среда, 12 августа 2015 г.

uBrewery Worker Declares His Feelings About Tom Brady On The Bottom Of 20,000 Cans Of Beerr


4 4 4 9
  • If you’ve had a can of Sun King beer recently, you might’ve been holding a vessel bearing one man’s personal feelings on New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, and never have known it. That man is named Biscuit, he works on the brewery’s canning line, and he thinks “TOM BRADY SUX,” according to the “Born on” date on the bottom of more than 20,000 cans of beer.

    Sun King Brewery is in Indianapolis, the home of the Colts, where its beer is sold at Lucas Oil Stadium. Though the brewery isn’t taking credit for the anti-Brady stance, it’s still on board with football loyalty.

    The canning shenanigans (shecanigans?) date back to May 13, in the midst of the DeflateGate controversy that had everyone buzzing, notes the Indy Star.

    “It was a prank by Biscuit,” Sun King co-owner Clay Robinson told the Indy Star of the cans of Wee Mac Scottish Ale that came off the line with the Brady message. “It wasn’t an idea we came up with at all. Every day, we change the thing on the bottom of our cans. One of the guys running the canning lines had to come up with something. Biscuit is his name. So Biscuit put ‘Tom Brady Sux.'”

    Biscuit is still employed by Sun King, but now he has to submit a list of sayings he’s going to stamp on the cans each week.

    If you’re a fan of the Colts, or Sun King, or even Tom Brady, you might be out of luck trying to get your own can, as that batch’s shelf life is nearing its end.

    “I assume most were consumed and recycled without anyone noticing,” Robinson said.

    *Thanks for the tip, Chuck!

    How ‘Tom Brady Sux’ ended up on Sun King beer cans [Indy Star]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCitizens Bank Must Pay $31.5M In Fines, Refunds For Failing To Credit Full Deposit Amountsr


4 4 4 9
  • Several federal agencies teamed up like your favorite buddy-cop movie to bring down the bad guy today. In this particular case the bad guy was Citizens Bank, which must now pay a total of $20.5 million in penalties and $11 million in refunds to the owners of accounts it allegedly failed to credit for full amounts of deposited funds.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, along with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced today that they have taken action against Citizens Bank for violating federal laws related to properly servicing customer accounts.

    According to the regulators’ consent order [PDF], from January 2008 to November 30, 2013, Citizens Bank shorted consumers millions of dollars by failing to address mistakes in which the bank’s scanner misread either the deposit slip or the checks provided by consumers.

    Like many banks, Citizens required consumers making deposits to fill out a slip listing the checks or cash being deposited, and their total. Customers then turned that slip over to the bank and received a receipt reflecting the amount of the deposit transaction.

    However, an investigation found that Citizens Bank frequently did not give consumers full credit for their deposits when the amount scanned on the deposit slip was less than the amount of the checks and cash deposited.

    “The bank credited the consumer’s account with what was read on the deposit slip, not the actual sum of money the consumer transferred into the bank,” the consent order states. “Citizens only investigated and fixed errors when they were above a certain threshold.”

    From January 2008 to September 2012, the bank only looked into discrepancies greater than $50. From September 2012 to November 2013, the bank only looked into discrepancies greater than $25, according to the complaint.

    Regulators allege that in addition to failing to investigate discrepancies, Citizens falsely told consumers that deposits were subject to verification.

    The promise of verification implied that the bank would take steps to ensure consumers were credited with the correct deposit amount, but investigators say that simply wasn’t the case.

    Instead, the bank’s practice was not to verify and correct deposit inaccuracies unless they were above the $25 or $50 threshold.

    Although some consumers benefited from this policy, others lost money that rightfully belonged to them, investigators say.

    As a result of its allegedly unfair deposit practices, the CFPB ordered Citizens Bank to pay approximately $11 million in refunds to victims who did not receive all the money that should have been deposited into their accounts.

    The refunds must include any fees the consumer incurred related to the under-crediting, including but not limited to any overdraft fees, insufficient funds fees, and monthly maintenance fees, as well as a reasonable estimate of interest on those amounts.

    If the consumers have an open account with the bank, they will receive a credit to their account. For closed accounts, Citizens Bank will send a check to the affected consumers.

    Additionally, the bank must pay a $7.5 million civil penalty to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund and end all practices that are in violation of federal financial laws.

    “Among other things, this means the bank must properly review its compliance management system to ensure no further violations relating to its processing of deposits, it must not misrepresent its processing practices, and it must incorporate corrective actions if the bank fails to process deposits consistent with federal consumer financial law,” the consent order states.

    The FDIC separately ordered Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania to pay restitution and a $3 million civil penalty. The OCC separately ordered Citizens Bank, N.A., to pay restitution and a $10 million civil penalty.

    In all, Citizens Bank must pay about $11 million in consumer refunds and $20.5 million in federal penalties for these coordinated actions.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPolice: Pennsylvania Woman Faked Cancer For Two Years To Scam Thousands In Donationsr


4 4 4 9
  • Any scam that takes money from unsuspecting folks is bad, of course, but those that prey on people trying to help those in need seem to leave an extra nasty taste in the mouth: police in Pennsylvania say one woman took advantage of the kindness of others by pretending she had cancer for two years, allegedly raking in thousands of dollars in donations.

    State Police have charged the 23-year-old woman with theft by deception and receiving stolen property, reports WJAC.

    Authorities say she lied about being diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in March 2013, and since then would take money from events organized to raise funds on her behalf. At her most recent event held in April, police said she raised $14,000.

    The state police investigator says her “elaborate scheme” involved her having relatives driver her to the hospital and then tell them to wait in the lobby while she went to another part of the hospital. She’d later return and make it appear she got treatment. She even shaved her head as part of the alleged scam, police say.

    Not only is she facing felony charges, but she’ll have to give up her title as a former Miss Pennsylvania U.S. International pageant winner. Pageant directors released a statement about her arrest, saying the organization was “saddened” to hear the news of her alleged scam.

    “We were also led to believe that she was dealing with this horrible disease and stood by her as she struggled being a beauty queen and a cancer patient,” the group said. “We at Butler’s Beauties believe that with a crown and sash you can accomplish many great things as a role model, spokesmodel and community leader as a beauty pageant queen. When you deceive the public and take people’s money that is under the pretense of fraud, we will not tolerate those actions.”

    The statement added that she is no longer a representative of the Miss Pennsylvania U.S. International organization “and will be required to return her crown and sash upon her release from being detained.”

    Related: How To Not Suck… At Charitable Giving

    Police: Woman Lied About Having Cancer [WJAC]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uRegulators File Suit Against Data Broker That Helped Payday Loan Scammer Bilk $7M From Consumersr


4 4 4 9
  • (Quazie)

    (Quazie)

    From time to time, federal regulators shut down shady payday lending companies that debit consumers’ accounts or charge their credit cards without permission. But those nefarious operations have to get their information from somewhere, right? Well, today the Federal Trade Commission sent a message to all of those companies providing such personal information to scammy-mcscammersons by taking action against a data broker operation that illegal sold payday loan applicants’ financial information.

    The FTC today announced that it filed a lawsuit [PDF] against Sequoia One LLC, Gen X Marketing Group LLC, and their operators for allegedly selling the financial information of 500,000 individuals to a scam operation that bilked nearly $7.1 million from those consumers’ accounts.

    According to the FTC complaint, the data broker enterprise bought loan applications from the operators of payday loan websites and got others directly from consumers via their own payday loan websites.

    But instead of passing on those applications to legitimate payday lenders, the FTC alleges the operation sold the data to companies – like Ideal Financial Solutions – that intended to use the information for their own financial gain.

    The FTC contends that the data broker operation sold many of its loan applications to Ideal Financial – which the FTC shut down back in 2013 – for about 50 cents each, while legitimate lenders often pay up to $100 or more for such information.

    The complaint alleges the operation knew that Ideal Financial was making unauthorized bank account debits and credit card charges, but sold the personal information anyway.

    In fact, according to the complaint, the operation actually helped hide Ideal Financial’s fraud by using fine-print disclosures on their websites as well as other misleading tactics to avoid alerting banks to the fraudulent activity.

    The data broker operators – Paul T. McDonnell, Theresa D. Bartholomew, and John E. Bartholomew, Jr. – agreed to a proposed settlement order to resolve the FTC’s charges. Under the proposal, the Bartholomews received a $7.1 million judgment that will be suspended upon payment of $15,000. The order against McDonnell imposes a judgment of more than $3.7 million, which will be suspended due to his inability to pay.

    FTC Charges Data Brokers with Helping Scammer Take More Than $7 Million from Consumers’ Accounts [Federal Trade Commission]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uFDA: We Think The Secret Ingredient In Your “Herbal Viagra” Is Actual Viagrar


4 4 4 9
  • Here’s some news that apparently comes as a surprise to many consumers: it is not a good idea to buy pills marketed as “natural” aphrodisiacs or “herbal Viagra.” While the famed erectile dysfunction treatment won’t be available as a generic medication for a few years yet in the United States, that doesn’t stop companies from making analogues to it and selling it as “natural” supplements.

    For example, the package for yet another “Black Ant” product advertises what it does in language that sort of resembles English:

    [M]ale hormone active (sic), albumen assimilation and stimulating marrow making blood function effects (sic) can accelerate blood corpuscle growth and producing sperm (sic). It can effectively activate adrenal gland PDA sound ause (sic) factor, dilute and supplement sperms (sic), reach several ejaculation and many times orgasm (sic)

    The same company also sells numerous similar products, which lab analysis by the FDA found to contain sildenafil, the active ingredient in Viagra.

    R Thomas Marketing, LLC 7/31/15 [FDA]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uAmazon Ending Pay-Per-Click Ad Program That Took Shoppers To Other Retail Sites, Creates Text-Only Adsr


4 4 4 9
  • Amazon changed the way it provides sponsored links, instead of showing photos, the company now provides simple text links.

    Amazon will change the way it provides sponsored links, instead of showing photos, the company now provides simple text links.

    Smaller retailers who pay to have ads appear on the bottom of Amazon search results will soon see less of their products and more text, as the e-commerce giant prepares to shutter a pay-per-click ad program that took shoppers away from its site. 

    The Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog, citing an email sent to Amazon advertisers, reports that the e-tailer will stop showing ads at the bottom of search results that when clicked takes shoppers to other small retailers’ websites starting on October 31.

    Product Ads, as the former program was called, often directed customers to smaller retailers that offered specialized services but might not actually sell on Amazon.

    According to Amazon, the company generally made anywhere between 10 cents and $2.05 in per-click fees from those advertisers.

    But the company isn’t doing away with outside advertisements – and their revenue – all together. In place of Product Ads, which featured photos of products linked to outside retailer sites, Amazon will offer simple text ads running along side product searchers.

    A spokesperson for Amazon confirmed the changes, nothing that the company is “constantly reviewing the services we offer partners to help them best reach our customer base.”

    The company didn’t offer an explicit explanation for its change, but the Digits blog suggests the move might be a challenge to Google, which has placed a handful of links at the bottom of many Amazon.com search results.

    Amazon has previously attempted to cut into Google’s online ad market share by introducing its own programs to place ads on sites other than its own.

    The company’s new method, dubbed Text Ads, will likely push Google off Amazon’s site altogether, Digits reports.

    Amazon Tweaks Ads On Its Site, in Possible Challenge to Google [The Wall Street Journal Digits Blog]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uMcDonald’s Officially Beefs Up The Quarter Pounder, Could Prices Be Increasing Too?r


4 4 4 9
  • McDonald's increased the amount of beef in its Quarter Pounder.

    McDonald’s increased the amount of beef in its Quarter Pounder.

    Back in June, McDonald’s was mum on whether or not there was truth to reports that it would up the beef in its Quarter Pounder. Today, we received confirmation as the company has officially added 0.25 ounces to the burger. But now that there’s more meat between the buns, will it mean more money from our wallets?

    CNBC reports that the Golden Arches quietly increased the size of its Quarter Pounder sandwich from 4 ounces before cooking to 4.25 ounces before cooking and hasn’t yet decided if more beef should equate to a higher cost.

    Sources close to the company say that the chain’s franchise operators will decide if the bigger burger needs a bigger price tag.

    While McDonald’s didn’t provide details on how much the burger weighs after it hits the grill, the previous 4 ounce version clocked in at 2.8 ounces after cooking.

    The change was first spotted on McDonald’s nutrition webpage, which provides descriptions of its menu items – including their weight before cooking.

    According to CNBC, the more sizable burger comes after McDonald’s reported an uptick in beef prices, saying on an earnings call recently that costs rose about 1% in the last quarter.

    McDonald’s quietly changes its Quarter Pounder size [CNBC]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist