пятница, 17 июля 2015 г.

uWin In Publisher’s Clearing House Game Due To ‘Technical Malfunction’r


4 4 4 9
  • prize_patrolHave you ever wondered whether anyone really wins the Publisher’s Clearing House sweepstakes? One woman thought she did while playing a game for real money on the company’s website. She won five separate digital slots-style games, racking up a total of $5,00. She was happy to wait for her check…and wait…and she kept waiting.

    She contacted PCH to let them know their Prize Patrol was running late, and they had terrible news. She hadn’t won those games after all. The company explained in an email that a technical malfunction made it look like she had won, but there was no real prize. All she had were the photos that she took of her computer screen when the win came up on her screen.

    She brought her complaint to CBS Sacramento, and they checked with Publisher’s Clearing House. This sweepstakes player wasn’t alone, it turns out: they said that the technical malfunction continued for a few hours, and “a small percentage of people” experienced it. Whether they meant a small percentage of “people who played during that period” or “people on the planet” isn’t clear, but at least the problem wasn’t unique to her.

    However, the prize-givers told the TV station that they didn’t want a player “to walk away unhappy,” so they gave her $1,000: at least that was one of her glitchy prizes.

    Call Kurtis: I Won A Publisher’s Clearing House Game, Why Am I Not Getting Paid? [CBS Sacramento]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uCVS Takes CVSPhoto Site Down After Possible Credit Card Data Breachr


4 4 4 9
  • The notice currently on the CVS Photo website.

    The notice currently on the CVSPhoto website.

    If you’ve used your credit or debit card to purchase photo prints through CVSPhoto, you might want to pay attention. The drugstore chain has taken down CVSPhoto.com while it investigates a possible credit card data breach.

    “We have been made aware that customer credit card information collected by the independent vendor who manages and hosts CVSPhoto.com may have been compromised,” reads a statement on the website. “As a precaution, as our investigation is underway we are temporarily shutting down access to online and related mobile photo services. We apologize for the inconvenience.”

    The company is asking that anyone who used their card to buy anything on CVSPhoto.com take a look at their card statements and activity to make sure there aren’t any suspicious transactions. If so, they should contact the appropriate bank/card company immediately to report it.

    The credentials for the CVS Photo site are kept separate from the other CVS online properties like CVS.com, optical.cvs.com, and cvs.com/MinuteClinic. The company says there is no evidence of a breach on these sites.

    Consumers with questions can call the company at 1-800-SHOP-CVS.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uTesla Announces $10K Acceleration Improvement Upgrade Called “Ludicrous Mode”r


4 4 4 9
  • teslaludicrousmodeIf you’ve got an extra $10,000 hanging around and were thinking of buying a new Tesla Model S, you might be interested in an upgrade company CEO Elon Musk just announced: “Ludicrous Mode,” an improved acceleration that brings the dual motor version of the car from zero to 60 mph in just 2.8 seconds.

    Musk announced the upgrade option during a call on Friday, which is a 10% acceleration bump from the previous model.

    It’s a “pretty awesome improvement,” Musk said, according to Bloomberg, calling the 1.1 g’s of acceleration “faster than falling.”

    There’s an option for a $3,000 upgraded battery pack as well, which gives cars 15 more miles of range than before.

    Tesla noted that its planned Model X crossover vehicle is on track for deliveries in two months and the Model 3, the planned mass-market car, in a bit more than two years, the company said.

    The Model X will also have Ludicrous Mode available. Though its acceleration speed hasn’t been set yet. Musk says it’ll take about three seconds to get from zero to 60mph, according to MarketWatch.

    No one was quite sure what Tesla would announce today, after the company sent out emails to alert the press yesterday, though Musk clued in followers that it would pertain to the Model S:

    As for Musk’s hopes for additional sales by making these tweaks?

    “I have no idea. We are just trying to make awesome cars,” he said during the call.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCourt Sides With JetBlue Employee Who Reported Passenger For Saying The Word “Bomb”r


4 4 4 9
  • If you’re in a bad mood at the airport and feel tempted to haphazardly include the word “bomb” in any sentence, you probably want to refrain from doing so. A federal appeals court recently sided with JetBlue employees who reported a passenger for making an offhand gripe that was misinterpreted as a bomb threat, and which got her arrested by the FBI.

    The matter goes back to 2008, when the passenger was scheduled to fly from JFK International in New York City to Austin. Though she arrived at the airport hours ahead of departure, the woman did not make it to the gate until after the crew had closed the plane’s door.

    When told she wouldn’t be able to board, the traveler was not pleased, especially since her checked baggage was making the trip to Austin without her.

    “Isn’t it a security risk to let a bag go on a plane without a passenger, what if there was a bomb in the bag?” She asked, according to court documents.

    A JetBlue employee responded that “TSA agents would know if there was a bomb in the bag.”

    The traveler then says she fired back, “TSA‐‐my ass” and walked away. An FBI report on the interaction claims she stated, “TSA does not know how to do their f***ing job because if it did TSA would not catch it and let it go through!”

    This is where things get into she-said/company-said.

    The JetBlue employee claims she did not personally regard the passenger as a security risk, and only told her supervisor that the woman had implied she had a bomb with the “What if there was a bomb in the bag?” question.

    The passenger alleged that the employee deliberately misrepresented the conversation by telling her supervisor that the woman claimed there was indeed a bomb in the bag.

    Regardless oh which one is more accurate, security and the FBI were notified, the plane was re-routed, the traveler detained and eventually charged with making a false bomb threat. That charge was subsequently dropped, but the passenger did plead guilty to misdemeanor drug charges after a small amount of marijuana was found in her bag.

    She later violated her probation and was sentenced to 30 days in jail. The passenger was also charged around $13,000 for the cost of re-routing the Austin-bound flight to Richmond, where her bag was searched and no bomb was found.

    The woman sued JetBlue over the incident, alleging defamation, but in 2014 a U.S. District Court in Brooklyn side granted summary judgment [PDF] to the airline saying that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA) immunizes airlines and employees who make a “voluntary disclosure of any suspicious transaction relevant to a possible violation of law or regulation, relating to air piracy, a threat to aircraft or passenger safety, or terrorism.”

    The traveler appealed that ruling, claiming that the lower court erred in granting summary judgement. She argued that you can’t decide whether the ATSA immunity applies until you decide which version of events is the more accurate.

    But a three-judge Second Circuit Court of Appeals panel held that either version of the incident in this matter still result in the same conclusion: That the ATSA applied and JetBlue and the employee are immune.

    “[The passenger] raised questions about a bomb and disparaged the effectiveness of the TSA. Had JetBlue reacted otherwise, it might have been in violation of its obligation to report potential threats, and could have been subject to civil penalties,” reads the opinion [PDF] “Because it is undisputed that [the gate agent] and JetBlue were aware of ominous (even if ambiguous) references to a bomb on a flight, no reasonable jury could find that differences in wording between [the passenger’s] account and [the employee’s] constituted materially false statements made to law enforcement.”

    The woman’s attorney tells the AP his client will likely appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uPolice Arrest Man On Suspicion Of Knocking Over Girls’ Lemonade Stand, Stealing $30r


4 4 4 9
  • As any ambitious kid (or former kid) who’s tried to bring in a big haul from running a sidewalk lemonade stand knows, it isn’t easy to make a lot of money from selling drinks for a nickel (or $1, whatever a cup of lemonade goes for these days). Two young entrepreneurial spirits faced an even tougher situation for their fledgling business, after police say a guy overturned their lemonade stand and made off with all their profits.

    An 18-year-old California man was arrested on suspicion of knocking over two teens’ lemonade stand, both literally and figuratively, reports the L.A. Times.

    The man walked up to the stand on Wednesday afternoon and even though he said he didn’t have any money, the two 13-year-olds girls gave him some lemonade, the San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department says.

    Authorities said he walked away for a moment before coming back and overturning the stand, grabbing the cash box filled with about $30 and running off with it. One of the girls’ brothers took off after him and confronted him, but returned with only the empty money box.

    A sheriff’s deputy caught up with him about 10 minutes later and arrested him on suspicion of strong-arm robbery, officials said.

    Man accused of toppling girls’ lemonade stand and fleeing with $30 [Los Angeles Times]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uRetailers Turn To Electronic Price Tags To Combat Amazonr


4 4 4 9
  • An example of electronic labels made by Stockholm-based tech company Pricer.

    An example of electronic labels made by Stockholm-based tech company Pricer.

    On Amazon, not only can the price of a product change from minute to minute, but you often have multiple sellers offering the same product at different products. How is a bricks-and-mortar retailer supposed to compete with that level of flexibility and agility? Not having to print out new price tags every time you tweak a price might be a start.

    Bloomberg reports on the growing trend of electronic price tags, which have already been deployed at Kohl’s and Nebraska Furniture Mart, a small chain of massive home furnishing warehouse stores.

    The tags not only allow for making a quick price change, but could let a retailer make price changes across multiple outlets simultaneously.

    So, in theory, if Amazon or some other competitor drops their price, a retailer with one of these price tags could respond accordingly. The hope is that this could help to cut down on “showrooming,” the practice of using physical retail stores to get eyes/hands-on with a product and then going online to get it for less.

    “If we have a TV for $1,200 and Amazon has it for $900, customers are going to say, what the heck, your prices are not the lowest,” David Bash, chief information officer at Nebraska Furniture Mart, tells Bloomberg, though he notes that the store limits price changes to once a day to minimize confusion for customers.

    Stores could also take advantage of smartphone-based functionalities with these electronic tags, helping customers navigate rows or find items on shelves by causing tags of sought-after products to blink when the shopper approaches.

    As you’d expect, it’s not cheap to change over an entire store from traditional paper/plastic shelf labels to the new-fangled electronic ones. A large retailer can end up spending in the six figures to update a single location.

    “This is not an inexpensive solution,” admits a rep for Swedish company Pricer, a manufacturer of this tag technology. “It’s starting to gain a lot more interest. Over the next year or two, you’ll see a lot more retailers rolling them out.”

    For stores that are frequently modifying prices or rearranging shelves, electronic tags could save labor costs in the long-run, allowing stores to cut prices to compete with online sellers. Stores could also take those employees who would have been spending their time redoing price labels and put them to work serving customers.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFamous People Pressuring Costco To Stop Selling Eggs From Caged Hensr


4 4 4 9
  • In an effort to get Costco to jump on the cage-free bandwagon, famous faces have been coming out against the practice of keeping hens confined, urging bulk retailer Costco to change its ways. Brad Pitt, Ryan Gosling and Bill Maher have all recently brought the issue to the attention of the public.

    Last week, Maher penned a New York Times editorial titled “Free the Hens, Costco!”, in which he pointed out that the company had vowed in 2007 that it would change how it treats egg-producing hens… and it hasn’t.

    “Multiple investigations into battery cages document animals with deteriorated spinal cords, some who have become paralyzed and then mummified in their cages,” Maher claims in the article. “Imagine cramming five cats or dogs into tiny cages, hundreds of thousands in each shed, for their entire lives. That would warrant cruelty charges, of course. But when the egg industry does it to hens, it’s considered business as usual.”

    Meanwhile, Gosling and Pitt have been writing letters to the company, telling it that it’s time to change its ways. Last month Gosling sent a letter to Craig Jelinek, the chief executive officer of Costco Wholesale Corporation, which was posted by the Humane Society of the United States.

    After describing video footage from the Humane Society’s undercover investigation that he says revealed the cruel conditions caged hens live in, Gosling accused Costco of deceiving its customers.

    “Furthermore, it is appalling that Costco has been selling these eggs with deceptive labeling on cartons featuring graphics of birds living out in a green pasture,” he wrote. “You’re already eliminating cages for veal calves and pigs – don’t you feel that chickens also deserve the same mercy?”

    Pitt was also in the mood to write, adding his voice to the hue and cry yesterday with a letter he wrote to Jelinek on behalf of Farm Sanctuary (an organization that advocates against the mistreatment of animals and factory farming, a group Maher also supported in his letter). He wrote about caged birds suffering atrophy of their muscles and bones from years of immobility.

    “As you know, these birds producing eggs for your shelves are crammed five or more into cages that are not large enough for even one hen to spread her wings,” Pitt writes, according to the Associated Press.

    Pitt and Maher both commended Costco for its other animal-welfare efforts, urging it to fulfill its pledge to uncage egg-producing hens.

    “Nearly a decade ago, Costco indicated that its next step on this issue would be creating a timeline for getting those cages out of your egg supply, and yet today, you appear to have made no progress at all — even as you have set timelines for getting pigs and calves out of cages,” Pitt wrote, asking the company to set a timeline for ending its sale of the offending eggs.

    In June, Costco noted that there are “vigorous debates about animal welfare and laying hens.”

    “Some, such as the Humane Society, advocate that hens be ‘cage free,’ and not confined in cages. Some advocate that cages are safer for hens,” a statement read, acknowledging that it’s seen a bump in sales for organic/cage-free eggs in the last nine years.

    The company has yet to specifically address any of the celebrities’ complaints directly, saying it is “committed to the ethical treatment of animals” and its code of ethics is part of the company mission statement.

    Other food companies have been moving in the cage-free direction, with General Mills announcing recently that it will eventually only use eggs from cage-free hens in U.S. operations, and Dunkin’ Donuts said it’s considering a similar move. Back in 2012, Burger King promised it would stop using suppliers that caged pigs and hens.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist