понедельник, 30 марта 2015 г.

jikUtah Restaurant Owner Removes Over-Sized Genitalia From Bull Sign After Uproarde

4 4 4 4

The owner of a steakhouse who added an extra-large genital enhancement to the bull on the restaurant’s sign says he’s removing the nether bits that caused a slew of complaints from residents, but he’s not doing it because of the controversy.

He says he woke up one day and realized that the bull would be just as effective on the sign if it didn’t have the long cone-shaped phallus it originally included, reports The Spectrum.


But it’s not because of all the naysayers out there he says, adding that he called up the city to explain himself first.


“I told them I am not removing the penis for you or because of your complaints. I don’t like you. I’m doing it for me,” he said. “I just decided it would look better without the weenie. And oh my God! It’s beautiful.”


City officials say that though a stream of complaints have come in from people about the restaurant since it opened in 2009, there’s no cause to revoke its business license.


The owner says he filed all the proper paperwork to get the sign approved, which the City Manager admits, but added that “the dimensions of certain parts of the animal don’t seem to be built the same way as in the plan that came to us.”


The bull’s bits caused a controversy recently when the animal showed up atop a stack of signs for the restaurant, but it’s not like the owner planned it that way, he claims.


“I didn’t put it up to piss them off; I put it up because it’s an amazing piece, and I bought it as-is, but I am having fun with all the attention, and it’s brought in more customers,” he said.


At the same time, he admits that the cone shape didn’t feel quite… right.


“But I don’t know what a weenie on a bull is supposed to look like,” he says.


Owner alters Barista’s infamous bull [The Spectrum]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

jikDunkin’ Donuts Considering Using Only Cage-Free Eggsde

4 4 4 4

Leaning into the growing consumer demand for products that are sourced from animals who aren’t contained as strictly as in the past, Dunkin’ Donuts announced today that it’s looking into using eggs only from uncaged hens in all its restaurants. It’s also planning on buying pork in the U.S. only from suppliers that don’t put animals in gestation crates by 2022.

According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, by the end of next year 10% of all eggs for breakfast sandwiches at the chain’s U.S. locations will be from cage-free hens.


This, after Dunkin’ Donuts had pledged to reach a goal of getting 5% of its eggs from cage-free sources by the end of 2013, according to the company’s senior director of corporate social responsibility, Christine Miller.


Revised rules for the U.S. egg industry aimed at improving conditions for the 305 million egg-laying hens in the country discourage the kind of cramped cages that have been used for decades.


California already requires every egg-in-shell sold in the state to come from hens that have enuogh room to sit down, turn in a circle and spread their wings. Washington, Oregon, Michigan and Ohio have passed hen-cage laws that are taking effect in the next few years, and other states have proposed bills on the docket as well.


Dunkin’ Donuts Considers All Cage-Free Eggs [Wall Street Journal]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

jikStubHub Files Antitrust Suit Against Ticketmaster, Golden State Warriorsde

4 4 4 4

gswticketmaster eBay-owned ticket resale site StubHub has sued both Ticketmaster and the NBA’s Golden State Warriors for allegedly threatening to cancel the subscriptions of season ticket holders if they try to resell any of their tickets via StubHub.


According to the complaint [PDF] filed in a federal court in San Francisco, the Warriors already have a monopoly on primary ticket sales, which are done exclusively through Ticketmaster, and that the team and the ticket company are trying to perpetuate this control over ticket sales “by forcing Warriors fans to use only Secondary Ticket Exchange services provided by the Warriors, through Ticketmaster, for the resale of Warriors tickets.”


“They have set out to achieve this illegal outcome for a single purpose: to reap service fees and profits that they could not earn in a competitive Secondary Ticket Exchange environment,” contends the complaint, which alleges violations of the federal Sherman antitrust act and state-level laws in California.


StubHub argues that anyone who has a ticket to a Warriors game should be able to sell it on whichever secondary market they choose, but alleges that “To control and profit from the resale of Warriors tickets through such Exchanges, the Warriors and Ticketmaster have cancelled or threatened to cancel fan ticket subscriptions to Warriors season and post-season tickets if fans choose to resell their Warriors tickets over a Secondary Ticketing Exchange that competes with Ticketmaster’s,” which obviously includes StubHub. “In short, Defendants have offered a Hobson’s Choice to Warriors fans: use Ticketmaster’s Secondary Ticket Exchange exclusively or forfeit your Warriors tickets altogether. To Warriors fans, this is effectively no choice at all.”


The reseller claims that this policy resulted in an 80% drop in StubHub’s inventory of Warriors tickets between 2013 and 2014:


stubhublawsuitgraph


“[I]f Defendants are not prevented from continuing their anticompetitive practices, Ticketmaster will become the only Secondary Ticket Exchange through which Warriors tickets will be sold,” argues StubHub, “just as it has been the only Primary Ticket Platform through which Warriors tickets (and tickets to most other large events in the United States) have been sold for years.”


The complaint alleges that Ticketmaster makes it difficult for fans to resell tickets by, for example, delaying delivery of printed tickets until only days before an event — even if they were purchased months in advance.


StubHub also cautions that if Ticketmaster’s alleged anticompetitive policies aren’t stopped now, the company is “likely to seek to replicate them with other teams and entertainment venues throughout the United States, restricting more consumers to a single Secondary Ticket Exchange and forcing competitors and innovators, such as StubHub, to exit the business. As a result, millions of Americans will find themselves captive to a monopoly Secondary Ticket Exchange unconstrained in its ability to charge supra-competitive prices for lower quality services.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

jikT-Mobile Decides To Base New Coverage Map On Real Data From Real Phonesde

4 4 4 4
T-Mobile's dynamic coverage map for the greater Washington, DC area.

T-Mobile’s dynamic coverage map for the greater Washington, DC area.



T-Mobile has been trying, for the past few years, to break away from the dominant competition in the mobile space by doing anything they can think of differently. And now, that extends to information for potential customers, too: their coverage map.


The company announced the change to the new map today. Basically, it has two big differences from everyone else’s, the company claims. First, it’s going to be updated at least twice a month, instead of being a static, annual thing. And secondly, it works backwards.


Your typical wireless coverage map is a visual representation of where the company claims to provide service. Customer experience, for a variety of reasons, may not always line up.


So T-Mobile’s new map is coming at it from the other angle: it’s a visual representation of where customers say the company provides service. The so-called “Next Gen Network Map” isn’t 100% made up of customer data points; it also includes data from third-party network monitoring services like Inrix.


The map doesn’t just say where customers get T-Mobile coverage, but specifically breaks down what level of coverage — 4G LTE vs 3G, and so on — is available at a given address. The map also incorporates speed test data for some (but not all) locations, showing the average of customer network speed-tests run over the past 90 days.


It’s not hard to see why T-Mobile would be gung-ho for the new coverage mapping tech. Despite aggressive expansion, T-Mobile still faces a popular perception of having a small, slow, crappy network. If the “uncarrier” can refute that perception with real, real-time data, they may be able to win over more customers from AT&T and Verizon.


As for consumers, it’s a good way to get a look at what T-Mobile offers in your area, or in an area you’re likely to travel to. Though data that granular can be of mixed utility: two addresses, each within six blocks of yours truly, offered wildly divergent speed test results, with one clocking in at barely 1 Mbps and the other reporting an average of 12 Mbps. And none of the customer-verified nodes in between those two addresses had speed test data attached.


Still, more transparency is basically always a good thing. And T-Mobile’s chief tech officer Neville Ray seems to agree. “We want the rest of the competition to do this,” Ray said. “In the future, customers will demand greater visibility on all aspects of their service.”


T-Mobile ditches static coverage map [CNet]




by Kate Cox via Consumerist

jikNet-A-Porter In Deal Talks With Online Retailer Yooxde

4 4 4 4

net Amazon’s foray into the luxury apparel business may be over before it even began. Just a week after reports surfaced that the company was in talks to buy high-end retailer Net-a-Porter for $2 billion, the smaller company confirmed it’s seeking a possible deal with someone else.


BBC News reports that Net-a-Porter and Italian-based online retailer Yoox are discussing a “potential business combination” that could create a mega luxury retailer worth more than $2.5 billion.


Both Yoox and Net-a-Porter – which is owned by Swiss company Richemont – launched in 2000 as a way to provide more upscale brands in one place. However, the two companies took a decidedly different approach to doing so.


London-based Net-a-Porter showcases its products much like one might see while thumbing through a fashion magazine, while Yoox focuses on buying overstocked or unsold items from previous seasons from high-profile fashion designers and then selling those apparel products for a discounted price.


According to BBC News, the company also operates some full-priced online store for big fashion house. Called monobrand e-shops, they are described as “powered by Yoox.”


Reports of a merger between the two companies first surfaced last year, but those were never confirmed.


Yoox and Net-a-Porter in merger talks [BBC News]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist

jikSalus Capital Claims Shenanigans In RadioShack Bankruptcy Auctionde

4 4 4 4

Last week, it seemed like the bankruptcy auction for what’s left of RadioShack would be pretty straightforward. Standard General, one of the chain’s biggest lenders, would put up a small amount of cash and a large amount of their own debt to take over about 1,700 stores. Another lender called shenanigans on the whole sale, offering a cash bid and claiming that it was superior. Now the auction enters week 2.

As we explained last week, at issue here is the question of what a bankruptcy auction is for. Is the point to make sure that one lender gets compensated and that a different version of the brand lives on, or is it to sell off the company’s assets for as much cash as possible, then distribute the proceeds fairly to all of the company’s creditors? Another important question is how much debt owed to a bidder by the bankrupt company can be part of the bid.


Lenders that aren’t Standard General claim that the hedge fund is being allowed to put up far too much debt and not enough cash for the remains of the once-mighty retailer. The most vocal of these has been Salus Capital, which banded together with other junior creditors and lenders to make its own cash bid. RadioShack chose Standard General as the winner anyway, and Salus argued in bankruptcy court earlier today that “machinations and manipulation” involving bond trades have made this auction unfair, and Salus didn’t submit a new, higher bid this morning as expected. Instead, the company is continuing with its current bid


Salus Changes Mind About New Bid for RadioShack [Wall Street Journal]

Bidders ready for second week of action in RadioShack bankruptcy [Dallas Business Journal]




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

jikGNC Agrees To DNA, Allergen Testing Of Herbal Supplementsde

4 4 4 4
Even though GNC products were ultimately found to abide by federal rules and industry standards, the company has agreed to DNA barcode testing on its ingredients, along with requiring its suppliers to test for common allergens.

Even though GNC products were ultimately found to abide by federal rules and industry standards, the company has agreed to DNA barcode testing on its ingredients, along with requiring its suppliers to test for common allergens.



Earlier this year, New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sent cease-and-desist letters to several major retailers, including Target, Walgreens, and GNC, after genetic testing of store-brand herbal supplements found that many of these products did not contain the herbal ingredients they purported to include, and that some contained potentially dangerous allergens. Today, GNC and Schneiderman announced an agreement that will apply stricter testing standards — more rigorous than those required by the federal government — to the company’s supplements.

According to the agreement [PDF], GNC cooperated with the AG’s office and the company has not been found to have deviated from FDA rules or industry standards in its production of these supplements.


The issue is that those guidelines allow for chemically similar natural and synthetic ingredients to be substituted for the herbs being advertised on the label. Schneiderman’s office contends that the methods used to test these ingredients “provide inadequate assurance of the authenticity of herbal supplements.” Those standards also allow for low-level contamination, even from allergens, and again the AG raises concerns saying that a lack of testing means consumers don’t know if “contamination falls below relevant safety thresholds.”


Thus, GNC has agreed to use DNA barcoding — wherein testers compare the DNA of an ingredient in the supplement with a reference segment of DNA — for the ingredients in its GNC Herbal Plus products. The company will start this testing within 18 months.


The company will also require of its suppliers that they implement randomized allergen testing on active herbal and botanical ingredients for Herbal Plus products. These tests will look for the eight most common allergens, as determined by the FDA.


In an effort to educate consumers, GNC will publicize the difference between whole herb ingredients — in which an herb is chopped or ground into a powder — and extracts, where the herb is treated with a solvent to pull out certain components.


These new testing procedures will apply to products sold at all GNC stores nationwide.


“When consumers take an herbal supplement, they should be able to do so with full knowledge of what is in that product and confidence that every precaution was taken to ensure its authenticity and purity,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “I urge all herbal supplements manufacturers and retailers to join GNC in working with my office to increase transparency and put the safety of their customers first.”


For its part, GNC is touting today’s agreement as proof that there was nothing wrong with its supplements.


“As our testing demonstrated, and this agreement affirms beyond any doubt, our products are not only safe and pure but are in full compliance with all regulatory requirements,” said Michael G. Archbold, CEO of GNC in a statement. “As an industry leader we have always gone above and beyond the minimum requirements in pursuing quality for our consumers, and we will continue to lead the efforts for higher standards. This is good for consumers, good for the industry, and good for GNC.”


Public health advocates are simultaneously applauding today’s agreement and pointing out that more should be done by the government to regulate this growing, multibillion-dollar industry.


“The agreement GNC reached with New York State represents important progress in ensuring that supplements contain what they claim to,” says David Schardt, Senior Nutritionist, Center for Science in the Public Interest. “But Congress should pass reform that would allow the FDA to police this marketplace and remove products that are dishonestly marketed or potentially dangerous.”


David S. Seres, M.D., Director of Medical Nutrition at Columbia University Medical Center adds, “When federal law prohibits the kind of regulation that we demand on all other products used for health benefits, the Attorney General’s actions represent an important step in reining in the supplement industry and assuring that the consumer can trust what is in the bottle.”




by Chris Morran via Consumerist