четверг, 4 июня 2015 г.

uTaco Bell Confirms A Boozy Menu At Soon-To-Open Chicago Locationr


4 4 4 9
  • Nothing goes better with a chalupa than a nice glass of red wine. Okay, we don’t actually know that, but we do know that the pairing will certainly be an option at Taco Bell’s new Chicago location.

    The fast food restaurant confirmed earlier rumors that it would sling boozy beverages for the first time in the U.S. when its new Wicker Park neighborhood location opens, Bloomberg reports.

    Customers at the restaurant will have the option to add beer, wine or “mixed alcohol freezes” to their meals – as long as they’re of legal age.

    The company says the location is modeled after its stores in South Korea, Japan and Spain, where alcohol is also served.

    Taco Bell tells Bloomberg that the alcoholic beverages will be served in a new cup, designed to distinguish the contents from non-alcoholic beverages.

    This isn’t the first time that Yum! Brands – the owner of Taco Bell and several other fast food brands – has dipped its toes in the taco/booze pool.

    Last spring, the company announced plans to open a new upscale eatery called U.S. Taco Co. that served “American-inspired” tacos and other American dishes, as well as boozy milkshakes. While the U.S. Taco Co. location eventually opened in California, the company postponed plans to serve alcohol after it was unable to obtain a liquor license.

    In addition to being the first U.S.-based Taco Bell to serve alcohol, the new Wicker Park eatery will also be the first in the country to encompass a new “urban concept.”

    Among other things the new concept features open kitchens and food served in baskets.

    “This design is focused on simplifying and modernizing the restaurant experience,” the company said in the statement.

    Taco Bell Will Serve Booze at U.S. Restaurant for the First Time [Bloomberg]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uHere Come Brownie Batter Oreosr


4 4 4 9
  • Nabisco-Limited-Edition-Brownie-Batter-Oreo-CookiesThere’s something about the intense chocolate flavor and gritty texture of brownie batter that makes it irresistible. Continuing their series of exotic Oreo flavors, Nabisco will try to capture this flavor in the form of Oreo “creme,” between two standard chocolate-flavored cookie wafers.

    S’Mores Oreos have hit the shelves as this year’s “summer” theme cookie, so perhaps it was inevitable that news of another one would leak, even though Nabisco vowed this spring to stop advance notice of new flavors from leaking online.

    The Impulsive Buy notes that the cookies surfaced at a recent trade show in Chicago, as well as from disparate sources online. Don’t worry: this is probably not another hoax, and the cookies will join their buddies on the entire shelving unit crammed with different flavors of Oreos that you can now find in most grocery and discount stores.

    COMING SOON: Limited Edition Brownie Batter Oreo Cookies [The Impulsive Buy]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


среда, 3 июня 2015 г.

u9 Things We Learned About Patagonia’s Efforts To Avoid All Exploited Laborr


4 4 4 9
  • fabric_background.png

    You can’t avoid it: along the entire supply chain of everything that you wear, someone has most likely been exploited. Just ask outdoorwear company Patagonia, which performed audits in 2011 all the way down its supply chain to look for exploited workers and victims of human trafficking. They found problems, which were not unexpected.

    The Atlantic looked at the work that Patagonia is doing to improve conditions for everyone who produces the items they sell. Things are improving, but ensuring that hundreds of factories in multiple countries don’t exploit people is a huge task.

    1. While you might picture an exploited worker behind a sewing machine, they didn’t find problems in the factories that actually assemble merchandise for Patagonia. An audit four years ago turned up issues in the mills where fabrics for their clothing are made, which are mostly in Taiwan.
    2. Mills find their employees through brokers, and recruit throughout Asia. That’s not necessarily bad, but brokers can charge more than ten times a worker’s monthly wage, and mills handle workers’ money and automatically hand over fees to the brokers first.
    3. Mills also hold on to workers’ passports so they are unable to leave.
    4. There are 175 suppliers of fabric and parts for Patagonia items: they’re comfortable with the treatment of workers in factories, and now looking farther down the supply chain.
    5. Audits farther down the supply chain are rare, since there are so many suppliers and it’s easier to track the treatment of workers that a company does direct business with.
    6. Factory owners use labor brokers to save the expense of hiring directly: a company that wants to take responsibility for the whole supply chain would have to raise prices.
    7. Patagonia imposed a limit on broker fees in their supply chain after these audits four years ago, and has asked suppliers to ban them as of this month.
    8. Social responsibility is part of the company’s branding: companies that sell cheaper clothing or answer to shareholders can’t expect to meet the same standard right now.
    9. Why don’t they move production to the United States, where they can watch even more closely? Patagonia representatives say that there aren’t enough workers with the proper skills here, since most of our clothing is produced overseas.

    All Your Clothes Are Made With Exploited Labor [The Atlantic]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uDemand For Southwest Airlines Sale Fares Overwhelms Websiter


4 4 4 9
  • Getting outta town has been delayed until further notice.

    Getting outta town has been delayed until further notice.

    It’s probably not surprising that when Southwest Airlines announced a summer sale with one-way fares as cheap as $49, travelers were delighted. They were so delighted that they’ve overwhelmed the carrier’s site, making it difficult for customers to book new flights, or to print their boarding passes for travel that’s planned for, um, now.

    Problems with the website mean long waits on the phone, too: users report being unable to get through by phone or the company’s website. “The response from customers taking advantage of our recent sale is creating website performance issues,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to Bloomberg News, and the company’s social media team is also busy updating customers about the situation and soothing their anxieties about being deprived of discounted airfares.

    The sale ends tomorrow night, and users are already requesting that it be extended into Friday.

    Southwest Website Overwhelmed as $49 Airfares Spur Booking Surge [Bloomberg News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uWalmart’s Key To Happy Employees: Relaxing The Dress Code, Making Sure Stores Aren’t Freezingr


4 4 4 9
  • In an effort to show employees – and the rest of the world – that it cares, Walmart says it plans to address worker concerns by relaxing its dress code and making stores warmer.

    A day after the big box retailer announced it would raise the hourly pay for about 100,000 employees, Reuters reports the company will attempt to improve workplace conditions at its 4,555 locations in the U.S.

    When announcing the changes to employees on Wednesday, executives for the company said it was helping to “make your life easier.”

    The new dress code, expected to go into effect in July, allows workers to wear black or khaki denim pants. The current dress code permits only khaki trousers, Reuters reports.

    Employees who complete physically demanding jobs can start wearing blue denim and t-shirts.

    Walmart also plans to address employee complaints that stores are too cold by increasing the temperatures across the board. According to Reuters, the retailer’s temperature control is centrally located at its Arkansas headquarters.

    Additionally, the company plans to implement a new training program and upgrading handheld terminals for department managers.

    Wal-Mart relaxing dress code in bid to address worker concerns [Reuters]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uWe Know How To Read Over-The-Counter Drug Labels, But We Don’t Always Understand The Potential Dangersr


4 4 4 9
  • When you buy some Tylenol or NyQuil, you probably know — or find out easily from looking at the label — that these products contain acetaminophen. But knowing the names of active ingredients in an over-the-counter drug isn’t the same as knowing how those ingredients will interact with other drugs or what could happen if you take too much. A new study looks at the apparent disconnect between reading a label and understanding the potentially dangerous implications of what you’re taking.

    For the study, published in the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, researchers from UCLA, UC Irvine, and Cal State Sacramento compared the average college undergrad’s understanding of OTC drugs with that of current nursing and medical students who presumably have some education on common drug ingredients and interactions.

    The researchers hypothesized that the wide availability and ubiquitous advertisement of OTC drugs leaves many consumers with the impression that these products are relatively harmless. They cite a 2012 study that found that buyers of these drugs often believed they could determine on their own how much they should take, regardless of directions on the label.

    But this naive attitude toward drugs can put the user at risk.

    “A consumer who takes a cold medicine containing, for instance, acetaminophen, may see nothing wrong with taking an additional medicine that also contains acetaminophen,” write the study’s authors. “But in that case, he or she will likely ingest at least 1300 mg of acetaminophen, and if those doses are repeated every 4-6 hours, the consumer will take in at least 5200 mg of acetaminophen per day, well over the limit.”

    Overuse of acetaminophen can result in damage to your liver and is particularly dangerous for small children.

    The first test in the study was an open-ended thought task in which participants — one group of undergrad business majors, the other nursing students — were presented with common OTC drugs or brands and asked to write down the thoughts that came to mind. They were then asked a series of multiple choice questions about their knowledge of OTC drugs.

    In terms of the multiple choice questions, it’s no surprise that the nursing students outperformed the others, with an average score nearly double that of the novice undergrads.

    But the real difference between the two groups is highlighted when looking at the list of thoughts they jotted down. Nursing students were three times as more likely to write down the active ingredient and twice as likely to mention potential risk, though both groups seemed to have the same impression that OTC drugs are generally safe.

    In a second test, subjects were shown retail packaging (front and back) of pairs of OTC drugs and asked to assess whether someone who had taken both drugs might be at risk. They were also asked to determine whether two paired products were similar.

    “[N]ovices failed to use active ingredients as a diagnostic or relevant attribute when assessing the risk of taking two OTC drugs together, only experts did this,” reads the study. “Novices seemed to hold the naive belief that OTC drugs were relatively risk-free because they viewed double doses of the same active ingredient as about the same in terms of health risk as single doses of two different ingredients.”

    What if you make the active ingredient more noticeable and prominent on the packaging through some sort of burst or icon?

    A third test repeated the previous test but with more obvious displays of the main active ingredient in each product.

    Alas, while the novice test subjects were indeed more readily able to identify when two products had similar or different ingredients, the more prominent labeling “was relatively ineffective on its own at improving risk assessments among novice consumers… Even after they saw the active ingredient icons, these consumers continued to naively believe that taking two OTC drugs with the same active ingredient was about as safe as taking two OTC drugs with different active ingredients.”

    The researchers say their results suggest that merely calling out the active ingredients without providing context or education for the consumer may not have the desired effect. Perhaps drug labels need to be more explicit, not just in highlighting the active ingredients, but in more explicitly stating the importance of avoiding concurrent use of two similar drugs.

    “Programs to educate the public on the risks of double-dosing must clearly emphasize that even over-the-counter medications can be dangerous when combined or misused,” write the researchers. “More broadly, this study suggests that it is vitally important for practitioners and policymakers to address safety issues by first working to understand what is at the root of the consumer’s misunderstanding.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uDon’t Leave A Message: JPMorgan Chase Scraps Voicemail For 65% Of Workersr


4 4 4 9
  • When looking to trim billions of dollars from the budget, companies often look at eliminating wasteful spending, reducing workforce and automating some services. While those are all efforts undertaken by JPMorgan Chase, the financial institution also found a surprising amount of savings by cutting the cord on employees’ voicemail.

    The Wall Street Journal reports that if you try calling a Chase consumer banking staffer when they’re away from their desk, you probably won’t get an option to leave a message.

    That’s because the lender has deactivated the voicemail for nearly 65% of its 135,908 workers, resulting in an annual savings of $3.2 million.

    Calls to employees without voicemail will now be answered with a generic message asking the caller to try back at another time.

    The decision to cut the messaging service came as the company attempts to trim nearly $2 billion from its annual expenses. And with voicemail costing $10 a month per line, it was a perfect target.

    “We realized that hardly anyone uses voicemail anymore because we’re all carrying something in our pockets that’s going to get texts or e-mail or a phone call,” Gordon Smith, head of JPMorgan’s consumer and community bank, said. “So we started to cut those off.”

    Not all of the company’s employees will be without voicemail, though. A spokesperson for the company says that some employees, such as bank managers, continue to need the service.

    JPMorgan isn’t the first company to ditch traditional voicemail systems. Last year, Coca-Cola eliminated voicemail at its headquarters, suggesting callers use email or cellphones to reach employees.

    J.P. Morgan Hangs Up on Voicemail [The Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist