вторник, 21 июля 2015 г.

uYes, Here’s A Full Halloween Candy Display At Walgreensr


4 4 4 9
  • Jill knew that her blog readers wouldn’t believe what she had seen, even if she presented them with a photo. At her local Walgreens store, there was a full display of Halloween treats, including candy corn and Snickers pumpkins. Halloween. On July 21. Please, retailers, we’re still uncomfortable at seeing Back-to-School displays in the big-box stores! Don’t do this to us!

    “I asked my husband to grab a newspaper so I could photograph this, thinking no one would possibly believe these photos were taken today without date proof,” she wrote. Smart, since I almost didn’t believe it, and I’ve been writing about this stuff for six years now.

    To a certain extent, this makes sense: not because people are stocking up on Halloween candy three months early, but because
    October in July: Walgreens already stocking Halloween candy [Jill Cataldo]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uBaggage Handlers, Security Workers Set To Strike At New York Airports, Could Disrupt Travelr


4 4 4 9
  • The fight for higher wages could disrupt travel for Delta Air Lines and United Airlines passengers flying in and out of New York’s two largest airports starting Wednesday night, as a union representing some security workers, baggage handlers and wheelchair attendants approved a strike.

    Reuters reports that service workers union 32BJ SEIU – which represents workers employed by Aviation Safeguards – gave notice on Tuesday that about 1,000 workers at John F. Kennedy International and LaGuardia airports would begin strikes at 10 p.m. Wednesday.

    The union said in a statement that the strike was approved after Aviation Safeguards, a subcontractor for Delta and at least one United terminal at the New York airports, threatened to fire workers for organizing for higher wages and benefits.

    “While the airlines have been making record profits and the Port Authority has approved billions of dollars to modernize LaGuardia airport, the airport workers who make these profits possible are struggling to survive,” the union said. “Their demands for better treatment are met with illegal repression.”

    The union contends that Aviation Safeguards – a subsidiary of Command Security Corp. – has, on several occasions, illegally stopped workers from wearing buttons, misrepresented their rights as airport employees and threatened to fire them for striking.

    Command Security Corp denied the union’s accusations.

    A spokesperson for Delta tells Reuters that the airline would be “taking measures to ensure that our more than 35,000 customers booked through LaGuardia on Thursday are not affected.”

    United said it has contingency plans in place should the strike move forward.

    The Port Authority, which operates both JFK and LaGuardia, tells Reuters that it has taken “significant steps in recent years to encourage wage and benefit increases for employees of airline contractors at its airports.”

    Some LaGuardia, JFK airport workers to strike on Wednesday [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uColorado TV Station Puts The Kibosh On First Recreational Marijuana Ad Amid Legality Questionsr


4 4 4 9
  • (via CNNMoney)

    (via CNNMoney)

    It almost was, until it wasn’t: The first recreational marijuana TV ad ever got pulled from its slotted schedule last night amid legal concerns. The thing is, while marijuana is legal for recreational use in Colorado and some other states, it’s still illegal in the eyes of the federal government, putting it in a gray zone in matters of banking and advertising, among other things.

    In Colorado, it’s legal to air marijuana TV ads when 70% of the audiences is 21 or older. The ad in question was slated for a late night slot around the time of Jimmy Kimmel Live, when 97% of the audience as at least 21, according to Nielsen figures.

    The ad was for Neos, a company that makes cannabis oil and vaporizers, and it was supposed to air on an KMGH, an ABC affiliate in Denver, late on Monday night, reports CNNMoney.

    The ad features young people doing fun things like dancing up on each other in clubs and scaling mountains, with a voiceover pointing out that this kind of person could be you. Marijuana itself is never mentioned nor shown.

    “You lead an adventurous life, always finding new ways to relax,”the narrator says. “Now enjoy the best effects and control with Neos portable vape pen and recreate discreetly this summer.”

    At the end, we see campers playing a guitar and hanging out, generally having a nice, relaxing time.

    “A bold new way to unwind. Neos, recreate responsibly,” the voiceover says.

    Because weed is still illegal according to the feds, the station decided to err on the side of caution and not air the ad.

    “Scripps has decided not to accept marijuana advertising at this time,” a spokeswoman for the E.W. Scripps Company, which owns the station, told CNNMoney. “We are proud to be a company of free speech and open expression, but we have concerns about the lack of clarity around federal regulations that govern broadcast involving such ads.”

    The ad agency that produced the Neos spot noted that the channel is officially putting all cannabis commercials on hold until further notice, citing an investigation into the legality of airing an ad for a “federally illegal” substance on federal airwaves.

    Watch the pot ad that got yanked off TV [CNNMoney]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uBackpage.com Sues Sheriff For Persuading Visa, MasterCard To Stop Serving Siter


4 4 4 9
  • Just a sampling of the adult-entertainment listings on Backpage for the Chicago area.

    Just a sampling of the adult-entertainment listings on Backpage for the Chicago area.

    Earlier this month, the sheriff of Cook County, IL, persuaded both Visa and MasterCard to end their relationships with online classifieds site Backpage.com, alleging the site is known to “promote prostitution and facilitate online sex trafficking.” Today, the website fired back with a lawsuit against the sheriff.

    Backpage has continued to offer adult-oriented classified ads for escorts and massages, even as competitors like Craigslist no longer include dedicated sections for these types of services. The site has been repeatedly accused of abetting sex trafficking, but has survived legal efforts to censor the user-generated ads.

    However, the Wall Street Journal reports that Backpage believes Sheriff Thomas Dart’s efforts to eliminate Visa and MasterCard as payment options for advertisers on the site are tantamount to government censorship of protected free speech.

    “Sheriff Dart’s actions to cripple Backpage.com and all speech through the site are an especially pernicious form of prior restraint,” reads the complaint, filed in a federal court in Chicago. “He has achieved his purpose through false accusations, innuendo, and coercion.”

    Backpage seeks damages to make up for the revenue it’s losing by not being able to accept these cards.

    “Our goal is to ensure that one elected official, particularly a county sheriff, cannot dictate what speech is or is not appropriate,” the site’s general counsel tells the Journal.

    American Express, which has long avoided associations with adults-only merchants like strip clubs, had already ended its relationship with Backpage for advertising in the adult section of the site.

    The sheriff’s office unsuccessfully sued Craigslist in 2009, claiming its adults-only ads were a public nuisance. This time, Dart says he isn’t trying to censor anyone; he just doesn’t want credit card companies to facilitate potentially illegal transactions.

    “It is regrettable that Backpage has dedicated so many resources to lawyers and lobbyists when they could be partnering with law-enforcement to seek justice for sex trafficking victims,” a statement from the sheriff’s office to the Journal read.

    While Backpage has received support from some in the media for its previous First Amendment fights, others are applauding the recent decisions by Visa and MasterCard.

    “Other businesses should act just as boldly to stop their brands from being associated with a website that reportedly generates millions of dollars every month through online ads for adult entertainment,” reads a recent opinion piece from the Seattle Times editorial board. “[S]exual exploitation of anyone, especially children, should not be as easy to purchase as a book on Amazon.com or takeout from Jimmy John’s.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uComplaint Alleges LifeLock Violated 2010 FTC Settlement By Continuing To Make False Claimsr


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-07-21 at 3.24.49 PMBack in 2010, identity theft protection company LifeLock entered into an $11 million settlement with federal regulators and several states regarding its use of allegedly false claims regarding the effectiveness of its services. According to those same regulators, the company has violated that agreement by continuing to make claims that fail the truth test. 

    The Federal Trade Commission announced today that it has taken action against LifeLock for violations of its settlement with the agency and 35 state attorneys general, but declined to provide specifics on what penalties the company could face, aside from asking a court to impose an order requiring full redress to all customers affected by the violations.

    According to the FTC complaint [PDF] filed in U.S. District Court in Arizona, from at least October 2012 until March 2014, LifeLock failed live up to is obligations under the 2010 settlement.

    Under the previous deal, LifeLock was barred from making deceptive claims about services and was required to take more stringent measures to safeguard the personal information it collects from customers. The company also agreed to provide $11 million in refunds to customers.

    At the time of the agreement, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said that LifeLock had essentially promised not to misrepresent that its services offer “absolute protection against identity theft because there is, unfortunately, no foolproof way to avoid ID theft.”

    The FTC alleges the company broke that promise by continuing to make claims that it protected consumers’ sensitive data with the same high-level safeguards as financial institutions.

    The Commission assets that from January 2012 through December 2014, LifeLock falsely claimed it protected consumers’ identity 24/7/365 by providing alerts “as soon as” it received any indication there was a problem.

    Additionally, the complaint states that LifeLock violated its previous order by failing to establish and maintain a comprehensive information security program to protect its users’ sensitive personal data, including credit card, social security, and bank account numbers.

    FTC Takes Action Against LifeLock for Alleged Violations of 2010 Order [Federal Trade Commission]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


ueBay Will Send Your Full Name, Location, And Phone Number To Any Auction Bidder Who Asksr


4 4 4 9
  • Reader A. is a full-time eBay seller, who recently listed and sold a pricey item for a relative, splitting the proceeds. Relatively early in the auction, something happened that surprised and upset A: one of the bidders requested his contact information on file from eBay, which included his phone number and the city and state where he lives. eBay automatically sent it to the bidder without consulting him. Why?

    Maybe this is well known to frequent eBay sellers, but A. does this full time and no customer had ever requested his information before. Here’s the e-mail that he received. The information that’s redacted is his city and phone number provided to eBay, as well as the bidder’s own information. This included his full name, too, which isn’t part of the auction.

    ebay_message_screenshot

    While neither party necessarily knew that the information that the other had provided to eBay was up-to-date or even real, A. was still uncomfortable and worried. Like many eBay sellers, he runs his business out of his home. Especially if the seller lives in a small town or has an uncommon name, it’s very easy to find someone’s street address. It’s even easier if the seller is listed in the phone book and you have their home address.

    It would be a safe assumption that the item up for auction was somewhere in his home, and he began to worry that someone might be on their way to steal the item–which was out of sight, but also highly portable.

    The item was rare and valuable enough (the final bid had four figures) that someone breaking into his home was a reasonable fear. Putting it in a bank vault wouldn’t prevent someone from coming to visit while A. was or wasn’t home.

    It’s awkward to discuss this situation without mentioning what the item was, or its approximate price, but A. is worried that eBay could shut down his account or otherwise punish him for complaining about this privacy issue publicly. Yet he wants to warn other eBay sellers that this could happen to them, too.

    After A. brought this issue to us, we took it to eBay. We just wanted to know why this is an okay thing to do. Releasing the contact information for a winning bidder in an auction or the purchaser in a fixed-price listing is necessary, but why are they releasing sellers’ contact information to bidders when it’s early in the auction?

    Typically the seller shouldn’t have anything to worry about, as we only allow members of eBay to request contact information. We allow any transaction partner (including a bidder) to request the buyer/seller’s contact information. This includes a phone number, and the address. This is for all members of the site, and something we’ve found be very helpful overall. There’s not a way to opt out of this as we expect it of everyone on the site, namely because we’re only a venue and don’t buy or sell the item directly.

    eBay does acknowledge that users could misuse this information, especially phone numbers, and instructs members to…contact their phone company or the police if they have any issues.

    Please be aware that we can’t take action on communications that happen outside the eBay system, so if you do have an issue with your trading partner’s phone call, we recommend you contact your phone company to report any harassment. If you receive calls that threaten your property or personal safety, you might also want to report the incident to your local law enforcement agency.

    Well, okay, but is it possible to opt out and keep random bidders from getting your contact information? No. eBay won’t let you do that. You can use a service like Google Voice or Skype to mask your phone number, giving that number to eBay instead.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uBojangles’ Customer Who Returned $4,000 He Found In Bag Says His Good Deed Was Greeted With Disrespectr


4 4 4 9
  • When you do a good deed, you probably don’t do it just because you’re anticipating a good reward. But at the very least, a pleasant “thank you” is surely something you could expect. But one Bojangles’ Famous Chicken ‘n Biscuits customer says not only was he not thanked for returning between $4,000 to $4,500 in cash he found in a bag that was supposed to contain his food, but was treated with downright disrespect by restaurant staff.

    The Virginia man had received cold chicken in his order, he tells WTVR/CBS 6 News, and sent it back to the person working at the drive-thru recently. He was told to pull up and the fresh chicken would be out and hot in six or seven minutes.

    A worker eventually came out and handed him a bag of food, which did include a Bojangles’ chicken box… but no chicken.

    “When I opened the box up, the BoJangles’ chicken box, there was probably close to $4,500 in cash” and also bank deposit slips, he says, in plastic bags.

    He thought maybe he was being set up, or that someone was trying to steal money, so he rushed inside the restaurant to find a manager and explain what had happened. He says he was stunned by the manager’s response about what would have happened if he had not come back inside with the money. Which, again, he did.

    “He told me in an arrogant, nasty attitude being disrespectful saying that, ‘We would’ve called the authorities on you, too,’” the customer claims. “Here I am doing a good thing, bringing the money back. Most folks probably would’ve kept on going and wouldn’t have recognized it until they got home.”

    For his efforts he says he was offered another meal and a tailgate party. He called a district manager later, who he claims hung up on him, before finally reaching Bojangles corporate headquarters. The big cheeses there offered a $100 gift certificate, he says, but that’s not enough.

    “I deserve respect, an apologetic letter from the Bojangles’ company and probably a cash reward,” he said. “What is a $100 gift certificate when you’re bringing in $4,500?”

    WTVR hadn’t received a reply from Bojangles yet, and Consumerist also reached out to the company today for a comment. We’ll update this post if we hear back.

    Man who complained about cold chicken finds $4,500 cash Bojangles’ bag [WTVR.com/CBS 6 News]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist