среда, 15 июля 2015 г.

uBirchbox Wants Customers To Help Decide Where Next Stores Will Ber


4 4 4 9
  • birchboxinBirchbox, the company to blame for the current subscription beauty box trend, opened a retail store last year in Manhattan, where shoppers can create their own boxes in person and shop for other beauty products. Now the company wants to expand, and wants customers to tell them where to build their next store.

    The plan is to use shipping containers to create pop-up stores in three different cities next month, then open permanent stores in two cities sometime in 2016. To promote this summer tour, Birchbox is asking users to vote on their preferred city, which will be one factor in how they decide which cities to visit or settle down in. Voting ends on Friday, July 17.

    “Our offline customers have a higher lifetime value with us online, so for us, this isn’t just another cute pop-up,” co-founder and CEO Katia Beauchamp said in a statement. “It’s a serious step towards further retail expansion and a way for us to test the waters in new markets.” While the company already knows where their customers are located, with the whole shipping-monthly-boxes-to-them thing, their most dedicated customers are the one who will stop by the website and ask the beauty retailer to come to their city.

    The expansion is also an expansion of the Birchbox Man brand: each pop-up stop will have separate shops for products for men or women, and one of the new stores that will open next year will feature only men’s products.

    Online beauty retailer Birchbox delving deeper into offline [Chain Store Age]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


вторник, 14 июля 2015 г.

uFirst United Airlines Bug Bounty Payout Is One Million Milesr


4 4 4 9
  • The bug bounty program at United Airlines started just two months ago, and an independent researcher has already found a bug serious enough that the airline paid out 1 million miles for the first bug turned in. That’s worth about $25,000 in cash, or he could, well, travel with them.

    The researcher who found the bug has his own security firm in Florida, and told Kapersky Labs’ Threat Post as much as he’s allowed to about his find. He can’t actually tell anyone much about the nature of the bug that he found or where he found it, but he is able to say that it would have allowed an evil-doer to execute code remotely on one of United’s systems.

    It must have been a serious bug if it was worth that many miles, though. As soon as they verified the researcher’s citizenship and that he was in the U.S. when he discovered the flaw, they made two deposits in his frequent flyer account: one with one point, and one with a million.

    United Airlines Hands Out Million-Mile Bug Bounty [Kapersky Labs] (via Wired)



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uThe Pizza Farm Is Real: There Are Also Fish Stick Bushes And Taquito Treesr


4 4 4 9
  • PizzafarmerA few weeks ago, we shared our disappointment that while “pizza farms” exist, they are not places where you pluck sun-ripened pizzas from the vine and eat them in a meadow while pepperoni-beasts surround you, grazing red peppers. No, they’re places where you eat pizza on the farm where the ingredients were grown or raised, which is almost as good. Then we learned about an actual pizza farm.

    We were not aware that in his downtime when he isn’t acting, Nick Offerman runs a bucolic farm that raises pizzas, taquitos, fish sticks, and other fresh products for America’s school lunches.

    Fortunately, it was before the entire Consumerist team quit to work on the pizza farm that we realized this is all a hoax. There are no fish stick bushes or fields of sloppy joes. The ad is actually a message from the American Heart Association meant to persuade us to support the reauthorization of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, a 2010 law that shoved more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains on the lunch trays of kids across the country. Ew.

    Pizza Farm with Nick Offerman
    Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act [USDA]
    http://ift.tt/1JfJTlm



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uReport: GM Threatened With Regulatory Investigation Before Issuing Recall For Fire-Prone Hummersr


4 4 4 9
  • Last week, General Motors announced that it would recall nearly 196,000 Hummer vehicles because simply turning on the heading or cooling system could set the car ablaze. While we reported that federal regulators had received nearly two dozen consumer complaints about the issue over the past seven years, a new report finds that the real number of reported incidents is much higher, and that GM may have continued to put off issuing the recall had it not been for threats of an investigation.

    Jalopnik, citing sources with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, reported earlier today that General Motors only recalled the model year 2006 to 2010 Hummer H3 and model year 2009 to 2010 H3T after regulators threatened to open a formal investigation into the issue.

    According to GM, the issue with the Hummer vehicles is related to an electrical part in the heating and cooling system that can overheat and cause a fire inside the dashboard.

    Jalopnik reports that the first fire related to the blower issue occurred in August 2008 and was reported to NHTSA the following month.

    However, a chronology report [PDF] posted by NHTSA at the time of the recall alleges the company only learned about the issue after receiving two consumer complaints through its Speak Up For Safety program in September 2014.

    Three months later, GM says it opened a safety field investigation into the Hummer H3 blower motor.

    During the investigation, GM analyzed complaints, incident reports, warranty data, and other field data, and “concluded that the blower motor connector issue was isolated to the subject Hummer H3 and H3T vehicles.”

    GM’s investigation also confirmed that the mismatched electrical conductivity could result in overheating and melting of the blower motor connector module.

    Despite the findings, in April 2015, GM closed the investigation without further action.

    When the company reviewed its decision with NHTSA, the agency “asked additional questions and directed GM to additional [reports] that appeared to be related to this issue.”

    The NHTSA source tells Jalopnik that at this point, knowing GM’s history of downplaying potential safety issues, the regulator threatened the company to either recall the vehicles or face a formal investigation.

    After one more discussion, the manufacturer made the decision to conduct a safety recall in early July.

    At the time the recall was announced, GM said it was aware of several reports of fires, including three that resulted in minor burns.

    But Jalopnik asserts that instead of the previously reported 20 complaints submitted to NHTSA, there have actually been 73 incidents involving vehicle’s HVAC blower motor. Those reports detail parts of the car being burned or melted and, in some cases, fire causing the total loss of the vehicle.

    “Was traveling through a parking lot, noticed a glow from the corner of my eye, and something dripped from under the passenger glovebox,” one complaint states. “There was a funny smell. I immediately stopped and told my passenger to get out and noticed a fire under the passenger glovebox.”

    “Pulling into my stepson’s school, I began to smell and see smoke,” another Hummer owner writes to NHTSA. “When I got closer to the parking area, sparks began to fall from underneath the right passenger dash. I immediately parked the car and ran around to the right passenger side and opened the door… I have searched online and found that this is a common reoccurring problem with Hummers and there are many reports similar to my experience.”

    As we all probably know by now, this wouldn’t be the first time that GM has let potential safety issues go unchecked. The company’s massive ignition switch defect – which has currently been linked to more than 120 deaths – went unreported for more than a decade before the company finally announced a recall in 2014.

    But, of course, GM isn’t the only one to blame behind the igntion switch or Hummer recall delays. A recent 42-page report [PDF] by the Transportation Department’s Office of Inspector General claims inadequate data and analysis in NHTSA’s processes undermines its ability to identify and investigate vehicle safety concerns.

    Specifically, the audit found systematic flaws contributed to the decades-long delay in identifying and addressing GM’s ignition switch defect.

    GM Didn’t Recall The Hummer Over Fires Until The Feds Threatened Them [Jalopnik]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uTelebrands Stops Marketing Amish Secret Furniture Polish After S.C. Johnson Challenges Ad Claimsr


4 4 4 9
  • amishsecretYou may remember Telebrands, the company that sells innovative products through a very distinctive style of advertising. You probably remember them very well, because we had a story just this morning about their settling a New Jersey lawsuit alleging violations of that state’s Consumer Fraud Act. The company also came to an agreement with competitor S.C. Johnson and Son, agreeing to pull ads for its Amish Secret Furniture Cleaner and stop making claims that standard furniture polish is bad for wood.

    The challenge came through the National Ad Division, the self-regulation body where companies can call shenanigans on each other’s advertising and trigger an impartial investigation. Here’s the commercial in question:

    Telebrands didn’t waste time defending its product or promising to change the commercial. Amish Secret has already vanished, with its website tossed down the memory hole and only available through the Internet Archive. (Warning: the commercial auto-plays.)

    It’s not that the product is bad, exactly, but it’s not a substitute for refinishing grimy old wood furniture. There’s no substitute for that. It’s easy to see how S.C. Johnson, makers of Pledge, didn’t appreciate commercials for Amish Secret airing that say things like:

    “Furniture polishes are a nasty, greasy mess, and over time attract dust like a magnet.”

    “Forget oily sprays. Amish Secret cleans layers of built-up wax, revealing a fresh, lasting shine without leaving a sticky, oily residue.”

    In their statement, advertiser Telebrands :

    believes that the advertising claims it makes regarding the Amish Secret Furniture Cleaner are truthful and accurate, but in the interest of expeditiously resolving the current challenge and for business reasons, it has voluntarily agreed to permanently discontinue the challenged claims in a timely manner.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uHertz Now Requiring Rental Customers To Provide Refueling Receipt For Trips Under 75 Miles, Or Pay $14r


4 4 4 9
  • (dierk schaefer)

    (dierk schaefer)

    In yet another example of why it pays off to make sure you fully understand a company’s terms of service, and pay attention when those policies change, Hertz rental customers should be aware of a new refueling requirement when driving a vehicle less than 75 miles.

    Starting July 15, Hertz’s new Express Refueling option at certain locations presents an alternative for drivers on shorter trips, but it’s one that may be unwelcome for people who aren’t used to (or may forget to) get a receipt for gas. Hertz customers should’ve received an update via email recently, reading:

    Beginning on 7/15/2015 there will be a new refueling option for Hertz rentals in the United States. This Express Fuel option applies at select locations to rentals during which the entire distance driven is 75 miles or less. If you drive 75 miles or less and do not purchase gas, or purchase gas but fail to produce a receipt, a charge of $13.99 will be applied. If you drive 75 miles or less and produce a receipt of a fuel purchase made during your rental, the $13.99 charge will not be applied.

    Consumerist reader Andy is in favor of this, writing that he has often found it tough, while on overnight trips, to find gas stations near airports. He likes the idea of a flat $14 refueling charge, but wondered whether a driver could provide a receipt for as little as $1, if that’s really all it costs to refill a tank, and fulfill the requirement, thus avoiding a $14 charge.

    A Hertz spokeswoman confirmed as much to Consumerist.

    “If customers anticipate that the cost to fill up will be less than the Express Fuel rate, they are welcome to refuel on their own before returning the car,” she explains. “The gas station receipt simply establishes for us that the customer recently filled up. We believe many customers will value the convenience of a flat refueling rate rather than stopping at a gas station on the way.”

    Other Hertz customers aren’t so pleased with the requirement of having to provide a receipt, instead of simply returning the vehicle with a full tank as they did before (which you can still do on longer trips), as a recent thread on the forum FlyerTalk shows.

    But as one commenter notes, any customer who’s received a car with a fuel meter that reads “Full” but is actually one or two gallons short knows how frustrating that experience can be.

    “We only ask for a receipt with the short-distance rentals (75 miles or less) so that our agents know the customer recently filled up rather than opting for the Express Fuel convenience charge,” the Hertz rep told Consumerist. “Often the gas gauge indicates full following these short trips when it’s actually missing two to three gallons.”

    As for the cost of gas if you choose Fuel Express, compared to what you’d pay on your own, let’s do a quick calculation: The average price of gas nationally right now is about $2.78 per gallon, according to AAA. Suppose you’ve got a car that gets around 22 miles per gallon, which is somewhere in the middle between a Prius and a big truck. That comes down to $0.13 per mile driven, according to this handy New York Times calculator. That means if you drove 74 miles and found a gas station, you should spend about $9.62 for gas — well below that $14 Express Fuel option. Of course, any difference could be chalked up to a fee for having Hertz refuel the vehicle.

    Again, for some, the price of convenience may be an issue for many who don’t want to deal with finding a gas station. But if you do want to save money and fuel up yourself, don’t forget to bring that receipt with you when you return your car.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uGot A Burning Need To Stream Old Video Games Though Your Cable Box? Comcast And EA Have A Service For Your


4 4 4 9
  • Comcast hinted at adding streaming games to their X1 platform with a confused commercial last May.

    Comcast hinted at adding streaming games to their X1 platform with a confused commercial last May. The young men shown were acting impressed with a lack of buffering on an offline title.

    The only two companies ever to win Consumerist’s Worst Company In America award more than once are now teaming up for realsies. Comcast and EA are unveiling a new set-top streaming gaming service together, and it looks like a resounding “meh.”

    Comcast made the announcement today. The new service, called Xfinity Games, is currently in a sort-of-closed beta. Current Comcast customers who are already using the X1 platform can apply for access at xfinitygames.com.

    The partnership basically cuts out the middle-man of a Sony or Microsoft set-top console (or a PC), and makes certain EA games playable directly from Comcast’s X1 set-top device. Instead of including a traditional controller, players streaming through Xfinity Games can use their phones or tablets — Apple iOS or Samsung Android products — as controllers while kicking back and gaming on their TVs.

    The games you stream through Xfinity Games, Comcast makes sure to add, “are treated just like other internet traffic,” meaning that if you are subject a data cap threshold, the game content you stream will count against it.

    The initial lineup includes a variety of sports, puzzle, casual, and indie games published by EA studios. Comcast’s blog posts touts EA as “the company responsible for some of the biggest and best games in history,” which is at least an argument that could keep game fans busy for a few weeks… but none of those ultra-blockbuster franchises, or recent entries in them, are available on the service. Plants vs Zombies and FIFA 13 yes; Mass Effect and Madden, not so much. Nor are online multiplayer functions, voice chat, or remote play currently available for any game on the service.

    “It’s perfect for families with kids and even those of us who haven’t picked up a game in years,” Comcast says, although why a family would want to go through the process of hooking their iPad up to their X1 and TV for some Peggle instead of just playing the mobile version on that iPad is a lot less clear.

    Rumors of the service, and the partnership between EA and Comcast, first began to swirl almost two years ago, when the app first found its way onto Apple’s iOS App Store. Later, certain factually questionable ads Comcast ran in the intervening months served as a reminder that streaming games through the X1 is and was definitely on Comcast’s agenda.

    The point behind the Xfinity X1 platform is that it’s just that: a platform. The cloud-based, remotely accessible service integrates DVR, TV listings, and Comcast’s on-demand video offerings. Like many other stand-alone devices (Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Chromecast, etc.), the X1 allows you to run a variety of apps like weather, music, and sports alongside your Comcast content.

    And if making those apps readily available on your cable box keeps you in their walled garden and reduces the likelihood you’ll go out and get something that will let you switch to watching Netflix instead, well, so much the better for Comcast.



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist