пятница, 12 июня 2015 г.

uTuxedo Rentals Are Down Because Of Fewer, Less Formal Weddingsr


4 4 4 9
  • The number of weddings relative to the U.S. population is the lowest it’s been since World War I, and tuxedo-rental shops like Men’s Wearhouse are seeing a decrease in their business. They blame demographic patterns, changes in wedding fashion, and changes in the formalwear rental business as a whole for the decrease, and see the trend continuing for now.

    The first problem is that the wedding rate is falling: fewer people (as a proportion of the population) are getting married every year. That’s bad enough news for the wedding industry, but add in a different trend: less formal weddings are now in style. The current Men’s Wearhouse CEO noted in a recent conference call that they’re selling more suits for weddings: grooms want less formal outfits that they might wear again instead of paying for a tux that won’t quite fit and that they have to give back.

    There’s another trend that has traditional tux rental shops nervous: the Internet. Online tux shops offer lower prices, free two-way shipping, and can ship out a suit based on the wearer’s actual measurements. They rent accessories, too. If you’d rather invest in buying a tux, that’s more accessible than ever, too: you can order a tux from a reputable source for a lower price than ever.

    Men’s Wearhouse is trying something new to make rentals more accessible: they’re putting mini tux-rental shops in 300 Macy’s stores as an experiment. Will making fittings and pickups more accessible increase business? If you see more mini-shops expanding out to other stores, you’ll know that it did.

    The Rental Tux Is In Trouble [Bloomberg]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uDeep-Fried Starbucks Coffee Joins List Of Ridiculous Food You Can Find At The Fairr


4 4 4 9
  • (Courtesy of San Diego County Fair)

    (Courtesy of San Diego County Fair)

    If you thought the world couldn’t possibly cough up yet another deep-fried food oddity, you were wrong and you’ll probably be wrong again if you think people will ever stop chucking things into hot oil. The deep-fried trend is especially prevalent at fairs and festivals, with this year’s nominee for freakish fare showing up at the San Diego County Fair to much ado: Deep-fried Starbucks coffee.

    No, not just any coffee, apparently it must be Starbucks, as seen in the sign at the Bacon-A-Fair booth and on the cups the food comes in, reports FoodBeast.

    And if you’re imagining a piping hot crust filled with molten coffee, which sounds like something you’d inflict on your enemy so as to render him incapable of using his tongue ever again — it’s deep fried balls of ground coffee, dusted with sugar and topped with whipped cream. It comes on a stick, as fair food tends to do.

    No word from FoodBeast about how the thing actually tastes, (a doughnut filled with coffee grounds?), but here’s a video of what it’s like to tear into the thing:

    Instagram Photo

    Deep-Fried STARBUCKS COFFEE Is A Real Thing You Can Get At The Fair This Summer [FoodBeast]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uPolice Chief Totally Messes With Phone Scammer Telling Him He’s Won $7K From The Governmentr


4 4 4 9
  • A scammer peddling magical $7,000 rewards from the government chose the wrong person to try to dupe: A police chief in Indiana filmed his phone on speaker while a stranger explained to him that yes, the government does just give people “free grant money” for no reason, and that he could get his money at Western Union.

    The Danville Metropolitan Police Department posted the video to its Facebook page as well as on YouTube, where the police chief is sitting in the passenger seat of a car while his companion drives. He starts the recording out by asking the caller why he’s calling.

    “You have been selected by the federal government to receive a grant amount of $7,000,” the voice tells him. At which point you might want to have your volume down as he lets out an ear-splitting WOOOOOOOO!!! As one would do if they were actually going to receive $7,000 for no reason.

    The scammer goes on to explain why and how he’s been selected, saying the government had checked all his accounts “and you have been a low taxpayer so this is like a tax refund which you never, ever have to pay back in your whole life.”

    The WOOOOOOOOO!!!s continue, even as the scammer even tries to give his pitch an air of credibility, informing the chief that all calls are recorded, “for your safety and security reasons.”

    He adds that they won’t be putting the money directly into his regular account, but he can get it by going to — wait for it! — Western Union, where a supervisor will help him.

    “Western Union — that’s the one with the horses right?” the chief replies.

    The scammer instructs him to call them back and at that point someone will be on the line with him until he receives the grant money.

    He seems to realize he’s not fooling anyway when he relays a “grant confirmation code” and the chief purposely recites back the wrong number, substituting “666” in the middle repeatedly.

    “You can stick that money up your ass, okay?” the scammer says, to which the woman driver replies.

    Just a reminder: The government will never call you on the phone and tell you you’ve just won a bunch of money. Never give out personal information over the phone to a stranger.

    “I immediately recognized it as being a scam,” the chief told Fox 59, adding that the department decided to post the video as much to let people know what’s going on as much as well as for the fun factor.

    “They absolutely picked the wrong person,” he said.”



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uJeni’s Splendid Ice Creams Shuts Down Again Over Listeria Contaminationr


4 4 4 9
  • stack_of_pints__05446-1427209886-1280-1280That didn’t last long. About a month ago, Ohio-based Jeni’s Splendid Ice Creams was reopening its scoop shops following an April recall of all of its products for listeria contamination. But this morning, the company’s CEO announced some bad news.

    “We have found Listeria in our production facility again,” writes John Lowe in a statement posted to the company website. “We discovered the Listeria through routine swabbing as part of our monitoring program.”

    Lowe says that Jeni’s halted production earlier in the week and has been looking into how they could be getting contaminated by the nasty bacteria again.

    “We have a theory and are testing that theory,” he explains. “We don’t yet have a timeline for the resumption of production.”

    The company resumed production in mid-May following a full-scale recall of its products. Jeni’s stores reopened on May 22.

    An FDA probe of the original listeria problem found that Jeni’s was not fully compliant with cleaning and testing procedures. Lowe claims that Jeni’s has been testing every batch of ice cream it’s been putting out since resuming production and maintains that “all of the ice cream that has been served in our shops since reopening on May 22 has been safe and is 100% Listeria-free.”

    The company has retail locations in eight cities in seven different states across the country. Without enough safe ice cream to keep the stores stocked, the scoop shops are closing again until the problem is resolved and production can begin again.

    [via Eater]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uSteam Summer Sale Has Deep Video Game Discounts… And Pricing Shenanigans That Confuse Consumersr


4 4 4 9
  • steamsale2015For 125 million gamers who prefer to play on their computers, Steam is the online retailer of choice, especially when it runs one of its huge seasonal sales. But while these promotions, like the current “Monster Summer Sale,” offer what appear to be deep discounts, Steam is also repeatedly accused of artificially inflating prices to make these savings look better than they are.

    This leaves the savvy gaming consumer (and forums full of confused ones) wondering two things: are these accusations true and, if so, is that legal?

    The answers are “kinda sorta” and “probably yes.” Let’s dig into it a bit, shall we?

    Where Do Prices Come From?
    In many retail environments, the person who runs the store gets to determine at what price they will sell an item to consumers. Every supermarket buys its bananas at a wholesale price, and then decides for itself how much of a markup to put on those bananas. The same banana — or box of Cheerios, or gallon of milk, or potato — can cost two wildly different prices at two grocery stores across town, and customers will decide where to shop and what to buy based on their own list of priorities.

    Now imagine that the banana wholesaler always controls the prices, instead. The store no longer gets to say, “this banana cost us $0.03 so let’s sell it for $0.20.” Instead, the grocery store says, “No matter what your bananas are priced at, we are going to take a 30% cut. Also, during the second week in June, last week in November, and last week in December we have sales,” and hands over the shelf labels to the banana wholesaler to do with as they will.

    That last one is a lot closer to how video game digital storefronts work. In the world of games, minimum resale prices are basically always set by the game’s publisher. That’s also true on Steam. A game’s publisher sets the everyday price and any sale prices they’re willing to sell at. Steam dictates the event timing.

    The Shenanigans
    There are literally thousands of games for sale on Steam and while some sites helpfully aggregate sale and pricing data, it would be very difficult to comb through them all. But activity around some titles in particular has caught shoppers’ attention.

    There are two different kinds of things going on with pricing.

    Here’s the first: Summer sale day arrives! A game is listed at $30, being called “50% off.” Its launch price in 2014 was indeed $60, like almost every other blockbuster-style game… but since March, it’s been priced at $40. Isn’t it, then, really only 25% off? That’s the question users have about games like Wolfenstein: The New Order, which did that exact thing. The game is being offered at a definite discount off its every-day price, but not as high a discount as the advertising would have you believe.

    Here’s the other: Summer sale day arrives! You’re hoping for a deal on a major new game that has so far only ever retailed at $60. You go and hit the storefront and the game you planned to buy is no longer there. Instead, you see a banner advertising a great sale on a bundle of that game with an in-game currency cash card. And that “great sale” is… $60.

    That, alone, wouldn’t be so bad. Annoying, but not really misleading. But then, a few hours later, the original game makes a reappearance on Steam, without the bundle. It has a “25% off!” banner on it! Hooray! Except then you click through to find that the list price of the game suddenly shows up as $80, and that supposed great deal price is… $60.

    That’s exactly what developer Rockstar Games is accused of doing with Grand Theft Auto V.

    The pricing history for Grand Theft Auto V, via SteamDB.info.

    The pricing history for Grand Theft Auto V, via SteamDB.info.

    At the start of the sale, the option to buy GTAV vanished, and was replaced only with bundle choices. The “Great White Shark Cash Card” is an add-on that does indeed retail for $20 on its own, so selling the two as a bundle for $60 does technically constitute a 25% discount over the $80 it would usually cost to buy both.

    So is it true? Yes. Is it misleading? Also kind of yes.

    The good news is, negative attention seems to work. As of this morning, the game is back on the service, not in any bundles, without a sale banner, listed at its original $60 price point.

    The bad news is, it took a lot of complaints from a lot of players and gaming sites to make that happen.

    gtaisback

    The Law
    Advertising is heavily regulated speech. You’re not allowed to mislead customers or say things that aren’t true. And an internet full of inquiring minds wants to know: is all of this actually legal?

    Steam is global, and so are its sales. The laws, base pricing, and converted currency pricing vary around the world. But as yours truly is based in Washington, DC, and Valve is based in Washington state, we’re just going to look at American regulations.

    This sort of thing falls under the auspices of the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC’s Guides Against Deceptive Pricing have a whole section explaining what businesses may and may not do when it comes to listing or advertising discounts on their goods. The applicable section, when looking at discounts advertised in the Steam sale, is on “former price comparisons.”

    In the Wolfenstein example, the percentage of discount is being calculated against the game’s launch price, not its most recent price. However, its launch price was indeed its actual retail price for a period of many months. That means the 50% claim is pretty much legit:

    If the former price is the actual, bona fide price at which the article was offered to the public on a regular basis for a reasonably substantial period of time, it provides a legitimate basis for the advertising of a price comparison. Where the former price is genuine, the bargain being advertised is a true one.

    But what about that supposed $80 price point on GTA? Nobody ever actually paid $80 for that game — but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t actually a real price. “A former price is not necessarily fictitious merely because no sales at the advertised price were made,” the guide explains.

    But the guide then cautions: “The advertiser should be especially careful, however, in such a case, that the price is one at which the product was openly and actively offered for sale, for a reasonably substantial period of time, in the recent, regular course of his business, honestly and in good faith — and, of course, not for the purpose of establishing a fictitious higher price on which a deceptive comparison might be based.”

    Users noticed, screencaptured, analyzed, and complained about the supposed $80 price point for GTAV because this is the internet and that’s how things work. Realistically, however, that price listing was arguably an oversight, error, or mistake — it only lasted a few hours, and no longer appears on Steam.

    The Takeaway
    Sometimes the deals in seasonal video game sales really are killer. Backlogs fill and wallets empty during these events for a reason.

    But consumers need to read listings carefully, and pay attention to the bottom line. Whether it’s 50% off or 25% off, $30 for a game is still 30 of your dollars.



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uAmazon Adds Marketplace Merchants To Prime Shippingr


4 4 4 9
  • Back in January, Amazon expanded eligibility for its $35 Super Saver Shipping to items shipped by merchants in its Marketplace who already offer free shipping. Merchandise that doesn’t ship from an Amazon warehouse now counts toward the $35 free shipping threshold. Now they’re expanding the fold further, adding even more sellers to the virtual Amazon warehouse: selected large shippers will now be part of the Prime unlimited 2-day shipping program.

    The Amazon Markettplace has been a great way for Amazon to vastly expand its inventory without having to purchase more merchandise for its colossal warehouses. The “Fulfilled by Amazon” program means that sellers can have their items shipped directly from Amazon and participate in the Prime program that way, but sellers are charged fees to store their items in Amazon’s warehouses, as well as for packing and picking orders.

    Shipping for Prime has restrictions, of course. Items need 2-day shipping, just like the packages that ship from Amazon’s warehouses. This is a cost that sellers have to take care of themselves, meaning that it’s really only worthwhile to make larger, more expensive items prime-eligible. One seller that the WSJ spoke to only offers Prime as an option on items that cost over $50, for example.

    They have to ship out quickly, and Amazon keeps track of their performance, and also limits geographically which items can be “Prime” for a given buyer: an item in New Jersey might be Prime-eligible for a customer in New York, but not an item in Texas.

    The seller who the WSJ spoke to believes that there are maybe ten larger retailers that have been invited to become part of the program: it could expand to other sellers who are willing to pay for expedited shipping out of pocket, and who already offer free shipping on their merchandise.

    Amazon Expands Prime With Goods Shipped Directly From Merchants [Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uTwitter Lifting The 140-Character Limit For Direct Messagesr


4 4 4 9
  • Although many companies have branched into social media as a customer service tool, it can be frustrating for all parties involved when customers have to explain their issues in 140-character chunks of text. To make things a bit easier for everyone, Twitter has decided to lift the character limit in direct messages. So it’s like, email…?

    Twitter announced the upcoming change on its developer forums last night, saying that the change will be coming in July, giving developers some recommendations on making sure their applications and services can handle the longer messages. You know, these not-email direct messages.

    This will be useful for anyone who prefers to communicate seamlessly, without weird breaks between thoughts that just don’t fit within the limits.

    Lest this news has you getting your hopes up for longer public missives, settle down.

    “You may be wondering what this means for the public side of Twitter,” the company writes in the post. “Nothing! Tweets will continue to be the 140 characters they are today.”



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist