вторник, 2 июня 2015 г.

uDelta, Southwest Revamping Boarding Processes To Keep Flights On Time This Summerr


4 4 4 9
  • When heading out for a long-awaited summer vacation, most people don’t want to waste valuable time waiting in an airplane’s aisle while other people jam their bags in the crowded overhead bins, or playing a round of musical chairs so a family can sit together on the upcoming flight. In an effort to ensure travelers don’t miss time sunning themselves on the beach, two airlines are revamping their boarding processes. 

    The Associated Press reports that Delta Air Lines and Southwest Airlines are taking two entirely different approaches to expediting the boarding in an effort to reduce delays, customer complaints and extra costs.

    For Delta, the company is looking to streamline the way passengers stuff their bags in overhead bins. On Monday the airline rolled out its Early Valet service, which tasks airline employees with preloading carry-on bags, on nearly two dozen flights.

    Through the service, travelers will be given the option to have their bags specially tagged, taken from the gate by airline employees and placed in the gate above their assigned seat before the boarding process officially begins.

    A spokesperson for Delta says that the service is currently available on flights that have a high number of vacationers departing from Atlanta, New York, Los Angeles, Detroit, Minneapolis, Salt Lake City and Seattle, with more airports expected to be added later this month.

    Tests of the service were conducted last summer in Atlanta and Los Angeles resulting in some boarding time reductions, the spokesperson tells the AP.

    On the other side of the spectrum, Southwest – which doesn’t offer assigned seats – is aiming to cut back on the time passengers spend moving back and forth between seats to accommodate traveling families on crowded flights.

    Southwest’s current process allow families to board together after the “A” group as long as the children in their party are four years old or younger. Additionally, families can pay extra to board earlier.

    However, neither of those systems are full proof, and flight attendants often have to ask other passengers to move in order to accommodate older children or families that don’t get to the gate on time, the AP reports.

    While many travelers are happy to oblige the requests to move seats, the airline is aiming to alleviate that hassle through a recent test that expanded those covered in family boarding to include children up to 6, 8 or 11 years of age.

    “We’ve always tried to finesse it,” Teresa Laraba, a senior vice president overseeing customer service at Southwest, says of the tests that were designed to see “if there is a tweak that would improve the overall experience for everyone.”

    The airline is currently surveying passengers and expects to make a decision on whether or not a new system is needed later this month.

    Airlines try to save time with speedier boarding process [The Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uReader Notices Target Math, Gets $4.99 Off Price Of Lampr


4 4 4 9
  • Target is a discount store, but also a strange and mystical place where Doritos are refrigerated, sale items are simultaneously 50% off and free, and customers are notified when something isn’t on sale. As a Consumerist reader, Erin knew to look out for Target’s strange version of reality, and was able to get an item for the lower shelf tag price rather than the higher “sale” price.

    floor_lamp

    This is the most important reason to snap a picture of weird pricing discrepancies when you see them: in case your purchase scans at the wrong price, and you need to quickly illustrate the problem. (Also, then you can send the photo to us, but that’s secondary.) While your camera phone picture isn’t the definitive word on an item’s price, it helps your case and proves that you were paying attention and aren’t just making up different prices to be difficult.

    In this case, Erin saw the two different prices and brought her picture to the checkout. “I asked the CSR very politely if I could have it at the $14 price, and showed him the photo, and he said, ‘Hrm, yep. Our bad.'”

    The interesting question would be whether anyone has fixed this pricing discrepancy. Maybe they just slid the sale sign back over the original shelf tag instead of removing it.



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


понедельник, 1 июня 2015 г.

uNew Plenti Rewards Card Not As Rewarding As It Looksr


4 4 4 9
  • plentibarI carry a lot of store loyalty cards around. I have a separate wallet for them. I have five different cards just for different pet stores. “Another loyalty card” is not something that America seems to need. Yet last month, American Express introduced a loyalty program called Plenti, which promises to let you accumulate points on purchases at different retailers and other businesses. The problem is that the rewards aren’t as flexible as the card’s ad campaigns imply.

    AmEx announced that Plenti was coming earlier this year. Right now, there’s a small selection of companies that let you accumulate points for the Plenti program. In theory, they could cover a lot of an average family’s spending. There’s Exxon/Mobil gas stations, AT&T, Macy’s, Nationwide Insurance, Rite Aid, Direct Energy, Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and Hulu. The program launched at the beginning of May, and launched ad campaigns full of singing groceries in the last few weeks.

    The idea behind the program is to earn points at one place that you can spent at another: cool! Except, as Mouse Print’s Edwin Dworsky points out, it’s not as simple as that, because not all of the merchants in the program let you use points as currency or for discounts.

    Specifically, you can use the points at some Exxon and Mobil stations, but you’ll have to check for a Plenti logo on the door. You can also use them at Macy’s, and Rite Aid has replaced their Wellness+ program with Plenti, and you can cash in points earned elsewhere. That’s it.

    Maybe this will change if more retailers sign on. Before signing up for programs like this, though, make sure that the points would actually be useful to you.

    Get Rewards with Plenti (of Strings Attached) [Mouse Print]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uNetflix Testing Teasers For Its Original Shows, No Plans To Introduce Third-Party Adsr


4 4 4 9
  • After some Netflix subscribers started seeing teaser ads playing either before or after the company’s original programming, the streaming video service has confirmed that yes, it’s testing teasers –only featuring its own shows, before or after its own shows — but no, it won’t be introducing any third-party ads.

    Cord Cutters News first reported that users were seeing teaser trailers running before and/or after Netflix TV shows in browser viewing, with TechCrunch adding that it’s recently started running pre-roll teaser ads on some devices as well.

    “We’ve had originals teasers at the end of shows for a while. Some members [are] seeing tests at the beginning of shows. As you know, we test many things over the year, many of which are never universally deployed,” a Netflix spokesperson told TechCrunch.

    This isn’t unlike what you get on say, HBO Go or HBO Now, where subscribers often see spots for upcoming shows or new seasons before the original content starts playing. Showtime

    If you’re worried about those teaser ads turning into fully-realized commercials from corporate sponsors, rest easy — Netflix says it’s not going to bring in ads from third-party providers.

    “Our policy around ads is unchanged. We have no plans to support third-party ad units,” the spokesperson told TechCrunch.

    Netflix Starts Testing Pre-Roll Ads [Cord Cutters News]
    Netflix Tests Teasers For Original Programming, But Has No Plans To Run Third-Party Ads [TechCrunch]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uSears Shareholders Sue, Claim CEO Is Stripping Company For Partsr


4 4 4 9
  • For many years here at Consumerist, we developed a theory that the venerable department store Sears was secretly a vast anti-capitalist prank, which actively avoided selling merchandise. Its goal was something else: perhaps waiting for the retail real estate market to turn around and cash in the land and buildings that it owns. A group of Sears Holdings shareholders are starting to think the same thing, and they’ve filed a lawsuit against the company and its manifesto-writing CEO, Eddie Lampert.

    Specifically, the shareholders object to the sale of valuable stores that the company happens to own to real estate investment trusts. Two big store sales to REITs have been announced so far, and both are joint ventures with companies that own malls and other retail real estate. Current Sears shareholders will have the opportunity to invest in the real estate ventures, but the sale of the buildings doesn’t strike the shareholders who filed the lawsuit as a prudent business decision.

    The Chicago Tribune quotes the lawsuit, noting that the shareholders taking part believe that selling some buildings for $2.5 billion isn’t really going to help Sears Holdings. Remember that the company lost $1.7 billion last year, and that was considered an improvement.

    From the lawsuit:

    Sears and its stockholders would receive a severely inadequate cash payment that the defendant Lampert-controlled company may use to cover operating losses and debt obligations for another year or so, before stockholders are left holding the bag in an insolvency widely viewed as inevitable if the proposed transaction occurs.

    The shareholders seem to believe that in this scenario, Sears Holdings will inevitably fail. Its assets that are actually worth anything have been spun off into separate ventures, or sold to the real estate investment trusts. Once everything of value has been sold or spun off, Sears Holdings itself would have very little value, and these shareholders see its failure as “inevitable.”

    That’s just one scenario, though. It’s also possible that the cash infusion and renting out parts of their massive stores will be beneficial to Sears and Kmart, which will find their way in a changing retail environment and flourish as a multichannel merchant with a weird obsession with signing people up for its rewards program.

    Sears lawsuit alleges store sales to benefit CEO [Chicago Tribune]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uScammer Convinces Tourists To Pay $409 For Free Staten Island Ferry Ticketsr


4 4 4 9
  • It costs a lot of money driving into New York City through the Hudson River tunnels or over the George Washington Bridge, and subways and cabs certainly aren’t free. So you can’t fault tourists who assume they have to pay to ride the free Staten Island Ferry — but more than $200 per ticket?

    CBS2 in NYC reports that a Virginia couple were scammed out of $409 for two tickets on the ferry that connects lower Manhattan to Staten Island.

    The man was posing as a ticket agent in Battery Park, which adjoins the ferry terminal. Not only did he regularly scam people into paying for their free rides, he also conned some folks out of entrance fees to the public park.

    He claims to have raked in upwards of a few thousand dollars in a day, according to CBS2.

    Some critics say the city isn’t doing enough to crack down on this sort of very public bad behavior.

    “What’s really sad is that the city and the parks department have known about this for many years,” says Geoffrey Croft, president of New York City Park Advocates. “We have an open air scalpers market. These people have no licenses.”

    This news comes on the heels of reports of a hot dog vendor working near the Ground Zero site in lower Manhattan who was trying to charge $20-30 for a simple hot dog.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uIHOP Changes Logo For First Time In 20 Years Because The Old Version Was Too Frownyr


4 4 4 9
  • ihopenwoldIn a move that literally turns a frown upside down, IHOP has changed its logo for the first time in 20 years. Partly because the old version used a red swoop that was just a bit too sad.

    The company found that the red banner “appeared as a person’s frown,” its Vice President of Marketing Kirk Thompson told BuzzFeed News.

    That’s not the kind of negative attitude that guests want with their pancakes, he says, echoing statements in the company’s official press release.

    “Our guests have told us for many years that coming to IHOP, and in many cases just thinking about our world famous pancakes, makes them smile,” he says in the statement. “We believe this new logo captures the essence of the IHOP experience, which consistently delivers our guests not only craveable food, but also great memories shared with family and friends.”

    The new logo will be prominently featured on the IHOP menu, website, mobile app and in advertising signage at select restaurants.

    IHOP Changed Its Logo For The First Time In 20 Years [Buzzfeed News]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist