вторник, 9 июня 2015 г.

uNo More Carry-On Bottled Beverages For Carnival Cruise Passengersr


4 4 4 9
  • Carnival Cruise passengers traveling any time after July 8 be warned that you’ll no longer be able to sneak on a water bottle full of vodka… or gin… or water for that matter, as the cruise line will no longer allow outside most bottled beverages to be carried on board their ships.

    “Guests bringing bottled beverages on board are proving to be a source of multiple issues,” reads a Carnival FAQ about the policy change. The company says that they currently have to individually check all bottles to make sure passengers aren’t trying to smuggle booze, which brings boarding to a halt.

    The bigger issue, says Carnival, is that the people sneaking liquor onto the ships tend to get a bit out of control

    “We are concerned over the potential for behavioral issues associated with the unmonitored consumption of alcohol that results from alcohol that has been smuggled on board,” writes the company. “[W]hen behavioral issues occur on board… smuggled alcohol often appears to be a factor.”

    Passengers can still bring pre-packaged non-alcoholic beverages, but they have to be in sealed cartons or cans, and no more than 12 can be carried on. There is still an exception for a single bottle of wine or champagne.

    And you’ll have trouble bringing those drinks on cold, as the cruise line is limiting coolers to maximum dimensions of 12x12x12.

    Carnival denies that the policy change has anything to do with selling more booze to passengers. It points to a price drop in 12 packs of bottled water as evidence that it will not be raking in the cash. However, the price of $2.99 for pre-ordered 12-packs is about the same as you’d find at a grocery store and the $4.99 price is certainly a lot more than most of us would pay for that much water at the supermarket, so it’s not like Carnival is giving it away for free.

    [via USA Today]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uIs Comcast Running Manipulative “Push Poll” In Response To Philly Customer Service Study?r


4 4 4 9
  • Earlier this spring, Philadelphia released its Needs Assessment Report regarding Comcast, the city’s primary cable/broadband provider, one of its biggest employers, and the tenant of its tallest tower. The results of the survey were not good, with 99% of the written responses unfavorable to Comcast. At the time, the company said the report was innaccurate and said it would “deliver comprehensive proof” to the city. A new telephone poll being conducted on Comcast’s behalf appears to be in response to the city’s report, but some who’ve taken the survey say the questions being asked are designed to put Comcast in the best possible light.

    The first we heard of the survey was after Eric Rosso, Political Director for Pennsylvania Working Families, and no stranger to polling practices, Tweeted that he’d just taken a “ridiculous push poll” from Comcast that was “trying to garner results that favored them as a corporate citizen.”

    For those unfamiliar with the term “push poll,” it refers to a manipulative surveying practice where the questions are designed in such a way as to nudge respondents to give a desired response, and/or to put a desired message in the survey respondent’s mind. Push polls are most frequently used in election campaigns, but can be used by companies, especially when public opinion will play a large role in business matters.

    We spoke to Rosso, who didn’t record the call but did his best to recall the structure of the survey. He says it began with standard questions about Comcast service, picture quality, Internet speed — the kind of objective questions that fit into the “yes/no” or “rate on a scale of 1 to 4″ format and rarely require any sort of additional explanation.

    But then, says Rosso, the questions transitioned into more questionable territory. Rather than asking about his opinions and experiences as a Comcast customer, the caller asked him to quantify his feelings on things like Comcast’s Internet Essentials program for low-income consumers.

    While that’s a valid topic for a survey, Rosso says the way in which the question was phrased and the way in which he had to answer left no room for a nuanced answer.

    According to Rosso, giving a low score to the question about Comcast providing broadband access for some 43,000 low-income Philadelphians would give off the implication that you think such a program is a bad thing. And while consumer advocates have repeatedly criticized Essentials for being too restrictive, most believe that it’s a good but flawed program. You can’t get that sentiment across in a simple “scale of 1-4″ response.

    Likewise, the question about Comcast’s employment of thousands of Philadelphia-area residents was structured so that a low-scoring response would imply that the company shouldn’t employ as many people, not that there might be concerns about Comcast’s employment practices. And questions about Comcast’s tax contributions to the area left no room for qualifications related to the company’s tax breaks.

    Chris Rabb, author of Invisible Capital: How Unseen Forces Shape Entrepreneurial Opportunity and a professor at Temple University’s Fox School of Business, also took part in the phone survey. He tells Consumerist it was one of the most egregious examples of non-electoral push polling he’s seen in decades.

    This was particularly true, says Rabb, when the survey transitioned to questions about demands Philadelphia could make of Comcast in the company’s renewed franchise agreement, and how these could increase costs for the company.

    “All of the questions related to the franchise agreement were geared around the idea of ‘Do you believe you should have to pay for new expenses that we would tack on to your bill? Do you believe that you should pay for this?'” recalls Rabb. “They tried to make it seem like their profit margin is so thin that they can’t absorb any of the additional cost.”

    He notes that it’s telling that the survey never asked if you should think Comcast should eat any of these expenses as a cost of doing business.

    The apparent goal of these questions, say both Rosso and Rabb, is to paint Comcast’s corporate citizenship in the best possible light while also stirring up discontent among those who would object to their already-high cable bills increasing further.

    Since we have not been called to take part in this survey, and only have Rosso and Rabb’s recollections of the polls to go on, we contacted Comcast to ask if we could obtain the actual list of questions to see if they were indeed this leading or if the customers might be misremembering.

    A rep for the company said that providing the questions was not possible at this time but that could change if the survey data was used in the future.

    The rep did confirm that “a reputable third party, independent company is fielding a survey for us in Philadelphia,” adding that “Our commitment to Philadelphia is important to us, as are our customers here, and this survey gives us an opportunity to find out more about what’s important to them.”

    The company would not confirm or deny that the survey was in direct response to the Philadelphia Needs Assessment report, but did say that while this particular survey is Philadelphia-specific, Comcast frequently polls consumers in its various markets around the country.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uGet Your Free Iced Tea At Teavana June 10 To Celebrate Another Nonsense Holidayr


4 4 4 9
  • teavana_pineapple_berryDid you know that there’s a National Iced Tea Day? It’s tomorrow, June 10 and yes, it is a self-promotional event, but the important thing is that you can celebrate this non-holiday by picking up a free 16-ounce iced herbal tea at Teavana. If you go, be sure to avoid the upsell if fancy implements for making loose-leaf iced tea aren’t really your thing. [Starbucks Melody]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uBeach Town May Ban Renters From Using Vacation Homes’ Poolsr


4 4 4 9
  • One of the first attractions people might look for in a summer vacation home is exactly the thing a resort town wants to take away: Citing noise concerns, a Delaware beach town is considering banning renters from using the backyard pools at homes while they’re staying in the area.

    Rehoboth Beach’s board of commissioners is currently thinking long and hard about keeping renters of vacation homes from swimming in pools at the houses they rent, reports The News Journal, because as houses keep growing larger, those with pools are causing a ruckus in residential neighborhoods.

    Supporters of the pool rules are also in favor of limiting home sizes and occupancy limits for rented homes, saying these behemoths are changing the face of the resort.

    “It’s just a desirable place. Unfortunately, we’re a victim of our own success,” said one resident who is ambivalent on keeping renters out of pools, but supports regulations on occupancy, home sizes and new rules for pools. “For houses today to be teardown houses at $1 million is mind-boggling. But that’s what people are paying.”

    The town’s mayor agrees. He proposed the pool rule, writing in draft legislation that the growing attraction of these larger homes with pools to renters will have a “dramatic and destabilizing” effect on Rehoboth’s character.

    “This is the high-rise fight of our generation, if you will,” said Mayor Sam Cooper, adding that many “have experienced a degradation in their quality of life because of primarily new houses, but the introduction of the pools has been the big tipping point. They’ve had rentals around them and it’s no problem. But it’s the introduction of these pools that has really tipped the balance.”

    Of course, the owners of these sought after properties aren’t so pleased, saying banning renters from their pools would put a ding in their incomes and drive away renters from the resort town in general.

    “They really, really need to take into account the economic consequences of what they’re saying,” said one homeowner who bought a cottage in 2012 with her spouse and added a pool and spa to it. “It is a resort, and it has been for quite awhile. Some of the things they’re proposing could have a severe effect on welcoming visitors and renters.”

    Rehoboth board makes waves over swimming pools [The News Journal]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uWhy Can’t I Reach A Live Human Being At Uber When I Need To?r


4 4 4 9
  • Although there are many things that used to require a phone to do that we can now accomplish with an e-mail, a swipe, a tap or a Tweet, there are customer service situations — compromised accounts, dangerous situations and other scenarios — where we still want to be able to reach out and actually talk to a live human being. But unlike many other consumer-facing companies, Uber doesn’t offer a contact phone number or a more immediate way to get in touch with the company besides a support e-mail address.

    We’ve heard stories in the past where riders reported being held hostage, physically assaulted and harassed with unwanted sexual advances — by Uber drivers, often resulting in a lackluster response from Uber many hours or sometimes days after the incident, with varying degrees of aid offered.

    Other stories might not involve imminent physical harm, but it’s nevertheless frustrating for customers who find themselves in an emergency situation that would be best addressed with a quick response.

    We recently heard from a reader we’ll call “Vern,” who was upset that when he woke up in New York City to find he was somehow simultaneously taking an Uber ride in London, and his only recourse was to change his password and e-mail support@uber.com.

    Vern wrote Uber and waited… and waited for hours without receiving even an auto-respond message. He says it would behoove Uber to have a better method of reporting compromised accounts to crack down on fraud while it’s happening.

    “Given the volume of rides that Uber manages, it is inconceivable that they lack an expedited means of contact in more urgent situations,” Vern says. “I can’t imagine I am the only customer to have experienced this issue.”

    He says eventually Uber got back to him and deactivated his account — though it took a week to have it reactivated. He also got a $20 ride credit, but only after he specifically asked for it.

    It isn’t just riders who are frustrated by Uber’s lack of contact options. A member of the Consumerist staff once took a ride where the driver’s Uber app was on the fritz, causing her to lose multiple fares. The driver explained that even she didn’t have a phone number to call the company, just an e-mail.

    There is hope of speaking to a human for some of those drivers, according to Uber, which says there are dozens of in-person driver support centers around the globe which are run by the teams in those certain cities, including San Francisco, Philadelphia, Chicago and New York.

    While there’s no comprehensive list of those cities that Uber could provide Consumerist with, drivers who e-mail support will be directed to those centers if there’s one nearby that can help address the problem in person, Uber says.

    But again, in cases where there doesn’t happen to be a driver center nearby, a driver with an Uber app on the fritz in the middle of a potentially expensive fare will have no way, other than e-mail, to contact the company to address the issue while it’s happening.

    When Consumerist asked Uber about the possibility of other contact options for customers who feel that its support e-mail address isn’t enough, the company didn’t say it would never be a possibility. It then pointed instead to its customer service track record, saying that almost 17 million support tickets were solved in the last five years, with 8.6 million tickets solved in the first five months of 2015.

    “We have a dedicated support team available around the clock to our millions of riders in more than 300 cities around the world,” Uber said in a statement to Consumerist. “We have successfully and efficiently managed millions of customer support issues over the last five years, and we are always exploring new ways to provide the best and most efficient support possible.”

    After the recent spate of high-profile incidents where riders said Uber hadn’t responded fast enough, the company announced the creation of Incident Response Teams in March this year to address customer’s safety concerns.

    “To quickly respond to safety incidents, we have created Incident Response Teams that are on call worldwide on a 24/7 basis,” the blog post read. “These are specially trained groups that investigate and respond to serious safety concerns that may occur. The teams are distributed in regions around the globe and are there for those critical moments when a rapid resolution is needed.”

    There is no direct way for customers to escalate their issues however, as all problems are still reported via the support@uber.com e-mail address.

    Of course, Uber isn’t alone in this; it’s what often happens when you have a rapidly growing, customer-facing company where the underlying idea of the business is to be as uninvolved with the consumer-facing part of the operation as possible.

    Uber has argued — unsuccessfully, in some cases — in the past that it’s not actually a transportation company, it’s an app. After all, Uber claims, the drivers are independent contractors who don’t work for Uber. All the company does is make the connection between rider and driver, and process the payment.

    There’s nothing stopping Uber from expanding its current contact option to include live support, but it remains to be seen whether the company is willing to take the time to figure that out.



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uSan Francisco Officials Considering A Health Warning On Ads For Sodas, Sugary Drinksr


4 4 4 9
  • Although a proposed tax on sodas and sugary drinks didn’t fly in San Francisco, officials are now mulling the idea of slapping a health warning on advertisements appearing within the city limits for sugary beverages.

    The city’s Board of Supervisors is expected to vote today on measures that seek to put the brakes on soda drinking, with a “Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Ordinance” that would require health warnings on billboards, walls, the sides of cabs and buses and any other advertisements in San Francisco, reports the Associated Press.

    Such a move would make San Francisco the first place in the U.S. to require warnings on soda ads. The warnings wouldn’t pertain to soda cans, bottles or other packaging.

    The label for ads would read: “WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay. This is a message from the City and County of San Francisco.”

    Some limited vintage signs are exempt, but otherwise retailers would have to carry warnings on advertising within stores as well. The ordinance would go into effect in a year, if approved.

    “This is a very important step forward in terms of setting strong public policy around the need to reduce consumption of sugary drinks; they are making people sick, they’re helping fuel the explosion of Type 2 diabetes and other health problems in adults and in children,” says Scott Wiener, one of three San Francisco supervisors pushing the legislation.

    But opponents are already lining up against it, including CalBev, the state’s beverage association.

    “It’s unfortunate the Board of Supervisors is choosing the politically expedient route of scapegoating instead of finding a genuine and comprehensive solution to the complex issues of obesity and diabetes,” a spokesman told the AP.

    A spokesman for a company that has about 300 billboards and wall spaces says it isn’t fair just to focus on that medium while exempting newspapers and magazines.

    “It’s all these people who are telling me how to live my life and raise my children. I make that decision, not a bunch of elected officials,” he says. “Let’s fix the homeless issue, let’s fix potholes before you start telling me how to live my life.”

    Two other proposals before the supervisors would prohibit soda ads on city-owned property, while another would prohibit city funds from being used to buy soda. Mayor Ed Lee hasn’t said how he stands on the three proposals but said through a spokeswoman that he’s open to educating people through warning labels on ads.

    San Francisco Considers Health Warning on Soda Advertising [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uGeneral Mills Closes Snack Subscription Service, Kellogg To Open Oner


4 4 4 9
  • corn_snacksSubscription boxes full of stuff, ranging from pet treats to makeup samples, are a hot category right now. That’s why it makes sense that General Mills and Kellogg, companies best known for their cold cereals, are interested in the market for curated selections of “natural” packaged snacks shipped to customers’ doorsteps. While General Mills is getting out of the snack-box biz, though, Kellogg is just entering the market.

    General Mills’ service, called Nibblr, offered weekly, biweekly, or monthly boxes of snacks in small packages. The cereal giants were following established companies in that mini-industry, including Graze and NatureBox. The idea is to make money providing customers with snacks and with convenience instead of cereal, which turns into a commodity when users don’t have a preference for brands over generics.

    Bloomberg News explains that Nibblr was around for about a year and a half, and the company claims that the service was a test project, which “provided great learning for our organization, and we chose to focus our resources on other projects.”

    A Kellogg spokesperson said that the company is “always looking for new ways to reach our consumers,” and expanding their selection of “natural” foods, fuzzy though that term might be, is a good way to draw younger and health-conscious snackers who are apparently not so interested in cereal.

    Kellogg Said to Plan Snack Subscriptions as General Mills Exits [Bloomberg]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist