понедельник, 17 августа 2015 г.

uSprint Will Rent You An iPhone Forever For $22 Per Month, Totally Not A Contractr


4 4 4 9
  • iphone4evaDo you itch to replace your iPhone as soon as a new one is announced? Do you only live and travel in areas where the Sprint network is acceptably strong? If so, Sprint’s new “iPhone Forever” plan may be for you: it allows you to upgrade your phone whenever you feel like it, as long as you choose a newer iPhone model than the one you had before.

    This isn’t anything new, of course: Sprint began its “iPhone for Life” program last year, which was part of a bundle with a two-year contract. Now Sprint is joining its competitors in offering phone leasing and payment programs, trying to wean people off phone subsidies. The iPhone Forever program is just a variation on that which simplifies the plan pricing, and offers a discount to people trading in a phone.

    The advertised pricing is $15 per month for people trading in a phone and $22 for people who aren’t, but that will only get you a 16 GB iPhone, which is not enough local storage space to be of much use. Upgrades to the storage space or getting the larger iPhone 6 Plus will increase your monthly payment.

    One thing that isn’t spelled out clearly: what happens if you lose or damage your phone? Sprint makes it clear that customers are responsible for finding their own insurance coverage, which Sprint will probably be happy to sell to you for a convenient upcharge.

    Sprint announces ‘iPhone Forever’, a $22/month yearly upgrade plan [9to5Mac]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uGoogle Launches Tool That Tells You If Solar Panels Can Save You Moneyr


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-08-17 at 1.43.50 PMAre you thinking of putting a solar panel on your home, but not sure if the investment would be worthwhile? Google’s latest unusual online tool aims to take the guesswork out of the alternative energy investment.

    Google today unveiled Project Sunroof, a tool that allows users to look up an address and find out just how useful those solar panels can be to both your wallet and your energy consumption.

    “As the price of installing solar has gotten less expensive, more homeowners are turning to it as a possible option for decreasing their energy bill,” the company said on its website. “We want to make installing solar panels easy and understandable for anyone.”

    Project Sunroof works by inputting your address in Google Maps and combining that information with other databases to create a personalized roof analysis.

    The tool then computes how much sunlight hits your roof each year. Next, Google Sunroof will recommend an installation size to generate close to 100% of your electrical use based on your roof size, the amount of sun hitting the area and your electricity bill.

    Finally, the tool generates your possible savings after considering current solar industry pricing data to run the numbers on leasing, taking a loan, or buying solar panels for your house. The equation also factors in federal and state tax credits, utility rebates and renewable energy credits in your area.

    Of course, if you find that solar panel installation is something you’d like to pursue, Google will gladly send your information to local solar providers.

    While Google’s latest tool may seem like it might only appeal to a smaller group of consumers, the use of solar panels has continuously grown over the last several years thanks in part to falling prices for the devices.

    As we previously reported, during the last decade, industry and the Chinese government realized that solar power would be important in the future, which it is.

    They responded to this prediction by building a huge number of solar panel factories and cranking out the panels in 2009, leading to a massive oversupply. That cut prices worldwide, making it a lot cheaper to cover your roof with solar panels.

    [via VentureBeat]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uBlue Bell Says Ice Cream Will Be Back In Some Stores On Aug. 31r


4 4 4 9
  • (kusine)

    (kusine)

    The nightmare is over, Blue Bell fans: four months after a recall linked to a listeria outbreak saw the ice cream disappear from shelves, months filled with speculation over when the company would start churning out dessert again, Blue Bell will be returning to select stores starting Aug. 31.

    The company announced the news on its website on Monday, a few days after Tweeting about its trucks hitting the road again.

    Blue Bell writes that it’s notified the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and state health officials in Alabama and Texas of its plan to start selling the ice cream in certain cities on a limited basis.

    “Over the past several months we have been working to make our facilities even better, and to ensure that everything we produce is safe, wholesome and of the highest quality for you to enjoy,” said Ricky Dickson, vice president of sales and marketing for Blue Bell. “This is an exciting time for us as we are back to doing what we love…making ice cream!”

    The company’s production facility in Sylacauga, Ala., began producing ice cream in late July, and is currently the only one making ice cream. Blue Bell facilities in Brenham, Texas, and Broken Arrow, Okla., “are still undergoing facility and production process upgrades similar to those made at the Alabama plant,” the company says.

    The company also hasn’t announced which flavors were part of the early batches, but a health official in Alabama told news outlet WFAA that flavors that were part of the test were only “homemade vanilla” and Dutch chocolate.

    There’s a five-phase plan to bring Blue Bell to 15 states:

    Phase One: Brenham, Houston and Austin, Texas, areas, as well as parts of Alabama, (Birmingham and Montgomery) where the product is being made, starting Aug. 31.
    Phase Two: North central Texas and southern Oklahoma
    Phase Three: Southwest Texas and central Oklahoma
    Phase Four: The majority of Texas and southern Louisiana.
    Phase Five: Complete the states of Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas and begin distribution in Arkansas, Florida, northern Louisiana and Mississippi. This phase will also include only parts of the following states: Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

    There aren’t any specific dates set for phases two through five. The timing of each phase will depend on product availability and when Blue Bell can properly service the customers in an area.

    Though all products were recalled in April, Blue Bell’s recall of listeria-tainted products began in March with certain desserts. Ten people were hospitalized and three died due to listeriosis traced to Blue Bell products.

    And remember, if you’re still holding onto old containers of Blue Bell: even though the Centers for Disease Control deemed the listeria outbreak over in June, folks with freezers full of the recalled products could still get sick.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uPassenger Rights Group Says Delta Is Shaming Travelers Into Buying Ticket Upgradesr


4 4 4 9
  • An example of the pop-up warning in question.

    An example of the pop-up warning in question.

    You might be familiar with the feeling: you go into a purchase with a plan of exactly what you want to buy. No frills, no fuss, no muss. But then, suddenly, you find you’re shelling out more money than you’d planned, perhaps after encountering some persuasive sales tactics. A passenger rights group says Delta Air Lines is employing shame as a method to get travelers to buy ticket upgrades they might not have wanted initially.

    Upselling, as its known, is the practice of convincing customers to buy perks or extras not included in a base price. In the airline industry, these add-ons can be anything from a wider seat or more leg room, to priority boarding and free ticket changes. But flyersrights.org, a nonprofit group that advocates for passengers, is calling Delta out on its tactics to get people to buy those extras.

    On Delta’s website, choosing a basic economy fare will bring you to a final page to confirm your purchase, notes the Los Angeles Times. Listed there are several consequences of buying the cheapest ticket: You’ll be last to board, meaning the last to find overhead bin space. You don’t get a seat assignment ahead of time, there are no refunds or ticket changes and no stand-by travel changes.

    The president of the passenger rights group says the practice is like when a car dealer pressures buyers into tacking on expensive upgrades to a basic car model.

    “If it works, other airlines will likely try to follow,” Paul Hudson told the LAT.

    Delta denies that the section of its site is meant to shame people, with a spokesman saying instead that it’s meant “to make people aware of what they are buying.”

    Critics say Delta Air Lines is shaming passengers to spend more [Los Angeles Times]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uMore Recalls Under A More Watchful Eye Is The “New Normal” For Auto Regulatorsr


4 4 4 9
  • Back in January, newly appointed chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Mark Rosekind predicted that 2015 could see even more recalls than the recallapalooza that was 2014.While, the 32.4 million cars recalled in the first eight months of the year still pales in comparison to the more than 63 million called back last year, Rosekind wasn’t completely off on his forecast – namely that the agency would take a less forgiving approach to possible safety defects.

    The Detroit News reports that though the millions of vehicles recalled this year might not top last year’s record-setting safety initiatives, it has already topped the previous record of 30.8 million vehicles recalled in all of 2004.

    The new pattern of increased recalls over the past year and a half is simply the “new normal” for regulators, who have increasingly trained a watchful eye on safety defects.

    NHTSA has taken several automakers and parts suppliers to task this year, with unusual hearings, record-setting fines and pressure to recall vehicles.

    After continued pressure from the regulatory agency, Japanese auto parts maker Takata officially recalled 33.8 million vehicles in May – many of which had previously been recalled by U.S. auto manufacturers.

    Just last week, Volkswagen reported in notices related to its latest recall for airbag non-deployment, that NHTSA demanded it call back the vehicles despite the fact the car maker had determined it wasn’t a safety issue.

    Sean Kane, president of auto safety group Safety Research and Strategies, tells the Detroit News that the more aggressive stance from NHTSA has encouraged automakers to move more quickly when it comes to investigating and initiating recalls.

    “There is a new normal,” Kane said. “Manufacturers are becoming much more diligent about fixing things that they would have been able to get away with doing customer satisfaction or dealer bulletins that NHTSA would have accepted in the past. Today, no one’s even going to cut these corners.”

    In fact, some companies have created their own departments to tackle safety issues. Fiat Chrysler, which has recalled the most vehicles in 2015, hired additional personnel and created new positions dedicated to recall campaign execution.

    “We have also taken steps to improve our parts procurement,” the company said.

    Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx told the Detroit News last month that NHTSA would continue to take an aggressive approach to getting unsafe vehicles off the roads, despite advances in technology and autonomous cars.

    “NHTSA is going to have to keep up… We have the Jetsons coming into us and we have Flintstones resources,” Foxx said.

    Still, the agency will have to overcome some of its own issues, and a declining budget.

    Earlier this year, a report from the Inspector General placed much of the blame for the General Motors ignition switch defect that killed 124 on the agency’s failures.

    More stringent auto recalls for 2015 are ‘new normal’ [The Detroit News]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uHawaii Blocking State Workers From Streaming Video Services To Prevent On-The-Job Binge-Watchingr


4 4 4 9
  • Listen, we’re not hear to judge you over how many hours you spent locked in a dark, air-conditioned room this weekend in front of a TV emitting a constant stream of entertainment. But once it comes time to go to work, the binge must end. Hawaii is taking steps to make it difficult for state workers to spend too much time on Netflix and Hulu, blocking those services so employees don’t waste time watching Cheers/Doctor Who/Friends from start to finish.

    Binge watching is a real problem in Hawaii, where state workers spent between 100 and 300 hours watching Netflix in a single week, according to the Office of Information Management and Technology, reported Hawaii News Now.

    That’s enough Netflix viewing to equal an estimated two to nine full-time employees doing nothing but watching streaming content for the full 40-hour work week.

    Because watching Netflix isn’t working, the state has blocked access to Netflix and Hulu on its work computers. Free streaming sites like YouTube and others that are used for public relations, training and educational purposes will still be allowed.

    “Now it’s perfectly reasonable that they might use YouTube. The state uploads its own videos to YouTube. Some of these other services, maybe,” said Hawaii Information Serve communications director Ryan Ozawa. “But when you are looking at Netflix, you’re looking at Hulu, these are primarily entertainment services.”

    The state’s Chief Information Officer Todd Nacapuy announced the move in a memo to state department heads, the governor and legislative leaders.

    “In order to preserve sufficient online access for state business, we will be immediately blocking video streaming services,” he wrote.

    Of course, this isn’t anything new for private companies, as many employers have blocks in place to keep workers from accessing sites that aren’t essential to the job. Unless your job happens to be watching Netflix movies, in which case you’d better hope you have access to that site.

    State employees watch 100 to 300 hours of Netflix at work a week [Hawaii News Now]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uNY Times Claims Amazon Is A Cruel, Soul-Devouring Workplace; Jeff Bezos Disagreesr


4 4 4 9
  • Over the weekend, the New York Times published a lengthy article based on interviews with current and former (mostly former) Amazon employees about the company’s employment practices. They concluded that for most employees, the pace of work and atmosphere were unbearable, allowing employees no personal lives, encouraging snitching and paranoia, and working employees impossibly hard before spitting most of them out a couple of years later.

    The workplace that the Times describes isn’t bad compared to some workplaces: it doesn’t directly physically endanger workers’ lives or safety, like a white-collar version of the company’s warehouses that let employees pass out from heat exhaustion rather than install air conditioning. Amazon workers are paid competitively, but their offices lack the fancy perks that tech workers for other companies might get.

    No one seems to disagree that Amazon employees work long hours and that working there isn’t for everyone. The allegations that led founder and CEO Jeff Bezos to send out an all-company e-mail this morning, though, were that employees dealing with their own or close family members’ health problems or even a personal tragedy like a stillbirth were punished for not putting their jobs first.

    Bezos encourages employees to read the Amazon piece, then says that if some of the more extreme stories are true, he wants to hear about it:

    The NYT article prominently features anecdotes describing shockingly callous management practices, including people being treated without empathy while enduring family tragedies and serious health problems. The article doesn’t describe the Amazon I know or the caring Amazonians I work with every day.

    Even the best CEO inevitably has some jerks working under him or her in management, so maybe Bezos’ horror is genuine. People interviewed for the piece say that this attitude is knitted into the company culture, though: hard work and constant criticism of one’s peers are the best way to get ahead in system where a certain percentage of workers every year are culled: something that Bezos denies but that an Amazon spokesperson earlier confirmed to the Times.

    Inside Amazon: Wrestling Big Ideas in a Bruising Workplace [NY Times]
    Jeff Bezos Says Amazon Won’t Tolerate ‘Callous’ Management Practices [NY Times]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist