понедельник, 6 апреля 2015 г.

uWould You Pay A News Source To Read Individual Articles Online?r



4 4 4 9



  • When you hear a song you like, you might pay $0.99 to buy it. Or perhaps you just really need to get past this one level of Sugar Shock, so you shell out to purchase a new set of lives. What about paying a news source to read just one article? Why not? Micropayments are as ubiquitous as the smartphones we all use nowadays, and one publication thinks the model can work on an article-by-article basis.

    The Winnipeg Free Press announced that it’s going to be making its debut as the first North American publication to erect a paywall that works on a per-article basis for its online version, NiemanLab reported (H/T to Engadget).


    The newspaper is going to charge readers $0.27 (in Canadian currency, U.S. is about $0.21) for every article they read. There’s also going to be the option to buy a full digital subscription for $16.99 a month, and if you already subscribe to the print or e-edition of the newspaper, access is unlimited online.


    What if you don’t think you’ll like paying to read for an article before you get the chance to know if you like it? New sign-ups can get a month free to test the waters and decide if it’s something they’re into.


    The Free Press says it’s the first publication in North America to implement the pay-as-you-read model.


    “We wanted to come up with a system that would avoid some of the problems we’ve seen in other systems — but more accurately, come up with something that works,” Free Press editor Paul Samyn told NiemanLab.


    For example, some critics say there’s only a certain amount of readers who are willing to pay for online subscriptions when there’s some content available for free. The Free Press has been taking notes on these systems.


    “We obviously have been watching what other newspapers have been doing with some form of paywall, and while they have had some success, I don’t think anyone has really had roaring success,” Samyn said. “What you see is their ability to grow paid digital subscriptions appears to have either stalled or only grown marginally.”


    It’s a gamble — there might be some readers willing to pony up the cash each time to get their news fix, while others will simply go elsewhere for free.


    What do you think?






    The Winnipeg Free Press is launching a paywall that lets readers pay by the article [NiemanLab]


















ribbi







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist






oSling TV’s Final Four Faltering Raises Concerns About Launch Of HBO Noww



4 4 4 4


  • In the weeks leading up to the Final Four, Sling made a big marketing push to remind people you could watch NCAA games on ESPN, TNT, and TBS.

    In the weeks leading up to the Final Four, Sling made a big marketing push to remind people you could watch NCAA games on ESPN, TNT, and TBS.



    Even though Dish’s Sling TV streaming service had two full months of active, national usage under its belt — and even though the company says it expected high demand during the Final Four of the NCAA Men’s Basketball tournament — some Sling users were left staring at error messages instead of watching the end of Kentucky’s almost-perfect season. And with HBO expected to launch both its standalone streaming HBO Now service and live access via Sling this week, there’s cause for concern.

    Re/code points to numerous complaints over the weekend about error messages on Sling, which had been actively touting that users could watch Final Four games on the Turner channels included in the $20/month core package of Sling.


    “We’re sorry some basketball fans saw errors tonight due to extreme sign-ups and streaming,” reads a Tweet posted Saturday evening by the @SlingAnswers account. “Engineers rebalanced load across network partners.”


    Dish contends that the errors only affected a “fraction” of Sling users, but the service’s failure to meet full demand for such a high-profile event raises concerns about streaming video during a landmark week for the technology.


    HBO is expected to launch its standalone streaming service HBO Now this week in advance of the April 12 season premiere of Game of Thrones. At the same time, it’s also announced that Sling will be selling both live and on-demand access to HBO for $15/month.


    HBO Go, the network’s streaming service for customers who subscribe through traditional pay-TV vendors, has historically shown its inability to cope with high demand during season premieres, and most notably during the first season finale of True Detective in 2014.


    HBO Now has been developed with an outside partner, MLB Advanced Media, the baseball folks responsible for the MLB.tv streaming service, which — unless today is different from the previous decade of opening days — will have its hands full dealing with the inevitable huge number of complaints today as users try to watch their still-undefeated favorite teams online.


    Then there’s last week’s announcement from Sling that it will carry HBO and that it will launch the premium network in time for the GoT premiere.


    Given HBO Now’s initial exclusivity on Apple TV and iOS devices, a number of people will choose Sling both because it’s available on more devices and its HBO access will be live.


    But if users see a repeat of Sling’s Final Four faltering, or any of the HBO streaming options crash like HBO Go has done in the past, the people involved should expect a very vocal backlash from paying customers (and the friends who borrowed their passwords).










wow







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist



oJudge Rules: Woman Can Serve Elusive Husband Divorce Papers Via Facebook Messagew



4 4 4 4



  • The times, they are completely and totally changing: Used to be serving someone with divorce papers required some sort of face-to-face interaction, which can be difficult if the other party gets squirrelly and tries to avoid the encounter. But now it seems repeatedly pinging someone’s Facebook inbox will do just as well.

    Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Matthew Cooper ruled that a Brooklyn woman can use social media to make sure her former beloved knows he’s getting the ax, reports the New York Daily News.


    He ruled that she “is granted permission serve defendant with the divorce summons using a private message through Facebook,” with the help of her lawyer through her account. with her lawyer messaging Victor Sena Blood-Dzraku through her account, Cooper wrote.


    “This transmittal shall be repeated by plaintiff’s attorney to defendant once a week for three consecutive weeks or until acknowledged” by her husband, who seems to have no fixed address and isn’t the easiest to nail down.


    He’s only been keeping in touch with his wife by phone and Facebook, and apparently doesn’t want a divorce.


    The “last address plaintiff has for defendant is an apartment that he vacated in 2011,” the judge noted, adding that the woman “has spoken with defendant by telephone on occasion and he has told her that he has no fixed address and no place of employment. He has also refused to make himself available to be served with divorce papers.”


    Even the post office had no forwarding address for him, he has no billing address listed on his prepaid cell phone account and he might as well not exist to the Department of Motor Vehicles.


    He got his first divorce papers message last week.


    “So far, he hasn’t responded,” the woman’s lawyer says.


    EXCLUSIVE: Judge says Brooklyn woman can use Facebook to serve divorce papers [New York Daily News]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oJohn Oliver Gets Edward Snowden To Explain Government Snooping In Terms Of Penis Photosw



4 4 4 4


  • By June 1, Congress must decide whether or not to reauthorize certain sections of the controversial USA Patriot Act (aka the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act), but even though it’s been nearly two years since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed the NSA’s massive and far-reaching data collection programs, many Americans either are only vaguely aware or don’t understand because it’s not easy to immediately see how things like PRISM and MYSTIC affect your daily existence. That’s why John Oliver not only went straight to Snowden for an explanation of these programs, but to have him put the snooping in terms many Internet-era perverts can understand: penis photos.


    “It’s difficult for most people to even conceptualize,” Snowden admits in the above interview on HBO’s Last Week Tonight. He then starts to explain about the invisibility of the Internet and the complicated connections involved when Oliver interrupts.


    This is the whole problem,” says Oliver. “I glaze over. It’s like the IT guy comes into your office and you go, ‘Oh sh*t — don’t teach me anything. I don’t want to learn. You smell like canned soup.'”


    In order to show Snowden just how bored an uninformed a lot of Americans are, he plays some man-on-the-street interview footage demonstrating how little, if anything, people understand about Snowden and the NSA snooping scandal.


    Then, referring to a previous Snowden anecdote about people at the NSA sharing nude photos caught in their mass data collections, Oliver shows another video of those same Americans saying they’d be horrified if their dick pics were floating around government offices, but many of them don’t believe it’s happening.


    “The good news is there’s no program named ‘The Dick Pick’ program. The bad news is they’re still collecting everybody’s information, including your dick picks,” explains Snowden.


    This is the most visible line in the sand for people — Can they see my dick?” Oliver declares, handing Snowden a folder that purportedly contains a photo of Oliver’s genitals. “So let’s go through each NSA program and explain to me its capabilities with regards to that photograph of my penis.”


    702 surveillance (aka Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which authorizes the NSA to collect massive amounts of data on people “believed to be located outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information.”):


    Snowden: “Section 702… allows the bulk communications of Internet communications that are ‘one-end’ foreign… so if you have your e-mail through Gmail hosted on a server overseas… if it at any time crosses outside the border of the United States, your junk ends up in the database.”


    Oliver: “It doesn’t have to be sending your dick to a German?”


    Snowden: “No, even if you’re sending to someone within the United States, your wholly domestic communication between you and your wife can go from New York to London and back and get caught up in the database.”


    Executive Order 12333 (signed Dec. 4, 1981 by Pres. Ronald Reagan; authorized intelligence community to expand data collection operations):


    Snowden: “E.O. 12333 is what the NSA uses when the other authorities aren’t aggressive enough or aren’t catching as much as they’d like.”


    Oliver: “How are they going to see my dick? I’m only concerned about my penis.”


    Snowden: “When you send your junk through Gmail. That’s stored on Google’s servers. Google moves data from data center to data center, invisibly to you without your knowledge. That data could be moved outside the borders of the United States, temporarily. When your junk was passed by Gmail, the NSA caught a copy of that.”


    PRISM (an NSA surveillance that uses orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to collect stored data from large Internet companies):


    Snowden: “PRISM is how they pull your ‘junk’ out of Google, with Google’s involvement. All of the different PRISM partners — people like Yahoo, Facebook Google — the government deputizes them be sort of their surveillance sheriff.”


    Oliver: “Their a dick sheriff?”


    Snowden: “Correct.”


    Upstream (an NSA data collection technique that gathers in-transit information via the backbone of the Internet):


    Snowden: “Upstream is how they snatch your junk as it transits the Internet.”


    MYSTIC (the NSA’s program to collect data on all voice calls in certain countries):


    Snowden: “If you’re describing your junk on the phone, yes [they’re collecting it]”


    Oliver: “But do they have the content of that junk call, or just the duration of it?”


    Snowden: “They have content as well, but only for a few countries. If you were on vacation in the Bahamas, yes.”


    215 Metadata (Sec. 215 of the Patriot Act details how the government can compel companies to hand over information with regard to intelligence. Oliver is referring to the mass collection of metadata — non-content information like phone numbers, duration of calls, identities of those involved in call — from telecom providers):


    Snowden: “No [the government can’t see your penis], but they can probably tell who you’re sharing your junk pictures with. Because they’s seeing who you’re texting and who you’re calling.”


    Oliver: “If you called a penis enlargement center at three in the morning and the call lasted 90 minutes?”


    Snowden: “They would have a record of your phone number calling that phone number — which is the penis enlargement center. They would say they don’t know it’s a penis enlargement center but of course they can look it up.”


    To end the interview, Oliver asks, “Would your takeaway from all this be: Until such time as we’ve sorted all of this out, don’t take pictures of your dick?”


    “No… you shouldn’t change your behavior because a government agency is doing the wrong thing,” explains Snowden. “If we sacrifice our values because we’re afraid, we don’t care about those values very much.”










wow







  • by Chris Morran

  • via Consumerist



пятница, 3 апреля 2015 г.

oNYC Commission: Apartment Building’s Policy Barring Lower-Paying Tenants From Gym May Be Discriminatoryw



4 4 4 4



  • Rent-regulated tenants living in an apartment building on Manhattan’s Upper West Side have complained that its policy of only allowing market-rate tenants — who pay higher rents — to use the on-premises gym. The practice of keeping out those rent-stabilized tenants, who are mostly over 65, may constitute age discrimination, according to New York City Commission on Human Rights.

    A noticed filed by the commission yesterday says there’s enough evidence of discriminatory actions to merit a hearing on the complex’s gym rule, reports CBS New York. Market-rate tenants in the building tend to be younger, the complaint says.


    A 75-year-old rent-regulated tenant says in her complaint that she found out the gym would only be, in her words, “for the market-rate tenants, period,” after a sign was allegedly posted on the gym door ordering users not to hold the door for others.


    “You don’t get to make me a second-class citizen in my own home — just not going to happen,” said the woman, who’s been living in the building for more than 40 years. Her complaint is supported by Public Advocate Letitia James and other officials.


    She says she hopes that now the landlord will open up the gym to any paying tenant — heck, just because she’s older doesn’t mean she doesn’t want to work out.


    “I’m looking forward to Zumba classes,” she says.


    Upper West Side Apt Building’s Policy Barring Low-Paying Tenants From Using Gym May Be Discriminatory [CBS New York]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oU.S. Forest Service Issued Detailed Chart For Mixing 21 Cocktails In 1974 Government Documentw



4 4 4 4


  • (U.S. National Archives)

    (U.S. National Archives)



    If there’s one thing that everyone knows about the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service is that those guys love mixing up a tasty cocktail. Wait, actually, it’s doubtful anyone would know how much the government workers adore a properly made martini, as evidenced by a 1974 document with a detailed chart on how to make 21 different cocktails, complete with diagrams.

    Over at the Washington Post’s Wonkblog, Ana Swanson takes note of the in-depth pictorial guide from the forestry department, a nicely illustrated chart that outlines the ingredients and portioning for an Old Fashioned, Manhattan, a gin fizz, something called “Stars & Stripes” and more.


    The chart, which is currently living in the U.S. National Archives in Washington, D.C., also has illustrations detailing everything from what a “dash” of something is to sugar cubes.


    Further proving that these workers liked to get a chuckle while on the job, the chart includes the names of those who checked it over, “self-appointed barmasters” named I Mixum, Ima Sot, Jim Beam and I.P. Freely.


    Potty humor and booze together — a partnership that will never get old.


    A 1974 government document shows how to make a proper cocktail [Chicago Tribune]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oCredit Card Issuers Increase Limits For Subprime Borrowers; Raise Concerns About Risksw



4 4 4 4



  • As the economy continues to improve, credit card issuers have begun to loosen their vice grip on lending standards in order to raise borrowing limits for consumers. But the move to provide extend credit to those with blemished histories has raised concerns with consumer groups.


    The Los Angeles Times reports that banks have more readily raised borrowing limits for credit card customers in recent months, despite the fact that many of those consumers asking for increases are considered amongst the most risky borrowers.


    In fact, according to a Federal Reserve Bank of New York survey, credit card firms approved 76% of all requests from cardholders for higher borrowing limits in February.


    Analysts say the willingness to extend addition credit to consumers comes at a time when bank and credit issuer revenue has fallen because of tighter regulations and low-interest rates.


    The loss of profit, coupled with other factors such as smaller loan losses, labor market stabilization and consumers’ desire to spend more have combined to create an environment more accommodating to lending.


    “Credit card issuers are feeling a lot better about the economy and their position,” Bill Hardekopf, chief executive of LowCards.com, a credit card comparison website, tells the L.A. Times. “They want to generate some new business.”


    However, it’s the way in which these banks have tried to generate new business – by approving credit increases for subprime borrowers – that worries consumer advocates.


    Nearly half of the subprime borrowers – those with credit scores less than 680 – who applied for increased limits were approved in February.


    In the past, subprime borrowers have faced higher interest rates and fees because they are considered riskier borrowers.


    Another report from the American Bankers Association confirmed the trend in increased subprime borrowers, finding those cardholders are taking on more debt than any other category of borrower.


    “Credit cards are very useful for many people,” Lauren Saunders, managing attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, tells the L.A. Times. “But it’s way too easy to get in over your head, and we do worry about extending too much credit to people who should be trying to live within a budget instead of taking on more debt.”


    In contrast, those in the banking industry say there’s never been a better time for consumers to seek out additional credit, especially since the approvals are for current cardholders, not new accounts.


    “You already know what they’re doing,” Christine Pratt, a senior analyst with Aite Group, tells the L.A. Times. “You know what they look like. It’s not like you’re going out and grabbing new ones.”


    Even though cardholders likely understand their obligations, analysts at Standard & Poor’s Investor Service say the looser lending standards will likely also increase missed credit payments in the future.


    An increase in missed payments could then translate into an upswing in credit card delinquencies, which have fallen sharply over the past three years.


    Banks raising credit card borrowing limits for subprime customers [The Los Angeles Times]










wow







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist