четверг, 2 апреля 2015 г.

oRadioShack CEO Resigns As Company Prepares To Open New Stores Later This Monthw



4 4 4 4


  • sprintshack After getting a glimpse at what the new co-branded RadioShack/Sprint stores will look like, the company is preparing to unveil the brand spanking new stores later this month. Meanwhile, RadioShack’s CEO is exiting the scene before the debut after failing to successfully steer the company away from bankruptcy over the last two years.


    RadioShack investor Standard General successfully won approval in bankruptcy court this week to buy up the remaining 1,740 stores, with plans to morph those locations into a new beast with Sprint taking up about a third of each store’s footprint.


    It seems the new owners aren’t wasting any time, as the Wall Street Journal reports that the new version of the chain will be unveiled later this month. The stores will look a lot like they do now, as we previously noted — but without large displays dedicated to Sprint’s competitors.


    The chain is also culling the clutter, cutting back on laptops, tablets and digital cameras to focus on house-brand chargers, batteries and speakers. It’s still unclear what the new stores will be called, however: While Standard General is going to operate the stores, Salus Capital Partners has digs on RadioShack’s trademarks, patents and customer data.


    Unless the two sides can work out a deal to sell Standard General the intellectual property that makes RadioShack Radioshack, the new stores will have to be called something else. RadioSprint? SprintShack? NewOldThing Store?


    Who exactly will be running this new operation is also up for grabs — CEO Joe Magnacca resigned yesterday, reports the Dallas Business Journal, after two years of trying to save RadioShack’s sinking ship. A spokeswoman said she didn’t know who will replace him, or if the position will be refilled at all.


    RadioShack Is Dead, Long Live RadioShack [Wall Street Journal]

    RadioShack CEO Joe Magnacca steps down [Dallas Business Journal]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oPolice: Kmart Shopper Left Bathroom Deposit In Box Of Store Security Tagsw



4 4 4 4



  • If there are aliens out there scanning our world’s media reports, at this point I’m terribly afraid they think humans don’t now how to dispose of their waste properly — from public bike paths to parked cars, we’re just a mess. In yet another instance of presumably otherwise functioning adults, police say a woman did her bathroom business in a box of security tags at a Kmart store in Wisconsin. Sigh.

    Authorities say the woman went to Kmart to return merchandise and in turn, left a nasty deposit for workers, reports the Smoking Gun.


    Wearing a T-shirt with a picture of a dump truck and the phrase, “Dropping A Load,” as the police noted, the suspect elicited suspicion after workers smelled a “funky odor” coming from a cardboard box filled with store anti-theft security tags.


    That led to the disgusting find of a urine leaking from the box, as well as feces. Police allege she slipped behind a cash register to do her bathroom business, as seen on store security footage.


    After approaching the customer service desk to return some items, the complaint says she was shown on video walking to Aisle 1 where she “loosened her pants and squatted down” near the cash register, though store bathrooms were only about 50 feet away. A worker told police that the suspect is a regular customer, “so she should know where the public restrooms are located.”


    A minute or so later, she’s “seen reaching for paper towels beneath the counter.” After finishing up, she approached the customer service desk again, completed her return and left the store.


    Police used the return paperwork to identify the woman seen in the surveillance video, and confronted her at her home. She denied the dumping, though cops say she was wearing the same color shoes and pants as the perpetrator in the video, and showed police a jacket she was wearing in the store that also matched the jacket seen on the woman in the video.


    She was charged with disorderly conduct and two counts of resisting or obstructing an officer. She’s also been ordered to have “no contact with victim store, Kmart” as part of her bond conditions.


    Cops: Woman Pooped Inside Box At Kmart [The Smoking Gun]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oPotential FICO Credit Score Changes Could Hurt, Rather Than Help Some Consumers’ Creditworthinessw



4 4 4 4



  • The Fair Isaac Corporation – better known to consumers as FICO – is on the verge of turning the credit score game on its head with the release of a new credit-scoring approach that would consider consumers’ monthly bills, such as those for utilities and wireless plans, when determining creditworthiness. The change is purportedly intended to help consumers on the low end of the credit spectrum, but some consumer advocates are concerned that lower-income Americans could be the ones most adversely affected.

    The Wall Street Journal reports that the new approach aims to make it easier for consumers who don’t currently have scores to obtain a decent FICO score.


    FICO tells the WSJ that the new approach would provide scores to nearly 15 million of the 53 million Americans who currently don’t have FICO scores.


    The scores would continue to rely on factors such as payment history, amounts owed, length of credit history, new credit and types of credit used, but would add new factors including consumers’ payment history with their cable, cellphone, electric and gas bills, as well as how often they change addresses and other data.


    According to documents obtained from a FICO presentation on the revamped scoring approach, the new data would be furnished by database of telecommunications and utilities providers maintained by Equifax and the National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, while personal information would be furnished by LexisNexis.


    Like the tradition FICO scoring method, the new approach would have a range of 300 to 850. The company says that under the revamped approach, nearly one-third of the newly scored individuals would have a score above 620 – typically the threshold in which credit card issuers and other lenders approve applications.


    FICO along with Equifax and LexisNexis have begun a data score pilot to assess the new methods effects on consumers currently without credit scores. The pilot is expected to be completed in the coming months and scores based on the alternative approach made available by the end of the year for use by credit card issuers.


    Jim Wehmann, an executive with FICO, tells the WSJ that the increase in consumers with higher scores is a “good indication that this is a process to onboard more consumers and allow them to maintain more creditworthiness.”


    While providing more credit options for people is a good thing, basing a consumers’ creditworthiness on utility payments could have a negative affect on consumers struggling to make ends meet month-to-month.


    FICO scores are based on five factors: payment history, amounts owed, length of credit history, new credit and types of credit used. The scoring equation takes into account both negative and positive information on a consumer’s credit report; meaning if you pay your bills even a day late it could lower your FICO score.


    In 2012, the National Consumer Law Center provided testimony during a House subcommittee hearing exploring the uses of consumer credit data, including the use of utility payments in credit reports.


    Chi Chi Wu, staff attorney for NCLC, expressed advocates’ fears that using the additional information would “add millions of news negative reports to the credit reporting system and will actually hame more consumers, especially financially strapped consumers, by creating credit black marks.”


    According to Wu’s testimony [PDF], consumers’ sporadic late utility payments are often the result of weather extremes. Consumers who see their bills spike in the winter or summer may not be able to pay those off in full during the season but will over time.


    The advocates also counter that using utility bills in FICO scores would actually produce more failing scores than positive one, saying that nearly 55% of consumers previously without scores will end up with a suboptimal or subprime score.


    When the issue came up again in legislation in 2013, a coalition of consumer advocates, including the NCLC, Consumers Union, the Center for Digital Democracy and the National Fair Housing Alliance, penned a letter of objection to sponsors. The letter reiterated the concerns of using such data, saying reporting of utility bills would undermine “long-standing protections” developed by state utility commissions across the country to protect consumers when utility bills spike during weather extremes and hurt consumers when they are applying for jobs or looking to buy home or auto insurance.


    FICO Gives Millions a Path Toward a Decent Credit Score [The Wall Street Journal]










wow







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist



oDoctors Say Drinking A Gallon Of Iced Tea Every Day Could’ve Caused Man’s Mysterious Kidney Failurew



4 4 4 4



  • Even when it comes to delicious, refreshing drinks, too much of a good thing can sometimes be dangerous: In a letter published in a scientific journal, doctors say drinking a gallon of iced tea every day could’ve led to kidney failure in a 56-year-old man who just couldn’t get enough of the stuff.

    The New England Journal of Medicine calls it iced-tea nephropathy in a new letter describing the case, reports Reuters Health, warning others that massive consumption of tea could be responsible for other unexplained cases of kidney failure.


    The 56-year-old man suddenly developed weakness, fatigue and body aches, and it seems the source of his ailments was an excessive amount of oxalate, which is a compound found in many foods. You can also get a build-up of oxalates from “juicing” too much, gastric bypass surgery, and eating foods chock full of ascorbic acid like beets, spinach, nuts and strawberries.


    Before you swear off any of those foods however, rest assured that the amount you’d have to consume is a heck of a lot — the man said he drank 16 nine-ounce glasses of iced tea a day, resulting in an intake of more than 1,500 milligrams of oxalate per day. That’s well above the advised 40-50 mg limit per day, according to the Academy of Nutrition and Diatetics recommendations.


    “If you drink tea once or twice a day, it probably wouldn’t exceed what is the normal range for Americans. But this patient was taking 10 times that amount,” said Dr. Umbar Ghaffa of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, a coauthor of the letter.


    Too much oxalate can lead to kidney stones, which in turn can damage the kidney by blocking the flow of urine. Ghaffar told Reuters that this case involved oxalate crystals actually inside the kidney, which generates an inflammatory reaction.


    “If that’s not resolved it will cause scarring and loss of the kidney tissue. So that’s what probably was happening in this patient,” he explains.


    On the other hand, previous research has shown that people who drink tea in normal amounts can have a lower risk of kidney stones, another professor who was not involved in this case told Reuters.


    “But in this case, the person was drinking huge amounts of oxalate,” said Dr. Gary Curhan, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. “I would caution people against drinking that much, but drinking a glass or two would not concern me.”


    Massive tea consumption linked to kidney failure [Reuters Health]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oU.S. Commodities Regulators Accusing Kraft, Mondelez Of Manipulating Wheat Pricesw



4 4 4 4



  • The U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission is suing Kraft Foods Group Inc. and Mondelez Global LLC, which was spun off from Kraft in 2012, claiming the two food Goliaths manipulated wheat prices in 2011, earning profits of $5.4 million as a result.

    The commodities regulator alleges in a lawsuit filed Wednesday that the companies raked in extra cash by artificially lowering the price of wheat by snapping up large amounts of futures contracts, reports the Wall Street Journal.


    After droughts damaged crops in Russia, Europe and China in the summer of 2011, wheat prices soared, meaning higher prices for food companies like Kraft. The CFTC says that company uses 30 million bushels of wheat a year to make Oreo cookies, Wheat Thins and other products.


    That’s when, according to the CFTC’s complaint, Kraft’s wheat traders worked out a plan to heavily buy December-dated wheat futures contracts, signaling to other traders that food companies and other grain processors would also be into snapping up large quantities of wheat at the end of the year.


    Such a move caused the price for Kraft to buy physical wheat before December would go down, because grain companies might’ve thought Kraft didn’t need as much grain for its mills right away, says the CFTC.


    But despite buying $90 million of December 2011 wheat futures, which is about a six-month supply of meat, the complaint says the companies never intended to take the order, and only expected that the market would react to their moves by lowering cash wheat prices, which is exactly what happened.


    “Kraft executed its plan, and the market reacted as Kraft expected, yielding Kraft more than $5.4 million in futures trading profits and savings from its strategy,” CFTC officials wrote in the complaint.


    Kraft and Mondelez declined to comment to the WSJ, citing active litigation.


    CFTC Sues Kraft, Mondelez for Alleged Manipulation of Wheat Market [Wall Street Journal]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oFederal Jury Rules Heinz Didn’t Rip Off Man’s Idea For Single-Serve Ketchup Packetsw



4 4 4 4


  • heinzdip A Michigan food industry entrepreneur lost his fight against H.J. Heinz Co. this week, when a federal jury ruled yesterday that the company didn’t rip off his idea with its Dip & Squeeze single-serve ketchup packets.


    The U.S. District Court jury in Pennsylvania ruled that while Heinz didn’t take advantage of the man’s idea for a ketchup packet that you could dip fries into at an opening at the top when it came out with its packets in 2010, it gave the man credit for presenting a new and novel idea for a single-serve ketchup packet, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.


    Heinz welcomed the verdict, as it maintained that it came up with the Dip & Squeeze concept all on its own.


    “Heinz firmly believed all along that [the plaintiff’s] claims were groundless, and we are pleased to have prevailed in this case,” said Michael Mullen, senior vice president of corporate & government affairs. “Heinz’s history of product and packaging innovations dates back to our founder, H.J. Heinz, and continues today as a cornerstone of the company.”


    The man’s attorney and his client haven’t decided whether or not to appeal the decision, which marks the end of a five-year battle against Heinz. In 2010, the company debuted its multi-use ketchup packets, but in 2008, both sides agree, the man met with Heinz to discuss ways to improve on the traditional foil packets used in fast-food.


    At that meeting, he presented his Little Dipper concept that allows diners to dip fries in an opening at the top of the packet. While the entrepreneur claims that afterward Heinz brushed him off and didn’t include his product in a 2008 focus group showing consumers different prototypes to land on the best one, Heinz says he didn’t come through with promised samples of the concept he’d originally pitched.


    Heinz also argued that its European division had already been using a multi-use packet as far back as 2002, and had pitched ways to improve single-serve packets to Burger King in 2006. That project stalled due to costs, Heinz testimony claimed.


    “He had an interesting idea,” Heinz’s attorney said of the entrepreneur, “He should go back and work on more interesting ideas and spend more time doing that than litigating against companies like Heinz.”


    Michigan man loses battle against Heinz over Dip & Squeeze packets [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]










wow







  • by Mary Beth Quirk

  • via Consumerist



oU.S. Travelers To Cuba Can Now Rent Through Airbnbw



4 4 4 4



  • While many American companies continue to make preparations for the loosened travel restrictions between the U.S. and Cuba, online-home rental marketplace Airbnb says it already has properties available on the island for booking.


    Reuters reports that the company added more than 1,000 rental listings in the country shortly after President Obama announced earlier this year that he would begin normalizing relations with Cuba.


    Airbnb says that following the announcement in December that Americans could travel to the country for certain reasons such as family visits and education, there was a 70% spike in searches for rentals in Cuba.


    For now the company’s Cuba services are only open to U.S. travelers, and those people must be able to prove they have a license from the U.S. government to travel to the island.


    Reuters reports that National Foreign Trade Council, a lobbying group focused on international trade, believes the expanded Airbnb offerings in Cuba could go a long way in meeting demand for travelers’ accommodations.


    Airbnb joins a list of other American companies looking to capitalize off of restored diplomatic ties between the two countries. In early March, reports surfaced that Amazon was testing a “ship to Cuba” button on its website.


    Airbnb opens rental listings for U.S. travelers to Cuba [Reuters]










wow







  • by Ashlee Kieler

  • via Consumerist