четверг, 5 марта 2015 г.

jikSolo Diner Sues Portland Restaurant For $100K Claiming Staff Refused To Serve Her On Valentine’s Dayde

4 4 4 4

On the one hand, there is absolutely nothing wrong with a table for one for Valentine’s Day, or any day. On the other hand, restaurants want to fit as many patrons as they can on busy nights like Feb. 14. So is it wrong to boost a patron when the other half of her reservation can’t make it?

A Portland-area woman believes it is, reports KGW.com, and is suing a local eatery claiming staff told her to leave when her husband didn’t come to dinner with her on Valentine’s Day.


She says she and her husband had a reservation on the night of Feb. 14 at a local Italian restaurant, that was serving a five-course meal as a special holiday menu. But after eating a big lunch, the husband backed out. She decided to go have dinner by herself anyway.


In her lawsuit, she says that she started feeling uncomfortable as soon as she arrived. She claims she was seated after others coming in after her, and found it strange. She also says in the court documents that when was finally seated and told a waitress she was ready to order, she was instead asked to leave and give up her table.


But there are two sides to every story, and the owner of the restaurant tells it a bit differently to KGW, based in his staff’s accounts of how things went done.


According to the restaurant’s version, when the woman arrived alone, she didn’t tell staff that the other member of her party wouldn’t be coming. They assumed that meant her date was still on the way, so they gave her a glass of wine for her wait.


The owner says that when the place is serving special menus, the staff won’t usually seat patrons until everyone shows up, and that the tables are reserved for parties of at least two so the restaurant can sell every seat in the house.


When her date didn’t show up, she was finally seated at a table and given a second glass of wine. That’s when the waitress asked if her other person was going to be joining her, and she said that he wasn’t coming.


“At that time, because of that day – Valentine’s Day – the waitress said, ‘Sorry, you cannot take a table by yourself, you can either sit at the bar or outside,’ ” the owner says.


In her lawsuit, the customer says she didn’t feel like eating anymore.


“I was so hurt. I’ve never experienced this before here in Portland and I was crushed,” she said. “I even gave them away [sic] out by saying I will do take out and they told me they don’t do take out.”


To that point, the restaurant owner says that while takeout is usually allowed, it wasn’t available that night because of the five-course special. He claims that before a server could explain, the woman had left.


She’s now seeking $100,00 in damages and a public apology, “to make sure all business owners in N.E. Alberta know we are serious about our community,” according to the court documents.


The owner says he won’t accept those demands, but that he’d like to talk to the woman, who is welcome back at the restaurant.


“‘I am so sorry. It was in no way intentional. Please let me make up for it.’ That is what I would say if I could talk to her,” he told KGW.






Woman sues Portland restaurant, demands public apology [KGW.com]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

jikHBO Registers URL For “HBO Now” Websitede

4 4 4 4
The URL for "HBO-Now.com" has recently been registered on behalf of HBO, giving credence to reports that it will use the HBO Now name for its upcoming streaming service.

The URL for “HBO-Now.com” has recently been registered on behalf of HBO, giving credence to reports that it will use the HBO Now name for its upcoming streaming service.



Yesterday, we got the first meaty (but currently unconfirmed) details about HBO’s upcoming standalone streaming service. And new information seems to indicate that the name of the service may indeed be HBO Now.

While a WhoIs search for HBOnow.com shows that this URL is currently held by domain name registrar Dynadot, it’s worth noting that the name was snapped up in Sept. 2014, shortly before HBO announced it would launch a standalone streaming service.


So that doesn’t tell us much, but simply adding a dash and coming up with HBO-now.com, you get results for a URL registered by MarkMonitor (who holds regist on behalf of HBO. Additionally, the URL was registered in Jan. 2015, meaning this is a new URL for the cable network and not some address it snapped up years ago for an abandoned project.


It’s worth noting that HBO holds both the HBOgo.com and HBO-Go.com URLs, though the hyphenated version does not redirect to the streaming service. So perhaps HBO-Now.com is not the actual URL the network will use but just a way for the company to block people from hijacking that name.


As you’d probably expect, HBO is neither confirming nor denying any of the recent news regarding HBO Now (or whatever they might end up calling it).


“We know there is great anticipation about our standalone streaming service,” reads a statement to Consumerist. “And when we have details to share, we will do so.”


According to the countdown clock atop the home page of Game of Thrones news site, WatchersOnTheWall.com, we’re only 38 days away from the season premiere of the wildly popular HBO series, and numerous reports about the streaming service have indicated that the goal is to get it up and running before that date.


So maybe it’s time for HBO to stop being so mysterious and just share those details?




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

jikWhy Do Girl Scouts Sell A “Caramel deLite” In Milwaukee And A “Samoa” In Seattle?de

4 4 4 4

When I first the nest to live among strangers in a strange land/another state, I was surprised to hear people talking about eating “Samoas” and “Tagalongs” during Girl Scout cookie season. Once I realized they meant “Caramel deLites” and “Peanut Butter Patties,” I figured these weirdos just used different names for the same cookies. But the thing is — they aren’t the same cookies.

Though there are some of you who may already know that there are two different bakeries churning out Girl Scout cookies every year, many who have long found themselves on one side of the divide or the other will perhaps be interested to know that it’s not just a regional naming convention thing — each Girl Scout region chooses which bakery it wants to provide its cookies.


There’s ABC Bakers, owned by Interbake and based in Richmond, VA, which has been baking for the Girl Scouts since 1937; and then there’s Little Brownie Bakers, owned by Kellogg Co. and headquartered in Louisville, KY, a licensed baker for the Girl Scouts since 1974.


Thin Mints are the only cookie that keep their name across the two bakeries, but they, along with the rest of the cookie line, vary in taste and texture — among other things — between the two bakeries.


The Los Angeles Times has a great interactive graphic covering all the different textures and names between the two bakeries (as well as cost, calories, total fat, sugar, protein). There’s also a color-coded map by region so you can see where a Peanut Butter Sandwich is a Do-si-do, or you can plug in a city and see which kind of cookies are happening there.


For example, in Milwaukee, where I grew up, Caramel deLites have a higher cookie-to-caramel ratio and milkier chocolate, and are a smidge cheaper and more sugary. Whereas the Samoas in Seattle have more caramel and a darker chocolate coating, cost a few cents more per cookie and are a bit fattier and higher in calories.


If you’re thinking what I’m thinking, this all calls for a side-by-side taste test sometime in the very near future.


6 Girl Scout cookies you thought you were getting but aren’t [Los Angeles Times]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

jikComcast Not Afraid Of Streaming Services; Won’t Commit To Playing Nice With Themde

4 4 4 4
Comcast can not currently make deals with broadcasters to keep their content off competing online video services like Sling, but that restriction expires in 2018 and the company won't publicly commit to continuing this prohibition.

Comcast can not currently make deals with broadcasters to keep their content off competing online video services like Sling, but that restriction expires in 2018 and the company won’t publicly commit to continuing this prohibition.



Earlier this week, a Dish executive claimed that Comcast was afraid of so-called over-the-top streaming services like Dish’s Sling TV and that the cable giant could use its size and influence to prevent broadcasters from signing onto Sling and others. Now Comcast is saying it has nothing to fear from these new services, but won’t commit to avoiding deals that make it difficult for them to compete.

According to Multichannel.com, Comcast CFO Michael Angelakis recently told the audience at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference in San Francisco that the company isn’t worried about services like Sling, or the upcoming HBO Now, or Sony’s currently unnamed over-the-top offering because they are still in the “embryonic” stage, and that while they might individually be less expensive than a cable package, the savings don’t hold up when you begin to combine them to replicate the pay-TV experience.


“Some of these tend to be pretty expensive and when you add them all up they can probably outstrip the value of some off our core services when you add it with broadband,” he explains. “We have thought about more flexible packaging, more streaming and lighter packages in order to provide those alternatives and those choices to our customers. We have to evolve and we have to pivot appropriately and I think we will do that.”


But will Comcast, as Dish contends, use its position as the largest single pay-TV and broadband provider in the U.S. to prevent TV networks from making their content available to online competitors?


As we pointed out in the earlier story, conditions [PDF] placed by regulators on the 2011 merger of Comcast and NBC explicitly prohibit the company from making deals that “discriminate against, retaliate against or punish” online video services, and Comcast’s most recent compliance report [PDF ] indicates that the company has behaved itself.


However, these conditions expire in 2018. Meaning that Comcast could, in the not very distant future, make deals with broadcasters that give them access to the company’s 22 million TV subscribers (and more than 30 million if the Time Warner Cable merger is approved) in exchange for not making their content available to over-the-top competitors.


We asked Comcast’s VP of Government Communications Sena Fitzmaurice if the the company was willing to commit to not making the sort of deal described by Dish after the merger conditions expire in 2018.


“We aren’t going to negotiate deal conditions in the press,” explained Fitzmaurice.


In response, we pointed out that our question was not in regard to conditions that may be put on the pending TWC merger, but whether Comcast had any intention of using its leverage after the existing conditions expire in 2018.


“Dish makes it seem like the conditions today don’t exist,” answered Fitzmaurice. “They do… Dish completely ignores them.”


Consumerist reached out to Dish for comment on the statements made by Fitzmaurice, but a rep for the satellite company would only point us to Dish’s Dec. 2014 filing with the FCC regarding the Comcast/TWC merger.




by Chris Morran via Consumerist

jikRaiders Of The Lost Walmart Uncover 11-Year-Old External Hard Drivede

4 4 4 4

The Raiders of the Lost Walmart are a bold group of retail archaeologists who comb the big-box stores of the world for whatever the exact opposite of treasure is. They find obsolete technology available at prices so high that it deeply confuses savvy shoppers. While knocking $20 off the price of a 4-year-old blender and putting it in the “clearance” section is a decent strategy to move some housewares, it works less well for external hard drives.


IMAG0201


Actually, the products that Raider Doug found on a recent trip to Walmart are even older than that. The Seagate hard drive in the middle, for example, hit the market in 2004. Does it work fine to store data? Sure, probably. Can you buy a lot more storage for significantly less money in places other than the clearance shelf of Walmart’s electronics department? Definitely.


Photoshop Elements 6 isn’t as old, having been released only in 2007, but Adobe is now on version 13. Sure, it could be useful for people with older computers, but that’s a limited market.


The VHS to DVD converter kit is a little more complex. That kit may have been on the Walmart shelves for a while, but the product is a current one. “You can buy a cheap usb capture device for roughly $10, install the included drivers, scrap the packaged software(usually Ulead), and use Windows Movie Maker,” notes Doug. The additional $55 is apparently a tax on people who don’t know that, or who want to make the process more complex.




by Laura Northrup via Consumerist

jikPolice: Woman Swilled Other Customers’ Drinks, Hit TGI Fridays Manager In Head With A Glassde

4 4 4 4

It’s bad enough to purloin drinks from your fellow restaurant patrons, but police in upstate New York say one TGI Fridays customer added insult to injury by not only walking around sipping from other customers’ beverages, but she then allegedly smashed a drinking glass against the manager’s head after being told she’d have to leave.

The accused drink-stealer was cruising the restaurant around 9:30 on Monday night, reports Syracuse.com, tasting other people’s drinks. That didn’t go over well with anyone, so a manager asked her to leave, the police said.


But that didn’t go over too well with the suspect, who allegedly took a glass and hit the manager on the head. She suffered several cuts to one side of her head but declined medical treatment, a police rep said.


The suspect was then detained by mall security, with cops saying she spit on a mall security guard in the process. She’s been charged second-degree assault, fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon and second-degree harassment. Apparently there are no charges for (allegedly) getting your cooties all over innocent strangers’ drinks.


Woman charged with assaulting TGI Fridays employee with drinking glass in Destiny USA [Syracuse.com]




by Mary Beth Quirk via Consumerist

jikHigh-End Mandarin Oriental Hotels Confirm Data Breachde

4 4 4 4

Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group – operators of more than two dozen upscale hotels from Atlanta to Jakarta – confirmed late Wednesday that its properties are the latest victims of a credit card breach.


Krebs on Security reports representatives for the upscale hotel chain confirmed the breach but didn’t say how many of its hotels or customers were affected by the hack.


“We can confirm that Mandarin Oriental has been alerted to a potential credit card breach and is currently conducting a thorough investigation to identify and resolve the issue,” the company said in a statement. “Unfortunately incidents of this nature are increasingly becoming an industry-wide concern. The Group takes the protection of customer information very seriously and is coordinating with credit card agencies and the necessary forensic specialists to ensure our guests are protected.”


Rumors of a breach began swirling when financial industry sources divulged a pattern of fraudulent charges on customer cards that had all recently been used at the upscale hotel chain.


Krebs reports that banking industry sources say the breach most likely began just before the holidays in 2014 and impacted most of Mandarin’s hotels in the U.S. including those in Boston, Florida, Las Vegas, Miami, New York, and Washington, D.C.


Sources say it’s possible the hack originated from compromised payment terminals at restaurants and other businesses operating inside the hotels rather than the hotel front desk.


Credit Card Breach at Mandarin Oriental [Krebs on Security]




by Ashlee Kieler via Consumerist