среда, 15 июля 2015 г.

uWhite House Unveils New Plan To Get Affordable Broadband Access To Low-Income Householdsr


4 4 4 9
  • (Steve)

    (Steve)

    By 2015 it seems like everyone has broadband access, but that “everyone” is very deceptive. Although the vast majority of middle- and high-income homes in the United States have broadband access at home, low-income homes are much less likely to.

    While most of us don’t have much choice in providers, we do at least have access from someone. But that access is out of reach for millions of households at the lowest levels of income. The latest Census Bureau estimates say that about 25% of the nation still lacks broadband access at home.

    So how do you get internet access to more of the nation’s poorest families? The answer is deceptively simple: go where they live.

    The White House today announced a new initiative to do just that. The pilot program, ConnectHome, is a partnership with non-profit agencies, local governments, and private business to bring broadband access to public housing around the U.S. The plan is to bring no- or very-low cost broadband into public housing so that low-income families can get online.

    It’s not municipal broadband; private companies are, instead, opening up their wires a bit in markets that they already serve. Participating ISPs include CenturyLink, Cox, Sprint, and Google Fiber, among others. The businesses will provide internet access in the range of $0 to $14.95 for eligible families in public housing in 28 pilot areas.

    The initial pilot of the program will reach at least 275,000 low-income households (including over 200,000 children) in 27 cities and one tribal nation, including:

    • Arkansas: Little Rock
    • California: Fresno, Los Angeles
    • Colorado: Denver
    • Connecticut: Meriden
    • District of Columbia
    • Florida: Tampa
    • Georgia: Albany, Atlanta, and Macon
    • Illinois: Rockford
    • Louisiana: Baton Rouge, New Orleans
    • Maryland: Baltimore
    • Massachusetts: Boston, Springfield
    • Missouri: Kansas City
    • New Jersey: Camden, Newark
    • New York: New York City
    • North Carolina: Durham
    • Ohio: Cleveland
    • Oklahoma: Choctaw Nation (tribal lands)
    • Pennsylvania: Philadelphia
    • Tennessee: Memphis, Nashville
    • Texas: San Antonio
    • Washington: Seattle

    ConnectHome also has a number of tech and internet businesses like Best Buy, Cox Communications, GitHub, and the College Board, providing relevant education and devices to families in the program. Aside from one $50,000 grant from the USDA for getting ConnectHome up and running in the Choctaw Nation, the $70 million price tag is being entirely provided by private business, non-profit organizations, and local entities.

    If this initiative sounds familiar, that’s because it has a whole heck of a lot in common with Comcast’s Internet Essentials, which does basically the same thing but is of course limited to Comcast’s service areas. Comcast began the low-cost, low-speed program for low-income families as a condition of its purchase of NBCUniversal in 2011.

    In Comcast’s case, households have to meet a very specific and occasionally very challenging set of criteria in order to enroll in Internet Essentials. While ConnectHome is an umbrella program bringing together different ISPs around the nation, each provider will to some degree set its own terms. Google, for example, will be providing free access to “select public housing authority properties” in areas it serves with Fiber, while CenturyLink will provide its Internet Basics service for $9.95 the first year, and $14.95 for four years after that, to HUD households in its coverage area.

    ConnectHome is the latest in a series of government initiatives designed to connect more Americans to the 21st century and all its — digital, online, cloud-based, streaming, and otherwise internet-requiring — tools. Last month, the FCC voted to expand its Lifeline program to allow low-income families to apply the $10 subsidy to broadband service instead of phone service if they choose. That dovetails nicely with ConnectHome, which will help provide $10 broadband service to many of those same low-income homes.

    While the internet has become more accessible for all households, including the poorest ones, over the course of the 21st century to date, the digital divide is still real and it is still stark.

    Internet use consistently remains lowest in the lowest-income households. Source: Pew Internet Project

    Internet use consistently remains lowest in the lowest-income households. Source: Pew Internet Project


    The lower the income, the lower the likelihood a household has internet access at home. The White House estimates that in the lowest income quintile — the bottom 20% poorest homes in America — two-thirds of households have a computer, but fewer than half have an internet connection to hook it up to. According to HUD, families in public housing are surviving on an average income of about $13,000 per year (well below the federal poverty guideline), which makes the average monthly broadband bill simply too cost-prohibitive.

    White House National Economic Council Director Jeff Zients said on a press call, “Americans need world-class internet because so much of the prosperity that we seek and so many of the jobs that we want to create depend on access to the tools of the digital economy.” He added that the program, “Sends a powerful message to every kid in every community … that they deserve a fair shot at success no matter where they’re from,” from the most densely packed inner-city neighborhood to the most remote corners of a rural reservation.

    Cable’s major lobbying group, the NCTA, supports the plan, which President Obama will formally unveil at a speech this evening in Oklahoma.



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uNew Law Brings Happy Hour Back To Illinois Bars — In Moderationr


4 4 4 9
  • (afagen)

    (afagen)

    What time is it in Illinois? It’s Happy Hour: Fans of after-work drink deals will surely be rejoicing in Illinois, where the governor just signed a law making happy hour legal again in the state — to a certain point.

    Illinoisans have been waiting since 1989 to once again convene at bars at that special space between after-work drinks and a committed night on the town, ever since happy hour drink specials were banned under state law.

    Gov. Bruce Rauner signed The Culinary and Hospitality Modernization Act (SB 398) on Wednesday, with the law becoming effective immediately. The bill passed the House on May 28 and the Senate shortly after, on May 31, allowing discounts for up to four hours per day and up to 15 hours a week, as long as those specials are advertised a week in advance and don’t continue after 10 p.m.

    Volume specials are still prohibited, the state’s FAQ [PDF]on the new law notes, so no “two-for-one” drink deals for one person and no “all you can drink” promotions. Happy Hour Law also says establishments serving alcohol can’t increase the volume of alcoholic liquor in a drink, or the size of the drink, without proportionally increasing the price regularly charged for that drink on that given day.

    And though happy hour often brings to mind discounted drinks during a certain time period, the new law says prices can’t be reduced or fluctuate throughout a business’ normal operating hours and everyone has to get the same prices — so no Brand X beer for half price just for the ladies between 5-7 p.m, for example.

    A bar could have an all-day discount on that beer for all customers, as long as it promoted the new price a week ahead of time.

    So what kind of discounts or deals can customers expect to see during those four hours per day? Bucket promotions, which also includes selling pitchers of alcohol, as long as it’s delivered to two or more people, and as long as it’s offered all day to everyone (No Ladies’ Night promos, for example); offering free food or entertainment along with drink purchases; including drinks as part of a meal package; and increasing drink prices instead of charging a cover fee to offset the cost of special entertainment that’s not regularly scheduled.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uPapa John’s Franchise Owner Faces Jail Time, $500,000 In Back Pay & Penalties For Skirting Wage Lawsr


4 4 4 9
  • For the third time this year, prosecutors have accused an owner of a New York-area Papa John’s pizza franchise of not paying employees minimum wage and overtime. This time, the franchise owner is accused of not only failing to pay his workers properly, but devising a scheme to carry out the non-payment through falsified tax documents. Now, he and his company are not only facing more than $500,000 in payments to employees and fines, but jail time.

    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, along with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division, announced charges today against BMY Foods Inc. and its operator for allegedly failing to pay minimum wage and overtime to approximately 300 current and former employees.

    According to the AG’s office, instead of paying overtime wages as required by New York and federal labor laws, the owner of the franchise paid workers the same, regular pay rate for all hours worked.

    In order to conceal this practice, the company allegedly paid for overtime hours in cash to avoid creating a record and created fictitious names for employees to use in their computerized timekeeping system.

    When employees’ weekly hours reached 35 or 40 per week, they were allegedly required to use the fictitious names so that the employer’s failure to pay proper overtime for these hours would be concealed.

    BMY Foods and its operator both allegedly made the cash payments under the fake names and kept separate paper records reflecting both the check and cash payments made to the same worker, the AG reports.

    To continue the scheme, the company allegedly filed fraudulent tax returns with the State of New York that omitted the cash payments made under fictitious names.

    According to the complaint, the operator created the two-name ploy after finding out that he was under investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor for wage violations.

    The charges filed by the AG’s office seek jail time and the payment of $230,000 in back wages to current and former employees of the stores. The Dept. of Labor’s judgement stipulates that the operator must pay an additional $230,000 in liquidated damages to employees and $50,000 in civil penalties.

    “My office will not hesitate to criminally prosecute any employer who underpays workers and then tries to cover it up by creating fake names and filing fraudulent tax returns,” Schneiderman said in a statement. “We will continue to be relentless in pursuing the widespread labor law violations, large and small, which we have found in the fast food industry. And I call on franchisors to stand up and stop the widespread lawlessness plaguing your businesses and harming your hardworking employees.”

    Today’s wage theft case is the third for the New York AG’s office this year. Back in February and March, the office obtained judgments totaling $3 million against two other Papa John’s franchisees, Emstar Pizza and New Majority Holdings, for violating wage laws.

    A.G. Schneiderman And U.S. Department Of Labor Announce Criminal Charges Against, And Civil Settlement With, Papa John’s Franchisee For Wage Theft [Eric Schneiderman]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uCustomers Spot Signs That NYC Nail Salons Are Setting Themselves Apart After Reports Of Bad Work Conditionsr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uAmy’s Baking Company To Go Wholesale-Only, Restaurant For Saler


4 4 4 9
  • amysupdateYou may remember Amy’s Baking Company, a bakery and bistro in Phoenix that somehow turned one appearance on the United States version of Gordon Ramsay’s program “Kitchen Nightmares” into years of infamy. Maybe it was because it was the first and only time Ramsay walked away from a restaurant makeover, or how the restaurant’s owners declared war on Reddit, or possibly the entire Internet. This plan didn’t lead to long-term success as a restaurant.

    If you’ve always dreamed of running a notorious bakery in Arizona, too bad: the owners say that they already have a prospective buyer lined up, who is from France and needs immigration and legal approval. The Bouzaglos don’t plan to leave the food service business: they told Phoenix Business Journal that they’re going to take their recipes and run a wholesale dessert and baked-good business out of the town where they live.

    Part of the reason the company wants to get out of the restaurant business has to do with the space they rent: a mysterious odor in the building has caused ABC to occasionally shut down and lose revenue. The eponymous Amy claims that the odor has caused health problems for her. Naturally, this led to conflict with the landlord, which spilled out to Twitter. The building now has a new owner, and soon Amy’s Baking Company will too.

    EXCLUSIVE: Amy’s Baking Co. owners looking to sell restaurant, start wholesale dessert business [Phoenix Business Journal] (via Eater)



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uApple Confirms It’s Not Getting Rid Of The iPod, Finally Updates The Devicer


4 4 4 9
  • Screen Shot 2015-07-15 at 1.03.11 PMJust a month ago, we flirted with the possibility that Apple’s recent removal of the iPod from the top of the company’s site – in favor of its new subscription music service – may have been the beginning of the end for the company’s music player. Alas, today, the tech giant revealed that, no, it’s not sending the iPod the way of the dodo bird, instead, it’s updated the device… for the first time in three years.

    The Wall Street Journal reports that Apple introduced an updated version of its iPod Touch, complete with the same software chip as the newest iPhone and a big ol’ powerful camera.

    Among the updates Apple bestowed on the new iPod – which retails starting at $199 – are improved fitness tracking capabilities, 10-times faster graphics performance, and three-time faster WiFi connectivity, the company says.

    The device will now come with Apple’s streaming-music service on a free trial basis for three months. But remember, if you do get the new iPod and decide you don’t want to keep the streaming-service after three months, you have to manually change preferences so not to be charged the $9.99 or $14.99 fee each month.

    Apple’s new iPods will come in either a 16-gigabit version or a 128-gigabit version in several colors.

    The company’s relative muteness on the possibility of a new iPod – along with the aforementioned home screen change – had many consumers and tech-lovers questioning whether or not the company would keep the device that was so groundbreaking when released in 2001.

    In fact, the last major update for the iPod came in 2012, followed by the demise of the iPod Classic in September 2014.

    Apple Updates iPod Touch [The Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uPeople Are Going Out To Restaurants More Like They Used To Before The Recessionr


4 4 4 9
  • Times, they are a-changing, and that’s a good thing when it comes to the restaurant business lately: More people are going out to eat recently, in numbers that haven’t been seen since before the recession hit in 2008.

    Global research firm NPD group released new figures on restaurant visits between June 1, 2014 through May 31, showing that folks made 61.1 billion visits to U.S. restaurants, reports the Chicago Tribune.

    That number is a promising sign that the economy is continuing to recover from the recession, food industry experts say. The more people are working and making money, the more likely they are to go out and eat away from home.
    We’re also spending more money when we go out, with a year-over-year increase of 2.4%. That’s the biggest bump restaurants have gotten in five years.

    Fast-casual chains alone, with restaurants like Chipotle and Panera Bread, have grown by 8%, the biggest boost in the quick-service industry, which accounts for about 80% of U.S. dining. In comparison, fine-dining restaurants only make up about 1% of dining in the U.S.

    “It’s taken awhile to get there,” an NPD spokeswoman said of surpassing pre-recession numbers.

    Restaurant visits surpass pre-recession numbers [Chicago Tribune]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist