пятница, 31 июля 2015 г.

uClass-Action Suit Accuses CVS Of Overcharging Customers For Generic Drugsr


4 4 4 9
  • The country’s second largest pharmacy chain is the latest party in a class-action lawsuit that accuses CVS of deliberately overcharging hundreds of thousands of patients for generic prescription drugs.

    Bloomberg reports that the pharmacy customers claim in the class-action seeking lawsuit that CVS intentionally overcharged them for prescription drugs by submitting claims for payment to third parties at inflated prices.

    According to the lawsuit, since 2008 CVS has engaged in “massive fraud” that led to “substantial ill-gotten gains” by charging three or four times the typical price for generic drugs.

    At issue in the lawsuit is CVS’s Health Savings Pass, a discount program for patients paying cash for prescriptions. The plan costs $15 per year to join and offers 90-day supplies of some generic drugs for $11.99.

    The complaint contends that patients who purchased prescriptions through third-party plans paid higher prices than those who paid through CVS’s program.

    CVS allegedly failed to present insurance companies with the discounted price, resulting in customers paying higher co-pays based on the more expensive prices.

    “Not only was the HSP program a means by which CVS could maintain and increase its market share by fending off discounted prices from its competitors, but importantly, CVS also intended that the HSP program would serve as a mechanism to hide CVS’s true usual and customary prices from third-party payers,” the lawsuit says.

    A CVS spokesperson tells Bloomberg that he couldn’t comment on the lawsuit, as the company had yet to be served, but that a similar suit had been dismissed in Massachusetts.

    “It is important to note that co-pays for prescription medications are determined by a patient’s prescription coverage plan, not by the pharmacy,” the spokesperson said. “Pharmacies charge the co-pays that are set by the coverage plans.”

    The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and a court order banning CVS from running the alleged scheme.

    CVS Health Accused in Suit of Overcharging for Generic Drugs [Bloomberg]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uWalmart Customer With Tourette’s Claims She Was Kicked Out Of Store, Told Not To Returnr


4 4 4 9
  • A Florida woman with Tourette’s syndrome is suing Walmart, claiming she was banned from the store, in violation of the American with Disabilities Act. She and her husband are seeking more than $2.2 million in damages for emotional distress.

    People with Tourette’s may exhibit facial tics and other involuntary repetitive movements, and have outbursts of profanity, known as “coprolalia,” according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

    The woman was shopping at Walmart with two of her children in August 2011 when she was ordered to leave and not come back by a manager and a security officer, according to a circuit court filing complaint, reports Florida Today.

    Her lawyer says the Walmart workers also called the police, who issued a no-trespassing order against her.

    “It’s putting part of her hometown off-limits for her. And it’s a place she’s accustomed to frequent, and she has the right to frequent. They used to do this to people who had black skin, or who didn’t speak English, or were Chinese (or of) Asian ancestry. Women were excluded from some places — and that’s just been in my lifetime,” her attorney told Florida Today.

    He added that most people understand when they hear her having a verbal tic, or using profane language.

    “They recognize it as Tourette’s, and they just shrug it off like water off a duck’s back,” he said.

    The lawsuit was filed in mid-May, and seeks $2 million in damages for the woman’s emotional distress, as well as $200,000 for the husband, due to “loss of consortium” with his wife.

    Walmart’s legal counsel stated in a court filing that store employees did not act improperly; did not physically or psychologically harm the customer; and had no prior knowledge of her Tourette’s syndrome or medical condition.

    The woman says she is often traumatized by the treatment she receives because of her outbursts. Since the alleged incident at Walmart, she says she’s led a more secluded life, and her kids do her grocery shopping for her.

    “God didn’t make everybody to be the same. You know, this is who I am. There’s nothing I can do about it. It’s genetic. It’s hereditary. And it’s something that I have to live with for the rest of my life. This is just me,” she told Florida Today.

    Brevard woman with Tourette’s sues Walmart over ban [Florida Today]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uI Can’t Buy A Car Because Lexus Thinks I’m Deadr


4 4 4 9
  • Dead people do not need cars, and they also have trouble making the payments. That’s probably why one woman’s credit score plummeted to zero when a lender accidentally put her down as dead. It was due to human error, but she’ll need to wait 30 days to move on with her new car purchase because someone at Lexus Financial Services picked the wrong thing in a drop-down menu.

    Yes, that is literally what happened. Unfortunately, it just takes one creditor accidentally telling the bureaus that you’re deceased to send your credit score plummeting to zero and to make it impossible to sign up for new lines of credit.

    What can you do about it? You can’t prevent people from clicking on the wrong thing at your lender, unfortunately, but the best thing to do is check your credit periodically for errors like this. Use AnnualCreditReport.com at least 30 days before you plan to start shopping for a new home, car, or other thing that requires credit bureaus to believe that you’re alive.

    It takes about 30 days to clear an error for the system, but this 100% alive aspiring car owner was lucky: she had contacted CBS Sacramento about her plight, and their calls to Experian and Equifax prompted the credit bureaus to correct Acura’s error a few weeks earlier than they normally would have, and she got to zoom off in her new car.

    Call Kurtis: I Can’t Buy a Car Because Lender Declared Me Dead [CBS Sacramento]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uPrisoners Will Soon Be Eligible For Pell Grants To Finance Educationr


4 4 4 9
  • Twenty years after passing a law that banned prisoners from financing higher education with federal grants while incarcerated, the government is ready to begin investing in the education of inmates.

    The Washington Post reports that the government announced plans today that it will initiate an experiment — called the Second Chance Pell Pilot Program — to offer a limited number of prisoners Pell grants to finance their education from a select number of colleges starting as soon as next year.

    The move, which is being made under the Obama administration’s authority for limited financial aid experiments, doesn’t immediately change the status of the ban put in place in 1994. At the time, Congress decided it was unfair for prisoners to claim a share of federal financial aid dollars that were in limited supply at the time — $5 billion, compared to the $29 billion available today.

    The Second Chance program aims to help prisoners who are eligible for release within five years work toward an associate’s or a bachelor’s degree while incarcerated. The schools partnering with the program have yet to be announced.

    “America is a nation of second chances,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a statement. “Giving people who have made mistakes in their lives a chance to get back on track and become contributing members of society is fundamental to who we are – it can also be a cost-saver for taxpayers.”

    Duncan maintains that the new experiment will not take money away from the nearly eight million students who are expected to receive Pell grants in 2016, saying that the cost of the program will be very modest.

    Although the experiment isn’t a reversal of the 1994 ban, it could eventually lead there. At the time that ban was enacted, the government estimated that more than 25,000 inmates received $35 million in Pell Grants for the first nine months of the 1993-1994 school year.

    For two decades, critics of the ban have argued that Congress was shortsighted in taking away funding for prisoners’ schooling. They contend that investing in education for inmates could reduce the likelihood they will commit another crime when released, the Post reports.

    Despite the long-running rule, many schools have continued to operate their own inmate education programs. One such program is Goucher College in Maryland, which enrolls 60 to 100 prisoners at a time.

    “There’s a long waiting list,” Goucher President Jose Antonio Bowen, tells the Post. “Anything that helps bring more education to the incarcerated is something we would support.”

    Feds announce new experiment: Pell grants for prisoners [The Washington Post]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAmerican Airlines Plane Evacuated With Emergency Slides, Three Passengers Burnedr


4 4 4 9
  • An American Airlines flight pulling away from the gate at the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport on Thursday was evacuated with the use of emergency slides, resulting in minor injuries for three passengers.

    NBC-DFW reports that the flight – carrying 141 passengers and five crew members – was readying for travel to Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport when smoke was reported in the cabin.

    Five emergency exits, including two over the wings and one through the plane’s tail, were opened during the incident. Two inflatable slides were utilized at the passenger access door and a rear service door, American said.

    During the evacuation three passengers were injured, suffering from minor burns.

    “Our fleet service team was still on the ramp and assisted passengers and crew with a successful evacuation of the aircraft,” a spokesperson for the airline said.

    The airline said that passengers were being put on other flights to Chicago Thursday afternoon.

    Emergency Slides Used to Evacuate American Airlines Plane at D/FW Airport [NBC-DFW]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uCable Companies Refuse To Reveal How Much They Make Off Of Set-Top Boxesr


4 4 4 9
  • Sen. Ed Markey of Massachussetts and Sen. Dick Blumenthal of Connecticut recently posed a handful of questions to the nation’s cable and satellite providers about their set-top boxes — Are they required? How many customers have them? Is there an option for customers to purchase their own? etc. While some providers were more transparent in their responses than others, but one thing they all agreed on: We’re not telling you how much we make from leasing these devices.

    For example, even though Comcast [PDF] says that virtually all 22 million pay-TV customers have set-top boxes, with a total of 59 million devices currently being used, and that the monthly lease per box ranges from $1-$2.50/month, it balks — citing “competitive sensitivity” — at providing the senators either the average per-customer revenue from these leases or the total revenue.

    AT&T, which filed the response [PDF] before its merger with DirecTV was approved, likewise acknowledged that its entire U-Verse install base has a set-top box. While the company says the first device is provided at no charge, AT&T didn’t provide any information about the average number of devices per household or the total number of devices currently in use, so we don’t know how many U-Verse subscribers are paying $8/month for their additional set-top boxes. AT&T claimed it can’t share any more detailed information because it’s “commercially sensitive.”

    Speaking of DirecTV, the country’s largest satellite service (and second-largest pay-TV provider) provides so little information it’s bordering on the deceptive. The only useful data in DirecTV’s response [PDF] is that customers lease “roughly 2.5 boxes per household” and that it charges $6/box, but it glosses over the all the related fees it charges for things like Whole-Home DVR service.

    Verizon [PDF] is much more willing to break down the pricing of its boxes, DVR services, and number of TV sets involved, showing how FiOS can run you anywhere from $11.99/month for a single TV up to $85.99 for eight TVs with “Quantum Premium Service.” But once again, in spite of this info dump on Verizon’s part, the company joins the chorus of cablers refusing to say the average per-customer revenue or total annual revenue from leased devices.

    The most amusing response comes from Time Warner Cable [PDF], who justified its refusal to answer virtually every question by stating that “TWC operates in a highly competitive market and does not make this information publicly available in the ordinary course of business.” [bolded for emphasis].

    That’s right, Time Warner Cable, whose $45 million merger with Comcast failed because of an obvious lack of competition in the cable marketplace, is apparently hoping that if it repeatedly states that it “operates in a highly competitive market,” it might come true.

    After looking at these responses — and others from Cox, Cablevision, Charter, Brighthouse, Cox, and Dish — Sens. Markey and Blumenthal did their best to estimate how much these companies are making based on what little information they provided.

    By their math, the average pay-TV customer will spend around $89/year for a single set-top box. And since the average household with pay-TV service has approximately 2.6 boxes, the senators estimate the average yearly cost of having these cable boxes is around $232.

    Figuring that, between all these companies there are some 221 million set-top boxes being leased in the U.S. right now, that would put the industry’s annual revenue at nearly $20 billion.

    While the senators understand the technological need for having a set-top box, they believe that consumers should not be forced to lease just one or two models made available by their pay-TV provider.

    “Consumers should have the same range of choices for their video set-top boxes as they have for their mobile phones,” said Senator Markey in a statement. “When Congress last year regrettably removed the requirement that cable company services be compatible with set-top boxes purchased in the marketplace rather than rented directly from the provider, we doomed consumers to being captive to cable company rental fees forever. We also endangered a competitive set-top box marketplace, replacing consumer choice with cable company control. We need a new, national consumer-friendly standard that will allow consumers to choose their own video box irrespective from their pay-TV provider. Consumers should not be forced to rent video boxes from their pay-TV provider in perpetuity.”

    Blumenthal says the $200+ annual expense on set-top box leasing is “unjust and unjustifiable. As the world becomes increasingly connected and technology advances, new innovations must be able to break into the cable marketplace and provide the vigorous competition that drives down prices for consumers. Consumers deserve competitive options in accessing technology and television – not exorbitant prices dictated by monopoly cable companies.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uWhole Foods Announces Five Cities Getting One Of Its Cheaper Storesr


4 4 4 9
  • Back in May, Whole Foods announced it’d be making a play for that coveted category of customers, the almighty millennials, by launching a new line of lower-cost stores. The company has now revealed which cities will see those first cheaper stores.

    If you’re on the East Coast and hoping for lower prices, well, you’re out of luck for now: the first of five “365 by Whole Foods Market” locations the company is opening in the second half of 2016 is slated for the Silver Lake neighborhood of L.A. The company says it made the “strategic decision to renegotiate the lease in development for the Silver Lake location,” transforming the Whole Foods Market there into a 365 by Whole Foods Market store.

    The other locations getting a millennial-baiting store include Houston; Bellevue, WA; Portland, OR and Santa Monica, CA.

    These spots were chosen due to a “high demand for both quality food and value in a convenient format,” according to a statement by Jeff Turnas, president of 365 by Whole Foods Market.

    In May, Whole Foods co-founder and co-Chief Executive John Mackey said prices will be lower at the new stores, which will also cost less to run and be “hip, cool, and tech-oriented.”

    Whole Foods could use a boost right now, as it admitted earlier this week that the company had its weakest increase in quarterly sales since the early days of the Great Recession.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist