понедельник, 4 мая 2015 г.

uFire Department Called To Untangle Girl’s Fingers From Target Shopping Basketr


4 4 4 9
  • A trip to Target turned into quite the ordeal for a young Michigan girl over the weekend when the local fire department had to be called to unsnarl her fingers from a shopping basket.

    The Detroit Free Press reports that a four-year-old girl’s fingers had become so twisted into a shopping basket that store employees had to call 9-1-1 for help.

    The incident began Saturday night when a mother and daughter paid a visit to a Detroit-area Target. Sometime during the trip the little girl’s fingers became stuck in the holes of a shopping basket.

    Store employees were unable to set her fingers free using soap, so they called the local firefighters and paramedics.

    Authorities were able to free the girls fingers by cutting the basket with scissors and tin snips. The girl was uninjured.

    The local fire department tells the Detroit Free Press that they were “happy to assist with this simple but unusual situation and glad that she is okay.”

    It’s unclear how the girl’s fingers became so badly engaged with the basket, the fire department says.

    Firefighters free child’s fingers from shopping basket [The Detroit Free Press]



ribbi
  • by Ashlee Kieler
  • via Consumerist


uChipotle Reveals Its Guacamole Recipe To The Worldr


4 4 4 9

  • Is Chipotle farther away than your own kitchen? Probably, but that won’t matter now if you’ve got a hankering for the chain’s guacamole, because Chipotle revealed its recipe and instructions on how to make the good green stuff online Sunday morning.

    After making the announcement that it’s going entirely GMO-free with all its ingredients, its latest effort to woo the public appears to be a straight appeal to the tastebuds.

    “We know that you know that guac is extra, but have you ever thought about what makes it so delicious? Well, it starts with sourcing the best whole ingredients possible, and ends with a quick mash in our restaurant. In fact, it’s so easy, we’re going to show you how to do it below,” Chipotle says on its website.

    The recipe includes ingredients known to anyone who makes guacamole at home: Avocados, lime juice, salt, jalapenos, red onions and cilantro. Though the proportions are on a smaller scale — two avocados per homemade batch instead of the 48 used at Chipotle — other than that, Chipotle says this is it’s recipe.

    You can find the step-by-step ingredients (basically: Chop, add, mix, eat, as seen in the gif below) on Chipotle’s site. Charge yourself extra if you feel like it.

    guac



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist


пятница, 1 мая 2015 г.

uNordstrom Remodels Flagship Stores, Won’t Make You Go Insider


4 4 4 9
  • There are two interesting developments that Nordstrom is trying right now: first, they’re remodeling and fancying up their stores in Seattle, Chicago, and San Francisco, seeking to draw international tourists with world-class retail experiences. They’re also experimenting with curbside order pickup, so local shoppers can pick up their online order of bras without getting out of their cars.

    These trends make sense: while people might shop online for their own mundane purchases, while on vacation they might visit a department store that they don’t have at home. They’re shopping for recreation or for an experience rather than Nordstrom wants to attract people visiting these three cities from all over the world, and more importantly keep them in the building for long enough to buy some stuff.

    Two floors of the Seattle store have already been remodeled, and reporters got to tour the new space. There’s more natural light, and also a new cocktail and tapas bar and a cafe. The Seattle store will also be about 20,000 feet bigger than it was before the remodel, and renovations of the other floors will be done next spring. People probably won’t travel from all over the world just to see these stores, but they hope that tourists might stop in to shop.

    Nordstrom aims high with downtown flagship remodel [Seattle Times]

    SEE ALSO:
    Uncanny: This Man Can Always Tell When He’s In A Store’s Flagship Location [Clickhole]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uPhilip Morris International Uses Copyright Claims To Quiet Marlboro Criticsr


4 4 4 9
  • Earlier this year, John Oliver thrust Philip Morris International — the New York-based cigarette giant that markets Marlboro and other brands in hundreds of countries outside the U.S. — into the spotlight for its questionable legal efforts to delay and block tobacco regulation around the globe. And this morning, the company used copyright claims to have videos posted by critics of Marlboro removed from the Internet.

    The group Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids has been highly critical of the “Be Marlboro” marketing campaign that PMI has been running in various countries since 2012. The ads tell young smokers to “Don’t Be A Maybe” and project a vibrant lifestyle full of partying and extreme sports while leaving out things like cancer, emphysema, and heart disease.

    CTFK had compiled several Marlboro marketing videos with footage of Marlboro-sponsored parties that were part of this marketing. These clips were uploaded, without any editing, to video-sharing site Vimeo to show how Marlboro actively markets to the young-adult market.

    But after the group sent out a press release notifying the media of its video collection, the clips vanished from Vimeo because of a copyright request from the Philip Morris office in Switzerland:
    vimeograb

    The available takedown details provide nothing more than the names of the videos removed from the site other than the titles of the deleted clips and PMI’s claim to ownership. We’ve reached out to PMI for further explanation but have not yet received a reply from the company.

    “We want people to see these videos for the same reason Philip Morris International wants to take them down,” explains a spokesperson for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, “because they make it clear that the Be Marlboro ad campaign is targeting young people around the world. Philip Morris claims they don’t market to kids, but the Be Marlboro advertising and videos show otherwise. They use images and themes like sex, parties and risk that are sure to appeal to teens and entice them to become Marlboro smokers. It’s important for public officials around the world to see this marketing and take action to protect kids by banning the Be Marlboro campaign and others like it.”

    While these particular videos are no longer available on Vimeo, we were able to view them in order to present them so that readers can decide whether or not they cross an ethical line.

    “In 2012, Marlboro launched a new revolutionary campaign — ‘Don’t Be A Maybe; Be Marlboro!’ — which is aimed to inspire a young adult smoker into decision-making,” explains the voice-over on the clip produced by Philip Morris Slovakia for a pop-up “Red City” festival Marlboro put together there. “Only thanks to courage, it’s possible to make decisions.”

    Philip Morris International says the goal of "Don't Be A Maybe" is to "inspire a young adult smoker into decision-making." Here we see someone jumping off a 10-meter tower, presumably rather than having to smoke a Marlboro.

    Philip Morris International says the goal of “Don’t Be A Maybe” is to “inspire a young adult smoker into decision-making.” Here we see someone jumping off a 10-meter tower, presumably rather than having to smoke a Marlboro.

    “We tried to inspire and induce visitors to make a decision to experience something new at the festival,” continues the voice-over. “Ongoing activities through the day were presented in the spirit of the brand campaign and linked to the overall concept through music, dance, graffiti, and lifestyle.”

    Marlboro wants to encourage young smokers to dance, which is good because they won't be able to dance very much later in life if they're still smoking.

    Marlboro wants to encourage young smokers to dance, which is good because they won’t be able to dance very much later in life if they’re still smoking.

    There was also a video from a 2012 party in Moldova, complete with DJs wearing furry panda heads and a topless dancer.

    Several minutes of the Moldova video feature this topless dancer grinding on the panda-headed DJs. The Marlboro logo in the image above was inserted to cover her bare, pierced nipples.

    Several minutes of the Moldova video feature this topless dancer grinding on the panda-headed DJs. The Marlboro logo in the image above was inserted to cover her bare, pierced nipples.

    In Indonesia, the partying may have been less explicit, but the Marlboro branding was not.

    While this Marlboro poster tells men to boldly go and ask for a woman's phone number, even though the only women shown attending this party were working there as models or dancers.

    While this Marlboro poster tells men to boldly go and ask for a woman’s phone number, even though the only women shown attending this party were working there as models or dancers.

    What's a party without premium product placement?

    What’s a party without premium product placement?

    The party also featured a fashion show with women wearing Marlboro's favorite color: red.

    The party also featured a fashion show with women wearing Marlboro’s favorite color: red.

    What better way to drive home the cigarette brand's anti-maybe message?

    What better way to drive home the cigarette brand’s anti-maybe message?

    While the Indonesia Marlboro party was noticeably free of non-working female attendees, the one in Saudi Arabia was a strictly male-only event, and even more focused on pushing Marlboro cigarettes:

    Interestingly, the Saudi Arabia video states that "Freedom doesn't start with a maybe," but glosses over the lack of freedom for women in Saudi Arabia.

    Interestingly, the Saudi Arabia video tells viewers that “Freedom doesn’t start with a maybe,” but glosses over the lack of freedom for women in Saudi Arabia (like the fact that none of them would be allowed to attend this party).

    In all of the videos we watched, this was the first where we saw any kind of visible health warning, though you'd have to squint to see it.

    In all of the videos we watched, this was the first where we saw any kind of visible health warning, though you’d have to squint to see it.

    Yes, that's a steel briefcase full of Marlboros...

    Yes, that’s a steel briefcase full of Marlboros…

    This is the guy who shows off that steel briefcase to talk up the cigarettes and distribute samples.

    This is the guy who shows off that steel briefcase to talk up the cigarettes and distribute samples.

    The video of the Saudi Marlboro party was the only one we saw where guests were actually shown smoking.

    The video of the Saudi Marlboro party was the only one we saw where guests were actually shown smoking.

    The video ends with "behind-the-scenes" footage of a host asking attendees to name the best cigarette brand. You'll never guess what they say.

    The video ends with “behind-the-scenes” footage of a host asking attendees to name the best cigarette brand. You’ll never guess what they say.

    One could argue that these parties are not significantly different from events thrown every night in cities all around the world by alcohol, electronics, software, and food companies. The claim could also be made that party attendees don’t actually care about the sponsor or the branding message and just want to enjoy themselves. At the same time, one has to wonder why Marlboro is going through the cost and expense of both throwing these parties and hiring producers to record them, but doesn’t want them to be shared — without any subsequent edits or commentary — by a group critical of Marlboro’s motives.

    We leave you with the original Last Week Tonight report that first put the Be Marlboro campaign in the national spotlight:

    (All above party photographs are screen-grabs taken from four separate Philip Morris videos provided to Consumerist by Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids)



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uNet Neutrality Is Already Improving Internet Connections And It Hasn’t Even Gone Into Effectr


4 4 4 9
  • (Steve)

    (Steve)

    Though the FCC narrowly voted to approve the new Open Internet Order (AKA net neutrality) several months ago, the rules don’t actually kick in until June 12. Yet with those new guidelines looming, some Internet service providers are already beginning to play nice with the companies that do most of the heavy lifting for the web.

    Earlier today, Verizon announced that it had reached a new interconnection deal with Cogent, a company you may have never heard of, but who plays an important role in carrying data across the Internet. Cogent is one of the major bandwidth providers for online businesses, transporting massive amounts of data from the source to ISPs like Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, and Time Warner Cable, who only handle much of your data for the so-called “last mile” to your home or office.

    Cogent was caught in the middle of the openly nasty dispute between Netflix and several ISPs, including Verizon. The company was responsible for much of Netflix’s bandwidth, which can sometimes account for around 1/3 of all downstream traffic in the U.S., but when that data got to the peering points — those connections where Cogent actually hands off data to an ISP — it was becoming bottlenecked because the ISPs were refusing to open up additional connections to alleviate the flow.

    Netflix ultimately ended up making deals with Comcast, Verizon, TWC, and AT&T for more direct access to their networks, taking some of the burden off Cogent and similar providers. Meanwhile, the question of whether ISPs could passive-aggressively allow data to bottleneck remained unanswered.

    The new neutrality rules will allow companies like Cogent to file complaints with the FCC because ISPs will officially be reclassified as common carriers that are not allowed to discriminate when it comes to the data flowing to their end users.

    Whether or not those complaints end up being successful, it appears the mere threat of having to deal with them is pushing toward resolutions in advance of the enactment of the neutrality rules.

    For example, while the Verizon/Cogent deal includes provisions for adding capacity and establishing new interconnection locations between their two networks, Cogent says the agreement does not involve the exchange of any money.

    Cogent CEO Dave Schaeffer tells Ars Technica, “We have never paid for peering, and we continue to never pay for peering.”

    Schaeffer also said that Comcast — the first to reach an interconnection agreement with Netflix — has recently been the most reasonable of the large ISPs, opening additional ports as capacity demands. However, AT&T, TWC, and CenturyLink are not playing as nice.

    Ars notes that Verizon recently announced an interconnection deal with Level 3, another major bandwidth provider that could have filed a complaint under the new neutrality rules. It’s not known whether that arrangement involves any money.

    Though the threat of neutrality complaints is apparently helping nudge some ISPs toward agreeable resolutions, Schaeffer says he may end up having to take his concerns before the FCC if companies aren’t willing to work with him.

    “I sincerely hope I don’t have to file any, but I am also prepared,” he tells Ars. “If any of the mass market ISPs violate the consumer protection provisions outlined in the Open Internet Order, we will go to the Enforcement Bureau and file a complaint.”



ribbi
  • by Chris Morran
  • via Consumerist


uJet.com Is Either The Future Of Retail Or A Doomed Wacky Schemer


4 4 4 9
  • brilliant_jetThis week, a new e-commerce site launched to about 10,000 beta users who signed up for a preview. The easy-to-remember name of this new site is Jet.com, and its goal is to remove some of the inefficiencies of shopping online. Will they succeed?

    This isn’t the team’s first war with Amazon: they founded Quidsi, the company behind Diapers.com, Soap.com, and Wag.com. Amazon waged price war on those sites, and the company eventually admitted defeat by being acquired by Amazon.

    Jet’s founder told the Washington Post that it’s targeting a novel group of consumers: older millennials. That’s a generation of people who are in their late twenties to early thirties and who are not terrified of computers, yet who also don’t see the appeal of using Amazon Prime to order their paper towels. Founder Marc Lore explained to the Washington Post that he wants to compete on price, and that means flipping around the process of shopping. Instead of letting users throw whatever they want in their cart and calculating shipping once they’re ready to check out, how Jet works is that it figures out in real time how much to charge for different items based on the customer’s address. Along the way, users also get incentives to choose items that happen to come from the same vendor or the same warehouse as the items they’ve already chosen, incentivizing customers to make shipping easier on the suppliers.

    More importantly, by signing up partners across the country instead of building its own massive warehouses, Jet is able to build a massive inventory without constructing massive warehouses.

    The cost of “free” shipping and returns is built into the prices at all retailers, and the novel thing that Jet offers is the ability to waive free return shipping in exchange for a small discount.

    What’s interesting, though, is how Jet acquired their big user base before launching. While 10,000 beta users were allowed to shop yesterday, they claim to have signed up 350,000 users who are waiting to be allowed behind the virtual velvet rope. Yes, people are always interested in new and exciting ways to shop, especially if it’s something exclusive that not everyone has access to.

    Jet did something a little different, though: they were able to sign up so many people before the site launched by holding a contest. Early adopters would get 6 months of their membership for free (a $25 value) but the top referrer would get 100,000 stock options. The winner of that contest was a 28-year-old Pennsylvania man who spent $18,000 advertising on sites that give users prizes for performing online tasks like registering accounts. He signed up about 8,000 people and won the contest. Jet isn’t a public company, but those 100,000 shares could be worth as much as $20 million.

    This guy used a get-rich-quick scheme and got rich [CNN]



ribbi
  • by Laura Northrup
  • via Consumerist


uOwners Of Derby-Pie Trademark Fight To Keep It From Becoming Genericizedr


4 4 4 9
  • Not a Kerns Kitchen Derby-Pie.

    Not a Kerns Kitchen Derby-Pie. (sheesalt)

    First of all, what’s a derby pie? For those not living in or near Louisville, many Kentucky Derby fans say it’s a pie made with bourbon, chocolate chips and pecans. And then there’s one company that says it’s a walnut treat made without bourbon. Thing is, the latter holds the trademark to the phrase Derby-Pie, and it’s not ready to allow others to peddle their own iterations of the traditional dessert with that name.

    While the denizens of Louisville will likely be gulping down what they call derby pies for tomorrow’s event at Churchill Downs,  only one business has the legal right to call its creations Derby-Pie, reports NPR’s Foodways blog.

    That company is Kerns Kitchen, and it hasn’t shied away from suing in its fight to keep the term from becoming genericized, potentially leading to a loss of its legal trademark.

    One worker at an area restaurant remembers when she and her co-workers used to serve what they called derby pie, until the establishment received a cease-and-desist from Kerns.

    “You can say, ‘We have chocolate pecan pie, but we do not have Derby-Pie,’ ” the worker says now if someone orders a derby pie. “You didn’t know if they’d sent a plant in to see if we were doing it or not.”

    Kerns tells NPR its Derby-Pie chocolate nut pie was created by family members in the 1950s as their restaurant’s signature item. The company later ditched the restaurant idea and kept the pie business, registering Derby-Pie as a trademark around that time.

    With a business that produces 800 pies per day, according to the company, Kerns is fierce about protecting its recipe and technique, along with staunchly defending the trademarked name.

    In another bit of legal wrangling, the manager of a local diner has been sued twice by the company, once in 1997 and once in 2007.

    “I actually put up a sign after that conversation [that read]: Have a piece of ‘I Can’t Call It Derby Pie’ pie,” he says of his reaction during the first legal fight, which . Now though, he says he makes a Kentucky Bourbon Pie.

    Though Kern’s doesn’t want its pie to go the way of zipper, laundromat and linoleum — other trademarked names that fell to genericide when people used them to reference any similar product — critics say threatening other people who use the name is robbing Kentuckians of their history, Kentuckians who might think of a different recipe when they hear “derby pie” anyway.

    “If you have people scared to use the words ‘derby pie,’ and yet Grandma used to make it, then you’ve really banished Grandma in a way, haven’t you?” the diner owner says.

    What’s Inside A ‘Derby Pie’? Maybe A Lawsuit Waiting To Happen [NPR Foodways]



ribbi
  • by Mary Beth Quirk
  • via Consumerist