среда, 26 августа 2015 г.

uH&M Offering $1M Prize Every Year For Best Clothes-Recycling Idear


4 4 4 9
  • In a shopping culture where it’s easy to find something you like, when you want it, for a price that’s on the cheaper side, many of us end up simply chucking clothes we don’t want when we buy replacements. In an effort to combat that “disposable” clothing culture, H&M is offering up a $1 million prize every year for the best idea on how to recycle those unwanted garments, and keep them out of the trash.

    H&M, which is launching a line of jeans made from recycled cotton next week, will offer a €1 million (or about $1.16 million) prize for new techniques to reuse old clothes, Chief Executive Karl-Johan Persson told Reuters.

    “No company, fast-fashion or not, can continue exactly like today,” Persson said. “The (prize’s) largest potential lies with finding new technology that means we can recycle the fibers with unchanged quality.”

    The more clothes companies churn out every year, the more concerns grow up about cotton eventually running out. The problem is that many cotton recycling methods now result in poor-quality fibers that have to be mixed with other materials, which renders them unable to be recycled. Those clothes end up in land fills.

    Cheap clothing is great, and it’s something H&M is known for, so it won’t be easy for the company to figure out how to keep selling low-priced stuff and not deplete the world’s cotton supplies, an environmental science professor explains to Reuters.

    “This is a great challenge for H&M whose trademark is cheap clothes at good quality … The fact it’s cheap means there’s a risk people buy and throw away, or buy too much,” he said.

    Other companies have already taken steps to combat the environmental effects of “fast fashion”: Mud Jeans leases garments to customers and then offers to replace them every year, repairing and reselling the used items or recycling the fabric; Marks & Spencer in the UK and Italian store Calzedonia both collect used items in their stores for recycling; and British designer Tom Cridland offers a 30-year guarantee on his range of T-shirts to encourage people to buy something more expensive, but will last.

    “I don’t believe it is fair on customers to churn out plain white T-shirts that will only last a year or two,” he told Reuters. “I can’t compete on price so I have to do something different.”

    Recycling — fashion world’s antidote to environmental concerns [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uBurger King Proposes Unholy Alliance With McDonald’s To Promote Peace Dayr


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-08-26 at 9.03.40 AMVinegar and oil, soda and pop rocks, Burger King and McDonald’s: those are just a few things that don’t quite mix well together. Well, except that last one, apparently, as The King is calling on the Golden Arches to set their differences aside and give consumers what they want: something called a McWhopper.

    Burger King peppered its social media accounts, created a special website and took out full-page ads today, proposing that the two fast food giants join forces to create a mashup of their most infamous menu items: the Big Mac and the Whopper.

    As far as Burger King’s previous attempts to drum up publicity – Left-Handed Whopper and the Whopper Freakout — this one seems to be rooted in a good cause.

    Burger King says the campaign to “settle the beef” was created to raise awareness for Peace One Day, an organization that raises awareness and encourages action for Peace Day. The day, celebrated on Sept. 21, was designated as the annual International Day of Peace by the United Nations back in 2001.

    Titled “An Open Letter From Burger King to McDonald’s,” the King’s full-page ad – which appears in several major newspapers – reads: “We come in peace. We know we’ve had our petty differences, but how about we call a cease-fire on these so-called ‘burger-wars’?”

    The company goes on to propose a collaboration: selling the McWhopper – if McDonald’s agrees – at a pop-up store in Atlanta on Peace Day. Customers won’t have to shell out big bucks for the special sandwich, instead they will pay simply by declaring to end the “beef” with someone they know, the Wall Street Journal reports.

    It’s unclear exactly what the McWhopper would entail, but Burger King’s ad suggests it would be “a big burger with big ambitions,” whatever that means.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uCountless Consumers Are Paying Off Someone Else’s Debt Because Of Default Judgmentsr

uOscar Mayer Recalls 2 Million Pounds Of Turkey Bacon That May Spoil Before Its Timer


4 4 4 9
  • someonethinkofthebaconCustomers have been contacting Kraft Heinz Foods about something unfortunate: their packages of turkey bacon were going bad long before the posted expiration dates. The company investigated these complaints, and the investigation has culminated in more than 2 million pounds of bacon being recalled because it too might go bad.

    The recall includes both cured and uncured bacon, and the regular Oscar Mayer brand as well as the “Selects” nitrate-free version. If you have a package of turkey bacon in your fridge, here’s what to look for:

    Oscar Mayer Selects Turkey Bacon: 56-ounce boxes with four packages. The “best by” date will be August 24 through October 26, 2015.

    Oscar Mayer Turkey Bacon: 36-ounce boxes containing three packages. The “best by” date will be August 28 through October 20, 2015.

    Oscar Mayer Turkey Bacon: 48-ounce boxes containing four packages. The “best by” date will be between September 3 and October 30, 2015.

    All of the products that are part of this recall will be marked with the plant number P-9070, and line number RS19.

    If you have any questions about the recall or about your personal bacon, contact Kraft Heinz at (800) 278-3403. The company told the USDA that they received some reports that eating the spoiled bacon made some customers sick.

    Kraft Heinz Foods Company Recalls Turkey Bacon Products Due To Possible Adulteration [USDA]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


вторник, 25 августа 2015 г.

uStarkist Tuna Class Action Settlement Means Customers Get $25 In Cash Or $50 In Tunar


4 4 4 9
  • Two and a half years ago, a man who eats tuna filed a class action lawsuit against Starkist, a tuna company. His allegation was that the company was deliberately under-filling each can by a few tenths of an ounce. That might not make a difference to one consumer making one tuna salad, but would add up over millions of cans. While Starkist doesn’t admit fault, the case has been settled.

    If you’re a resident of the United States and bought at least one five-ounce can of any of these tunas from Starkist between February 19, 2009 and October 31, 2014, you’re eligible to file a claim:

    Chunk Light Tuna in Water
    Chunk Light Tuna in Oil
    Solid White in Water
    Solid White in Oil

    As often happens with class actions for small items, they’re assuming that you haven’t saved your last five years’ worth of grocery receipts. They’re asking consumers to say on penalty of perjury when they file a claim that they have, indeed, purchased tuna during the period covered by the suit.

    To file, go to the very descriptive TunaLawsuit.com and fill out a claim form or exclude yourself from the lawsuit by November 20, 2015.

    StarKist Tuna Class Action Settlement [Top Class Actions]
    Hendricks v Starkist Co. [Official Site]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uRaiders Of The Lost Walmart Find Ancient And Mysterious My Little Poniesr


4 4 4 9
  • Within the elite squad of retail archaeologists known as the Raiders of the Lost Walmart, some Raiders have subspecialties. Their deep subject knowledge gives us a better understanding of the antiquities that they find buried in the nation’s big-box stores. One of these specialists is Professor Jeffrey, subject expert on My Little Pony.

    pinkieparty

    This trove starts with some familiar territory for people who follow the Raiders’ exploits: a video game at Walmart. Specifically, a Nintendo DS game featuring the character Pinkie Pie that came out in 2008. The good news is that it’s on sale, but only marked down to $15.

    The thing with that game, though, is that it’s from a previous generation of “My Little Pony” marketing, before the super-popular “Friendship is Magic” series came out in 2010 and the characters were redesigned. Jeffrey says that the game came out in 2008, which is probably about right. It’s probably fun and all if you have that game system, but expensive and outdated.

    While visiting a Kmart store, though, he found something even more baffling: merchandise for that older generation of pony products that’s probably going to confuse young fans of the characters when they receive this activity book as a gift or a parent who doesn’t know the difference picks up these plates and cups for their party.

    ponycups

    pony_plates

    pony_activitybook

    They probably date to the same era as the game, which means that they’ve been sitting on the shelf for 7 years. Paper plates don’t go bad, exactly, and neither do kids’ activity books, but that doesn’t mean that anyone wants to buy these items, either.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uCarMax Plays “Used Car Recall Roulette” By Selling Potentially Dangerous Vehiclesr


4 4 4 9
  • carmaxcertDuring the height of recallopalooza 2014, a coalition of consumer advocacy groups raised concerns about CarMax, alleging that the nation’s largest used vehicle seller was misleading customers with claims of “Quality Certified” cars and “125+ point” inspections while not revealing that some cars had been recalled for safety issues that had not yet been repaired.  More than a year later, a new report shows that CarMax is continuing this practice, which one legislator has dubbed “used car recall roulette.”

    The report [PDF] from Connecticut Public Interest Research Group examined CarMax’s inventory and sales records at two dealerships in the state, and found that many of the vehicles listed for sale have unaddressed recalls.

    In all, the report found that 74 of the 566 vehicles for sale at the two dealerships during the month of July were currently under recall campaigns.

    The recalls ranged from seat belt defects, non-deployment of airbags, fire risks related to leaking fuel or faulty catalytic converters, loss of power steering while driving, faulty rear breaks, and axles prone to breaking.

    Sen. Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut, who has sponsored several bills that would ensure used vehicle recalls are addressed before being sold, tells NBC Connecticut that the ConnPIRG report is “chilling.”

    “Bottom line: CarMax is playing a deadly game of ‘used car recall roulette’ with consumer lives,” he said.

    During the investigation at an East Haven, CT, dealership, ConnPIRG found that of the 42 vehicles subject to recall, four were part of two or more recall campaigns.

    “One vehicle, a 2007 Toyota Yaris, had four unrepaired safety recalls, including air bags that may fail to inflate when needed, seat rails that can break and allow the seats to slide forward in a crash, and two defects that can cause it to catch on fire,” the report states.

    At the Hartford CarMax location, investigators found 32 vehicles with unaddressed recalls, five of which were subject to two or more recall each.

    “One vehicle, a 2007 Toyota Prius Hybrid 4D Hatchback, had three unrepaired recalls, including faulty steering components that can cause a loss of steering, corroded coil wire that can cause stalling while the vehicle is being driven, and an accelerator pedal that can get stuck in wide open position, causing a crash, serious injury, or death,” the report found.

    Although the group’s findings are certainly eye-opening, CarMax isn’t running afoul of any law by selling vehicles with safety recalls.

    That’s because, while it’s illegal for consumers to sell recalled microwaves, blenders, or other products, the folks at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration lack the authority to actually force people to fix recalled vehicles before they are sold or rented.

    Legislators and consumer groups have called for stricter regulations against such used car sales, but so far no federal law or requirement has been enacted, thanks in part to opposition from CarMax and other dealers.

    While CarMax says it takes steps to ensure the safety of car buyers, it doesn’t seem to be considering actually fixing those cars before sending them back on the road, despite the fact that any repairs would be covered by the vehicle manufacturer, not the dealer.

    Instead, the company will stick with its current process: going over such safety information with the car buyer prior to closing a sale. At that point, if the consumer buys the vehicle, it’s up them to get it fixed.

    A spokesperson for CarMax tells NBC Connecticut that the company leads the industry in transparency, noting that ConnPIRG received its information from the company directly.

    “Before any customer purchases a used vehicle in our stores, a CarMax associate and the customer review the vehicle’s NHTSA VIN-specific recall report and the customer signs a form acknowledging receipt of the recall report with their sales documents,” the spokesperson said.

    ConnPIRG took issue with that process, noting the method of disclosure is designed as a way to protect the company from liability, rather than keep consumers out of harm’s way.

    “It’s a bit late in the game to ‘disclose’ that a specific car is being recalled, after a car buyer has been lulled onto the lot with a promise of a car that is ‘the very best’ and ‘perfect,’ checked out multiple cars and taken them for test drives, negotiated over the price, and several house after arriving at CarMax’s store – made a decision to buy,” the report states.

    Also at issue is CarMax’s continued marketing of vehicles that are “Quality Certified” and undergo a 125+ point inspection, saying the statements are misleading to potential customers.

    ConnPIRG contends that because CarMax functions much like a franchised car dealership selling used cars, these statements can easily mislead consumers about the dangers of some recalled vehicles.

    “CarMax’s advertising that all their vehicles are ‘certified’ may also mislead car buyers, particularly shoppers who have seen ads touting the ‘certified’ used car sales offered by competing franchised new car dealerships,” the report states. “Those ‘certified’ programs are designed to meet criteria established by auto manufacturers, who typically require their dealerships to ensure that any vehicle they offer for sale as a “certified” car has had any outstanding safety recall repairs performed.”

    Last year, consumer groups claimed the statements by CarMax “tend to lull car buyers into a false sense of security.” The groups called on the Federal Trade Commission to investigate CarMax’s practice of marketing quality-control while still selling vehicles that require repairs.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist