четверг, 20 августа 2015 г.

uTwo Newark Airport Stores Will No Longer Sell Dronesr


4 4 4 9
  • It isn’t just the skies around Newark Liberty International that have been seeing drones lately — until recently, two stores inside the airport were selling unmanned aerial vehicles.

    NJ.com wondered why the airport that’s had a recent spate of drone sightings in the air space used by commercial aircraft would offer the flying objects for sale — especially since some folks might be concerned over the possible danger of a drone interfering with an airplane’s flight.

    Though it’s unclear whether there were any limits on the sale of drones at an airport, two stores that were selling drones will be pulling them from shelves. Brookstone had offered a drone equipped with a 1080 pixel HD camera, and a smaller version without a camera, and Hudson News reportedly had a table of remote-controlled flying objects for sale.

    The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey said on Tuesday that it would demand both companies stop selling drones “immediately.”

    “The Port Authority shares the aviation community’s safety concerns about the growing presence of drones around the region’s airports and is strongly opposed to the sale of drones at terminal shops,” a Port Authority spokesman said in a statement.

    A Hudson Group spokeswoman said the items were toys, but said the chain would remove them.

    “We’re not here to cause panic in the streets,” she told NJ.com. “If it is uncomfortable for customers or the airport, we will do what we always do in that situation, and that’s remove them. And that’s what I’m going to recommend we do.”

    Drones terrify pilots, so why are they sold at Newark airport? [NJ.com]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uDept. Of Education Plans To Overhaul Loan Forgiveness Program For Students Defrauded By Schoolsr


4 4 4 9
  • As thousands of former Corinthian College students continue to wait to learn whether or not they’re on the hook to repay billions of dollars in student loans they took out to attend the now defunct for-profit college, the Department of Education announced plans to overhaul the loan forgiveness process for students who believe they have been defrauded by their colleges.

    Starting next month, the Dept. of Education will begin working to craft a new process aimed at making it easier for students to have their federal loans discharged if the school they attended was found to have used illegal or deceptive tactics to persuade them to borrow funds to finance their education.

    The process to create a more streamlined loan forgiveness process will include field hearings and the creation of an advisory panel, the Dept. said in an announcement.

    Specifically, the Dept. will look to clarify:
    • the procedures to be used for a borrower to establish a defense to repayment;
    • the criteria that the Department will use to identify acts or omissions of an institution that constitute defenses to repayment of Federal Direct Loans to the Secretary;
    • the standards and procedures that the Department will use to determine the liability of the institution participating in the Federal Direct Loan Program for amounts based on borrower defenses; and
    • the effect of borrower defenses on institutional capability assessments.

    “The process we are beginning today aims to create a clearer, more comprehensive system,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in the statement. “And we think it is critical that this solution also does right by American taxpayers. That’s what they deserve.”

    The Dept. expects to have a rule in place by November 2016, meaning it would likely go into effect in July 2017.

    The need to change the current process to have student loans discharged based on the fraudulent practices of a college – known as “borrower defense to repayment” – became clear earlier this year after thousands of former students of Corinthian’s Heald College, WyoTech and Everest University campuses found the system complicated and difficult to navigate, the Dept. says.

    In some cases, consumer advocates warned that many student might not bother to apply for discharges because the system was too daunting.

    The Washington Post reports that only about 7,000 former CCI students have applied for forgiveness, with just 2,600 applications processed so far.

    The upcoming changes will not affect the ongoing debt relief process for CCI that the Dept. announced back in June.

    At that time, the Dept. of Education said students who attended (after June 20, 2014) the 30 CCI campuses that closed in April had two options to seek relief:

    1. Apply for a closed school loan discharge, which would get rid of the obligation to repay and reimburse the student for any payments made; or
    2. Transfer earned credit to another institution to continue their education in a comparable program.

    While it’s become increasingly clear to lawmakers that the process is in need of a change, some have expressed their concern that the Department doesn’t require the offending colleges to foot the discharged debt tab.

    But Education Under Secretary Ted Mitchell tells the Post that usually isn’t an option, as many schools that fail have few assets to cover the billion-dollar federal loan tabs they created. Such was the case for CCI, which filed for bankruptcy listing just $20 million in assets, a far cry from the $3.5 billion in outstanding federal loans owed by its former students.

    Mitchell said that in addition to streamlining the process to apply for forgiveness, the Department will address the need to use enforcement actions to attempt to recoup funds to cover borrower claims.

    “This is very important to us,” Mitchell said. “We know borrowers deserve as clear a set of policies and regulations as possible to make it easier, more transparent, more efficient for them to apply for relief.”

    Obama administration plans to overhaul rules on student debt forgiveness [The Washington Post]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uUber Defends Robocalls, Claims They Were Legitimate Political Messagesr


4 4 4 9
  • A week after Uber was sued for allegedly spamming non-customers with text messages, the ridesharing service faces another complaint claiming intrusive telephonic behavior. This time, the plaintiff says Uber is violating federal and New York state laws with pre-recorded calls urging consumers to contact their local lawmakers. But Uber says the calls were political in nature, thus exempt from the robocall rules.

    Earlier this summer, Uber had been trying to rile up New York City consumers to oppose Mayor Bill de Blasio’s proposal to put a cap on the number of non-taxi drivers who can pick up passengers. But according to the complaint [PDF] filed Tuesday in a federal court, the company’s opposition campaign is robocalling NYC residents without their permission.

    The plaintiff claims that between July 16 and July 21, Uber robocalled his home landline four different times with messages urging consumers to rise up against the mayor’s proposal (which has subsequently been dropped).

    Three of the calls used the following prerecorded message, per the plaintiff:

    “Hi. It’s Molly with Uber, and we need your help. Uber ended the days when you couldn’t get a ride home because cabs didn’t want to leave Manhattan. Now Mayor de Blasio is trying to bring the bad old days back because his millionaire taxi donors are telling him to. But why on earth would your Council Member ever consider voting for something like this? They should stand up for you, not take orders from the mayor. Your Council Member is sponsoring this bill, and we need your voice. Please call your council member, and tell them to take their names off Mayor de Blasio’s anti-Uber bill. Because you, and all New Yorkers, deserve reliable transportation. Paid for by Uber.”

    The other call was virtually the same, but from “Derrick.”

    The Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits telemarketers from initiating “any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party.” Violations of the TCPA can result in fines of at least $500 per call; more if it’s proven that the caller knowingly violated the rules.

    The lawsuit seeks class-action status to represent all recipients of these calls who did not give Uber their express consent to receive prerecorded marketing calls. The plaintiff, who is an attorney, believes there are thousands of others who were on the receiving end of this campaign.

    However, as those of you who live in election “battleground” states are well aware, the TCPA does have an exemption for certain political campaign robocalls. Uber, which plans to fight this lawsuit, tells Bloomberg News that it believes these calls fall under the category of acceptable political messaging.

    The company rep contends that Uber was “engaged in legitimate efforts to enlist the support of New York voters, a great many of whom were opposed” to de Blasio’s proposal.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uApple Watch Sport Users Complain That Lettering And Logo Are Wearing Offr


4 4 4 9
  • It’s not until a new product officially leaves the testing phase and reaches the general public that its real problems are discovered, and owners of the Apple Watch Sport are reporting an unexpected problem: The Apple logo on the backs of their watches is wearing off. Sure, it doesn’t affect how the watch works, but for a product that’s pricey and marketed as having luxury watch standards, that’s unexpected.

    (Reddit)

    (Reddit)

    Or maybe inside Apple’s Reality Distortion Field, what’s happening is that a silver Apple logo is revealing itself, making the watch’s status as a super-luxury product known. To anyone who looks at the back. Of a watch that people wear. That probably isn’t the solution.

    One user on Apple’s support forums reported the color of the watch casing peeling on the back, around some of the words, and says that his or her case is pending with Apple. That user posted yesterday, but they aren’t alone: someone on Reddit reported the same problem a few weeks ago.

    Maybe it’s a fluke or defect in only a very few watches, or maybe it’s a problem to watch out for. Either way, it’s an annoying issue for owners who have to face getting their wrist computers replaced.

    Apple Watch Sport owners report unexpected rear logo damage, other text scratching off [Apple Insider]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uTraveler Captures Video Of Delta Plane Being Struck By Lightning On Runwayr


4 4 4 9
  • So you’re bored on the plane and looking out the window at all the other jets queued up for takeoff. You decide to shoot a little video with your phone when — what the &^&@$, did lightning just strike that plane?

    Check out the above clip from YouTube user Jack Perkins, who writes that the footage was taken at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International on Tuesday.

    Just in case you miss it the first time, the lucky cellphone videographer repeats footage of the lightning-strike in slow-motion.

    [via AJC.com]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uRegulators Open Investigation Into American Airlines Flight’s Rough Landing Because Of Wind Shearr


4 4 4 9
  • Federal regulators will investigate an incident in which an American Airlines flight collided with approach lights at the Charlotte Douglas Airport in North Carolina while attempting to land during a sudden change in wind patterns on Saturday. While dramatic shifts in wind are exceedingly rare when it comes to affecting an aircraft’s landing, it turns out the incident last week is the second in less than two months for the carrier.

    The National Transportation Safety Board announced Wednesday that it had opened a formal probe into why American Airlines flight 1851 – operated by US Airways – collided with lights before striking and damaging the underside of its tail while landing in North Carolina on Saturday.

    Pilots for the flight, which was traveling from Hartsfield-Jackson Airport in Atlanta to Charlotte, reported encountering wind shear – a sudden or dramatic shift in wind often associated with thunderstorms – during its final approach, the Board says.

    As the plane came in to land, the bottom of the aircraft scraped against the runway approach lights, before the tail hit the runway.

    The pilots quickly aborted the landing, took off again and landed safely on a second attempt, NTSB says. No injuries were reported as a result of the incident.

    A look at Flight Aware radar shows the American flight circled the airport before attempting to land a second time, while storm systems can be seen near the airport.

    A look at Flight Aware radar shows the American flight circled the airport before attempting to land a second time, while storm systems can be seen near the airport.

    Shortly after the plane landed, the cockpit voice recorder and black box were removed for analysis by the Federal Aviation Administration and NTSB. The board says the aircraft was immediately taken out of service after suffering “substantial damage.”

    NTSB says its investigation will include an examination of weather conditions at the time of the event, airplane performance, and operational factors.

    While incidents such as the one that occurred on Saturday in Charlotte are unusual – as pilots are trained to avoid such wind conditions and enhanced radar has minimized the likelihood of encountering such events – the Wall Street Journal reports it’s the second such occurrence for American Airlines in two months.

    On June 26, an American flight approaching Dallas-Fort Worth experienced a close call after also reportedly running into a wind shear (also known as a microburst).

    That flight came within dozen of feet of touching down prematurely. The aircraft wasn’t damaged during the incident and no injuries were reported.

    [via The Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uRegal Cinemas May Now Check Theatergoers’ Bags Upon Entryr


4 4 4 9
  • (Nicholas Eckhart)

    (Nicholas Eckhart)

    You might already be used to having your backpack or purse searched upon entering concerts or sporting events, but now there’s one more venue that may take a look inside your belongings: Regal Cinemas announced it may search guests’ bags upon entry to any of its locations across the country.

    The theater chain, which has about 7,300 screens in the U.S., added a new security policy to its website, noting that “security issues have become a daily part of our lives in America.”

    “Regal Entertainment Group wants our customers and staff to feel comfortable and safe when visiting or working in our theatres. To ensure the safety of our guests and employees, backpacks and bags of any kind are subject to inspection prior to admission,” the policy reads. “We acknowledge that this procedure can cause some inconvenience and that it is not without flaws, but hope these are minor in comparison to increased safety.”

    Entertainment Weekly notes that it’s unclear whether Regal will increase ticket prices to cover the cost of additional staff that might be needed to check moviegoers’ bags.

    This might not cause even a ripple among movie lovers, however, as one analyst for entertainment research company Rentrak tells USA Today. Basically, it’s old hat.

    “Moviegoers have become so accustomed to having these types of security measures enacted in all kinds of public spaces, from theme parks to sports venues and rock concerts,” Paul Dergarabedian explains. “Regal has decided to make a concerted effort to show their patrons that they’re aware of security issues.”

    As for whether the increased security will hurt the box office, he doesn’t think it’ll many any difference whatsoever.

    “I don’t think anyone is going to stay away from a movie theater because of increased security measures. If anything, they’re going to appreciate it,” he says.

    The move comes after two unrelated shootings in movie theaters recently: in July a gunman killed two women and then himself at a theater in Louisiana, and in an attack at a theater in August near Nashville, a man went after a theater full of people with pepper spray, a hatchet and a pellet gun. He was killed by police.

    Regal theaters may search bags at the door [USA Today]
    Regal Cinemas begins checking bags at entry after theater shootings [Entertainment Weekly]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist