to re-sign the new terms. Those who did not agree to the terms last month will see the latest revamp “in the coming days and weeks,” Ek says.

    [via Business Insider]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist