четверг, 4 июня 2015 г.

uLocal Dunkin’ Donuts Owner Decides He Can Be Cool With BBQ Place Selling Breakfast Tacos Nearbyr


4 4 4 9
  • Though from the consumer perspective having more choices is always a good thing, businesses don’t particularly like it when competitors move in on what they see as their turf. So went the ballad of a local Dunkin’ Donuts and its BBQ restaurant neighbor, where the two neighbors found themselves at odds over who was allowed to serve breakfast in the shopping center.

    The trouble in one Texas town started when the BBQ place started selling breakfast tacos to capitalize on that morning crowd, reports KHOU-11, after the owner felt like it was time to expand the menu.

    But he says he soon found out the Dunkin’ Donuts across the way had a beef with his breakfast business. He went on social media to tell folks that the shop had told him to stop selling breakfast food, saying they had “powerful people on their side.”

    “We’re not looking for a fight,” the BBQ owner said. “We’re not going to start a fight. But we’re not going to be pushed around either.”

    Dunkin’ Donuts corporate caught wind of the situation and urged the two to be good neighbors in a statement this week:

    “We are aware that a business owner who sells products in the same shopping center as a new Dunkin’ Donuts restaurant has publicly expressed frustration with the local Dunkin’ franchisee. Our local franchisees are small business owners in the community as well and as such seek to be good neighbors.”

    After a few days of silence, the franchisee finally spoke out with a statement of his own, agreeing to relax and be cool with the breakfast tacos.

    “Upon looking into this matter more closely, I have determined there is no conflict or dispute between my business and [the BBQ restaurant],” the statement reads. “In the spirit of being a good member of the community, I wish [the owner] continued success.”

    Though the BBQ owner is a bit bummed that everything had to go down the way it did after he’d been one of Dunkin’ Donuts supporters, he’s ready to get back to the business of selling food.

    “We’re not trying to hurt anybody’s business,” he told KHOU-11. “We’re just trying to give our customers what they want and that’s the bottom line.”

    Dunkin’ Donuts has beef with local BBQ restaurant [KHOU-11]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uGuy Fails To Check Powerball Ticket, Spends Six Weeks Clueless To The Fact That He’s A Millionairer


4 4 4 9
  • There are some problems we all wish we could have, and finding out you’ve been needlessly spending your days as a normal person only to learn you’re actually a millionaire is certainly one of them. A New York man thought the Powerball winner had already been found, when in fact, he had the winning ticket worth $136 million tacked up in his basement behind a pipe for six weeks.

    The 56-year-old plumber matched all six numbers for the March 14 Powerball jackpot, playing numbers he’s used before but that he says don’t have any specific meaning, reports WABC-TV.

    He blames the delay between the drawing and when he realized he was a multimillionaire on a simple conversation with a friend, a few days after the numbers were pulled.

    She told him the winning ticket was bought at a store nearby, and he said, “That’s where I bought my ticket.”

    But she added that she heard it was a school teacher who won, so he figured it wasn’t his lucky day. Except that it was, which is amazing.

    “When I saw all the numbers matched up, I panicked,” he said. “I immediately called my son and asked him to come over right away.”

    His son confirmed the numbers matched up, checking them on his phone.

    The winner says on the way to claim his reward, he called up that friend who’d mentioned the teacher winning.

    “I called her and said, ‘You just made me wait six weeks to become a millionaire.’ We both had a big laugh about it,” he said.

    He’s treating his son to part of the winnings, amounting to $38.6 million for him and $16.5 million for his lucky offspring. Although he’s now super rich and could probably spend the rest of his days floating in a money bath, he says he’s going to continue working as a plumber.

    “I honestly don’t know what my plans are right now,” he said. “I want to continue to work, but will be able to relax a little more and not have any worries financially.”

    STATEN ISLAND PLUMBER WINS $136 MILLION POWERBALL, LEAVES TICKET PINNED TO WALL FOR 6 WEEKS [WABC]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uNo Surprise Here: CFPB Finds Reverse Mortgage Ads Create False Impressionsr


4 4 4 9
  • thompsonLast year, Consumerist reported on why you shouldn’t run out to sign up for a reverse mortgage just because Fred Thompson or other paid spokespeople opine about the benefits in national advertising campaigns. Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau echoed our fears that these ads can be misleading by releasing the results of a focus group and issuing an advisory warning consumers that promotions for the costly product often don’t tell the whole story.

    The CFPB focus group on reverse mortgage advertisements found that more often than not many participants were left with misperceptions regarding the financial products.

    The study [PDF] focused on 97 unique ads found on TV, radio, in print and on the Internet. In all, the CFPB interviewed about 60 homeowners age 62 and older in focus groups and in one-on-one interviews in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C.

    For the most part, consumers revealed they were confused about reverse mortgages being loans, and they were left with false impressions that they are a government benefit or that they would ensure consumers could stay in their homes for the rest of their lives.

    “As older consumers consider reverse mortgage loans to tap into their home equity, they need to be careful of those late night TV ads that seem too good to be true,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a statement. “It is important that advertisements do not downplay the terms and risks of reverse mortgages or confuse prospective borrowers.”

    Reverse mortgages allow a borrower, 62 years or older, to convert the equity on their home into either a lump sum or monthly payments. The funds are not required to be paid back until the borrower moves or dies.

    According to the report, many of the ads were incomplete and/or contained inaccurate information.

    Although a normal 30-second ad doesn’t generally describe all the details about a particular product or service, the CFPB says the incomplete state of reverse mortgage promotions raised heightened concerns because reverse mortgages are complicated and often expensive loans intended for older, and frequently vulnerable, homeowners.

    The report found that ads used in the focus groups were characterized by:

    • Ambiguity that reverse mortgages are loans: Most ads either did not include interest rates or included interest rates in fine print. Additionally, some consumers said they thought that because the money they received through a reverse mortgage represented home equity they had accrued over time, there was no reason they would have to pay it back.

    • False impressions about government affiliation: In many cases, the ads left some older homeowners with a false impression that a reverse mortgage was a risk-free government benefit and not a loan.

    • Difficult-to-read fine print: The study found that some consumers did not pick up on key aspects of the loan because the loan requirements were often buried in the fine print –– if they were even mentioned at all. Many reverse mortgage ads reviewed did not, for example, mention helpful information like interest rates, repayment terms, and other requirements.

    • Celebrity endorsements that imply reliability and trust: Many ads featured celebrity spokespeople discussing the benefits of reverse mortgages without mentioning the risks. Most consumers recalled TV ads that featured spokespeople portrayed as reliable and trustworthy.

    In fact, one consumer in the focus group said, “When it’s a former Congressman endorsing it, it makes it sound like a good idea.”

    • False impressions about financial security and staying in the home for the rest of the consumer’s life: The study found that many ads implied financial security for the rest of a consumer’s life.

    But a reverse mortgage does not guarantee financial security no matter how long a consumer lives. A consumer can tap into their equity too early and run out of funds to draw on.

    Additionally, borrowers with a reverse mortgage are still responsible for paying property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, and property maintenance. Failing to meet these requirements can trigger a loan default that results in foreclosure.

    Most of the advertisements reviewed failed to mention such requirements.

    “Incomplete or inaccurate statements made in advertisements about reverse mortgages can pose serious risks to older Americans,” the CFPB says in a statement. “Without more balanced information, consumers may not make the right financial choice and jeopardize their retirement security.”

    In addition to release its focus group findings, the CFPB warned consumers on Thursday to be vigilant about misleading and confusing reverse mortgage advertisements.

    The advisory [PDF] aims to provide older consumers with accurate information about reverse mortgages including that the product is a home loan, not a government benefit; that ads won’t always tell the whole story; and without a comprehensive plan someone taking out a reverse mortgage could outlive the loan funds.

    CFPB Study Finds Reverse Mortgage Advertisements Can Create False Impressions [CFPB]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uSouthwest Airlines Extends Fare Sale Due To Ongoing Website Issuesr


4 4 4 9
  • Getting outta town has been delayed until further notice.

    Getting outta town has been delayed until further notice.

    This week, Southwest Airlines had a sale on tickets that was popular. Extremely popular. It was so popular that aspiring passengers couldn’t get through to the company’s website or phone lines, and many wished that the sale could be extended for an extra day to make up for forcing customers to hit “refresh” repeatedly.

    The sale was originally supposed to end at 11:59 PM today in the originating city of the flight that you want to book. Instead, it will end at 11:59 tomorrow.

    “We recently launched a fare sale that created an extraordinarily high volume of customer demand and impacted Southwest.com functionality, We apologize to customers for any inconvenience and impact to travel plans,” an airline spokesperson told the Associated Press. While the company says that they’re working hard to get things running, the website continues to struggle today.

    Remember for future sales like this that if you simply must book a fare now and don’t want to wait, other airlines, including American and United, will match prices if they serve the same route. Other airlines are also providing discounted fares on similar routes. If you don’t have your heart set on Southwest, you can get the same or a similar price that way.

    Southwest Airlines Says Sale Response Overwhelmed System [AP]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uFormer CVS Workers Claim They Were Told To Watch Minority Shoppers In Some NYC Storesr


4 4 4 9
ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCFPB Fines Mortgage Company $20M For Pushing Customers Into Spending More Than They Had Tor


4 4 4 9
  • While a report earlier this year suggested that consumers don’t spend nearly enough time shopping for the right mortgage, that doesn’t mean lenders are off the hook for purposefully steering potential homeowners into costlier mortgages. Because doing so will land a company in hot water with federal regulators. Just ask RPM Mortgage and its top executive, who must now pay $20 million for their allegedly deceptive practices.

    The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced today that it filed a complaint [PDF] against RPM and its CEO Erwin Robert Hirt for a scheme that awarded employees with bonuses and higher commission if they steered consumers into more expensive mortgages – a violation of a 2011 federal rule prohibiting incentivizing loan originators.

    According to the complaint, California-based RPM Mortgage instituted a compensation plan in April 2011 that gave loan officers financial incentives to drive consumers into higher-rate mortgage loans.

    RPM provided its loan officers with different forms of compensation that were derived in part from the interest rates of the loans they closed.

    The company allegedly worked to mask the compensation plan by filtering it through so-called “employee-expense accounts.” To do so, RPM deposited profits from an originator’s closed loans – profits that were directly tied to the loans’ interest rates – into an expense account set up for the originator.

    The accounts were used to pay bonuses and higher commissions to its loan originators. The company also allowed loan originators to tap their expense accounts to offset interest-rate reductions or give credits to certain customers to avoid losing the transactions to competitors.

    The CFPB alleges that through this scheme, RPM paid or financed millions of dollars in unlawful bonuses, pricing concessions, and supplemental commissions.

    In all, the complaint claims RPM paid 511 bonuses to its loan originators from their individual employee-expense accounts.

    Under the proposed consent order [PDF] related to the complaint, RPM would pay $18 million in redress to consumers affected by the company’s unlawful compensation practices, while the accompany and Hirt would pay a combined $2 million fine to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund.

    CFPB Orders RPM Mortgage to Pay $19 Million for Steering Consumers Into Costlier Mortgages [CFPB]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uLos Angeles One Step Closer To Raising Minimum Wage To $15/Hour By 2020r


4 4 4 9
  • The Los Angeles City Council took another step on Wednesday in its mission to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2020, but the finalization of the ordinance will have to wait for a second vote next week.

    The Associated Press reports that the city council voted 13-1 to adopt a plan that would raise the minimum wage for nearly 800,000 workers, making L.A. the largest city to approve such wage increases.

    Under the ordinance, the $9/hour minimum wage in the city – which already sits above the $7.25/hour federal minimum – would see several incremental increases between 2016 and 2022.

    Starting in July 2016, the hourly wage will increase to $10.50. Each year after would see increases to $12, $13.25, $14.25 and then $15, the AP reports.

    Nonprofits and businesses with fewer employees will have an additional year to comply.

    By 2022 the city plans to tie minimum wage increases to the consumer price index. The idea is that in years of price inflation, low-wage workers won’t get left behind while employers won’t be compelled to give raises during flat or down years.

    L.A.’s push for an increased minimum wage began in 2014 when Mayor Eric Garcetti put forth a plan that would have raised pay to $13.25/hour by 2017. But labor groups pushed for more.

    And just two weeks ago, the council gave the first inkling that it would approve a more aggressive plan, by voting to have the city attorney draft an actual ordinance based on the $15/hour minimum wage.

    Because Wednesday’s vote wasn’t unanimous, the council will undertake a final procedural vote on June 10. It will then be sent to the mayor for his signature.

    Seattle was the first major city to get the $15/hour minimum wage ball rolling when its city council voted last summer to approve a plan to raise wages over the course of up to seven years. San Francisco, where the minimum wage is already over $12/hour, followed suit in November 2014. Its plan will reach the $15/hour target by July 2018. And like the L.A. proposal, future wage increases will be tied to the CPI.

    Los Angeles closes in on becoming largest city in US to approve minimum wage of $15 an hour [The Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist