понедельник, 4 мая 2015 г.

uAre Front-Loading Washers Still Mold Machines?r


4 4 4 9
  • Newer front-loading washing machines have developed a reputation for growing mold. Lawsuits also sprouted in the front-loader market, but washing machine manufacturers were ultimately not found liable for inflicting moldy washers on the public. That might make you hesitant to buy a front-loading washer, even if you find them appealing. Should you

    Our fungus-free colleagues down the hall at Consumer Report say that the problem isn’t as bad as it used to be, since manufacturers have made some improvements that prevent mold growth. However, it can be very valuable to read any user reviews that you can find for the model that you’re interested in, and for very similar front-loaders from the same manufacturer. (Consumer Reports offers reviews for subscribers, and you can also seek them out on retailer and manufacturer sites, or review megasites like Epinions.) If you’re going to use the appliance for years on end in real life, the experiences of other people who have done the same are valuable.

    This is because the mold problem hasn’t been eradicated. You can take steps to prevent mold from growing in the first place, and keeping your machine clean and your laundry area dry are probably a good idea anyway.

    That leaves the answer to the core question of “should I buy a front-loading washer?” as “maybe, as long as you do some research first.”

    Do new front-loading washing machines still have mold problems? [Consumer Reports]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uDomino’s Australia Takes Pizza-Tracking To The Streetsr


4 4 4 9
  • Pizza status: captured by cat. (brandylee)

    Pizza status: captured by cat. (brandylee)

    When you hail a ride using Uber and similar mobile applications, you know how close your car is to you thanks to the GPS receivers in your phone and in your driver’s phone. That’s nice and all, but what if that same technology could be used to track something that’s really time-sensitive…like a pizza delivery.

    The company trying this out, Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Ltd., runs the Domino’s restaurants to a few European countries in addition to Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Apparently, these are all countries where people get very impatient about their food deliveries, so they’re taking the Pizza Tracker concept a little further.

    You may remember the Pizza Tracker: it tells you where your pizza is in the pizza-cooking process. Between the shop and your home, though, it disappears: the driver could be lost, running late, or off on a side trip. This tracker solves that mystery, while also letting bosses spy on delivery drivers. If they’re speeding, making side trips on the clock, and zooming around corners. The 50 shops that tested this app found that drivers cut back on potentially dangerous behavior.

    Australia’s Domino’s Plans Uber-Style Pizza Delivery Driver Tracker [Wall Street Journal]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uCops Using GPS To Track Credit Card-Skimming Devices Back To Scammersr


4 4 4 9
  • For years, we’ve been telling you about credit card skimming devices that collect the information on your card when you swipe at places like ATMs and gas pumps. The common-sense thing to do when finding a skimmer is to remove it. And while that prevents anyone else from being victimized, the scammers who hooked up the illegal device are rarely caught. That’s why some police are now leaving gas pump card skimmers in place but adding a GPS tracker to follow the skimmer back to its criminal creators.

    See, many skimmers store the stolen information locally on the device. So in order for the scammer who installed it to get that information, he or she needs to take the skimmer off and download the information.

    Skimmers are also often only meant to be temporary; get as many cards as possible in a short period of time before the rubber cement holding the skimmer to the gas pump gives out. Thus, the scammer will likely be by soon to collect the device for use elsewhere.

    Police can stakeout a known skimming device and wait for the scammer to come and get it, but that’s expensive, time-consuming and may not work.

    Cybersecurity expert and journalist Brian Krebs reports that police in Redlands, CA, have recently been using specially designed GPS trackers to locate all manner of criminals, including people behind gas pump skimmers.

    It’s not a cure-all for the problem, as the GPS device has a limited battery life of as little as six hours. It can be extended by being set up to only send a signal after it’s been moved and by pinging less frequently.

    Additionally, because scammers are always innovating to stay ahead of the police, some now use bluetooth skimmers that allow for remote collection of the data. These higher-tech devices also use the pump’s power supply, so the criminal has no need to remove the skimmer or come into contact with it directly.

    Even if the GPS idea isn’t perfect, it’s a lot better than these anti-skimmer stickers that some gas stations just can’t figure out how to use… no, seriously, they just have absolutely no grasp on the purpose of these stickers.

    No one knows how prevalent gas pump skimming is nationwide, but Krebs points to a 2010 study in Florida that found skimmers in about 1.5% of the 6,100 gas stations tested in the state.

    This is why, in terms of account security, it’s generally better to use a credit card than a debit card at gas stations. Even if both your debit and credit card have $0 liability for fraud, it can be an arduous process getting stolen funds returned to your checking account while the credit card company will just remove the fraudulent charges from your account.

    Of course, paying with cash will prevent any sort of ID fraud, but filling up can be an expensive prospect and in this plastic-happy age many consumers don’t carry that much actual currency on them.



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uNearly 35% Of Consumers Have Never Checked Their Credit Reportsr


4 4 4 9
  • While consumers are often urged to take advantage of the free once-a-year opportunity to request a credit report and make sure they aren’t riddled with errors, a new survey suggests many Americans simply aren’t heeding the suggestion.

    A new survey from Bankrate.com found that more than one-third of American adults – roughly 35% – have never requested their credit reports.

    When it comes to not checking credit reports, both millennials and older consumers were the most likely culprits. Nearly 44% of senior citizens (those 65 years of age or older) report they have never checked their credit reports, while 41% of consumers ages 18 to 29 have never reviewed the records.

    While nearly half of costumers surveyed – roughly 48% – say they have checked their credit reports, the frequency at which they do so is troubling.

    Of the consumers who have checked their reports, only 23% do it yearly, while 14% say they typically go more than year between reviews.

    Bankrate analyst Jeanine Skowronski says in a statement, that many consumers often wait too long before pulling their reports, risking the possibility that errors are marring their credit worthiness.

    “Monitoring your credit goes well beyond scanning a three-digit number,” she says in a statement. “Americans need to thoroughly review their credit reports for errors or signs of fraud.”

    As Consumerist has reported in the past, fixing an error on one’s credit report can often be a long and tedious task – something that shouldn’t be left unnoticed until you absolutely need to qualify for that loan.

    In fact, negative info on your credit report can linger for up to seven years, even if your debt record is otherwise pristine.

    So if you’re one of the millions of consumers who have never reviewed their credit report, there’s no time like the present.

    AnnualCreditReport.com is the site you can go to in order to get reports from each of the three main bureaus — Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion — once per year for no cost.

    But, according to Skowronski, just getting your hand on the report isn’t enough.

    “They also need to understand what factors, like missed payments or high debt to available credit ratios, are driving their credit in order to improve it,” she says.

    For help deciphering what those numbers mean, our colleagues at Consumers Union’s DefendYourDollars.org have put together a primer on the topic.

    Survey: Americans embrace free credit scores [Bankrate.com]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uTurns Out Kids Can React On Camera To New Technology As Well As Weird Old Stuffr


4 4 4 9
  • Pictured: Unrestrained glee.

    Pictured: Unrestrained glee.

    The Internet just loves it when kids are put on camera reacting with things, but it seems we are not content to find out how children behave when faced with Walkmans and cameras that use film, but words also come out of their mouths at the sight of shiny, new technology. Who knew?

    In a first for the latest episode of “Kids React” from YouTubers TheFineBros, our young heroes get their little mitts on something new instead of old — an Apple Watch — and respond with predictable amounts of adorableness.

    “Eee! New stuff!” squeals one, her eyes lighting up like she just saw all of The Directions (that’s better than just one, right?) walking toward her.

    “Can I keep it?” one savvy kid with no compunction asking the question an adult in the same situation would want to ask but would instead remain silent, afraid of rejection.

    As hip and with it as we expect the younger set to be, many of them didn’t realize what this thing is. And others are disappointed it doesn’t do all the things they’d want it to — or maybe if someone “doesn’t have enough money to buy a phone but they have the money to buy this.”

    The whole thing is as amusing and cute as kids can be, and it’s Monday, so you might need this:



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


uCablevision CEO: Pay-TV Is The “Milk & Eggs” Of His Business; Internet Is The “Soda & Chips”r


4 4 4 9
  • As we noted earlier today, Comcast now effectively has exactly the same number of Internet customers as it does cable subscribers, and the Internet users will soon outnumber those who get their TV from Comcast. And while a pay-TV customer brings in significantly more gross revenue for a cable company than someone who is broadband-only, these companies are likely making more profit off their Internet users.

    This is according to Cablevision CEO James Dolan, whose New York-based company also announced its quarterly earnings this morning. And like Comcast, it is seeing its cable subscriber numbers drop amid increased prices and competition from streaming products.

    Speaking about the earnings this morning, Dolan likened the cable/ISP business to running a convenience store, where you’ve got certain items that customers rely on you to carry and those other items that you rely on customers to buy so that you make a profit.

    “Our philosophy is that video is akin to the eggs and milk in a convenience store. You have to have it, but you don’t make money on it,” Dolan explained, according to FierceCable.com.

    That’s where the “soda and chips” of selling broadband comes in.

    “You can charge more, you can differentiate and the margins are good,” said Dolan.

    And so it appears that the company’s new goal is to make sure as many people buy their soda and chips from Cablevision.

    That’s why the company is currently the only pay-TV provider making the standalone HBO Now streaming service available to its customers. That not only gives some consumers with DSL (or without any Internet access) to get faster service, it also allows Cablevision to share in some of that $15/month charge for the service. The company’s quarterly earnings don’t include any information about this deal as the quarter ended March 31, shortly before the launch of HBO Now.

    Cablevision also recently announced that its customers will be able to order Hulu Plus with their online service. That’s another way for a pay-TV company to make even more revenue from an existing customer base.

    It’s really no different than the existing pay-TV model where the customer pays for a base level of service and then buys premium services from the cable company, who then takes a piece of the cost.

    However, there has been a lot of handwringing from some in the pay-TV industry that making these online entertainment options readily available through the cable company would lead to further cord-cutting.

    FierceCable reports that Cablevision COO Kristin Dolan is not seeing cannibalization, but is seeing more people sign up for broadband.

    We’ve spoken to other analysts who support this “if you can’t beat ’em, make some money from ’em” approach. They say any cable companies that don’t make deals to sell HBO Now, Netflix, Hulu, or other subscriptions directly to customers are setting themselves up for disaster.

    “Consumers are going to buy these things anyway,” one analyst told Consumerist. “It’s not like people aren’t aware of Hulu or HBO Now. These aren’t secrets. By not getting into revenue-sharing with these services, pay-TV operators are just watching their money go to someone else.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uNHTSA Won’t Open Investigation Into Unintended Acceleration In Toyota Corollasr


4 4 4 9
  • Toyota will not face another probe regarding unintended acceleration in its vehicles, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced over the weekend.

    The Agency denied a consumer’s petition for an investigation into low-speed surging in nearly 1.7 million model year 2006 to 2010 Toyota Corollas, according to a notice [PDF] posted by NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigations (ODI).

    The petition claimed that unintended acceleration may cause the vehicle’s brakes to fail, resulting in the car not stopping in time to prevent a crash.

    NHTSA’s rejection of the petition comes eight months after the petitioner alleged experiencing multiple low-speed surge events while driving a 2010 Corolla; the last incident resulted in a collision with a parked vehicle in June 2014.

    According to the denial notice, NHTSA investigators evaluated the petition by performing over 2,000 miles of test driving of the petitioner’s vehicle, reviewing the June 2014 accident report and vehicle data recorder, as well as reviewing nearly 160 similar consumer complaints submitted by the petitioner.

    The agency also looked into the petitioner’s claims that an expert witness in a lawsuit involving a Corolla vehicle in Oklahoma City found that a software issue led to unintended acceleration.

    Investigators say that during testing of the vehicle they closely followed the detailed instructions provided by the consumer regarding the conditions of the surging events, but did not find any unusual performance of the throttle or transmission systems.

    “In addition, testing of the incident vehicle brake system found that it functioned normally and could hold the vehicle stationary…Testing also showed the vehicle’s brakes could bring it to a full stop in less than three feet at the speeds provided in the petitioner’s account of the crash,” the notice states.

    NHTSA’s review of data from the Corolla’s Event Data Recorder – which the petitioner interpreted to show the gas pedal was in idle position during the crash – determined that the vehicle’s brakes didn’t come on until immediately after the impact. Investigators also say that it’s possible that the gas pedal was actually depressed during the accident.

    “ODI does not believe that the brake switch data recorded by the EDR is consistent with the petitioner’s statement that the vehicle accelerated with the brake applied and vehicle testing demonstrated that acceleration would not occur if the brake pedal had been applied with any meaningful force,” the NHTSA analysis states.

    In reviewing the 163 similar unwanted acceleration complaints cited by the petitioner and filed with NHTSA by Corolla drivers, investigators found that most accidents involved drivers pressing the gas instead of the break, or pressing both pedals or braking too late.

    “No evidence of throttle or brake system faults were found in post-incident inspections of these vehicles and there is no indication of faults in those systems in the available service histories before and after the events,” investigators state. “Based on this analysis, ODI does not believe there is evidence of a vehicle based defect.”

    As for claims that a computer software issue in Toyota vehicles was to blame for the unintended acceleration, NTHSA investigators found the computer systems in the vehicles were made by two separate companies, meaning there was no basis to relate the petitioner’s vehicle to the one mentioned in the previous lawsuit.

    In all, investigators determined that further investigation into the issues raised by the petition is not warranted.

    The Associated Press reports that while the petitioner hasn’t had time to review the entire NHTSA report, he believes the conditions in which the vehicle was tested varies drastically from those when the alleged unintended acceleration occurred.

    Had NHTSA moved forward with an investigation, it would have been the second for Toyota regarding unintended acceleration in the last six years.

    The previous investigation, which began in 2009 following the tragic death of an off-duty California Highway Patrolman and his family in a Lexus, ended in March 2014 when the automaker reached a deal with the Department of Justice to pay $1.2 billion to close a criminal probe over the issue.

    In the California case, the vehicle went off the road at around 120 mph, but not before someone in the car called 9-1-1 urgently seeking help because they could not get the car to slow down.

    This incident and other reports led to the recall of millions of Toyota vehicles, along with hundreds of civil lawsuits, some of which have been settled and some that continue to linger in the legal system.

    NHTSA tied the sudden acceleration problems to five deaths. However, the root cause of the problem has been a much-disputed topic. Some have claimed it was a problem with the vehicles’ electrical systems, while Toyota blamed it on unsecured floor mats that became trapped under the accelerator or brake pedals, making it difficult or impossible to control the speed of the cars.

    Back in March 2014, it was reported that federal prosecutors found evidence that Toyota made misleading statements about safety problems that were revealed by its own internal audits, and that the company made misleading statements to the government and to the public about those safety issues.

    US safety agency rejects request to probe unwanted acceleration in Toyota Corollas [The Associated Press]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist