пятница, 8 мая 2015 г.

uCalifornia Says Alleged Recycling Scam Trucked In Bottles & Cans From Arizona For $14M In Illegal Refundsr


4 4 4 9
  • It might just be a bunch of bottles and cans, but when you get enough recyclables together it can mean a hefty wad of cash. California authorities say a group involved in an alleged illegal recycling scheme was flush with $14 million in refunds after trucking roughly 250 million cans and bottles from out of state and redeeming them.

    A grand jury indicted five California residents on charges including grand theft and recycling fraud in March, reports the Associated Press, but the details of the case were just announced Thursday by California’s Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, or CalRecycle.

    Officials also say more than a dozen private recycling centers in Southern California are on the hook for playing a part in the scam, because they accepted the Arizona recyclables. Though all centers are responsible for determining where a container came from, in this case those involved were operated by or in cahoots with the fraud ring, CalRecycle noted.

    In April 2014, Department of Justice agents “witnessed a semi-truck being loaded with used beverage containers” in Phoenix and then followed it to a dirt lot in Bakersfield, where the containers were moved to a trailer and a U-Haul truck, and eventually taken to a recycling center in the city.
    That operation led to investigators uncovering what they call a scam involving recycling centers redeeming bottles and cans from Arizona from 2012 to 2014.

    So why is it illegal to bring Arizona cans to California for cash? Money refunded for containers in California is given out based on the fact that there was an original $0.05-$0.10 charge to buy that bottle or can, marked as a California Redemption Value claim on containers. But if the can comes from Arizona, that means it was purchased there and thus not subject to that initial California charge.

    “Californians rightly expect us to act aggressively to combat CRV fraud,” CalRecycle Director Caroll Mortensen said. “These indictments send a clear message to anyone who thinks they can cheat the system by illegally cashing in on out-of-state containers through fraudulent CRV redemptions.”

    California says it busted $14M can, bottle recycling scheme [Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uJPMorgan Chase, Bank Of America Agree To Wipe Debt Cleared By Bankruptcy From Credit Reportsr


4 4 4 9
  • Two of the country’s largest banks are finally getting around to removing the debt consumers eliminated during bankruptcy proceedings from their credit reports, a move that puts Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase in line with federal law.

    The New York Times reports that the banks have agreed to update borrowers’ credit reports over the next three months, providing needed relief for about a million consumers.

    Under federal law, when someone erases a debt in bankruptcy, their bank is required to update their credit reports to indicate the debt is no longer owed. But according to several lawsuits, many of the country’s largest banks have been disregarding those rules, leading to inaccurate and unfair red marks on credit reports.

    Instead, the financial companies allegedly ignored the discharges in order to make money by selling off the debt to collectors, who then refused to correct issues unless borrowers paid the debts that were already cleared, the Times reports.

    While JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America agreed to correct credit reports, neither company is admitting any wrongdoing as part of the deal.

    JPMorgan plans to ensure that all debts discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy are correctly recorded on credit reports by August.

    For its part, Bank of America plans to change the way it reports all extinguished debts that are sold to financial firms. Additionally, the company say all credit card debts sold since May 2007 will be removed from consumers’ credit reports.

    Bank of American and JPMorgan Chase aren’t the only banks doing battle in court over the issues. Citigroup and Synchrony Financial also face lawsuits alleging they deliberately ignored bankruptcy discharges.

    Synchrony agreed last year to provide relief similar to that of JPMorgan and Bank of America.

    According to the Times, the banks tried repeatedly to have the lawsuits thrown out, but all of those attempts have so far been refused.

    In the case against Citigroup, the judge criticized the company for not chaining the way it reports debts to credit reporting agencies, saying the he believes the only reason the bank hasn’t rectified its process is because “t makes money off of it.”

    In a statement to the Times, Citigroup said it takes the issue seriously, and has made a proposal to plaintiffs that falls in line with what other banks have done.

    Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase Agree to Erase Debts From Credit Reports After Bankruptcies [The New York Times]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uAmazon Wants Its Delivery Drones To Track Customers Down Wherever They Arer


4 4 4 9
  • Is it sometimes inconvenient and/or annoying to await the arrival of a package at home, or have it sent to your place of work? Yes. Do you want a drone finding your location via smartphone and dropping a package wherever you happen to be? Perhaps, though we can see some settings where Amazone’s idea for its delivery drones might get a bit awkward.

    Amazon details its idea in a patent for an “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Delivery System” (via BBC), including the ability for drones to track the location of the person it’s bringing a package to using data pulled from their smartphones.

    And like a bunch of commuter birds in flight, the drones will also be able to chat with each other about the weather and traffic conditions, allowing them to update their routes in real time.

    The drones would also constantly be monitoring for humans or other animals that might cross its path, and adjust accordingly.

    As for the actual moment of delivery, it’s not like you’ll be sitting in the park in the midst of a bad break-up, only to be bonked on the head by your new Xbox or something. Instead, customers will be able to choose from delivery options like “bring it to me” or instead choosing to have it go to their home, workplace or for example, “my boat.”

    This does bring into play the question of the “porch” temptation — what’s to keep interlopers from nabbing the packages before they reach their intended recipient? Ostensibly, that’s also something Amazon would be working out.

    The patent also outlines a plan where Amazon uses different kinds of unmanned vehicles depending on the package’s shape and weight. I now see a future of “drone-watching” — complete with books describing the various species of unmanned aerial vehicles.

    “Oh look, honey! It’s a gold-bellied Amazon drone!”

    Of course, just having a patent doesn’t mean that the final result will be identical to the description. There are plenty of legal regulations still being worked out to govern what drones can do and where they can go. And it’s only been a month since the Federal Aviation Administration gave Amazon and other companies approval to test drones, so the future of drone deliveries could still be a few years away.

    Amazon details drone delivery plans [BBC]
    UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE DELIVERY SYSTEM [U.S. Patent & Trademark Office]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uDelta Passengers Get Free Pizza After Plane Cabin Fills With Smoke During Flightr


4 4 4 9
  • It can’t be fun to be flying miles above the Earth and then have the plane cabin fill up with smoke. But passengers on a Delta Air Lines flight who had to sit through a bit of a scare until when one of their plane’s engines reportedly went out at least got free pizza when the plane landed to soothe any frayed nerves.

    Late on Thursday, a Delta plane flying from Fort Lauderdale to New York was diverted to Charleston, S.C. “after a performance issue with one of the Boeing MD-88 aircraft’s two engines was observed,” an airline spokesman told ABC News, adding that the plane landed safely and taxied to a gate.

    Passengers reported a smoky mid-air scene that caused some alarm, including a 60 Minutes producer who happened to be on the flight and shot video of the smoke in the cabin. She told CBS News the captain informed the 89 passengers onboard he’d shut down one of the engines.

    “We could hear the beeping of the smoke alarm and it was pretty quickly — the cabin was filling up with smoke pretty quickly — so yeah, it was a little nerve wracking,” she said. “They told all of us to put our heads down in our laps because the air would be fresher.”

    Another passenger who spoke to ABC News shot video after the plane had landed, with the hashtag #neveradullday:

    Delta provided pizza and beverage for the travelers passing the time in Charleston before getting another plane to take them to New York’s LaGuardia Airport around four hours late. Because everyone knows hot, melty cheese can help ease the mind, not to mention the stomach.

    “Delta’s top priority on every flight is safety and apologizes for the delay,” the spokesman added.

    Delta Flight From Florida Diverted After Smoke Fills Cabin [ABC News]
    Delta passenger’s “scariest flight ever” [CBS News]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCompany Behind M&M’s, Snickers Endorses “Added Sugars” Label For Foodsr


4 4 4 9
  • Of all the companies to advocate for alerting consumers to added sugars, the country’s most famous candy maker would be probably be among the least likely. But yesterday, Mars Inc. — the company behind M&M’s, Snickers, Milky Way, and Twix — gave its corporate stamp of approval to the idea of limiting the use of added sugars and labeling those products that contain extra sugar.

    In a letter [PDF] to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mars gave its endorsement to recommendations from regulators to measurements for added sugars to products’ Nutrition Facts labels.

    “The world’s leading health authorities — including the World Health Organization (WHO), the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and the UK Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition — have recommended that people limit their intake their intake of sugars, particularly those added to foods, to no more than 10% of total energy/caloric intake,” writes Mars in a statement. “Mars supports this recommendation.”

    Mars says it currently limits its products to 250 calories per serving, but that it will seek to add more products with fewer than 200 calories/serving.

    Jim O’Hara, Health Promotion Policy Director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, applauded Mars for publicly supporting these regulatory recommendations.

    “Consumers need to know how much added sugar is in their food and beverages to make healthy choices,” says O’Hara. “The best way to do that is having an ‘added sugars’ line on Nutrition Facts panels to distinguish those sugars from the naturally occurring sugars in fruit or milk ingredients… As the process continues, we hope Mars will show continued leadership on other reforms such as expressing added sugars in teaspoons, not just in grams.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uFDA Investigators: Blue Bell Found Bacteria Issues At Production Facilities Two Years Ago, Failed To Actr


4 4 4 9
  • (Kusine)

    (Kusine)

    A few weeks ago the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that the current Blue Bell listeria outbreak that has been linked to three deaths and at least 10 illness in four states to illnesses that occurred at least five years ago. Now, federal investigators claim the Texas-based ice cream maker knew of bacteria problems at its plants nearly two years ago, but failed to do anything about it.

    The Houston Chronicle reports that recently released documents [PDF] from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration show Blue Bell’s own repeated testing programs found traces of listeria at the company’s Broken Arrow, OK plant.

    According to the FDA, the testing, which included five samples in 2013, 10 in 2014 and two in 2015, found traces of listeria on floors, pallets used to store and carry ingredients and other non-food-contact surfaces at the plant.

    Despite the repeated findings, the company allegedly did nothing to find the cause of the contamination, or further check surfaces that do come into contact with the ice cream products.

    Tests in 2014 and 2015 indicated high levels of coliform – another kind of bacteria – along the entire production process, violating the limits under Oklahoma law, the Chronicle reports.

    Recent FDA inspections of Blue Bell plants – occurring after the outbreak was first announced in March – found dirty conditions including condensation inside the plant dripping into ice cream containers, cleaning water that wasn’t hot enough, dirty pallets with “mold-like residue and red stains,” and black “mold-like material” on equipment used to freeze ice cream.

    Additionally, the inspection found that procedures used by the company to clean and sanitize equipment and surfaces was not adequate.

    “Specifically, you failed to demonstrate your cleaning and sanitizing program is effective in controlling recurring microbiological contaminations,” the report states. “You continued to have presumptive positive environmental test results for Listeria and elevated total coliform results following the daily cleaning and sanitizing treatments of your equipment and facilities.”

    Food safety consultant Larry Keener tells the Chronicle that in a routine inspection, FDA representatives might not include such issues in its report.

    “But given the outbreak, the scrutiny is intensified, and every item or infraction, small or large, is noted,” he says.

    While the issues described above occurred at the Oklahoma plant, which was temporarily closed earlier this spring, the FDA reported similar issues at two other plants in Alabama [PDF] and Texas [PDF]. Those plants have also been closed.

    Despite the findings by the FDA, investigators say they still haven’t determined how listeria actually entered the ice cream, leading to the outbreak and massive recall.

    Officials with Blue Bell confirm that company testing found issues starting in 2013.

    “Several swab tests did show the presence of listeria on nonfood surfaces in Blue Bell’s Broken Arrow (Oklahoma) plant in 2013,” company spokesman Joe Robertson said in an email. “As is standard procedure for any such positive results, the company would immediately clean the surfaces and swab until the tests were negative. We thought our cleaning process took care of any problems, but in hindsight, it was not adequate, which is why we are currently conducting such a comprehensive re-evaluation of all our operations.”

    The company says it is preparing detailed responses to the FDA findings and plans to take steps to upgrade testing and employee training.

    In a separate statement on Thursday, Blue Bell announced it doesn’t expect its ice cream products to return to retailer shelves for several more months, the Montgomery Advertiser reports.

    “The extensive and detailed process of updating, cleaning and sanitizing our four production facilities, as well as training employees and implementing new programs and procedures, will take longer than we initially anticipated,” the company said in a statement. “Each facility will have its own timetable and production may resume in some locations before others.”

    The company, which has recalled more than 8 million gallons of ice cream since March, says that ensuring products are safe is of the utmost priority, even if that means shelves remain empty for several more months.

    “Unfortunately, we do not yet have a firm timeline for when Blue Bell ice cream will be back in stores, but we believe at this time that it will be several months at a minimum,” Paul Kruse, Blue Bell CEO and President, said in a statement.

    Blue Bell Ice Cream won’t return soon [Montgomery Advertiser]
    FDA: Blue Bell knew of listeria, didn’t correct problems [Houston Chronicle]

     



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uWhy Is This Store Charging Bottle Deposit On Dryer Sheets?r


4 4 4 9
  • (Communicore 82)

    (Communicore 82)

    Some consumer mysteries are very tiny, which is what makes them somehow even more frustrating. For example, why did a bodega charge a customer ten cents in bottle deposit fees when she bought laundry supplies? The store was somehow charging the deposit on dryer sheets, but not charging it on beverages which should be subject to it. Why? The store say that it was all a mistake.

    Well, that explanation makes sense. It might be baffling to some people people that someone would contact a TV consumer reporter over ten cents, but it bothered this laundry-doer that the store might be charging bottle deposit, or CRV, on items for which consumers couldn’t get it back.

    If your state doesn’t have such a program, it’s simple: to incentivize people to recycle certain kinds of bottles and cans, stores collect a five-cent deposit on each container (ten cents in some states, as viewers of “Seinfeld” know) which the customer gets back by bringing the container to a store or bottle redemption center. This is supposed to be programmed into cash registers or store computers at purchase, and in the case of this store wasn’t.

    Call Kurtis Investigates: Why Was I Charged Deposit for Recyclables on Dryer Sheets? [CBS Sacramento]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist