вторник, 5 мая 2015 г.

uMore Banks Are Offering Student Loan Refinancing, But Is It Really Safe & Beneficial?r


4 4 4 9
  • For the last several years legislators have repeatedly introduced a bill that would allow student loan borrowers to refinance their private and federal student loans to the lower interest rates at which new loans are currently being issued. Although the legislation hasn’t managed to make it into law, that hasn’t stopped banks and credit unions from creating their own refinancing programs to help alleviate the debt burden for student loan borrowers.

    Such was the case last month when Navy Federal Credit Union not only announced it would begin to issue private student loans, but would allow borrowers to refinance outstanding loans issued by other lenders and the federal government.

    While many borrowers might jump at the prospect of refinancing their student loans, consumer advocates and federal regulators caution that there may be a downside that isn’t immediately obvious.

    Maura Dundon, senior policy counsel for the Center for Responsible Lending, tells Consumerist that several years ago it may have been difficult for private student loans borrowers in good standing to refinance their loans, but more and more financial institutions are starting to offer the option.

    These banks and credit unions stepping into the refinancing game often take two approaches: refinance private student loans into new private loans with lower interest rates or refinance federal student loans into private student loans with lower interest rates.

    LOSING THE PROTECTIONS

    It’s the second option – rolling federal loans into private loans – that creates the most concern for consumer advocates.

    “The main issue is that you have to be really cautious,” Dundon says. “If you refinance a federal loan into a private loan, you lose the benefits of the federal loan program.”

    Dundon, of course, is referring to the benefits that federal student loan borrowers receive , such as income-based repayment plans, loan forgiveness programs and certain loan discharge protections.

    Income-driven plans like Pay As You Earn and others are designed to prevent borrowers from defaulting on their loans, a problem faced by about 20% of people repaying college debt.

    Pay As You Earn allows borrowers to pay 10% a year of their discretionary income in monthly installments. The unpaid balances for consumers working in the public sector or for nonprofits are then forgiven after 10 years and those working in the private sector after 20 years.

    Persis Yu, a staff attorney with the National Consumer Law Center, tells Consumerist that this type of refinancing can also strip borrowers of other important federal protections that most consumers don’t want to think about because they often are the result of unhappy life events.

    “For a lot of people, these are things you don’t think about,” she says. “Some federal loans are dischargeable if you become disabled or they are dischargeable if you die. You also have federal rights to certain deferments and forbearance, that you don’t have on the private student loan side.”

    Additionally, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warns active-duty servicemembers that refinancing federal loans into private loans could spell the end of pre-service obligations.

    Under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, active duty servicemembers are eligible for an interest rate reduction for all federal and private student loans taken out prior to the start of their service.

    “If you consolidate your loans while serving in the military, you will lose the ability to qualify for this benefit,” the CFPB says in a questionnaire on its website.

    Because refinancing federal loans into a private loan is similar to taking out an entirely new loan, Yu says all those previous defenses simply go out the window.

    FIXED OR VARIABLE RATE?

    Another risk borrowers thinking of refinancing federal loans into private loans should consider is their new annual percentage rate.

    “Part of the problem is that federal loans do have a fairly high interest rate compared to what might be on the private loan market,” Yu says of consumers desire to refinance.

    The CFPB, which offers several resources for student loan borrowers, encourages consumers looking to refinance their loans to study up on the different rate categories: fixed and variable.

    “Interest rates for most outstanding federal loans have fixed rates, which means that you never have to worry about your monthly payment going up when interest rates rise in the future,” the CFPB says on a portion of its website answering refinancing questions. “If you switch to a variable rate loan, know that your interest rate could rise higher than the original fixed rate loan over time.”

    Yu tells Consumerist that while it might be difficult for borrowers to envision their financial situation five or ten years from now, but that’s exactly how they should treat these long-term products.

    FEWER WORRIES BUT STILL RISKY

    When it comes to borrowers refinancing private student loans, things are a bit different.

    “Refinancing one private loan to another, there could be interest rate benefits to that,” Dundon tells Consumerist. “That’s more straight forward.”

    But the more seamless nature of this refinancing option doesn’t mean there isn’t risk involved.

    The CFPB advises consumers thinking of refinancing private student loans to consider several issues including APR categories and tax consequences.

    Just like federal student loans, refinancing a private loan could mean a change in the nature of rates from fixed to variable.

    “The monthly payment on your new loan might be lower, but the interest rate could be higher,” the CFPB says. “This can occur because the loan term might be spread out over more years.”

    Additionally, newly refinanced loans may no longer be considered a student loan for the purposes of the student loan interest tax deduction.

    While the availability and the benefit of refinancing both private and federal student loans varies depending on the borrower and their circumstances, one should be sure to fully consider all options before signing on the dotted line.



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uYes, Adding Gasoline And Lighter Fluid To A Birthday Cake May Increase Risk Of Setting Other Things On Firer


4 4 4 9
  • With the dawning of the Internet age has come an era filled with technological advances and tools that let humans talk to each other all over the world in mere seconds. And yet it has also wrought incredible stupidity, all for the sake of filming things to post on YouTube. Adding to the list of very unwise things to do for Internet fame: Adding flammable liquids to a birthday cake to make it explode — while inside the house.

    Police in New Jersey say a man intent on filming his flaming experience for all the Internet to see decided the best way to get a flaming cake was to add flammable ingredients to his concoction, reports The Record, setting fire to his kitchen table.

    Officials said they received a call Sunday morning but police and firefighters were met by an angry man when they turned up on the scene to investigate. After an officer advised him to calm down and let firefighters check out the home, “he then started yelling at his wife for calling emergency services,” the chief of police said.

    As they continued to talk to the man, the officer could smell gasoline coming from his clothing, and the truth came out.

    “The resident was attempting to film a fire with a birthday cake utilizing his iPad to post on You Tube,” the chief said. “He was using lighter fluid and gasoline on his kitchen table when it got out of control.”

    He was apparently ticked off as he was able to put out most of the fire before the Fire Department arrived, “and felt it was unnecessary for them to even be there.”

    Police: Maywood man’s secret cake ingredient for YouTube stunt? Gasoline [The Record]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uWhat Inppropriate Or Perfect Mother’s Day Merchandising Have You Seen This Year?r


4 4 4 9
  • allformomStores usually mean well. They just want us to expand the definition of what we think of as an appropriate gift for Mother’s Day. Instead of the traditional flowers, jewelry, and gift cards, they want us to consider buying our mothers a tablet computer. Or clothing. Or laundry detergent. Wait, laundry detergent? Isn’t giving your mother cleaning supplies completely against the point of the holiday?

    Yet here it is, as spotted by reader Joe at Kmart. The holiday-themed border is probably meant for whatever is on the other side of the shelf, but that doesn’t mean that customers can’t read. We also remember this display that appeared to feature Mother’s Day contraceptives from Big Lots a few years back. That made us wonder: what else are retailers pushing for Mother’s Day this year? During your regular shopping this week, if you spot something explicitly marketed as a gift for mothers that’s either perfect or completely incongruous, let us know. Send your pictures to tips@consumerist.com with the subject line “MOMGIFTS,” and we’ll inflict them on the rest of the world.

    PREVIOUSLY:
    Americans Plan To Spend Slightly More On Moms This Year
    16 Ways To Not Suck At Making Mother’s Day Special



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uBillions In College Aid Will Go Unclaimed Again Because Students Won’t Fill Out A Stupid Formr


4 4 4 9
  • Don’t say we didn’t warn you. Way back in December, we advised high school seniors who planned on attending college to not be stupid and go fill out a Free Application for Federal Student Aid [FAFSA] form right away. Every year, billions of dollars in grant money goes unclaimed because students and their parents never get around to filling out this paperwork, and it looks like the upcoming school year will be no different.

    This is according to an analysis by the nonprofit Bellwether Education Partners, who looked at FAFSA completion numbers in the weeks leading up to May 1 (so-called “college signing day,” when many schools require applicants to choose which college they will attend), and found that around 40% of high school seniors had not yet filed a FAFSA by mid-April.

    Only five states — Tennessee, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Indiana, Delaware — and the District of Columbia had completion rates higher than 50%, while 23 states were below 40% completion rates.

    Three states — Arizona, Alaska, and Utah — were all below 30% completion, with Utah having the lowest rate (18.6%) in the country.

    As of April 17, there were more than 104,000 unfinished applications still pending, an increase of more than 14,000 over the previous year.

    Granted, the form is an ugly mess that too-closely resembles a complicated tax return, and it requires some of the same information you’d put on your 1040, but remember: FAFSA money is not a student loan. These are grants that can reduce how much you need to borrow to pay for your education.

    Even if your family doesn’t need to borrow to pay for your college, you might still be eligible for some grants. Why pay full price when someone is willing to give you a grant you’ll never have to repay?

    The other issue that causes delays in getting FAFSAs filled out is the bizarre and varied deadline system. Each state has its own deadline, and a number of states cap their grants so that they are available on a first-come basis. Applying late in the process may result in the applicant not getting everything they are qualified to receive.

    This PDF breaks down each state’s specific deadlines. But our recommendation for any student who hasn’t filled out the form is to fill out your form immediately.

    Currently outstanding student loans already account for more than $1 trillion in debt in the U.S. The cost of attending college continues to increase, so that amount is only going to increase. Using grant money to reduce the amount that students need to borrow in the first place helps us all in the long run.

    [via Cleveland.com]



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uLost Lucky Lottery Winner Ruins All The Fun, Turns Out To Be An Undercover Agentr


4 4 4 9
  • lotteryguyThere was a feeling in the Internet air yesterday, one of solidarity, of coming together as a species in the face of a daunting mystery, and now that’s all over. There’s good news and “Aww, man, really?” news about the guy who’d won $75,000 in the lottery but only walked away with $75: He’s been found! The other news: He’s an undercover California lottery agent. The other, other news: Such a job exists.

    Yesterday evening after the good denizens of the Internet no doubt started scouring the Earth for this fellow, ABC 7 News reported that the agent was sent to the gas station with a dummy winning ticket to check on the store to see if it was in compliance with lottery rules and regulations.

    The cashier who handled the ticket trade-in misread the machine, and called his manager as soon as he realized the mistake. That was after the agent had taken his money and left.

    Though officials say most businesses are honest, undercover agents exist to make sure stores aren’t behaving badly and trying to cheat customers. The gas station manager says she hopes her store passes the test, as her employee alerted her to the situation right away.

    But the deputy director of the California Lottery told ABC he isn’t sure that the store followed all the rules, because the cashier didn’t hand the customer/agent a validation slip along with the money from the winning ticket. That would’ve confirmed the $75,000 payout, not $75.

    “We have a lot more questions than answers. A lot of red flags have been raised and we are looking into whether this was an honest mistake or not,” Lopez said.

    The group’s verdict won’t be reached until their investigation is complete in the next few weeks.

    MAN IN LOTTO TICKET MISHAP TURNS OUT TO BE UNDERCOVER CALIFORNIA LOTTERY AGENT [ABC 7 News]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uBig Credit Card Data Breach Hits Bars And Restaurants Using Harbortouch Point-of-Sale Systemsr


4 4 4 9
  • In much of the country, this is the first truly warm week of the year. The change of seasons has us turning to shorts, dresses, sandals, and chilled fruity drinks served in rooftop bars. But data breaches, alas, are always in style, and buying that beverage may land you with a stolen credit card number.

    The issue this time around is with point-of-sale vendor Harbortouch. Security expert Brian Krebs flagged the hack on his site this week.

    Unless you work in a few specific industries, you probably haven’t heard of Harbortouch. But they’re pretty huge: the company provides point-of-sale systems to roughly 150,000 businesses, generally restaurants and bars. Krebs reports that his sources at card-issuing banks say that at least 4200 Harbortouch customers nationwide appear to have been breached.

    As we have seen plenty of times before, and will continue to see plenty more times, this hack involved point-of-sale terminals being infected with malware. Once in place, the malware scrapes card data from affected merchants at the time of swipe, and sends it zipping merrily off to people who should not have it.

    Harbortouch confirmed the breach in a statement to Krebs, saying, “The incident involved the installation of malware on certain point of sale (POS) systems.” They added, “The advanced malware was designed to avoid detection by the antivirus program running on the POS System. Within hours of detecting the incident, Harbortouch identified and removed the malware from affected systems.”

    Their own network was not affected, Harbortouch said, nor was it the result of a vulnerability in their software. And, as one does, they have hired a specialist network forensic investigative firm to help them sort out precisely what happened.

    Harbortouch insists that “only a small percentage of our merchants were affected.” Technically, as far as we know, that’s true: 4200 out of 150k merchants is less than three percent. But over four thousand stores is also an awful lot of locations and an awful lot of lifted data.

    “Harbortouch does not directly process or store cardholder data,” the company told Krebs. “It is important to note that only a small percentage of our merchants were affected and over a relatively short period of time. We are working with the appropriate parties to notify the card issuing banks that were potentially impacted. Those banks can then conduct heightened monitoring of transactions to detect and prevent unauthorized charges. We are also coordinating our efforts with law enforcement to assist them in their investigation.”

    A few months back, after the P.F. Chang’s breach made headlines, Harbortouch made a post to their corporate blog on the importance of data protection and how not to become a victim of breaches. Unfortunately, “make sure the company you’re buying this system from doesn’t become infected with malware” was not on the list of action items.

    This particular kind of breach is likely slowly to become less prevalent over the next few years, as merchants in the U.S. finally make the long-overdue transition to chip-enabled EMV cards. But for now, consumers’ best bet is to assume breaches are inevitable and to keep a sharp eye on all of their own cards and accounts.

    Harbortouch is Latest POS Vendor Breach [Krebs on Security]



ribbi
  • by Kate Cox
  • via Consumerist


uSysco And FTC Fight Over Proposed Merger, Food Service Voltronr


4 4 4 9
  • The Federal Trade Commission and commercial food supplier Sysco are meeting in court today over Sysco’s right to acquire its next biggest national competitor, US Foods. Does America need a food service Voltron? Sysco is defending its proposed acquisition, but the FTC stands against it. Arguments in federal court started today, and could last for more than a week.

    While food supply is a fragmented market, Sysco and US Foods are the dominant national suppliers. That means they have relationships with hotels and restaurants that are national brands. The FTC’s argument is that while the marketplace may be pretty diverse on a local level, it isn’t so diverse for companies that have nationwide contracts with one supplier or the other. “Sysco and US Foods are the only broadline distributors with a truly national footprint,” the FTC noted after challenging the merger back in February, “and [the two companies] compete vigorously with each other to meet the needs of customers with foodservice locations dispersed nationwide or across multiple regions of the country.”

    There are 32 markets that the FTC has identified where customers really only have a choice between Sysco and US Foods. While the FTC can force one of the merging companies to sell off its business in that market as a condition of approving the merger, that is not at all helpful for national customers that would be left with only one provider if the merger went through. The FTC argues that the companies would do business in about 75% of the country, which is unacceptably large.

    Sysco’s counter-argument is that there are more than 16,000 food service providers nationwide, and plenty of competition. Together, the merged Sysco-US Foods would have about 27% of the commercial food-service market.

    Sysco Fights FTC in Antitrust Showdown to Save US Foods Deal [Bloomberg News]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist