пятница, 31 июля 2015 г.

uPot-Centric Colorado Credit Union Sues Federal Reserve Bank For Denying Accountr


4 4 4 9
  • fourthcornerpicThe state of Colorado no longer outlaws recreational marijuana use, but the U.S. government still considers it a Schedule I controlled substance, so many businesses making money from the locally legal sale of cannabis are having trouble finding banks to handle their cash. One credit union formed with the goal of providing financial services to those in the marijuana industry received a charter from Colorado, but has filed suit against a regional Federal Reserve bank for blocking its ability to work with other banks.

    Denver-based Fourth Corner Credit Union, whose stated mission is to “service the unique financial needs of the cannabis and hemp industries and their supporters,” received a charter from Colorado regulators in late 2014. The credit union then reached out to the Federal Bank of Kansas City to apply for what’s known as a “master account.”

    Master accounts at Fed branches allow banks to not only deposit their cash reserves, but gives banks the ability to easily transact business with other financial institutions by settling credits and debits through the account at that Fed branch bank. Basically, the master account is the bank’s bank account.

    Without a master account, “a depository institution is nothing more than a vault,” notes Fourth Corner in its lawsuit [PDF].

    The credit union accuses the Fed bank of delaying review of Fourth Corner’s master account application for nearly nine months, claiming that the usual turnaround for processing an application is only five to seven days.

    Fourth Corner argues that federal law requires the Fed banks to provide their payment services to all “depository institutions,” even if the institution is not a member of the Federal Reserve system.

    Despite the increasing decriminalization and legalization of marijuana, many established financial institutions are refusing to accept deposits from pot sellers, growers, and distributors out of concern that it may lead to unwanted scrutiny of their business from federal regulators and law enforcement.

    In early 2014, the U.S. government attempted to provide some guidance for banks who might find themselves involved with marijuana money, but it may have only muddied the waters. Banks now know they should file “suspicious activity reports” that are specific to the pot industry, but they don’t really know if they are breaking federal law by continuing to do business with these account-holders.

    As a result, there are a number of licensed marijuana businesses in Colorado and Washington who can’t deposit their piles of cash in the bank.

    Not only does this make it difficult for these businesses to pay taxes, rents, salaries, and other costs that would normally be dealt with through checks or electronic transfers, it is a growing public safety risk. In an era when gas station and fast food heists turn up less money because of increased use of credit cards, robbers will certainly be tempted to go after primarily cash businesses that have no bank in which to deposit their earnings.

    Part of the Fed’s eventual decision to deny the Fourth Corner master account application was the fact that the National Credit Union Administration — an independent federal regulatory agency — refused the credit union’s application for deposit insurance.

    In order to get a master account, an institution must show that it’s eligible to receive this type of insurance, but Fourth Corner argues that the insurance need not come from the NCUA and can be privately obtained. The credit union has filed a separate suit against the NCUA claiming it was denied due process in the insurance application review.

    Andrew Freedman, Colorado’s director of marijuana coordination, had hoped the Fed would be more open-minded about Fourth Corner’s business.

    “We thought it was a good solution to the problem,” Freedman told Dealbook about the Fed’s decision. “Here was a place willing to take on the risk of banking this underbanked group — and that could do rigorous compliance.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uConsumerist Friday Flickr Findsr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


четверг, 30 июля 2015 г.

uTexas Attorney General Says RadioShack Knowingly Sold Gift Cards That Would Soon Expirer


4 4 4 9
  • (JeepersMedia)

    (JeepersMedia)

    If the leadership of a company knows that they’re about to file for bankruptcy, should they stop selling gift cards? That’s what the Attorney General in Texas contends: that RadioShack knew after the 2014 holiday season ended that it would be declaring bankruptcy soon, and that gift cards they had issued would lose their value at the time of the bankruptcy or shortly afterward. Yet they sold ’em anyway.

    The AG says that 16,700 gift cards were sold between January 1 and the Shack’s bankruptcy filing. In their June lawsuit, which this count has been added to, they declared it unfair that customers with gift card balances would have to file claims and get in the metaphorical line behind the company’s creditors in the bankruptcy proceedings to get any money back at all.

    The smoldering remains of Radioshack, or RS Legacy Corp as it’s now known, have now been charged by the Texas AG of violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act by selling gift cards that it knew wouldn’t be valid for very long.

    RadioShack says that it doesn’t know how to find the holders of outstanding gift cards, but the AG’s office thinks that’s a whole bunch of nonsense: many of those cards were given as promotional items with a purchase, or purchased by people who were already registered in RadioShack’s customer-tracking system.

    The Defendants have informed Texas that they do not know who the holders of unredeemed gift cards are. However, Texas respectfully contends that such an assertion must be viewed with some skepticism in light of the fact that the Defendants maintain extensive data regarding their customers’ purchases. The Defendants likely know the names, mailing addresses, and email addresses of at least some of the purchasers if not the holders.

    If gift card numbers are part of the transaction records, then that could be cross-referenced with the list of gift cards with outstanding balances. Right?

    Amended Complaint Re: Gift Cards [Texas State Attorney General]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uFDA Warns About Mixups Between Drugs With Similar Namesr


4 4 4 9
  • (Scoboco)

    (Scoboco)

    Here’s a scary thought: dangerous medication mixups could begin at your doctor’s office. The FDA put out a warning today that they’ve received reports of mixups between similarly-named drugs that do very different things. The FDA urges patients and caregivers to know what the drug they’re supposed to be taking looks like, and alert medical providers if the drug that they receive looks different.

    The most prominent example that the FDA cited are the drugs Brintellix and Brilinta. Both are relatively new, and dispensed under their very similar brand names. Brintellix is an antidepressant, and Brilinta is a blood thinner. The FDA knows of 50 incidents where one drug has been dispensed instead of the other, but none yet where a patient has been harmed.

    Some mixups occurred when pharmacists made an error, confusing the two drugs. Some others began back in the doctor’s office, when a provider went to type an e-prescription into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system. When a physician types “BRI” in to the system, both drugs pop up; all he or she needs to do is pick the wrong one.

    The FDA’s advice to patients and caregivers is to know the names of the medicines you’re taking and why you’re taking them. This is important when you actually receive the medication, so you can study the bottle and any guides that the pharmacy has included. These will explain the medication, how to take it, and what conditions it’s normally taken for. If something doesn’t match up, alert the pharmacist.

    FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns about prescribing and dispensing errors resulting from brand name confusion with antidepressant Brintellix (vortioxetine) and antiplatelet Brilinta (ticagrelor) [FDA]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uNow Kids Can Chat With Thomas The Tank Engine, Toor


4 4 4 9
  • You might remember Hello Barbie, a wifi-enabled smart doll that lets children hold conversations with their Barbie dolls…after that speech is recorded, transmitted to product creator ToyTalk, converted to text, and the answer is sent back to Barbie. While the idea of a doll that can hold a conversation is interesting, there are a lot of other products out there that want to chat with your kids.

    The company behind the voice functions of Hello Barbie, ToyTalk, makes its own apps, which it calls “interactive storytelling.” They release an app today called “Thomas and Friends Talk to You,” which is exactly what it sounds like.

    In case you’re worried that the app is eavesdropping on your toddler and analyzing every word she says, ToyTalk made sure to explain to a reporter from Fast Company that the app, like the doll, is only listening when you press the “speak” button. One challenge with the “Thomas” app, aimed at a younger audience, was redesigning that talk button so toddlers would understand it easily.

    HOT ON HELLO BARBIE’S PLASTIC HEELS, TOYTALK NOW LETS KIDS CHAT WITH THOMAS THE TANK ENGINE [Fast Company]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uHanes Website Is The Latest, Oddest Victim Of Data Breachr


4 4 4 9
  • haneshackTo be honest, we had no idea that you could buy Hanes underwear (and socks, shirts, etc) from the Hanes website, mostly because we’d never really thought look at the Hanes website. But if you have been shopping at Hanes.com — and potentially at other sites in the Hanes Brands catalog — some of your information may have been compromised.

    A Consumerist reader forwarded us the above e-mail from HanesBrand exec David Thompson, letting customers know that the breach may have exposed personal info like name, address, phone number, along with the last 4 digits of the credit card on the account.

    The company says it has fixed the leak, but is taking questions via its customer service line at (800) 503-6681.

    We’ve reached out to Hanes to confirm this is genuine and to get an understanding of exactly which Hanes Brand sites were breached.

    The Hanes Brand umbrella includes a wide variety of apparel companies, including L’eggs, Playtex, Wonderbra, Champion, and Maidenform.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uMan With Prosthetic Leg Says He Was Told To Stay Off Water Park’s Slidesr


4 4 4 9
  • (KTXS)

    (KTXS)

    There’s perhaps nothing as refreshing in the heat of summer than splashing around in cool water. But one man said he was kept from the fun and relief a water park’s attractions can bring, after a worker told him he wasn’t allowed to go down slides because he had a prosthetic leg.

    An Abilene, TX man was at the park celebrating his 7-year-old’s birthday, and had arrived at the top of a water slide when he says the employee prevented him from going down the slide because of his prosthetic leg, reports KTXS.

    He walked back down and told a manager that he’d been visiting water parks across the state his entire life, and hadn’t had any issues before.

    “The manager said ‘I don’t make the policy at other places, and I can’t explain to you why they let you go down their slides,’” he said, quoting the manager. “’I don’t make the rules here, but I do enforce them so you can either abide by them or leave.’ ”

    After his mother posted about the experience on Facebook, a spokesman for the water park issued a statement on their prosthetic policy, and apologizing for any “embarrassment the family have suffered.”

    “Any apparatus that has metal pieces protruding from it has the legitimate potential of damaging or scratching the riding surface. The next rider will follow a very similar path and have the potential for a very painful fiberglass cut,” he said.

    But the prosthetic technician who built the man’s prosthetic leg says it shouldn’t have been a problem.

    “There’s nothing down there, in my opinion, that would hurt either a tube or a slide,” the technician told KTXS.

    The park spokesman added that upper management is “discussing a better way to handle situations such as these in the future, without creating a potential dangerous situation for subsequent riders,” noting that the park may include more specific signage at the entrance of the park and at the bottom of attractions, “to alleviate the unfortunate situation of a young guard being required to ask a disabled guest to exit a ride in front of other guests.”

    The man says he’s appreciated the outpouring of support he’s received online, and hopes that his experience will educate others.

    “I definitely feel a lot of positivity from it,” he said. “I definitely feel a lot of people uniting, and I think that’s great.”

    Abilene man with prosthetic leg kept off slides at Texas water park [KTXS]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist